Adherence to the ISHLT Protocol for the Referral of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis to the Transplantation Center among of Czech Centers for Interstitial Lung Diseases.

There are limited data on referral rates and the number of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who are eligible for lung transplantation. The aim of the present study was to assess adherence to the consensus of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) for the referral of patients with IPF among Czech interstitial lung disease (ILD) centers. Czech patients who were diagnosed with IPF between 1999 and 2021 (n = 1584) and who were less than 65 years old at the time of diagnosis were retrospectively selected from the Czech Republic of the European Multipartner Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry (EMPIRE). Nonsmokers and ex-smokers with a body mass index (BMI) of <32 kg/m2 (n = 404) were included for further analyses. Patients with a history of cancer <5 years from the time of IPF diagnosis, patients with alcohol abuse, and patients with an accumulation of vascular comorbidities were excluded. The trajectory of individual patients was verified at the relevant ILD center. From the database of transplant patients (1999-12/2021, n = 541), all patients who underwent transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis (n = 186) were selected, and the diagnosis of IPF was subsequently verified from the patient's medical records (n = 67). A total of 304 IPF patients were eligible for lung transplantation. Ninety-six patients were referred to the transplant center, 50% (n = 49) of whom were referred for lung transplantation. Thirty percent of potentially eligible patients not referred to the transplant center were considered to have too many comorbidities by the reporting physician, 19% of IPF patients denied lung transplantation, and 17% were not referred due to age. Among Czech patients with IPF, there may be a larger pool of potential lung transplant candidates than has been reported to the transplant center to date.

Outcomes of Concomitant Cardiac Surgical Procedures Performed During Pediatric Lung Transplantation in the United States.

Data on concomitant cardiac surgery (CCS) performed during pediatric lung transplantation (LTx) is limited. Therefore, we conducted a multi-institutional analysis to identify the incidence and outcomes of CCS in pediatric (< 18 years) LTx recipients by merging data (2004-2023) from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) databases. Of the total of 596 pediatric LTx recipients, 87 (15%) underwent CCS. The majority of these cardiac surgeries were atrial septal defect (ASD) closure (90%) followed by aortic arch/descending aortic repair (3%), atrial repair (3%), ventricular septal defect closure (2%), patent ductus arteriosus ligation (2%), and tricuspid valve repair (2%). The median age at LTx was 3 years (IQR: 0-12). Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) was the predominant indication for LTx (54%). Survival to discharge was 94% and 5-years survival was 64%. Our findings indicate CCS in children undergoing LTx has acceptable outcomes.

Lung Donation and Transplant Recipient Outcomes at Independent vs Hospital-Based Donor Care Units.

Importance: Centralizing deceased organ donor management and organ recovery into donor care units (DCUs) may mitigate the critical organ shortage by positively impacting donation and recipient outcomes. Objective: To compare donation and lung transplant outcomes between 2 common DCU models: independent (outside of acute-care hospitals) and hospital-based. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network deceased donor registry and lung transplant recipient files from 21 US donor service areas with an operating DCU. Characteristics and lung donation rates among deceased donors cared for in independent vs hospital-based DCUs were compared. Eligible participants included deceased organ donors (aged 16 years and older) after brain death, who underwent organ recovery procedures between April 26, 2017, and June 30, 2022, and patients who received lung transplants from those donors. Data analysis was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Organ recovery in an independent DCU (vs hospital-based DCU). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was duration of transplanted lung survival (through December 31, 2023) among recipients of lung(s) transplanted from cohort donors. A Cox proportional hazards model stratified by transplant year and program, adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics was used to compare graft survival. Results: Of 10 856 donors in the starting sample (mean [SD] age, 42.8 [15.2] years; 6625 male [61.0%] and 4231 female [39.0%]), 5149 (primary comparison group) underwent recovery procedures in DCUs including 1466 (28.4%) in 11 hospital-based DCUs and 3683 (71.5%) in 10 independent DCUs. Unadjusted lung donation rates were higher in DCUs than local hospitals, but lower in hospital-based vs independent DCUs (418 donors [28.5%] vs 1233 donors [33.5%]; P < .001). Among 1657 transplant recipients, 1250 (74.5%) received lung(s) from independent DCUs. Median (range) duration of follow-up after transplant was 734 (0-2292) days. Grafts recovered from independent DCUs had shorter restricted mean (SE) survival times than grafts from hospital-based DCUs (1548 [27] days vs 1665 [50] days; P = .04). After adjustment, graft failure remained higher among lungs recovered from independent DCUs than hospital-based DCUs (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis of national donor and transplant recipient data, although lung donation rates were higher from deceased organ donors after brain death cared for in independent DCUs, lungs recovered from donors in hospital-based DCUs survived longer. These findings suggest that further work is necessary to understand which factors (eg, donor transfer, management, or lung evaluation and acceptance practices) differ between DCU models and may contribute to these differences.

