Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.226
Filtrar
1.
Clin Transplant ; 38(8): e15386, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087488

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic immunosuppression following pancreas transplantation carries significant risk, including posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). We sought to define the incidence, risk factors, and long-term outcomes of PTLD following pancreas transplantation at a single center. METHODS: All adult pancreas transplants between February 1, 1983 and December 31, 2023 at the University of Minnesota were reviewed, including pancreas transplant alone (PTA), simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPK), and pancreas after kidney transplants (PAK). RESULTS: Among 2353 transplants, 110 cases of PTLD were identified, with an overall incidence of 4.8%. 17.3% were diagnosed within 1 year of transplant, 32.7% were diagnosed within 5 years, and 74 (67.3%) were diagnosed after 5 years. The overall 30-year incidence of PTLD did not differ by transplant type-7.4% for PTA, 14.2% for SPK, and 19.4% for PAK (p = 0.3). In multivariable analyses, older age and Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity were risk factors for PTLD, and PTLD was a risk factor for patient death. PTLD-specific mortality was 32.7%, although recipients with PTLD had similar median posttransplant survival compared to those without PTLD (14.9 year vs. 15.6 year, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: PTLD following pancreas transplantation is associated with significant mortality. Although the incidence of PTLD has decreased over time, a high index of suspicion for PTLD following PTx should remain in EBV-negative recipients.


Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos , Trasplante de Páncreas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/etiología , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/epidemiología , Femenino , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factores de Riesgo , Pronóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
2.
Clin Transplant ; 38(7): e15413, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033508

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether kidney/pancreas (KP) transplantation will prevent the progression of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with insulin dependent diabetes (IDDM) and end-stage renal disease. We sought to determine the pre- and posttransplant prevalence of symptomatic PAD and changes in carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in KP recipients. METHODS: In this single center study, outcomes were compared between KP recipients with and without a history of PAD. A subset of recipients underwent pre- and posttransplant IMT measurements. RESULTS: Among the study group (N = 107), 18 (17%) recipients admitted to a pretransplant history of symptomatic PAD, comprised 11 foot infections and 7 amputations (5 minor and 2 major). Baseline characteristics of age, gender, race, years of diabetes, dialysis history, smoking history, years of hypertension, and history of coronary artery disease (CAD) were equivalent between PAD and non-PAD cohorts. At a median follow-up of 60 months (IQR: 28, 110), 16 (15%) KP recipients had suffered a PAD event. In multivariate analysis, a pretransplant history of PAD (hazard ratio [HR] 9.66, p < 0.001) and CAD (HR 3.33, p = 0.04) were independent predictors of posttransplant PAD events. Among a subset of 20 recipients (3 with PAD), mean IMT measurements pretransplant and at a median of 24 (range 18-24) months posttransplant, showed no evidence of disease progression. CONCLUSION: Based on IMT measurements and clinical results, KP transplantation stabilized PAD in most patients, but did not alter outcomes of symptomatic PAD recipients. A pretransplant history of PAD and CAD was an independent predictor of posttransplant PAD events.


Asunto(s)
Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Pronóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Pruebas de Función Renal
3.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1359381, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873595

RESUMEN

Background: About 10-20% of pancreas allografts are still lost in the early postoperative period despite the identification of numerous detrimental risk factors that correlate with graft thrombosis. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study including 899 pancreas transplant recipients between 2000 and 2018. Early pancreas failure due to complete thrombosis, long-term pancreas, kidney and patient survivals were analyzed and adjusted to donor, recipient and perioperative variables using a multivariate cause-specific Cox model stratified to transplant centers. Results: Pancreas from donors with history of hypertension (6.7%), as well as with high body mass index (BMI), were independently associated with an increased risk of pancreas failure within the first 30 post-operative days (respectively, HR= 2.57, 95% CI from 1.35 to 4.89 and HR= 1.11, 95% CI from 1.04 to 1.19). Interaction term between hypertension and BMI was negative. Donor hypertension also impacted long-term pancreas survival (HR= 1.88, 95% CI from 1.13 to 3.12). However, when pancreas survival was calculated after the postoperative day 30, donor hypertension was no longer a significant risk factor (HR= 1.22, 95% CI from 0.47 to 3.15). A lower pancreas survival was observed in patients receiving a pancreas from a hypertensive donor without RAAS (Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System) blockers compared to others (50% vs 14%, p < 0.001). Pancreas survival was similar among non-hypertensive donors and hypertensive ones under RAAS blockers. Conclusion: Donor hypertension was a significant and independent risk factor of pancreas failure. The well-known pathogenic role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system seems to be involved in the genesis of this immediate graft failure.


