RESUMEN
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing public health concern in South Africa (SA) and poses a substantial economic burden on healthcare globally. A century has passed since the discovery of insulin, and despite advances in diabetes management, exogenous insulin remains a primary treatment for type 1 DM, posing challenges of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Pancreas transplantation should be considered a treatment for insulin-deficient DM, offering sustained euglycaemia and preventing complications associated with the disease. However, there has been a global decrease in the number of transplants performed. In SA, only a few pancreas transplants have been performed, primarily because of surgical risks and the need for immunosuppression. Islet transplantation is an alternative but faces limitations due to donor scarcity and immunosuppression requirements. This review explores recent progress in pancreas and islet transplants for DM, with the aim of providing insights into expanding treatment options for people with insulin-deficient DM.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Sudáfrica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Células Secretoras de Insulina/trasplanteRESUMEN
Pancreas transplantation is a complex surgical procedure performed to restore normoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes and includes whole/segmental organ transplant and islet cell transplantation (ICT). In the United States, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) is most commonly performed due to the higher occurrence of end-stage renal disease in diabetic patients. Understanding the surgical technique and postoperative anatomy is imperative for effective and accurate surveillance following transplantation. Imaging plays an essential role in patients with pancreatic transplants and is often used to evaluate viability, vascular and parenchymal anatomy, and identify potential complications. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound, color and spectral Doppler, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and angiography have a complementary role in the postoperative evaluation following a pancreas transplant. The common complications after a whole organ pancreas transplant include vascular thrombosis, graft rejection, pancreatitis, and infections. Complications can be classified into vascular (partial or complete venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, stenosis or pseudoaneurysm), parenchymal (pancreatitis, graft rejection), and bowel-related or miscellaneous causes (bowel obstruction, anastomotic leak, and peripancreatic fluid collections). Islet cell transplantation is an innovative therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. It involves isolating insulin-producing islet cells from donor pancreas and transplanting into recipients, to provide long-term insulin independence or significantly reduce insulin requirements. In recent years, isolation techniques, immunosuppressive regimens, and post-transplant monitoring advancements have propelled ICT as a viable therapeutic option. This comprehensive review aims to provide insights into the current state-of-the-art imaging techniques discussing both normal and abnormal features following pancreas transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) mellitus is an autoimmune disease in which immune cells, predominantly effector T cells, destroy insulin-secreting beta-cells. Beta-cell destruction led to various consequences ranging from retinopathy and nephropathy to neuropathy. Different strategies have been developed to achieve normoglycemia, including exogenous glucose compensation, whole pancreas transplantation, islet transplantation, and beta-cell replacement. AREAS COVERED: The last two decades of experience have shown that indigenous glucose compensation through beta-cell regeneration and protection is a peerless method for T1D therapy. Tremendous studies have tried to find an unlimited source for beta-cell regeneration, on the one hand, and beta-cell protection against immune attack, on the other hand. Recent advances in stem cell technology, gene editing methods, and immune modulation approaches provide a unique opportunity for both beta-cell regeneration and protection. EXPERT OPINION: Pluripotent stem cell differentiation into the beta-cell is considered an unlimited source for beta-cell regeneration. Devising engineered pancreas-specific regulatory T cells using Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) technology potentiates an effective immune tolerance induction for beta-cell protection. Beta-cell regeneration using pluripotent stem cells and beta-cell protection using pancreas-specific engineered regulatory T cells promises to develop a curative protocol in T1D.