The impact of time from ILD diagnosis to referral to the transplant center on the probability of inclusion in the transplant waiting list.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant is a therapeutic option for patients with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether time from ILD diagnosis to referral to a transplant center influences the probability of being included in the transplant waiting list. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including all ILD patients evaluated as lung transplantation (LT) candidates at a lung transplant center between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2022. The primary endpoint was the probability of being included in the lung transplant waiting list according to the time elapsed from diagnosis to referral to the transplant center. RESULTS: A total of 843 lung transplant requests were received, of which 367 (43.5%) were associated with ILD. Thirteen patients were excluded because they did not attend the first visit, whereas another 11 were excluded because some information was missing. As a result, our final sample was composed of 343 patients. The median time from diagnosis to referral was 29.4 (10.9 - 61.1) months. The overall probability of inclusion in the waiting list was 29.7%. By time from diagnosis to referral, the probability of inclusion in the waiting list was 48.1% for the patients referred 〈 6 months from diagnosis; 27.5% for patients referred 6 to 24 months from diagnosis; and 25.8% for patients referred 〉 24 months from diagnosis (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Early referral to a lung transplant center seemed to increase the probability of being included in the lung transplant waiting list. Further research is needed in this topic.

Early Extubation: Who Qualifies Postoperatively in Lung Transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: Early extubation has been adopted in many settings within cardiothoracic surgery, with several advantages for patients. We sought to determine the association of timing of extubation in lung transplant recipients' short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Adult, primary lung transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Recipients were stratified based on the duration of postoperative ventilation: 1) None (NV); 2) <5 Days (<5D); and 3) 5+ Days (5+D). Comparative statistics were performed, and both unadjusted and adjusted survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier Methods and a Cox proportional hazard model. A multivariable model including recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics was created to examine factors associated with NV. RESULTS: 28,575 recipients were identified (NV = 960, <5D = 21,959, 5+D = 5656). The NV group had shorter median length of stay (P < 0.01) and lower incidence of postoperative dialysis (P < 0.01). The NV and <5D groups had similar survival, while 5+D recipients had decreased survival (P < 0.01). The multivariable model demonstrated increased donor BMI, center volume, ischemic time, single lung transplant, and transplantation between 2011 and 2015 were associated with NV (P < 0.01 for all). Use of donation after cardiac death donors and transplantation between 2016 and 2021 was associated with postoperative ventilator use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients extubated early after lung transplantation have a shorter median length of stay without an associated increase in mortality. While not all patients are appropriate for earlier extubation, it is possible to extubate patients early following lung transplant. Further efforts are necessary to help expand this practice and ensure its' success for recipients.

Survival outcomes following urgent lung transplantation in France and the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Lung graft allocation can be based on a score (Lung Allocation Score) as in the USA or sequential proposals combined with a discrete priority model as in France. We aimed to analyse the impact of allocation policy on the outcome of urgent lung transplantation (LT). METHODS: US United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and French Cristal databases were retrospectively reviewed to analyse LT performed between 2007 and 2017. We analysed the mortality risk of urgent LT by fitting Cox models and adjusted Restricted Mean Survival Time. We then compared the outcome after urgent LT in the UNOS and Cristal groups using a propensity score matching. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema and redo LT, 3775 and 12 561 patients underwent urgent LT and non-urgent LT in the USA while 600 and 2071 patients underwent urgent LT and non-urgent LT in France. In univariate analysis, urgent LT was associated with an HR for death of 1.24 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.48) in the Cristal group and 1.12 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.19) in the UNOS group. In multivariate analysis, the effect of urgent LT was attenuated and no longer statistically significant in the Cristal database (HR 1.1 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.33)) while it remained constant and statistically significant in the UNOS database (HR 1.12 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.2)). Survival comparison of urgent LT patients between the two countries was significantly different in favour of the UNOS group (1-year survival rates 84.1% (80.9%-87.3%) vs 75.4% (71.8%-79.1%) and 3-year survival rates 66.3% (61.9%-71.1%) vs 62.7% (58.5%-67.1%), respectively). CONCLUSION: Urgent LT is associated with adverse outcome in the USA and in France with a better prognosis in the US score-based system taking post-transplant survival into account. This difference between two healthcare systems is multifactorial.

