Is Digital Animation Superior to Text Resources for Facial Transplantation Education? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Facial transplantation is a complex surgical procedure that requires education of medical professionals, patients, and the general public. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the educational efficacy of facial transplantation digital animation versus text resources for teaching medical students a complex surgical procedure and its applicable anatomical and surgical principles. METHODS: Medical student volunteers were recruited and prospectively randomized to an animation or a text group. Students completed preintervention and postintervention assessments of confidence and knowledge of head and neck anatomy and facial transplantation. Student Evaluations of Educational Quality survey assessed student satisfaction with both tools following study crossover. Knowledge assessment was developed using National Board of Medical Examiners guidelines and content validated by four experts. The Cohen d statistic was used to measure the effect size of each intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-six students were assigned randomly to the animation group (n = 19) or the text (n = 17) group. Postintervention analysis demonstrated significantly higher performance scores in the animation group compared to the text group (p = 0.029). The animation group had a larger effect size (Cohen d = 1.96 versus 1.27). Only students in the animation group reported significantly improved confidence in head and neck anatomy after the intervention (p = 0.002). Both groups demonstrated significantly increased postintervention confidence in knowledge of facial transplantation (p < 0.001). Satisfaction scores revealed that students significantly favored the animation resource (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Animation can be an effective tool for facial transplantation education and results in improved student knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction compared to text resources. Facial transplantation can also be used as an educational framework for teaching medical students anatomical and surgical principles.

Surgical Technique of Hemi-Face Transplant: A New Model of Training.

OBJECTIVE: Face transplantation from cadaveric donors is an alternative that has been explored as a way to overcome the disadvantages of reconstructive plastic surgery for patients with severe facial deformities, when its approaches are not able to offer good aesthetic and functional results. In this study, the authors describe the surgical technique of face transplantation in swine, investigating the reproducibility of the methods as an experimental model in transplantation. METHODS: Seven swines were operated upon. After euthanasia, the left hemifacial area was removed and implanted onto the same location on the same animal from which it was removed. The vascular pedicle was based on the facial artery, the caudal auricular artery, and the external jugular vein. The ventral buccal and dorsal buccal branches of the facial nerve and the transverse facial branch of the auricular nerve were taken into the flap. RESULTS: The mean time of the procedure was 4.5 hours. Differences in vascularization were found as the vessel that provides blood supply to auricular region can be the caudal auricular artery, instead of the temporal artery, as described in the literature. Operative difficulty increases if the animal is more obese. The medical student had training in microsurgical procedures to be able to perform the entire procedure. CONCLUSION: This study describes an experimental model of face transplantation in swine, providing a good model for training of the surgical technique. The method is reproducible in any setting that offers resources in experimental surgery and microsurgery.

Total Face, Eyelids, Ears, Scalp, and Skeletal Subunit Transplant Research Procurement: A Translational Simulation Model.

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric face transplant models are routinely used for technical allograft design, perfusion assessment, and transplant simulation but are associated with substantial limitations. The purpose of this study was to describe the experience of implementing a translational donor research facial procurement and solid organ allograft recovery model. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and a 49-year-old, brain-dead donor was identified for facial vascularized composite allograft research procurement. The family generously consented to donation of solid organs and the total face, eyelids, ears, scalp, and skeletal subunit allograft. RESULTS: The successful sequence of computed tomographic scanning, fabrication and postprocessing of patient-specific cutting guides, tracheostomy placement, preoperative fluorescent angiography, silicone mask facial impression, donor facial allograft recovery, postprocurement fluorescent angiography, and successful recovery of kidneys and liver occurred without any donor instability. Preservation of the bilateral external carotid arteries, facial arteries, occipital arteries, and bilateral thyrolinguofacial and internal jugular veins provided reliable and robust perfusion to the entirety of the allograft. Total time of facial procurement was 10 hours 57 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Essential to clinical face transplant outcomes is the preparedness of the institution, multidisciplinary face transplant team, organ procurement organization, and solid organ transplant colleagues. A translational facial research procurement and solid organ recovery model serves as an educational experience to modify processes and address procedural, anatomical, and logistical concerns for institutions developing a clinical face transplantation program. This methodical approach best simulates the stressors and challenges that can be expected during clinical face transplantation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.