Asunto(s)
Angiotensina II , Hipertensión , Trasplante de Páncreas , Trombosis , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Hipertensión/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Trombosis/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Supervivencia de Injerto , Aloinjertos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología
4.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(5): 376-379, 2024 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709686

RESUMEN

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive cutaneous malignancy. Immunosuppression increases the risk of MCC and is associated with poor prognosis. Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have worse overall survival (OS) than patients with immunosuppression due to other causes. Treating MCC after organ transplantation is challenging, as checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, the standard of care for treating MCC, increases the risk of transplant rejection. This paper reviews the cases of two simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients with MCC and explores the role of immunosuppression in the development of MCC. Immunosuppression was discontinued and checkpoint inhibitor therapy was initiated in the first patient and considered by the second patient. In both cases, treatment failed, and the patients died shortly after developing metastatic MCC. These cases illustrate the need for improved multidisciplinary treatment regimens for MCC in OTRs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):376-377.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8234  .


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células de Merkel , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/terapia , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/patología , Resultado Fatal , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología
5.
HPB (Oxford) ; 26(8): 990-997, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763805

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on the impact of donor liver function tests (LFTs) on pancreas transplantation outcomes. Understanding their contribution could expand the donor pool. METHODS: Using the UNOS database, data from January 2010-2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable cox regressions were performed to evaluate the association between LFTs (AST, ALT and total bilirubin levels), graft failure and mortality up to three years post-transplant. RESULTS: 9138 pancreas transplants were completed. Multivariate analysis showed no association between donor AST values > 500 U/L and increased rates of graft failure (p = 0.826) or mortality (p = 0.836). Similar findings were noted for donor ALT values > 500 U/L (p = 0.522 and p = 0.997, respectively). There was no correlation with graft failure (p = 0.322) or mortality (p = 0.423) for total bilirubin levels >3 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: LFTs in the deceased pancreas donor did not increase risk of graft failure or mortality following pancreas transplantation. Elevated LFTs should not serve as absolute contraindications to transplant.


Asunto(s)
Bilirrubina , Supervivencia de Injerto , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Bilirrubina/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Donantes de Tejidos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Selección de Donante , Aloinjertos , Medición de Riesgo , Regulación hacia Arriba , Hígado/enzimología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
6.
Int J Surg ; 110(8): 5078-5086, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701525

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of different pretransplant dialysis modalities on post-transplant outcomes for pancreas-kidney transplantation is currently unclear. This study aims to assess the association between pretransplant dialysis modalities [hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis] and outcomes following pancreas-kidney transplantation. METHODS: The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published from inception until 1 December 2023. The authors included studies that examined the relationship between pretransplant dialysis modalities and clinical outcomes for pancreas-kidney transplantation. The primary outcomes considered were patient, pancreas and kidney graft survival, and intra-abdominal infection. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies involving 1503 pancreas-kidney transplant recipients were included. Pretransplant HD was associated with improved pancreas graft survival (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.99, I ²=12%) and a decreased risk of intra-abdominal infection [odds ratio (OR)=0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.93, I ²=5%). However, no significant association was found between the dialysis modalities and patient or kidney graft survival. Furthermore, pretransplant HD was linked to a reduced risk of anastomotic leak (OR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.161-0.68, I ²=0%) and graft thrombosis (OR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.33-0.96, I ²=20%). CONCLUSION: Pretransplant HD is the preferred dialysis modality while awaiting pancreas-kidney transplantation, although well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos
7.
Clin Transplant ; 38(5): e15339, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775413