Implications of Race Adjustment in Lung-Function Equations.

BACKGROUND: Adjustment for race is discouraged in lung-function testing, but the implications of adopting race-neutral equations have not been comprehensively quantified. METHODS: We obtained longitudinal data from 369,077 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, U.K. Biobank, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Using these data, we compared the race-based 2012 Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012) equations with race-neutral equations introduced in 2022 (GLI-Global). Evaluated outcomes included national projections of clinical, occupational, and financial reclassifications; individual lung-allocation scores for transplantation priority; and concordance statistics (C statistics) for clinical prediction tasks. RESULTS: Among the 249 million persons in the United States between 6 and 79 years of age who are able to produce high-quality spirometric results, the use of GLI-Global equations may reclassify ventilatory impairment for 12.5 million persons, medical impairment ratings for 8.16 million, occupational eligibility for 2.28 million, grading of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 2.05 million, and military disability compensation for 413,000. These potential changes differed according to race; for example, classifications of nonobstructive ventilatory impairment may change dramatically, increasing 141% (95% confidence interval [CI], 113 to 169) among Black persons and decreasing 69% (95% CI, 63 to 74) among White persons. Annual disability payments may increase by more than $1 billion among Black veterans and decrease by $0.5 billion among White veterans. GLI-2012 and GLI-Global equations had similar discriminative accuracy with regard to respiratory symptoms, health care utilization, new-onset disease, death from any cause, death related to respiratory disease, and death among persons on a transplant waiting list, with differences in C statistics ranging from -0.008 to 0.011. CONCLUSIONS: The use of race-based and race-neutral equations generated similarly accurate predictions of respiratory outcomes but assigned different disease classifications, occupational eligibility, and disability compensation for millions of persons, with effects diverging according to race. (Funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.).

Survival Tree Provides Individualized Estimates of Survival After Lung Transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Identifying contributors to lung transplant survival is vital in mitigating mortality. To enhance individualized mortality estimation and determine variable interaction, we employed a survival tree algorithm utilizing recipient and donor data. METHODS: United Network Organ Sharing data (2000-2021) were queried for single and double lung transplants in adult patients. Graft survival time <7 d was excluded. Sixty preoperative and immediate postoperative factors were evaluated with stepwise logistic regression on mortality; final model variables were included in survival tree modeling. Data were split into training and testing sets and additionally validated with 10-fold cross validation. Survival tree pruning and model selection was based on Akaike information criteria and log-likelihood values. Estimated survival probabilities and log-rank pairwise comparisons between subgroups were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 27,296 lung transplant patients (8175 single; 19,121 double lung) were included. Stepwise logistic regression yielded 47 significant variables associated with mortality. Survival tree modeling returned six significant factors: recipient age, length of stay from transplant to discharge, recipient ventilator duration post-transplant, double lung transplant, recipient reintubation post-transplant, and donor cytomegalovirus status. Eight subgroups consisting of combinations of these factors were identified with distinct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. CONCLUSIONS: Survival trees provide the ability to understand the effects and interactions of covariates on survival after lung transplantation. Individualized survival probability with this technique found that preoperative and postoperative factors influence survival after lung transplantation. Thus, preoperative patient counseling should acknowledge a degree of uncertainty given the influence of postoperative factors.

A single-centre analysis of lung transplantation outcomes in recipients aged 70 or older.

OBJECTIVES: As life expectancies continue to increase, a greater proportion of older patients will require lung transplants (LTs). However, there are no well-defined age cutoffs for which LT can be performed safely. At our high-volume LT centre, we explored outcomes for LT recipients ≥70 vs <70 years old. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of survival after LT among older recipients. Data were stratified by recipient age (≥70 vs <70 years old) and procedure type (single versus double LT). Demographics and clinical variables were compared using Chi-square test and 2 sample t-test. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test with propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 988 LTs were performed at our centre over 10 years, including 289 LTs in patients ≥70 years old and 699 LTs in patients <70 years old. The recipient groups differed significantly by race (P < 0.0001), sex (P = 0.003) and disease aetiology (P < 0.0001). Older patients were less likely to receive a double LT compared to younger patients (P < 0.0001) and had lower rates of intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (P = 0.019) and shorter length of stay (P = 0.001). Both groups had overall high 1-year survival (85.8% vs 89.1%, respectively). Survival did not differ between groups after propensity matching (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed high survival for older and younger LT recipients. There were no statistically significant differences observed in survival between the groups after propensity matching, however, a trend in favour of younger patients was observed.