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Células Secretoras de Insulina , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Regeneración , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/inmunología , Células Secretoras de Insulina/fisiología , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Animales , Células Madre Pluripotentes , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Bench surgery for the preparation of deceased donor pancreatic grafts is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that energy devices could be used during bench surgery to decrease the bench surgery time. However, because bench surgery has two unique characteristics, wet conditions and no blood flow in the vessels, it is necessary to verify the safety and efficacy under such conditions. METHODS: In an animal tissue model, we validated both ultrasonic and bipolar energy devices: Harmonic Shears and the LigaSure (LS) vessel-sealing device by evaluating heat spread and pressure resistance under bench surgery conditions. In a clinical evaluation of the LS, we compared the outcomes of 22 patients in two different bench surgery groups: with and without the use of the LS. RESULTS: Clinically, the bench surgery time was significantly shorter in the LS group than that in the conventional group (P < 0.001). In the animal tissue experiments, the highest temperature in bench surgery conditions was 60.4°C after 1 s at a 5-mm distance in the LS group. Pressure resistance of ≥ 750 mmHg was achieved in almost all trials in both veins and arteries, with no difference between Harmonic Shears and LS. There was more surgical smoke visually in bench conditions versus in dry conditions and under half bite versus full bite conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The encouraging results of our exploratory clinical and animal studies of the energy devices suggest that they may be useful in the setting of bench surgery.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Animales , Trasplante de Páncreas/instrumentación , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Animales , Porcinos , Páncreas/cirugía , Páncreas/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
This review highlights noteworthy literature published in 2023 and pertinent to anesthesiologists and critical care physicians caring for patients undergoing abdominal organ transplantation. We feature 9 studies from 593 peer-reviewed papers on pancreatic transplantation, 3 from 194 on intestinal transplantation, and 28 from over 4513 on kidney transplantation. The liver transplantation section includes a special focus on 20 studies from 5666 clinical trial publications. We explore a broad range of topics, including donor management, perioperative recipient management, and innovative pharmacologic and mechanical interventions tested for the improvement of patient and graft outcomes and survival.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Hígado , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Intestinos/trasplante , Supervivencia de Injerto , Atención Perioperativa/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Graft loss increases the risk of patient death after simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. The relative risk of each graft failure is complex due to the influence of several competing events. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study compared 4-year patient survival according to the graft status using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Competing Risk Analysis (CRA). Patient survival was also assessed according to five eras (Era 1: 2001-2003; Era 2: 2004-2006; Era 3: 2007-2009; Era 4: 2010-2012; Era 5: 2012-2015). RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2015, 432 SPK transplants were performed. Using KM, patient survival was 86.5% for patients without graft loss (n = 333), 93.4% for patients with pancreas graft loss (n = 46), 43.7% for patients with kidney graft loss (n = 16), and 25.4% for patients with pancreas and kidney graft loss (n = 37). Patient survival was underestimated using KM versus CRA methods in patients with pancreas and kidney graft losses (25.4% vs. 36.2%), respectively. Induction with lymphocyte depleting antibodies was associated with 81% reduced risk (HR.19, 95% CI.38-.98, p = .0048), while delayed kidney function (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.09-7.95, p = .033) and surgical complications (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.22-7.08, p = .016) were associated with higher risk of death. Four-year patient survival increased from Era 1 to Era 5 (79% vs. 87.9%, p = .047). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients, kidney graft loss, with or without pancreas graft loss, was associated with higher mortality after SPK transplantation. Compared to CRA, the KM model underestimated survival only among patients with pancreas and kidney graft losses. Patient survival increased over time.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Páncreas , Supervivencia de InjertoRESUMEN
In classic pancreatic transplantation, the splenic artery and vein are ligated at the tail of the pancreas graft. This leads to slowed blood flow in the splenic vein and may cause thrombosis and graft loss. In this study, a patient received a pancreas after kidney transplantation. A modified surgical technique was used in the pancreatic graft preparation. The donor splenic artery and vein were anastomosed end to end at the tail of the pancreas. The splenic artery near the anastomosis was partially ligated, and an effective diameter of 2 mm was reserved to limit arterial blood pressure and flow. The patient recovered very well. Contrasted computed tomography scans on days 11 and 88 after pancreas transplantation indicated sufficient backflow of the splenic vein. We believe that this procedure may avoid the risk of splenic vein thrombosis after pancreas transplantation. This modified technique has not been reported in clinical cases previously and may help reduce the risk of thrombosis after pancreas transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Trasplante de Páncreas , Trombosis , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/cirugía , Bazo , Vena Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Esplénica/cirugía , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Esplénica/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pancreas transplant is currently the most effective method for maintaining physiological blood sugar levels and reversing small blood vessel injuries. Our team developed a model of whole pancreas transplant based on microsurgical techniques following the investigation of more than 300 mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mouse pancreatic transplant model is required to investigate the pathophysiological process of pancreas transplant and pancreatic preservation technologies. Recently, the segment-neck pancreas transplant has been the most utilized mouse pancreatic transplant model. The innovative mouse pancreatic transplant modelthat we developed in this study uses the whole pancreas and returns heart blood flow into the liver via the portal vein. RESULTS: With our mouse pancreatic transplant model, the survivalrate of mice aftertransplant was >80%, and the success rate of pancreatic transplant was >90%. CONCLUSIONS: The segment-neck and the whole pancreas model can guarantee that the transplanted pancreas functions effectively, and both have excellent postoperative outcomes, survivalrates and pancreatic active rates.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Vena Porta , Animales , Ratones , Vena Porta/cirugía , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Páncreas/cirugía , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , HígadoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Outcomes following pancreas transplantation are suboptimal and better donor selection is required to improve this. Vasoactive drugs (VaD) are commonly used to correct the abnormal haemodynamics of organ donors in intensive care units. VaDs can differentially affect insulin secretion positively (dobutamine) or negatively (noradrenaline). The hypothesis was that some VaDs might induce beta-cell stress or rest and therefore impact pancreas transplant outcomes. The aim of the study was to assess relationships between VaD use and pancreas transplant graft survival. METHODS: Data from the UK Transplant Registry on all pancreas transplants performed between 2004 and 2016 with complete follow-up data were included. Univariable- and multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses determined risks of graft failure associated with VaD use. RESULTS: In 2,183 pancreas transplants, VaDs were used in the following numbers of donors: dobutamine 76 (3.5%), dopamine 84 (3.8%), adrenaline 161 (7.4%), noradrenaline 1,589 (72.8%) and vasopressin 1,219 (55.8%). In multivariable models, adjusted for covariates and the co-administration of other VaDs, noradrenaline use (vs non-use) was a strong predictor of better graft survival (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.77 [0.64-0.94], p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Noradrenaline use was associated with better graft survival in models adjusted for donor and recipient variables - this may be related to inhibition of pancreatic insulin secretion initiating pancreatic beta-cell 'rest'. Further research is required to replicate these findings and establish whether relationships are causal. Identification of alternative methods of inducing beta-cell rest could be valuable in improving graft outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Dobutamina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Donantes de Tejidos , Aloinjertos , Supervivencia de InjertoRESUMEN
The diabetic population is witnessing a rise in obesity rates, creating specific hurdles for individuals seeking pancreas transplantation because they are frequently disqualified due to their elevated body weight. Introducing a robotic-assisted approach to transplantation has been proven to yield improved outcomes, particularly in patients with obesity. A retrospective analysis was conducted between January 2015 and September 2023. The study included a total of 140 patients, with 16 receiving robotic-assisted simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (RSPK) and 124 undergoing open approach simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (OSPK) during the study period. The median age was 45 (36.8-52.7) and 44.5 years (36.8-51.8) (RSPK vs OSPK, P = .487). There were no significant differences in demographics except body mass index (RSPK vs OSPK, 34.9 vs 28.1, P < .001) and a higher percentage of patients with high cardiac risk in the RSPK group. The robotic approach has a lengthier overall operative time and warm ischemia time. Surgical and nonsurgical complications at 30-days and 1-year grafts and patient survival (93.8% vs 96.8%, RSPK vs OSPK, P = .521) were similar. Our findings suggest that employing robotic assistance in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is safe. Wider adoption and utilization of this technique could potentially improve transplant accessibility for individuals with obesity and diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Factores de Riesgo , Pruebas de Función Renal , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugíaRESUMEN
Pancreatic transplantation is considered by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes an acceptable surgical procedure in patients with type 1 diabetes also undergoing kidney transplantation in pre-final or end-stage renal disease if no contraindications are present. Pancreatic transplantation, however, is a complex surgical procedure and may lead to a range of postoperative complications that can significantly impact graft function and patient outcomes. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) is often adopted to evaluate perfusion of the transplanted pancreas, identify complications and as a guide for interventional radiology procedures. CT assessment after pancreatic transplantation should start with the evaluation of the arterial Y-graft, the venous anastomosis and the duodenojejunostomy. With regard to complications, CT allows for the identification of vascular complications, such as thrombosis or stenosis of blood vessels supplying the graft, the detection of pancreatic fluid collections, including pseudocysts, abscesses, or leaks, the assessment of bowel complications (anastomotic leaks, ileus or obstruction), and the identification of bleeding. The aim of this pictorial review is to illustrate CT findings of surgical-related complications after pancreatic transplantation. The knowledge of surgical techniques is of key importance to understand postoperative anatomic changes and imaging evaluation. Therefore, we first provide a short summary of the main techniques of pancreatic transplantation. Then, we provide a practical imaging approach to pancreatic transplantation and its complications providing tips and tricks for the prompt imaging diagnosis on CT.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whole pancreas transplantation provides durable glycemic control and can improve survival rate; however, it can carry an increased risk of surgical complications. One devastating complication is a duodenal leak at the site of enteroenteric anastomosis. The gastroduodenal artery (GDA) supplies blood to the donor duodenum and pancreas but is commonly ligated during procurement. Since we have not had expressive changes in pancreatic back table surgical techniques in the recent decades, we hypothesized whether back table GDA reconstruction, improving perfusion of the donor duodenum and head of the pancreas, could lead to fewer surgical complications in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, we evaluated demographic information, postoperative complications, intraoperative donor duodenum, recipient bowel O2 tissue saturation, and patient morbidity through the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®). RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were included: 13 underwent GDA reconstruction (GDA-R), and 13 had GDA ligation (GDA-L). There were no pancreatic leaks in the GR group compared to 38% (5/13) in the GDA-L group (p = 0.03913). Intraoperative tissue oxygen saturation was higher in the GDA-R group than in the GDA-L (95.18 vs.76.88%, p < 0,001). We observed an increase in transfusion rate in GDA-R (p < 0.05), which did not result in a higher rate of exploration (p = 0.38). CCI® patient morbidity was also significantly lower in the GDA-R group (s < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified improved intraoperative duodenal tissue oxygen saturation in the GDA-R group with an associated reduction in pancreatic leaks and CCI® morbidity risk. A larger prospective multicenter study comparing the two methods is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Duodeno/cirugía , Páncreas/cirugía , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Arteria HepáticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pancreas transplant can have serious complications requiring salvage pancreatectomy, and surgical approaches should be carefully considered, with jejunal or ileal anastomoses most often employed. The jejunum may reduce gastrointestinal disturbance, whereas the ileum is more immunogenic. Proximal gastrointestinal anastomoses pose challenges with salvage pancreatectomy and creation of high-output stoma, often in the context of end-stage renal failure. Here, we compared outcomes between these techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patient records of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants at a single center between 2013 and 2015, with follow-up to 2020. RESULTS: Our center performed 86 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants during the study period; 10 patients were excluded because of incomplete records of anastomosis type. Of included recipients, 59.2% were men (mean age 41.5 ± 8.4 y), 72.4% were donors after brain death, and 98.7% had received a first pancreas transplant. Forty-three simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants were performed with ileal anastomosis and 33 with jejunal anastomosis. We found no significant differences in recipient or donor factors or immunosuppression regimen between anastomosis groups and no significant differences in overall patient, pancreas, or kidney graft survival or in gastrointestinal complications. Hospital length of stay was higher with ileal anastomosis (median 14 vs 19 days; P < .05), as was cold ischemic time (median 8:48 vs 9:31 hours; P < .05). Three patients required salvage pancre-atectomy and loop ileostomy formation with multiorgan support, prolonged intensive care unit stay, relaparotomy, and/or laparostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes were comparable between our patient groups. Catastrophic complica-tions occur in a minority of cases, requiring salvage surgery. More complications occurred with ileal anastomosis, but this approach allows graft pancreatectomy and formation of loop ileostomy, avoiding a more proximal stoma in clinically unstable patients. Further studies are needed to examine the impact of enteric anastomosis site.