RESUMEN

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the best treatment for selected individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease. Despite advances in surgical techniques, donor and recipient selection, and immunosuppressive therapies, SPKT remains a complex procedure with associated surgical complications and adverse consequences. We conducted a retrospective study that included 263 SPKT procedures performed between May 2000, and December 2022. A total of 65 patients (25%) required at least one relaparotomy, resulting in an all-cause relaparotomy rate of 2.04 events per 100 in-hospital days. Lower donor body mass index was identified as an independent factor associated with reoperation (OR .815; 95% CI:  .725-.917, p = .001). Technical failure (TF) occurred in 9.9% of cases, primarily attributed to pancreas graft thrombosis, intra-abdominal infections, bleeding, and anastomotic leaks. Independent predictors of TF at 90 days included donor age above 36 years (HR 2.513; 95% CI 1.162-5.434), previous peritoneal dialysis (HR 2.503; 95% CI 1.149-5.451), and specific pancreas graft reinterventions. The findings highlight the importance of carefully considering donor and recipient factors in SPKT. The incidence of TF in our study population aligns with the recent series. Continuous efforts should focus on identifying and mitigating potential risk factors to enhance SPKT outcomes, thereby reducing post-transplant complications.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Supervivencia de Injerto , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factores de Riesgo , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pronóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular
8.
J Surg Res ; 298: 149-159, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608426

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bench surgery for the preparation of deceased donor pancreatic grafts is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that energy devices could be used during bench surgery to decrease the bench surgery time. However, because bench surgery has two unique characteristics, wet conditions and no blood flow in the vessels, it is necessary to verify the safety and efficacy under such conditions. METHODS: In an animal tissue model, we validated both ultrasonic and bipolar energy devices: Harmonic Shears and the LigaSure (LS) vessel-sealing device by evaluating heat spread and pressure resistance under bench surgery conditions. In a clinical evaluation of the LS, we compared the outcomes of 22 patients in two different bench surgery groups: with and without the use of the LS. RESULTS: Clinically, the bench surgery time was significantly shorter in the LS group than that in the conventional group (P < 0.001). In the animal tissue experiments, the highest temperature in bench surgery conditions was 60.4°C after 1 s at a 5-mm distance in the LS group. Pressure resistance of ≥ 750 mmHg was achieved in almost all trials in both veins and arteries, with no difference between Harmonic Shears and LS. There was more surgical smoke visually in bench conditions versus in dry conditions and under half bite versus full bite conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The encouraging results of our exploratory clinical and animal studies of the energy devices suggest that they may be useful in the setting of bench surgery.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Animales , Trasplante de Páncreas/instrumentación , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Animales , Porcinos , Páncreas/cirugía , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea
10.
Transplant Proc ; 56(2): 456-458, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320871

RESUMEN

In classic pancreatic transplantation, the splenic artery and vein are ligated at the tail of the pancreas graft. This leads to slowed blood flow in the splenic vein and may cause thrombosis and graft loss. In this study, a patient received a pancreas after kidney transplantation. A modified surgical technique was used in the pancreatic graft preparation. The donor splenic artery and vein were anastomosed end to end at the tail of the pancreas. The splenic artery near the anastomosis was partially ligated, and an effective diameter of 2 mm was reserved to limit arterial blood pressure and flow. The patient recovered very well. Contrasted computed tomography scans on days 11 and 88 after pancreas transplantation indicated sufficient backflow of the splenic vein. We believe that this procedure may avoid the risk of splenic vein thrombosis after pancreas transplantation. This modified technique has not been reported in clinical cases previously and may help reduce the risk of thrombosis after pancreas transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Trasplante de Páncreas , Trombosis , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/cirugía , Bazo , Vena Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Esplénica/cirugía , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Esplénica/cirugía
12.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 22(1): 52-62, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284375

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Pancreas transplant is currently the most effective method for maintaining physiological blood sugar levels and reversing small blood vessel injuries. Our team developed a model of whole pancreas transplant based on microsurgical techniques following the investigation of more than 300 mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mouse pancreatic transplant model is required to investigate the pathophysiological process of pancreas transplant and pancreatic preservation technologies. Recently, the segment-neck pancreas transplant has been the most utilized mouse pancreatic transplant model. The innovative mouse pancreatic transplant modelthat we developed in this study uses the whole pancreas and returns heart blood flow into the liver via the portal vein. RESULTS: With our mouse pancreatic transplant model, the survivalrate of mice aftertransplant was >80%, and the success rate of pancreatic transplant was >90%. CONCLUSIONS: The segment-neck and the whole pancreas model can guarantee that the transplanted pancreas functions effectively, and both have excellent postoperative outcomes, survivalrates and pancreatic active rates.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Vena Porta , Animales , Ratones , Vena Porta/cirugía , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Páncreas/cirugía , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Hígado
13.
Clin Transplant ; 38(1): e15159, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37792580