Ambulatory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Patients Listed for Lung Transplant.

There has been an increase in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to bridge critically ill patients to lung transplant (LTX). This study evaluates how ambulatory status on ECMO affected waitlist and post-LTX outcomes. The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for patients aged of greater than or equal to 18 years and between 2016 and 2021 to identify pre-LTX patients supported by ECMO. The patients were classified in venous-arterial (VA) ECMO and veno-venous (VV) ECMO cohorts and further classified as ambulatory (AMB) and non-AMB (nAMB). Each cohort was controlled against the non-ECMO patients. Univariate statistical tests, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival curves, were used for analysis. The 90 day waitlist survival was the highest among the non-ECMO group (96%), but both AMB VV and VA groups had superior survival compared to the nAMB group (85% vs. 75%, 78% vs. 65%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for the median lung allocation score (LAS) (88) in the VV ECMO group, the waitlist survival was superior in the AMB VV ECMO compared to those not on ECMO (86% vs. 78%, p > 0.01). The 1 year post-LTX survival between non-ECMO and AMB VV ECMO was comparable (88% vs. 88%, p = 0.66). Ambulating patients or use of physical therapy while on ECMO can help improve lung transplant outcomes.

Costs of End-of-Life Hospitalizations in the United States for People With Pulmonary Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is a lifesaving intervention for people with advanced lung disease, but it is costly and resource-intensive. To investigate the cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation as a treatment option in pulmonary disease, we must understand costs attributable to end-of-life hospitalizations for end-stage lung disease. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the costs associated with end-of-life hospitalizations for people with pulmonary disease, and how have these trends changed over time? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults aged 18 to 74 years with hospitalization data in the Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample data from 2009 to 2019 with a pulmonary disease admission were included in this analysis. Those with a history of lung transplantation were excluded. International Classification of Diseases codes were used to identify pulmonary disease admissions, complications, and procedures and interventions. Total charges were calculated for hospitalizations and stratified by patient status at time of discharge. Trends in charges over time were assessed by demographic and hospital factors. RESULTS: One hundred nine thousand nine hundred twenty-four (4.1%) hospital admissions for pulmonary disease resulted in in-hospital mortality. Those with obstructive lung disease accounted for 94.1% of hospitalizations and 88.1% cases of in-hospital mortality. Estimated costs for end-of-life hospitalizations were $29,981 on average with wide variation in cost by diagnosis and procedure utilization. Inpatient costs were highest for younger people who received more procedures. Among the most expensive admissions, mechanical ventilation accounted for the greatest proportion of interventions. Significant increases in the use of mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and dialysis occurred over the time period. The rate of hospital transfers increased with a proportionately greater increase across admissions resulting in in-hospital mortality. INTERPRETATION: Costs accrued during end-of-life hospitalizations vary across people but represent a significant health care cost that can be averted for selected people who undergo lung transplantation. These costs should be considered in studies of cost-effectiveness in lung transplantation.

Racial and Gender Disparities in Transplantation of Hepatitis C+ Hearts and Lungs.

BACKGROUND: Transplanting organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected donors into HCV-negative recipients has led to thousands of more transplants in the United States since 2016. Studies have demonstrated disparities in utilization of kidneys from these donors due to gender and education. It is still unknown, however, if the same disparities are seen in heart and lung transplantation. METHODS: We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation/United Network for Organ Sharing data on all isolated heart and lung transplants from November 1, 2018, to March 31, 2023, classifying donors based on their HCV nucleic acid test (NAT) result: HCV-NAT- vs HCV-NAT+. We fit separate mixed-effects logistic regression models (outcome: HCV-NAT+ donor) for heart and lung transplants. Primary covariates included (1) race/ethnicity, (2) sex, (3) education level, (4) insurance type, and (5) transplant year. RESULTS: The study included 26,108 adults (14,189 isolated heart transplant recipients and 11,919 isolated lung transplant recipients). A total of 993 (7.0%) heart transplants involved an HCV-NAT+ donor, compared to 457 (3.8%) lung transplants. In multivariable models among all isolated heart transplant recipients, women were significantly less likely to receive an HCV-NAT+ donor heart (odds ratio [OR]: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.92, p = 0.003), as were Asian patients (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.86, p = 0.01). In multivariable models among all isolated lung transplant recipients, Asians were significantly less likely to receive HCV-NAT+ transplants (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.77, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There are disparities in utilization of heart and lungs from HCV-NAT+ donors, with women and Asian patients being significantly less likely to receive these transplants.

Racial Disparities in Waiting List Outcomes of Patients Listed for Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The Lung Allocation Score, implemented in 2005, prioritized lung transplant candidates by medical urgency rather than waiting list time and was expected to improve racial disparities in transplant allocation. We evaluated whether racial disparities in lung transplant persisted after 2005. METHODS: We identified all wait-listed adult lung transplant candidates in the United States from 2005 through 2021 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We evaluated the association between race and receipt of a transplant by using a multivariable competing risk regression model adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, Lung Allocation Score, clinical measures, and time. We evaluated interactions between race and age, sex, socioeconomic status, and Lung Allocation Score. RESULTS: We identified 33,158 candidates on the lung transplant waiting list between 2005 and 2021: 27,074 White (82%), 3350 African American (10%), and 2734 Hispanic (8%). White candidates were older, had higher education levels, and had lower Lung Allocation Scores (P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, African American and Hispanic candidates were less likely to receive lung transplants than White candidates (African American: adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91; Hispanic: adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.87). Lung transplant was significantly less common among Hispanic candidates aged >65 years (P = .003) and non-White candidates from higher-poverty communities (African-American: P = .013; Hispanic: P =.0036). CONCLUSIONS: Despite implementation of the Lung Allocation Score, racial disparities persisted for wait-listed African American and Hispanic lung transplant candidates and differed by age and poverty status. Targeted interventions are needed to ensure equitable access to this life-saving intervention.

Características de los niños y adolescentes con enfermedades pulmonares crónicas derivados para evaluación por equipo de trasplante pulmonar de Uruguay en el período 2003 - 2023 / Characteristics of children and adolescents with chronic lung diseases referred for assessment by the Uruguayan lung transplant team in 2003 - 2023 / Características de crianças e adolescentes com doenças pulmonares crônicas referidas para avaliação pela equipe uruguaia de transplante pulmonar no período 2003 - 2023

Introducción: el trasplante pulmonar se ha consolidado en los últimos años como una opción terapéutica para niños y adolescentes con enfermedad pulmonar grave en la que han fracasado otros tratamientos. Este procedimiento otorga una buena calidad de vida y una supervivencia prolongada, similar a la del trasplante realizado en pacientes adultos. La indicación general para el trasplante pulmonar es la insuficiencia respiratoria progresiva, y potencialmente letal, debida a una enfermedad pulmonar parenquimatosa o vascular. La selección de candidatos a trasplante es compleja, requiriendo condiciones médicas y socioambientales específicas. Objetivos: analizar las características clínicas de los pacientes pediátricos con enfermedades pulmonares crónicas derivados para evaluación por el equipo de trasplante pulmonar de Uruguay. Analizar las características clínicas y sobrevida de los pacientes trasplantados pulmonares pediátricos uruguayos. Material y métodos: estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo de todos los pacientes menores de 19 años derivados al equipo de trasplante pulmonar entre 2003 y 2023. Datos obtenidos de la base del programa y mediante revisión de historias clínicas. Resultados: se incluyeron 30 pacientes (15 de sexo masculino). La media de edad de los pacientes derivados fue de 13,4 ± 3,6 años. Las etiologías de los pacientes derivados fueron 17/30 (56,6%) fibrosis quística, 4/30 (13,3%) bronquiolitis obliterante postrasplante de médula ósea, 4/30 (13,3%) hipertensión pulmonar, 3/30 (10%) bronquiolitis obliterante posinfecciosa y 2/30 (6,6%) enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa. Ingresaron en lista de trasplante 14 pacientes, de los cuales 9 se trasplantaron, 1 se mantiene en lista de espera y 4 fallecieron a la espera del trasplante. Del resto de los pacientes derivados para evaluación: 7 pacientes se encuentran aún en evaluación. Fueron excluidos por razones psicosociales o causas médicas 2 pacientes. Dos pacientes tuvieron pérdida de seguimiento y otros 5 fallecieron durante la evaluación. Las etiologías de los pacientes trasplantados pediátricos fueron fibrosis quística (3/9), bronquiolitis obliterante postrasplante de médula ósea (3/9) e hipertensión pulmonar (3/9). De los pacientes trasplantados, 5 fallecieron (2 en el posoperatorio y 3 fallecieron por sepsis entre 1-2 años postrasplante). Los restantes pacientes están en seguimiento postrasplante hace un mes, 2, 7 y 9 años. No se han encontrado diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la sobrevida condicional cuando se compararon pacientes adultos y pediátricos. Conclusiones: los resultados en los pacientes trasplantados en cuanto a características y causas de mortalidad son comparables con los reportados internacionalmente. La mortalidad postrasplante fue algo mayor que en otros estudios, pero creemos que existe sesgo por el bajo número de pacientes. Dados los resultados mencionados, planteamos que el trasplante sigue siendo una alternativa terapéutica válida en nuestro medio. Los desafíos de este tratamiento incluyen la disponibilidad limitada de órganos de donantes adecuados, la toxicidad de los medicamentos inmunosupresores necesarios para prevenir el rechazo, la prevención y el tratamiento de la bronquiolitis obliterante, así como maximizar el crecimiento, el desarrollo y la calidad de vida de los receptores.

