Activity and short-term outcomes of kidney transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. / Actividad y resultados a corto plazo del trasplante renal durante la pandemia COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the national transplant activity has been reduced due to the overload of the health system and concern for patient safety in this situation. The aim of our work is to expose the activity of kidney transplantation in Cantabria during the state of alarm, as well as to assess the safety of the transplantation program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of kidney transplants performed in our Center from the beginning of the state of alarm until the beginning of the lockdown easing in Cantabria. Descriptive analysis of the demographic data of recipients and their donors, intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes. Comparative analysis with the data of the same period in 2017-2019, by means of the χ2 for categorical variables, Student's T and Mann-Whitney U tests in case of quantitative variables of normal and non-normal distribution, respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen kidney transplants were performed in the period described. Delayed renal function (DRF) was seen in 7.5% of patients, and 26.6% showed data of acute rejection; no patient presented COVID-19 disease. Comparative analysis showed a remarkable increase in the number of transplants in comparison with previous periods (15 vs 5.6), at the expense of donors from outside Cantabria (93.3%). We found no statistically significant differences in terms of cold ischemia time (p=0.77), DRF (p=0.73), need for dialysis (p=0.54), or appearance of post-surgical complications (p=0.61). CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of the pandemic in our region, and the adoption of strict protective measures has allowed the early and safe resumption of the renal transplantation program, increasing the number of transplants performed compared to previous years and maintaining comparable early post-operative results.

Retrospective Analysis of Pancreas Transplants in Poland in Years 1998-2015.

Transplantation of the pancreas is an established method for the treatment of complicated diabetes mellitus. As the numbers of diabetic patients increase so does the need for efficient treatment methods. Despite significant perioperative risk and complications related to immunosuppression, pancreas transplant remains the best therapeutic option for selected patients. METHODS: The analysis was based on the comparison of characteristics of all organ donors and recipients in years 1998 to 2015. The collected data were divided into 2 periods to facilitate identification of populational changes. RESULTS: The total number of pancreas transplants in Poland was 139 in years 1998 to 2006 and 268 in years 2007 to 2015. The largest differences revealed by the comparison of donor-related variables in both periods were those related to the doses of pressor amines, duration of circulatory arrest, and duration of stay at the intensive care unit. The critical finding consisted in the improvement of short-term survival of recipients and organs being observed in contrast to the surprising lack of improvement in long-term survival. Reduced likelihood of transplantation success was observed already in overweight patients (body mass index 25-29.99 kg/m2). CONCLUSIONS: No significant changes were observed with regard to pancreas transplant outcomes over the period of many years. Transplantation success is determined by 1-year survival of the organ, and the therapeutic success is measured by long-term disease-free survival of the patient. In the era of rapid advances in numerous areas of medicine, the lack of significant extension of patient survival times warrants a closer look of our knowledge on pancreas transplants.

OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Pancreas.

The overall number of pancreas transplants continued to increase to 1027 in 2018, after a nadir of 947 in 2015. New additions to waiting list remained stable, with 1485 candidates added in 2018. Proportions of patients with type II diabetes waiting for transplant (14.6%) and undergoing transplant (14.8%) have steadily increased since 2016. Waiting times for simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant have decreased; median months to transplant was 13.5 for simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant and 19.7 for pancreas transplant alone in 2018. Outcomes, including patient and kidney survival, as well as rejection rates, have improved consistently over the past several years. Pancreas graft survival data are being collected by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and will be included in a future report once there are sufficient cohorts for analysis.

Cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis as causes of diarrhea in kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal disorders in solid organ recipients may have various origins including cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis. The prevalence of these infections is poorly known in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients in industrialized countries. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the infectious causes of diarrhea in SOT patients. Secondary objectives were to gain further insight into the main characteristics of cryptosporidiosis, and to assess risk factors for this infection. All adult kidney and/or pancreas recipients presenting with diarrhea and admitted to our facility between May 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015 were enrolled. A stool sample was analyzed using a standardized protocol including bacteriological, virological, and parasitological investigations. Data related to clinical symptoms, immunosuppression, and environmental potential risk factors were collected through a self-administered questionnaire and computerized medical records. RESULTS: Out of 73 enrolled patients, 36 had infectious diarrhea (49.3%). Viruses ranked first (17/36), followed by parasites and fungi (11/17). Cryptosporidiosis was the most common parasitic disease (n=6 patients). We observed four microsporidiosis cases. The estimated prevalence of cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis in this cohort was 3.7 and 2.40/00, respectively. No significant risk factor for cryptosporidiosis or microsporidiosis, neither environmental nor immunological, could be evidenced. CONCLUSION: Both cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis represent a significant cause of diarrhea in kidney transplant recipients.