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Yeyuno/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Íleon , Drenaje/métodos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite significant advancements in immunosuppressive regimens and surgical techniques, the prevalence of adverse events related to immunosuppression remains a major challenge affecting the long-term survival rates of pancreas and kidney allografts. AREAS COVERED: This article presents a comprehensive review of the literature and knowledge (Jan/2012-Feb/2023) concerning glucose metabolism disorders and nephrotoxicity associated with tacrolimus and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi). Novel signaling pathways potentially implicated in these adverse events are discussed. Furthermore, we extensively examine the findings from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, mTORi, and steroid minimization. EXPERT OPINION: Tacrolimus-based regimens continue to be the standard treatment following pancreas transplants. However, prolonged use of tacrolimus and mTORi may lead to hyperglycemia and nephrotoxicity. Understanding and interpreting experimental data, particularly concerning novel signaling pathways beyond calcineurin-NFAT and mTOR pathways, can offer valuable insights for therapeutic interventions to mitigate hyperglycemia and nephrotoxicity. Additionally, critically analyzing clinical trial results can identify opportunities for personalized safety-based approaches to minimize side effects. It is imperative to conduct randomized-controlled studies to assess the impact of mTORi use and steroid-free protocols on pancreatic allograft survival. Such studies will aid in tailoring treatment strategies for improved transplant outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Hiperglucemia , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Hiperglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la CalcineurinaRESUMEN
A difficult decision for patients in need of kidney-pancreas transplant is whether to seek a living kidney donor or wait to receive both organs from one deceased donor. The framework of dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) can inform this choice, but a patient-relevant strategy such as "wait for deceased-donor transplant" is ill-defined because there are multiple versions of treatment (i.e., wait times, organ qualities). Existing DTR methods average over the distribution of treatment versions in the data, estimating survival under a "representative intervention." This is undesirable if transporting inferences to a target population such as patients today, who experience shorter wait times thanks to evolutions in allocation policy. We, therefore, propose the concept of a generalized representative intervention (GRI): a random DTR that assigns treatment version by drawing from the distribution among strategy compliers in the target population (e.g., patients today). We describe an inverse-probability-weighted product-limit estimator of survival under a GRI that performs well in simulations and can be implemented in standard statistical software. For continuous treatments (e.g., organ quality), weights are reformulated to depend on probabilities only, not densities. We apply our method to a national database of kidney-pancreas transplant candidates from 2001-2020 to illustrate that variability in transplant rate across years and centers results in qualitative differences in the optimal strategy for patient survival.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Causalidad , RiñónRESUMEN
Pancreatic transplantation is a complex surgical procedure performed for patients with chronic severe diabetes, often performed in combination with renal transplantation. Vascular and exocrine drainage anatomy varies depending on the surgical technique. Radiology plays a critical role in the diagnosis of postoperative complications, requiring an understanding of grayscale/Doppler ultrasound as well as computed tomography and MR imaging. In this review, we detail usual surgical methods and normal postoperative imaging appearances. We then review the most common complications following pancreatic transplants, emphasizing diagnostic features of vascular (arterial/venous), surgical, and diffuse parenchymal pathologic conditions on multiple imaging modalities.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Páncreas/cirugía , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To address long waitlist times and increase pancreas transplantation, our center has implemented a protocol for long-distance importation of pancreata. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pancreas transplantation at our institution from January 1, 2014, the start of our importation program, through September 30, 2021. Outcomes were compared between locally procured grafts and imported grafts, defined as grafts procured greater than 250 nautical miles (NM) from our center. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients underwent pancreas transplantation during the study time period; 19 (23.5%) received imported grafts. There were no significant differences in recipient demographics or type of transplant received. Mean distance of import was 644.2 ± 234.0 NM. Imported grafts were more likely to be from pediatric donors <18 years old (p = .02) and a significantly higher proportion of imported grafts came from donors weighing <30 kg (26.3 vs. 3.2%, p = .007). Cold ischemic time was longer for imported grafts than for local grafts (13.4 ± 2.3 h vs. 9.8 ± 2.2 h, p < .01). There was no significant difference in deaths or graft losses within 90 days or at 1 year between groups. CONCLUSION: Centers should consider expanding criteria for acceptance of imported pancreata to increase the number of transplants and combat organ nonutilization.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Páncreas , Donantes de Tejidos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is a complex and demanding procedure with a considerable risk of morbidity and mortality. Advances in surgical techniques and organ preservation have introduced changes in care protocols. Two cohorts of patients receiving SPKT with two different protocols were compared to determine overall survival and pancreatic and renal graft failure-free survival. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted in two cohorts of SPKT recipient patients that underwent surgery between 2001 and 2021. Outcomes were compared in transplant patients between 2001 and 2011 (cohort 1; initial protocol) and 2012-2021 (cohort 2; improved protocol). In addition to the temporality, the cohorts were defined by a protocolization of technical aspects and medical management in cohort 2 (improved protocol), compared to a wide variability in the procedures carried out in cohort 1 (initial protocol). Overall survival and pancreatic and renal graft failure-free survival were the primary outcomes. These outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. Results: Fifty-five SPKT were performed during the study period: 32 in cohort 1 and 23 in cohort 2. In the survival analysis, an average of 2546 days (95% CI: 1902-3190) was found in cohort 1, while in cohort 2, it was 2540 days (95% CI: 2100-3204) (p > 0.05). Pancreatic graft failure-free survival had an average of 1705 days (95% CI: 1037-2373) in cohort 1, lower than the average in cohort 2 (2337 days; 95% CI: 1887-2788) (p = 0.016). Similarly, renal graft failure-free survival had an average of 2167 days (95% CI: 1485-2849) in cohort 1, lower than the average in cohort 2 (2583 days; 95% CI: 2159-3006) (p = 0.017). Conclusions: This analysis indicates that pancreatic and renal graft failure-free survival associated with SPKT decreased significantly in cohort 2, with results related to improvements in the treatment protocol implemented in that cohort.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , América Latina , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Páncreas , Supervivencia de Injerto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Pancreas transplants from expanded criteria donors are performed widely in Japan because there is a shortage of brain-dead donors. However, the effectiveness of this strategy is unknown. We retrospectively studied 371 pancreas transplants to evaluate the possibility of pancreas transplantation from expanded criteria donors by the Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI). Patients were divided into five groups according to quintiles of PDRI values (Q1-Q5). The 1-year pancreas graft survival rates were 94.5% for Q1, 91.9% for Q2, 90.5% for Q3, 89.3% for Q4, and 79.6% for Q5, and were significantly lower with a lower PDRI (p = 0.04). A multivariate analysis showed that the PDRI, donor hemoglobin A1c values, and pancreas transplantation alone significantly predicted 1-year pancreas graft survival (all p < 0.05). Spline curve analysis showed that the PDRI was incrementally associated with an increased risk of 1-year graft failure. In the group with a PDRI ≥ 2.87, 8/56 patients had graft failures within 1 month, and all were due to graft thrombosis. The PDRI is a prognostic factor related to the 1-year graft survival rate. However, pancreas transplantation from high-PDRI donors shows acceptable results and could be an alternative when the donor pool is insufficient.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante de Páncreas/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Donantes de Tejidos , Páncreas , Supervivencia de Injerto , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of organ donations from deceased donors in Japan, pancreas grafts for pancreas transplantation (PTx) are frequently harvested from the donor in the same donation surgery as the liver graft. In such a situation, the common hepatic artery (CHA) and gastroduodenal artery (GDA) are dissected, resulting in decreased blood flow to the head of the pancreas graft. Therefore, GDA reconstruction using an interposition graft (I-graft) between the CHA and GDA has been traditionally performed to maintain blood flow. This study investigated the clinical significance of GDA reconstruction with the I-graft regarding the arterial patency of the pancreas graft in patients after PTx. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients underwent PTx for type 1 diabetes mellitus at our hospital between 2000 and 2021. Twenty-four cases in which GDA reconstruction was performed using the I-graft and artery blood flow of the pancreas graft was evaluated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography or angiography were included in this study. RESULTS: The patency of the I-graft was 95.8%, and only one patient had a thrombus in the I-graft. Nineteen patients (79.2%) had no thrombus in the artery of the pancreas graft; the other five cases had thrombus in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). The patient with the thrombus in the I-graft required graftectomy for the pancreas graft. CONCLUSIONS: The patency of the I-graft was favorable. Furthermore, the clinical significance of the GDA reconstruction with the I-graft is suggested to maintain blood flow in the pancreas head if the SMA is occluded.