Summary: Introduction: lung transplantation has been recently consolidated as a therapeutic option for children and adolescents with severe lung disease when other treatments have failed. This procedure provides a good quality of life and additional survival, similar to that of transplantation in adult patients. The general indication for lung transplantation is progressive, potentially fatal respiratory failure due to parenchymal or vascular lung disease. The selection of transplant candidates is complex, requiring specific medical and socio-environmental conditions. Objectives: to analyze the clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with chronic lung diseases referred for evaluation by the Uruguayan lung transplant team. To analyze the clinical characteristics and survival of Uruguayan pediatric lung transplant patients. Material and methods: descriptive and retrospective study of all patients under 19 years of age referred to the lung transplant team between 2003 and 2023. The data was obtained from the program's database and through medical records' review. Results: 30 patients were included (15 male). The mean age of the referred patients was 13.4 ± 3.6 years. Etiologies were 17/30 (56.6%) cystic fibrosis, 4/30 (13.3%) bronchiolitis obliterans post-bone marrow transplant, 4/30 (13.3%) pulmonary hypertension, 3 /30 (10%) post-infectious bronchiolitis obliterans, and 2/30 (6.6%) diffuse interstitial lung disease. 14 patients were placed on the transplant list, of which 9 were transplanted, 1 remains on the waiting list and 4 died while waiting for the transplant. Of the rest of the patients referred for evaluation: 7 patients are still under evaluation. 2 patients were excluded for psychosocial reasons or medical reasons. 2 patients could not be followed-up and other 5 died during the evaluation. The etiologies of the pediatric transplant patients were cystic fibrosis (3/9), post-bone marrow transplant bronchiolitis obliterans (3/9), and pulmonary hypertension (3/9). Of the transplanted patients, 5 died (two in the post-operative period, and three died from sepsis between 1-2 years post-transplant). The remaining patients are in post-transplant follow-up for 1 month, 2, 7 and 9 years. No statistically significant differences in conditional survival were found when comparing adult and pediatric patients. Conclusions: results in transplanted patients in terms of characteristics and causes of mortality are comparable with those reported internationally. Post-transplant mortality was somewhat higher than in other studies, but we believe that there is bias due to the low number of patients. Given the results above, we propose that transplantation continues to be a valid therapeutic alternative in our country. The challenges of this treatment include the limited availability of suitable donor organs, the toxicity of immunosuppressive medications necessary to prevent rejection, prevention and treatment of bronchiolitis obliterans, as well as maximizing the growth, development and quality of life of the receivers.

Introdução: o transplante pulmonar consolidou-se nos últimos anos como opção terapêutica para crianças e adolescentes com doença pulmonar grave, nas quais outros tratamentos falharam. Esse procedimento proporciona boa qualidade de vida e sobrevida prolongada, semelhante ao transplante realizado em pacientes adultos. A indicação geral para transplante pulmonar é insuficiência respiratória progressiva e potencialmente fatal devido a doença pulmonar parenquimatosa ou vascular. A seleção de candidatos a transplantes é complexa, exigindo condições médicas e socioambientais específicas. Objetivos: analisar as características clínicas de pacientes pediátricos com doenças pulmonares crônicas encaminhados para avaliação pela equipe uruguaia de transplante pulmonar. Analisar as características clínicas e a sobrevida de pacientes pediátricos uruguaios transplantados pulmonares. Material e métodos: estudo descritivo e retrospectivo de todos os pacientes menores de 19 anos encaminhados à equipe de transplante pulmonar entre 2003 e 2023. Os dados foram obtidos no banco de dados do programa e por meio de revisão de prontuários. Foram incluídos 30 pacientes (15 do sexo masculino). A média de idade dos pacientes encaminhados foi de 13,4 ± 3,6 anos. As etiologias dos pacientes encaminhados foram 17/30 (56,6%) fibrose cística, 4/30 (13,3%) bronquiolite obliterante pós-transplante de medula óssea, 4/30 (13,3%) hipertensão pulmonar, 3/30 (10%) pós -bronquiolite obliterante infecciosa e 2/30 (6,6%) doença pulmonar intersticial difusa. Foram colocados na lista de transplante 14 pacientes, dos quais 9 foram transplantados, 1 permanece em lista de espera e 4 faleceram enquanto aguardavam o transplante. Do restante dos pacientes encaminhados para avaliação: 7 pacientes ainda estão em avaliação, 2 pacientes foram excluídos por motivos psicossociais ou médicos. 2 pacientes foram perdidos no acompanhamento e outros 5 faleceram durante a avaliação. As etiologias dos pacientes transplantados pediátricos foram fibrose cística (3/9), bronquiolite obliterante pós-transplante de medula óssea (3/9) e hipertensão pulmonar (3/9). Dos pacientes transplantados, 5 faleceram (dois no pós-operatório e três por sepse entre 1-2 anos pós-transplante). Os demais pacientes estão em acompanhamento pós-transplante por 1 mês, 2, 7 e 9 anos. Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas na sobrevida condicional quando comparamos pacientes adultos e pediátricos. Conclusões: os resultados em pacientes transplantados em termos de características e causas de mortalidade são comparáveis aos relatados internacionalmente. A mortalidade pós-transplante foi um pouco maior do que em outros estudos, mas acreditamos que exista viés devido ao baixo número de pacientes. Diante dos resultados acima mencionados, propomos que o transplante continue sendo uma alternativa terapêutica válida em nosso meio. Os desafios deste tratamento incluem a disponibilidade limitada de órgãos de doadores adequados, a toxicidade dos medicamentos imunossupressores necessários para prevenir a rejeição, prevenção e tratamento da bronquiolite obliterante, bem como maximizar o crescimento, desenvolvimento e qualidade de vida dos receptores.

National utilization, trends, and lung transplant outcomes of static versus portable ex vivo lung perfusion platforms.

BACKGROUND: This study compared utilization and outcomes of the 2 widely utilized ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) platforms in the United States: a static platform and a portable platform. METHODS: Adult (age 18 years or older) bilateral lung-only transplants utilizing EVLP between February 28, 2018, and December 31, 2022, in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. Predischarge acute rejection, intubation at 72 hours posttransplant, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours posttransplant, primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours posttransplant, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality were evaluated using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Overall, 607 (6.3%) lung transplants during the study period used EVLP (51.2% static, 48.8% portable). Static EVLP was primarily utilized in the eastern United States, whereas portable EVLP was primarily utilized in the western United States. Static EVLP donors were more likely to be donation after circulatory death (33.4% vs 26.0%; P = .005), have a >20 pack-year smoking history (13.5% vs 6.5%; P = .005), and be extended criteria donors (92.3% vs 85.0%; P = .013), whereas portable EVLP donors were more likely to be older than age 55 years (14.2% vs 8.0%; P = .02). Transplants utilizing the static and portable platforms had similar risk of acute rejection, intubation at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours, and posttransplant mortality at 30 days and 1 year (all P values > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The static and portable platforms had significant differences in donor characteristics and geographic distributions of utilization. Despite this, posttransplant survival was similar between the 2 EVLP platforms.

Laparoscopic fundoplication after lung transplantation does not appear to alter lung function trajectory.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to determine if allograft function in lung transplant (LTx) recipients improves or stabilizes after laparoscopic fundoplication (LF). The secondary aim was to examine the differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) before and after LF for various subgroups to identify patients who obtained a superior respiratory outcome after LF, and potential predictive factors for this outcome. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive LTx recipients undergoing LF at a single centre in Brisbane, Australia between 2004 and 2018. 149/431 proceeded to LF after clinical review and pH study. Regular pre- and post-fundoplication pulmonary function tests were collected from participants. Data were analyzed with linear mixed models, random intercept models, the Reliable Change Index (RCI), and graphical and visual analysis of the trajectory of FEV1. RESULTS: There was 100% follow-up. After Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparison was performed, none of the models demonstrated statistical significance. The Reliable Change Index showed one patient had a significant improvement in lung function across that time period, while nine had a significant reduction. The rate of change before and after LF was similar for the 132/149 patients for whom the first and last pre- and post-LF FEV1 values were available. A subset of patients had a considerable reduction in their FEV1 in the peri-operative period (i.e., a large difference between the first measurement post-LF and the final measurement pre-LF). CONCLUSION: In the largest published cohort to date, LF performed in a high-volume center did not appear to alter the reduction in allograft function seen with time.

Lung transplant waitlist outcomes among ABO blood groups vary based on disease severity.

BACKGROUND: Blood group O candidates have lower lung transplantation rates despite having the most common blood group. We postulated that waitlist outcomes among these candidates and those with other blood types vary with disease severity and lung allocation score (LAS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 32,772 waitlist candidates using the United Network of Organ Sharing registry from May 2005 to 2020. After identifying an interaction between blood group and LAS, we evaluated the association between blood group and waitlist outcomes within LAS quartiles using unadjusted and adjusted competing risk models. RESULTS: In the lowest LAS quartile, blood group O had a 20% reduced transplantation rate (SHR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.75-0.85) and higher waitlist death/removal (1.33, 95%CI: 1.15-1.55) compared with group A. Blood group AB had a 52% higher transplantation rate (SHR: 1.52, 95%CI: 1.34-1.73) in the lowest LAS quartile compared with group A. In the highest LAS quartile, there was no difference in transplantation rates between groups O and A. In contrast, group B had a 19% reduced transplantation rate (SHR, 0.81 95%CI: 0.73-0.89) and AB had a 28% reduced transplantation rate (SHR: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.61-0.86) in the highest LAS quartile. Additionally, groups B and AB had increased risk of waitlist death/removal in the highest LAS quartile compared with A (SHR: 1.27, 95%CI: 1.08-1.48; SHR: 1.31, 95%CI: 1.00-1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Waitlist outcomes among ABO blood groups vary depending on illness severity, which is represented by LAS. Blood group O has lower transplantation rates at low LAS while groups B and AB have lower transplantation rates at high LAS.

A Framework for Using Real-World Data and Health Outcomes Modeling to Evaluate Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Models.

OBJECTIVES: We propose a framework of health outcomes modeling with dynamic decision making and real-world data (RWD) to evaluate the potential utility of novel risk prediction models in clinical practice. Lung transplant (LTx) referral decisions in cystic fibrosis offer a complex case study. METHODS: We used longitudinal RWD for a cohort of adults (n = 4247) from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry to compare outcomes of an LTx referral policy based on machine learning (ML) mortality risk predictions to referral based on (1) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) alone and (2) heterogenous usual care (UC). We then developed a patient-level simulation model to project number of patients referred for LTx and 5-year survival, accounting for transplant availability, organ allocation policy, and heterogenous treatment effects. RESULTS: Only 12% of patients (95% confidence interval 11%-13%) were referred for LTx over 5 years under UC, compared with 19% (18%-20%) under FEV1 and 20% (19%-22%) under ML. Of 309 patients who died before LTx referral under UC, 31% (27%-36%) would have been referred under FEV1 and 40% (35%-45%) would have been referred under ML. Given a fixed supply of organs, differences in referral time did not lead to significant differences in transplants, pretransplant or post-transplant deaths, or overall survival in 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Health outcomes modeling with RWD may help to identify novel ML risk prediction models with high potential real-world clinical utility and rule out further investment in models that are unlikely to offer meaningful real-world benefits.

Associations between resources and practices of ILD centers and outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: data from the IPF-PRO Registry.

BACKGROUND: Performance benchmarks for the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have not been established. We used data from the IPF-PRO Registry, an observational registry of patients with IPF managed at sites across the US, to examine associations between the characteristics of the enrolling sites and patient outcomes. METHODS: An online survey was used to collect information on the resources, operations, and self-assessment practices of IPF-PRO Registry sites that enrolled ≥ 10 patients. Site variability in 1-year event rates of clinically relevant outcomes, including death, death or lung transplant, and hospitalization, was assessed. Models were adjusted for differences in patient case mix by adjusting for known predictors of each outcome. We assessed whether site-level heterogeneity existed for each patient-level outcome, and if so, we investigated potential drivers of the heterogeneity. RESULTS: All 27 sites that enrolled ≥ 10 patients returned the questionnaire. Most sites were actively following > 100 patients with IPF (70.4%), had a lung transplant program (66.7%), and had a dedicated ILD nurse leader (77.8%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the event rates of clinically relevant outcomes across the sites. After controlling for patient case mix, there were no outcomes for which the site variance component was significantly different from 0, but the p-value for hospitalization was 0.052. Starting/completing an ILD-related quality improvement project in the previous 2 years was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.44, 0.82]; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of data from patients with IPF managed at sites across the US found no site-specific characteristics or practices that were significantly associated with clinically relevant outcomes after adjusting for patient case mix. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01915511. Registered 5 August 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01915511.