RESUMEN

Ectopic variceal bleeding is a potentially under recognized source of gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage. While vascular complications following pancreatic transplant are relatively common, the development of symptomatic ectopic venous varices has rarely been reported. We report two patients with a remote history of simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant (SPK) presenting two decades after transplant with an occult GI bleed. In both cases, a lengthy diagnostic course was required. The varices were treated with coil embolization via transhepatic approach. Our findings add to the limited literature on this topic and aid in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of this unusual presentation.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Trasplante de Páncreas , Várices , Humanos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/diagnóstico , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/etiología , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Várices/complicaciones , Várices/terapia , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos
14.
Clin Transplant ; 38(1): e15176, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37922244

RESUMEN

Gastroparesis is a common complaint among patients with diabetes. Symptoms tend to improve following successful pancreas transplantation (PTx), but persist despite euglycemia in a subset of patients. We aimed to assess the benefit of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in persistent gastroparesis following PTx. This was a single center retrospective review of all patients who underwent G-POEM for persistent gastroparesis following PTx. Patient demographics, pre and post procedure perception of symptom severity according to the patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal symptoms severity index (PAGI-SYM), gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) score, and 36-item short form survey (SF36) score along with gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) were analyzed. Seven PTx recipients underwent G-POEM for persistent gastroparesis symptoms. The majority were female. All reported nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, and post prandial fullness prior to G-POEM. The post procedure survey scores improved in all patients although this was not significant. The improvement in gastric emptying on GES was statistically significant. G-POEM is a relatively new treatment option for gastroparesis. While it requires specialized proceduralist and training, we have documented improvement in the management of symptoms. With increasing experience, we anticipate more significant benefit in post PTx patients with persistent symptoms of gastroparesis undergoing G-POEM.


Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Gastroparesia , Trasplante de Páncreas , Piloromiotomia , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Gastroparesia/etiología , Gastroparesia/cirugía , Gastroparesia/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Piloromiotomia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior
15.
Clin Transplant ; 38(1): e15166, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37848266

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis in pancreatic transplant recipients can be challenging to diagnose and manage. Incidental appendicectomy (IA) during pancreas transplantation obviates the risk of appendicitis but potentially at the cost of increased operating time or early post-operative complications. This study reviewed the value of IA at a single center. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent a pancreas transplant in our unit from January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2020, with end of follow-up on May 21st, 2023; recipients were grouped by whether or not an IA was performed during pancreas transplantation. Donor, recipient, operative, and graft outcomes were compared between the two groups. Post-transplant complications related to appendiceal pathology (or IA) were recorded and classified. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three patients underwent a pancreas transplant; 227 (93%) patients had an appendix in situ at transplantation, and of these 53 (23%) underwent an IA and 174 (77%) did not. There were no statistically significant differences in operative time (p = .06) or hospital stay (p = .50) between the two groups. In the IA cohort, there were no Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complications relating to the appendicectomy. In those that did not undergo an IA, two patients (1%) subsequently required appendicectomy due to appendicitis. Comparison of pancreatic graft survival showed no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .44). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that IA is effective at reducing risks of post-transplant appendiceal complications without significantly prolonging inpatient stay or impairing graft survival. These data support the consideration of undertaking an IA for all patients undergoing a pancreas transplant.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación , Supervivencia de Injerto
16.
Am J Transplant ; 24(2): 271-279, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839709

RESUMEN

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of infection after transplantation, but few studies have evaluated its epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes among pancreas transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020, at 3 sites in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. The primary outcome was clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi), defined as CMV disease or infection requiring antiviral therapy. The secondary outcome was pancreas allograft failure. Among 471 pancreas transplant recipients, 117 (24.8%) developed csCMVi after a median of 226 (interquartile range 154-289) days. CMV donor (D)+/R- patients had a significantly higher incidence of csCMVi (hazard ratio [HR] 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-7.64; P < .001). In adjusted analysis, a lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was associated with a greater risk of csCMVi among seropositive recipients (HR 1.39 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 1.13-1.73; P = .002) but not among D+/R- patients (HR 1.04 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 0.89-1.23; P = .595). csCMVi, lower ALC, and acute rejection (P < .001) were independently associated with pancreas allograft failure. In conclusion, CMV D+/R- was associated with csCMVi in pancreas recipients, although ALC was associated with csCMVi only among seropositive patients. The development of csCMVi in pancreas recipients was associated with poor pancreas allograft outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Páncreas , Adulto , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Citomegalovirus , Factores de Riesgo , Aloinjertos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico
17.
Clin Transplant ; 38(1): e15212, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38041451