Geographic Disparities in Access to Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplant in the Pre- and Post-Pancreas Allocation System Eras.

BACKGROUND: The 2014 pancreas allocation system (PAS) intended to decrease geographic variability in listing practices for simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant and define eligibility criteria for those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our primary aims were to evaluate geographic disparities in access to SPK and assess T2DM SPK listings in the pre- and post-PAS eras. METHODS: Adult listings for SPK and kidney transplant (pre-PAS, January 2010 to October 29, 2014; post-PAS, October 30, 2014, to June 2, 2017) were identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Multivariable logistic regression models tested associations of geography and/or diabetes mellitus type on the likelihood of SPK versus kidney transplant listing pre- and post-PAS. Competing risk models tested the likelihood of SPK transplantation within 2 years of listing for SPK. RESULTS: Among 41 205 listings (27 393 pre-PAS; 24 439 T2DM), univariate analysis showed reduced percentages for SPK post-PAS (22.1%-20.8%; P = 0.003). After adjusting for patient and center characteristics, geographic disparities declined slightly but persisted post-PAS (era by region interaction P < 0.001). The era by type of diabetes mellitus interaction effect was statistically significant (P = 0.039), reflecting that the proportions of SPK listings for T2DM increased in the post-PAS era (3.4%-3.9%; univariate P = 0.038), while those for type 1 diabetes mellitus remained statistically stable (47.9%-48.4%; univariate P = 0.571). Among people listed for SPK, geographic disparities in the cumulative incidence of transplantation within 2 years declined and the overall likelihood of transplantation increased in the post-PAS era (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Geographic disparities in access to SPK declined slightly but persisted post-PAS. With new allocation change proposals and elimination of listing criteria for T2DM, further monitoring is warranted.

More Than 25 Years of Pancreas Graft Survival After Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation: Experience From the World's Largest Series of Long-term Survivors.

BACKGROUND: The first simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant was performed in 1966. Early procedures were associated with significant morbidity and mortality and were performed in very low numbers in select patients. METHODS: This study includes all recipients of an SPK at the University of Wisconsin-Madison between 1986 and 1993, who were actively followed and had a functional pancreas allograft for >25 years as of October 31, 2018. RESULTS: A total of 291 SPK were performed during the study period; of these, 39 patients still had a functional graft at last follow up and 9 (18.8%) pancreas grafts were lost due to patient death or graft failure after >25 years. At last follow up, all 39 patients with functional pancreas graft had at least one comorbidity, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or coronary artery disease. Twenty-seven required enteric conversion; 11 patients experienced renal allograft failure (10 underwent a repeat kidney transplant); and 6 required amputation of part of the lower extremity. In the Cox regression analysis, bladder drained pancreas was associated with lower probability of prolonged pancreas graft survival (hazard ratio: 0.52; confidence interval: 0.32-0.85; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: With careful and detailed follow-up and attention to complications, some recipients of pancreas grafts have outstanding outcomes. As the number of pancreas recipients with prolonged graft survival may be rising, healthcare providers should be aware of the management of complications associated with this unique group of patients.

Transplantes de órgãos sólidos no Brasil: estudo descritivo sobre desigualdades na distribuição e acesso no território brasileiro, 2001-2017 / Trasplantes de órganos sólidos en Brasil: estudio descriptivo sobre desigualdades en la distribución y acceso en el territorio brasileño, 2001-2017 / Solid organ transplantation in Brazil: a descriptive study of distribution and access inequalities across the Brazilian territory, 2001-2017

Objetivo: descrever a distribuição dos transplantes de órgãos sólidos no Brasil, bem como informações da lista de espera (demanda) e origem dos pacientes transplantados, por tipo de órgão e Unidade da Federação, de 2001 a 2017. Métodos: estudo descritivo, com dados das Centrais Estaduais de Transplantes, da Associação Brasileira de Transplantes de Órgãos e do Sistema de Informações Hospitalares do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIH/SUS). Resultados: 153 centros de transplante foram identificados em 2017, apenas 11,8% deles localizados nas regiões Norte e Centro-Oeste; no período em estudo, foram realizados 99.805 transplantes, variando de 3.520 (2001) a 8.669 (2017); as regiões Sul e Sudeste concentraram o maior número de transplantes. Conclusão: existem desigualdades regionais na realização dos transplantes, possivelmente por não haver uniformidade na distribuição dos serviços.

Objetivo: describir la distribución de los trasplantes de órganos sólidos en Brasil, así como informaciones de la lista de espera (demanda) y origen de los pacientes trasplantados por tipo de órgano y unidad federativa, entre 2001 y 2017. Métodos: estudio descriptivo usando datos extraídos de Centrales Estatales de Trasplantes, Asociación Brasileña de Trasplantes de Órganos y Sistema de Informaciones Hospitalarias del Sistema Único Nacional de Salud (SIH/SUS). Resultados: 153 centros de trasplante identificados en 2017, solamente 11,8% están ubicados en las regiones Norte y Centro-Oeste; se realizaron 99.805 trasplantes, desde 3.520 (2001) hasta 8.669 (2017); Sur y Sudeste concentran el mayor número de trasplantes. Conclusión: hay desigualdad en el acceso a los trasplantes, posiblemente debido a la falta de uniformidad en la distribución de los servicios.

Objective: to describe the distribution of solid organ transplants in Brazil, as well as information about the waiting list (demand) and origin of transplant patients by organ type and Federative Unit, from 2001 to 2017. Methods: this was a descriptive study using data from State Transplantation Centers, the Brazilian Organ Transplant Association, and the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS). Results: 153 transplant units were identified in 2017, with only 11.8% located in the Northern and Midwest regions; within the study period, 99,805 transplants were performed, ranging from 3,520 (2001) to 8,669 (2017); the highest number of transplants was concentrated in the Southern and Southeastern regions. Conclusion: there are inequalities in transplantation access, possibly due to lack of uniformity in service distribution.

Long-standing diabetes mellitus and pancreas transplantation: An avenue to increase utilization of an ideal treatment modality.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased post-operative complications in various surgeries. Little data exist regarding the impact of long-standing DM (>25 years) on outcomes in pancreas transplantation (PTX). The objectives of our study were to determine if long-standing pre-transplant DM (>25 years) was associated with inferior outcomes following PTX. METHODS: Using a 13-year (April, 2000-May, 2012) retrospective analysis, we examined demographic and transplant factors, complications, and outcomes in patients without (Group A) and with (Group B) long-standing (>25 years) pre-PTX DM. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 4.2 years. Of 214 consecutive PTX performed, 137 (105 simultaneous PTX (SPK), 25 PTX after kidney (PAK), 7 PTX alone (PTA)) had pre-PTX duration of DM recorded, including 65 in Group A and 72 in Group B. There were no differences between cohorts with respect to demographics. There were no differences in post-PTX surgical/medical complications. There were no differences in outcomes between cohorts (ie, rejection, graft loss or death). CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale analysis demonstrated that PTX can be performed in patients with long-standing DM with excellent patient and graft outcomes. Long-standing DM did not lead to an increased post-PTX infections or complications. Our study suggests that duration of DM should not impact PTX candidacy.

Development of Charcot Neuroarthropathy in Diabetic Patients who Received Kidney or Kidney-Pancreas Transplants.

Only a small percentage of the general diabetic population develops Charcot neuroarthropathy. Charcot arthropathy greatly increases the risk of foot complications. At our academic institution, there appeared to be an increased incidence of Charcot arthropathy in transplant patients. We hypothesized that Charcot neuroarthropathy incidence is higher in the diabetic patients who had received kidney or kidney-pancreas transplants. The charts of 1000 patients were reviewed from January 2000 to January 2011. Four hundred and eighty-seven patients were included in the study. Of these diabetic patients, 249 had received a kidney transplant and 238 a kidney-pancreas transplant. The data were analyzed for the incidence of Charcot in each group. Other risk factors and sequelae were also evaluated and analyzed. The incidence of Charcot development in the diabetic patients who had a kidney-pancreas transplant was 18.4%, 44 of 238 patients. This was significantly higher than the incidence in kidney transplant patients, which was 11.2%, 28 of 249 patients (p < .05). Peripheral arterial disease was a statistically significant independent risk factor for developing ulceration, osteomyelitis, and subsequent amputation. Type 1 diabetic patients developed Charcot at a higher rate that was also statistically significant compared with type 2 diabetic patients. In our study, diabetic patients who had undergone kidney-pancreas transplants were associated with higher risk for development of Charcot neuroarthropathy than kidney transplants alone. The incidence of Charcot development in both these transplant groups was also much higher than in the general diabetic population. This is of particular interest to clinicians and surgeons as both transplant groups were found to be high risk for subsequent foot ulceration, infection, and amputation.

A steady decline in pancreas transplantation rates.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: After years of growth in many pancreas transplant programs, UNOS has reported declining transplant numbers in the USA. This precipitating trend urges for an evaluation of the transplant numbers and scientific productivity in the Eurotransplant region and the UK. METHODS: We performed a trend analysis of pancreas transplantation rates, between 1997 and 2016, adjusting for changes in population size, and an analysis of scientific publications in this field. We used information from the UNOS, Eurotransplant, and UK transplant registry and bibliometric information from the Web of Science database. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2016 there was an average annual decline in pancreas transplantation rates per million inhabitants of 3.3% in the USA and 2.5% in the Eurotransplant region. In the UK, transplant numbers showed an average annual decline of 1.0% from 2009 to 2016. Publications in Q1 journals showed an annual change of -2.1% and +20.1%, before 2004, and a change of -3.8% and -5.5%, between 2004 and 2016, for USA and Eurotransplant publications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting pancreas transplantation rates for changes in population size showed a clear decline in transplant numbers in both the USA and Eurotransplant region, with first signs of decline in the UK. Following this trend, the number of scientific publications in this field have declined worldwide.

[Diabetology and solid organ transplantation]. / Diabetológia és szervátültetés.

Diabetes increases the risk of different kidney diseases. The most important is diabetic nephropathy, however, ischemic kidney disease, chronic pyleonephritis and papilla necrosis may also develop. The prognosis of diabetic nephropathy has improved recently, however, it is still the primary cause of dialysis and transplantation. Cardiovascular diseases predict mostly mortality in diabetic patients, however, cerebrovascular insults and peripheral obstructive arterial diseases necessitating lower limb amputations are also important. Diabetic retinopathy is almost always present with diabetic nephropathy. Diabetic neuropathy may also develop, furthermore vascular complications often combine. All these urge complex workup, follow-up and early treatment. If transplantation is indicated, preemptive operation should be preferred, and living donation shows the best outcomes. Different forms of carbohydrate disorder may occur after transplantation: new-onset diabetes or diabetes known before transplantation may progress. Renal transplantation with pancreas transplantation may be indicated in type 1 diabetes with end-stage diabetic nephropathy, most often simultaneously. This may result in normoglycemia and insulin-independence and the progression of other complications may also halt. Transplant associated hyperglycemia occurs in most of the patients early, however, it is often transitory. Despite stabilization of the patient and of the immunosuppressive therapy, about one third of the patients may develop posttransplant diabetes. Insulin secretion disorder is the primary cause, but insulin resistance is also needed. Insulin administration may help, however, other antidiabetics can also be useful. Carbohydrate metabolism should be checked in both cadaveric and living donors. The authors make an attempt to summarize the above conditions with Hungarian relevance as well. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(46): 1930-1939.

[Role of interventional radiology in the transplantation of abdominal solid organs]. / Az intervenciós radiológia szerepe a hasi szervek átültetésében.

The transplantation of the abdominal organs has a major role in the treatment of several diseases. All subspecialities affected with the transplantation showed a rapid development in the last decades. The cooperation of the specialists of different segments of medicine provides the success of organ transplantation. Teamwork is necessary throughout the whole process starting from securing the technical background and proper human workforce, followed by the lifelong management of organs and recipients as well. One of the key players of organ transplantation is radiology and interventional radiology - the role of the latter one is discussed in this review, including the minimally invasive treatment of pre- and post-transplantation situations and diseases. Besides vascular and non-vascular interventions, the options of interventional oncology will be mentioned based on international literature and Hungarian experience. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(46): 1940-1947.

[The first five years of Hungary's Eurotransplant membership]. / Az Eurotransplant-csatlakozás elso öt éve Magyarországon.

The author concludes lessons learned from Hungary joining Eurotransplant five years ago through the more than half a century history of the Hungarian organ transplantation. The result of the stepwise evolution is that today's transplantation activity can be measured by a European benchmark. In comparison to the era before the membership, there are 40% more transplantations in the country. First the numbers of the living donor kidney transplantations significantly raised, followed by the organs transplanted from brain-dead donors: kidney, heart, pancreas, then liver and finally also lung. The ratio of the multiorgan donors changed from about 40% to more than 70%. A reassuring solution was found for the high urgent cases, for the paediatric transplants and for the highly immunized patients, who would have been in a desperate situation without Eurotransplant, but now every Hungarian end-stage organ failure patient has similar chances for getting a potential life-saving organ as their former luckier West-European counterparts. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(42): 1695-1699.

Outcomes of pancreas retransplantation in patients with pancreas graft failure.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas retransplantation is still a controversial option after loss of a pancreatic graft. This article describes the experience of pancreas retransplantation at a high-volume centre. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of all pancreas retransplantations performed in a single centre between 1997 and 2013. Pancreatic graft loss was defined by the return to insulin dependence. Risk factors for graft loss as well as patient and graft survival were analysed using logistic and time-to-event regression models. RESULTS: Of 409 pancreas transplantations undertaken, 52 (12·7 per cent) were identified as pancreas retransplantations. After a median follow-up of 65·0 (range 0·8-174·3) months, 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 79 and 69 per cent respectively, and 1- and 5-year patient survival rates were 96 and 89 per cent. During the entire follow-up, 22 grafts (42 per cent) were lost. Patient survival was not associated with any of the donor- or recipient-related factors investigated. Five-year graft survival was better after simultaneous kidney-pancreas retransplantation than pancreas retransplantation alone: 80 per cent (16 of 20) versus 63 per cent (20 of 32) (P = 0·226). Acute rejection (odds ratio 4·49, 95 per cent c.i. 1·59 to 12·68; P = 0·005) and early surgical complications (OR 3·29, 1·09 to 9·99, P = 0·035) were identified as factors with an independent negative effect on graft survival. CONCLUSION: Pancreas retransplantation may be considered for patients whose previous graft has failed.

Pancreas outcomes between living and deceased kidney donor in pancreas after kidney transplantation patients.

Background: Pancreas outcomes in pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK) patients have been reported as being inferior to those of patients who receive simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). The influence of the kidney donor (i.e. living versus deceased) has never been previously addressed. Methods: We retrospectively analysed all pancreas transplants performed in a single centre since 2007 and compared the outcomes between those patients who had previously received a living-donor kidney transplant (pancreas transplantation after living-donor kidney transplantation, PAldK; n = 18) or a deceased-donor kidney transplant (pancreas transplantation after deceased-donor kidney transplantation, PAddK; n = 28), using SPK (n = 139) recipients as a reference. Results: Pancreas survival was similar between all groups, but inferior for PAldK when including only those with a functioning graft at day 90 post-transplantation (P = 0.004). Pancreas acute rejection was significantly increased in PAldK (67%; 1.8 ± 1.4 episodes/graft) when compared with PAddK (25%) and SPK (32%) (P < 0.05) patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model including known risk factors for pancreas rejection, PAldK was the only predictor of acute rejection (hazard ratio 6.82, 95% confidence interval 1.51-30.70, P < 0.05). No association was found between donor-recipient HLA mismatches and graft rejection. Repeated HLA mismatches between kidney and pancreas donors (0 versus 1-6) did not correlate with pancreas graft rejection or survival in either PAK transplantation group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Pancreas graft outcomes are worse for PAldK when compared with PAddK and SPK patients.

Pancreas transplantation in type 2 diabetes: expanding the criteria.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pancreas transplantation in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) candidates remains disproportionately lower than in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM); however, outcomes in carefully selected patients mirrors that of T1DM. Despite the 2014 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) eligibility criteria for simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant (SPK) transplantation in T2DM patients, an expected increase in the number of transplants was not observed. RECENT FINDINGS: In an updated International Pancreas and Transplant Registry (IPTR) analysis, 1514 primary deceased donor pancreas transplants were performed in T2DM recipients [1995-2015, SPK 88%, pancreas after kidney (PAK) 9%, pancreas transplant alone (PTA) 3%]. In contrast to the declining number of SPK transplants for T1DM, the number of primary SPK transplants in T2DM patients is increasing over time in the USA. Improvement over time was noted for T2DM SPK patient and graft survival, and the rate of technical failures decreased, paralleling similar overall trends for pancreas transplants in general. Long-term follow-up data of pancreas outcomes in C-peptide positive vs. negative demonstrate noninferior outcomes. BMI does not appear to impact outcomes in carefully selected T2DM candidates. SUMMARY: The current UNOS regulations that currently limit access of T2DM to pancreas transplantation based on strict BMI criteria and C-peptide levels need to be liberated.

Pancreas Transplantation for Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the United States: A Registry Report.

Successful pancreas transplantation is still the only method to restore short-term and long-term insulin independence and good metabolic control for patients with diabetes. Since the first transplant in 1966, tremendous progress in outcome was made; however, transplant numbers have declined since 2004. This article describes the development and risk factors of pancreas transplantation with or without a kidney graft between 2001 and 2016. Patient survival and graft function improved significantly owing to careful recipient and donor selection, which reduced technical failure and immunologic graft loss rates.