RESUMEN

Pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) is a ß cell replacement option for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus; concerns have been raised regarding deterioration in kidney function (KF) after PTA. This retrospective multicenter study assessed actual impact of transplantation and immunosuppression on KF in PTA recipients at three Transplant Centers. The primary composite endpoint 10 years after PTA was >50% eGFR decline, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , and/or receiving a kidney transplant (KT). Overall, 822 PTA recipients met eligibility. Median baseline and 10-year eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2 ) were 76.3 (58.1-100.8) and 51.3 (35.3-65.9), respectively. Primary composite endpoint occurred in 98 patients (53.5%) with 45 experiencing a >50% decrease in eGFR by 10 years post-transplant, 38 eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 49 requiring KT. KF declined most significantly within 6 months post-PTA, more often in females and patients with better preserved GFR up to 5 years with 11.6% kidney failure at 10 years. Patient survival and death-censored graft survival were both 68% at 10 years with overall graft thrombosis rate 8%. KF declined initially after PTA but stabilized with further slow progression. In conclusion, prospective intervention studies are needed to test renal sparing interventions while gathering more granular data.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Páncreas , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Supervivencia de Injerto , Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Clin Transplant ; 38(1): e15197, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37975526

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risk factors and outcomes associated with post- transplant hypotension after simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) Transplantation are poorly defined. METHODS: SPK recipients at our center between 2010 and 2021 with functioning pancreas and kidney grafts for >6 months were included. Recipients were then divided into three groups based on active medications for the treatment of hypo-or hypertension at 6-months post-transplant: those with normal blood pressure (NBP) not requiring medication (NBP group), those on antihypertensive medications (HTN group), and those on medications for hypotension (fludrocortisone and/or midodrine) (Hypotensive group). RESULTS: A total of 306 recipients were included in the study: 54 (18%) in the NBP group, 215 (70%) in the HTN group, and 37 (12%) in the Hypotensive group. On multivariate analysis, the use of T-depleting induction (aHR = 9.64, p = .0001, 95% Cl = 3.12-29.75), pre-transplant use of hypotensive medications (aHR = 4.53, p = .0003, 95% Cl = 1.98-10.38), and longer duration of dialysis (aHR = 1.02, p = .01, 95% Cl = 1.00-1.04) were associated with an increased risk of post-transplant hypotension. Post-transplant hypotension was not associated with an increased risk of death-censored kidney or pancreatic allograft failure, or patient death. CONCLUSION: Hypotension was common even 6 months post-SPK transplantation. With appropriate management, hypotension was not associated with detrimental graft or patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Hipotensión , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Páncreas , Hipotensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipotensión/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto
20.
World J Gastroenterol ; 29(46): 6049-6059, 2023 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130739

RESUMEN

Pancreatic transplantation is considered by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes an acceptable surgical procedure in patients with type 1 diabetes also undergoing kidney transplantation in pre-final or end-stage renal disease if no contraindications are present. Pancreatic transplantation, however, is a complex surgical procedure and may lead to a range of postoperative complications that can significantly impact graft function and patient outcomes. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) is often adopted to evaluate perfusion of the transplanted pancreas, identify complications and as a guide for interventional radiology procedures. CT assessment after pancreatic transplantation should start with the evaluation of the arterial Y-graft, the venous anastomosis and the duodenojejunostomy. With regard to complications, CT allows for the identification of vascular complications, such as thrombosis or stenosis of blood vessels supplying the graft, the detection of pancreatic fluid collections, including pseudocysts, abscesses, or leaks, the assessment of bowel complications (anastomotic leaks, ileus or obstruction), and the identification of bleeding. The aim of this pictorial review is to illustrate CT findings of surgical-related complications after pancreatic transplantation. The knowledge of surgical techniques is of key importance to understand postoperative anatomic changes and imaging evaluation. Therefore, we first provide a short summary of the main techniques of pancreatic transplantation. Then, we provide a practical imaging approach to pancreatic transplantation and its complications providing tips and tricks for the prompt imaging diagnosis on CT.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA