RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognosis of lung transplantation recipients based on donor age. METHODS: A detailed search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for cohort studies on lung transplantation. The prognosis of lung transplant recipients was investigated based on the donor age, with the primary outcomes being 1-year overall survival (OS), 3-year OS, 5-year OS, and 5-year chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 10 cohort studies. Among the short-term outcomes, the older donor group demonstrated no significant difference from the young donor group in primary graft dysfunction within 72 hours, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, length of ventilator use, and intensive care unit hours. However, a longer hospital stay was associated with the older donor group. In terms of long-term outcomes, no difference was found between the two groups in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, and 5-year OS. Notably, patients with older donors exhibited a superior 5-year CLAD-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that older donors are not inferior to younger donors in terms of long-term and short-term recipient outcomes. Lung transplantation using older donors is a potential therapeutic option after rigorous evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Selección de Donante , Adulto Joven , Supervivencia de Injerto , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/mortalidad , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/etiología , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Background and Objective: Lung transplantation is the only life-extending therapy for end-stage pulmonary disease patients, but its risks necessitate an understanding of outcome predictors, with the frailty index and nutritional status being key assessment tools. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between preoperative frailty and nutritional indexes and the postoperative mortality rate in patients receiving lung transplants, and to determine which measure is a more potent predictor of outcomes. Materials and Methods: This study reviewed 185 adults who received lung transplants at a single medical center between January 2013 and May 2023. We primarily focused on postoperative 7-year overall survival. Other outcomes measured were short-term mortalities, acute rejection, kidney complications, infections, and re-transplantation. We compared the predictive abilities of preoperative nutritional and frailty indicators for survival using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and identified factors affecting survival through regression analyses. Results: There were no significant differences in preoperative nutritional indicators between survivors and non-survivors. However, preoperative frailty indicators did differ significantly between these groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that the American Society of Anesthesiologists Class V, clinical frailty scale, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were key predictors of 7-year overall survival. Of these, the CCI had the strongest predictive ability with an area under the curve of 0.755, followed by the modified frailty index at 0.731. Conclusions: Our study indicates that for critically ill patients undergoing lung transplantation, frailty indexes derived from preoperative patient history and functional autonomy are more effective in forecasting postoperative outcomes, including survival, than indexes related to preoperative nutritional status.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Fragilidad , Trasplante de Pulmón , Estado Nutricional , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Curva ROC , Evaluación NutricionalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to examine the prognosis of patients with acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) treated with lung transplantation compared to those with stable interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We conducted a detailed search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with the primary outcomes being overall survival (OS), acute cellular rejection (ACR), primary graft dysfunction (PGD), and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Five cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 183 patients enrolled in the AE-ILD group and 337 patients in the stable-ILD group. The results showed that in regard to perioperative outcomes, the AE-ILD group did not differ from the stable-ILD group in the incidence of ACR (relative risks [RR] = 0.34, p = 0.44) and the incidence of PGD â ¢ (RR = 0.53, p = 0.43), but had a longer LOS (mean difference = 9.15, p = 0.02). Regarding prognosis, the two also did not differ in 90-day OS (RR = 0.97, p = 0.59), 1-year OS (RR = 1.05, p = 0.66), and 3-year OS (RR = 0.91, p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Our study concluded that the efficacy of lung transplantation in patients with AE-ILD is not inferior to that of patients with stable ILD. Lung transplantation is one of the potential treatments for patients with AE-ILD.
Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Rechazo de Injerto , Tiempo de Internación , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Trasplante de Pulmón , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/cirugía , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/mortalidad , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/diagnóstico , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/etiología , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are common following lung transplantation (LuTx), yet their role in graft damage is inconclusive. Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) is the main read-out of DSA diagnostics; however its value is often disregarded when analyzing unwanted post-transplant outcomes such as graft loss or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Here we aim to evaluate an MFI stratification method in these outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of 87 LuTx recipients has been analyzed, in which a cutoff of 8000 MFI has been determined for high MFI based on clinically relevant data. Accordingly, recipients were divided into DSA-negative, DSA-low and DSA-high subgroups. Both graft survival and CLAD-free survival were evaluated. Among factors that may contribute to DSA development we analyzed Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infection in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens. RESULTS: High MFI DSAs contributed to clinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and were associated with significantly worse graft (HR: 5.77, p < 0.0001) and CLAD-free survival (HR: 6.47, p = 0.019) compared to low or negative MFI DSA levels. Analysis of BAL specimens revealed a strong correlation between DSA status, P. aeruginosa infection and BAL neutrophilia. DSA-high status and clinical AMR were both independent prognosticators for decreased graft and CLAD-free survival in our multivariate Cox-regression models, whereas BAL neutrophilia was associated with worse graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: P. aeruginosa infection rates are elevated in recipients with a strong DSA response. Our results indicate that the simultaneous interpretation of MFI values and BAL neutrophilia is a feasible approach for risk evaluation and may help clinicians when to initiate DSA desensitization therapy, as early intervention could improve prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante de Pulmón , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/inmunología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/mortalidad , Adulto , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Donantes de Tejidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Estudios de Cohortes , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , AncianoRESUMEN
Night work is frequently associated with sleep deprivation and is associated with greater surgical and medical complications. Lung transplantation (LT) is carried out both at night and during the day and involves many medical healthcare workers. The goal of the study was to compare morbidity and mortality between LT recipients according to LT operative time. We performed a retrospective, observational, single-center study. When the procedure started between 6 AM and 6 PM, the patient was allocated to the Daytime group. If the procedure started between 6 PM and 6 AM, the patient was allocated to the Nighttime group. Between January 2015 and December 2020, 253 patients were included. A total of 168 (66%) patients were classified into the Day group, and 85 (34%) patients were classified into the Night group. Lung Donors' general characteristics were similar between the groups. The 90-day and one-year mortality rates were similar between the groups (90-days: n = 13 (15%) vs. n = 26 (15%), p = 0.970; 1 year: n = 18 (21%) vs. n = 42 (25%), p = 0.499). Daytime LT was associated with more one-year airway dehiscence (n = 36 (21%) vs. n = 6 (7.1%), p = 0.004). In conclusion, among patients who underwent LT, there was no significant association between operative time and survival.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Tempo Operativo , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Privación de Sueño/complicaciones , AncianoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between driving pressure (ΔP) and 90-day mortality in patients following lung transplantation (LTx) in patients who developed primary graft dysfunction (PGD). METHODS: This prospective, observational study involved consecutive patients who, following LTx, were admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2022 to January 2023. Patients were separated into two groups according to ΔP at time of admission (i.e., low, ≤15 cmH2O or high, >15 cmH2O). Postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 104 patients were involved in the study, and of these, 69 were included in the low ΔP group and 35 in the high ΔP group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 90-day mortality showed a statistically significant difference between groups with survival better in the low ΔP group compared with the high ΔP group. According to Cox proportional regression model, the variables independently associated with 90-day mortality were ΔP and pneumonia. Significantly more patients in the high ΔP group than the low ΔP group had PGD grade 3 (PGD3), pneumonia, required tracheostomy, and had prolonged postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) time, postoperative ventilator time, and ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Driving pressure appears to have the ability to predict PGD3 and 90-day mortality of patients following LTx. Further studies are required to confirm our results.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/mortalidad , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/etiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Presión , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Lung graft allocation can be based on a score (Lung Allocation Score) as in the USA or sequential proposals combined with a discrete priority model as in France. We aimed to analyse the impact of allocation policy on the outcome of urgent lung transplantation (LT). METHODS: US United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and French Cristal databases were retrospectively reviewed to analyse LT performed between 2007 and 2017. We analysed the mortality risk of urgent LT by fitting Cox models and adjusted Restricted Mean Survival Time. We then compared the outcome after urgent LT in the UNOS and Cristal groups using a propensity score matching. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema and redo LT, 3775 and 12 561 patients underwent urgent LT and non-urgent LT in the USA while 600 and 2071 patients underwent urgent LT and non-urgent LT in France. In univariate analysis, urgent LT was associated with an HR for death of 1.24 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.48) in the Cristal group and 1.12 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.19) in the UNOS group. In multivariate analysis, the effect of urgent LT was attenuated and no longer statistically significant in the Cristal database (HR 1.1 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.33)) while it remained constant and statistically significant in the UNOS database (HR 1.12 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.2)). Survival comparison of urgent LT patients between the two countries was significantly different in favour of the UNOS group (1-year survival rates 84.1% (80.9%-87.3%) vs 75.4% (71.8%-79.1%) and 3-year survival rates 66.3% (61.9%-71.1%) vs 62.7% (58.5%-67.1%), respectively). CONCLUSION: Urgent LT is associated with adverse outcome in the USA and in France with a better prognosis in the US score-based system taking post-transplant survival into account. This difference between two healthcare systems is multifactorial.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Francia/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Puntaje de Propensión , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of immunosuppression management on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study in a cohort of 358 lung transplant recipients (LTx) over the period from March 2020 to April 2022. All included symptomatic patients had at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 rt-PCR. We used a composite primary outcome for COVID-19 including increased need for oxygen since the hospital admission, ICU transfer, and in-hospital mortality. We assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses the risk factors for poor outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, we included 91 LTx who contracted COVID-19. The COVID-19 in-hospital mortality rate reached 4.4%. By hierarchical clustering, we found a strong and independent association between the composite poor outcome and the discontinuation of at least one immunosuppressive molecule among tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and everolimus. Obesity (OR = 16, 95%CI (1.96; 167), p = 0.01) and chronic renal failure (OR = 4.6, 95%CI (1.4; 18), p = 0.01) were also independently associated with the composite poor outcome. Conversely, full vaccination was protective (OR = 0.23, 95%CI (0.046; 0.89), p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The administration of immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, cyclocporine or everolimus can have a protective effect in LTx with COVID-19, probably related to their intrinsic antiviral capacity.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Pulmón , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tacrolimus/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Early extubation has been adopted in many settings within cardiothoracic surgery, with several advantages for patients. We sought to determine the association of timing of extubation in lung transplant recipients' short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Adult, primary lung transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Recipients were stratified based on the duration of postoperative ventilation: 1) None (NV); 2) <5 Days (<5D); and 3) 5+ Days (5+D). Comparative statistics were performed, and both unadjusted and adjusted survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier Methods and a Cox proportional hazard model. A multivariable model including recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics was created to examine factors associated with NV. RESULTS: 28,575 recipients were identified (NV = 960, <5D = 21,959, 5+D = 5656). The NV group had shorter median length of stay (P < 0.01) and lower incidence of postoperative dialysis (P < 0.01). The NV and <5D groups had similar survival, while 5+D recipients had decreased survival (P < 0.01). The multivariable model demonstrated increased donor BMI, center volume, ischemic time, single lung transplant, and transplantation between 2011 and 2015 were associated with NV (P < 0.01 for all). Use of donation after cardiac death donors and transplantation between 2016 and 2021 was associated with postoperative ventilator use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients extubated early after lung transplantation have a shorter median length of stay without an associated increase in mortality. While not all patients are appropriate for earlier extubation, it is possible to extubate patients early following lung transplant. Further efforts are necessary to help expand this practice and ensure its' success for recipients.
Asunto(s)
Extubación Traqueal , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Extubación Traqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estimación de Kaplan-MeierRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we analyzed the effects of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and mixed infection on the perioperative prognosis of lung transplant recipients and studied statistics on antibiotic resistance in P aeruginosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective casecontrol study. We collected data on lung transplant recipients with combined lower respiratory tract P aeruginosa infection within 48 hours after lung transplant at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from August 2018 to April 2022. We grouped recipients according to P aeruginosa resistance to carbapenem antibiotics and summarized the clinical characteristics of carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa infection. We analyzed the effects of carbapenemresistant P aeruginosa infection and mixed infections on all-cause mortality 30 days after lung transplant by Cox regression. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to plot survival curves. RESULTS: Patients in the carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa group had a higher all-cause mortality rate than those in the carbapenem-sensitive P aeruginosa group at both 7 days (6 patients [22.3%] vs 2 patients [4.5%]; P = .022) and 30 days (12 patients [44.4%] vs 7 patients [15.9%]; P = .003) after lung transplant. In multivariate analysis, both carbapenemresistant P aeruginosa infection and P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection were independent risk factors for death 30 days after transplant in lung transplant recipients (P < .05). In subgroup analysis, carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection increased the risk of death 30 days after transplant in lung transplant recipients compared with carbapenem-sensitive P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection (12 patients [60%] vs 6 patients [19.4%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Combined lower respiratory tract carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa infection and P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection early after lung transplant increased the risk of 30-day mortality after lung transplant.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Carbapenémicos , Coinfección , Trasplante de Pulmón , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/mortalidad , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Resistencia betalactámicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Identifying contributors to lung transplant survival is vital in mitigating mortality. To enhance individualized mortality estimation and determine variable interaction, we employed a survival tree algorithm utilizing recipient and donor data. METHODS: United Network Organ Sharing data (2000-2021) were queried for single and double lung transplants in adult patients. Graft survival time <7 d was excluded. Sixty preoperative and immediate postoperative factors were evaluated with stepwise logistic regression on mortality; final model variables were included in survival tree modeling. Data were split into training and testing sets and additionally validated with 10-fold cross validation. Survival tree pruning and model selection was based on Akaike information criteria and log-likelihood values. Estimated survival probabilities and log-rank pairwise comparisons between subgroups were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 27,296 lung transplant patients (8175 single; 19,121 double lung) were included. Stepwise logistic regression yielded 47 significant variables associated with mortality. Survival tree modeling returned six significant factors: recipient age, length of stay from transplant to discharge, recipient ventilator duration post-transplant, double lung transplant, recipient reintubation post-transplant, and donor cytomegalovirus status. Eight subgroups consisting of combinations of these factors were identified with distinct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. CONCLUSIONS: Survival trees provide the ability to understand the effects and interactions of covariates on survival after lung transplantation. Individualized survival probability with this technique found that preoperative and postoperative factors influence survival after lung transplantation. Thus, preoperative patient counseling should acknowledge a degree of uncertainty given the influence of postoperative factors.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Adulto , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Algoritmos , Supervivencia de InjertoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cold ischemia time (CIT) influences short- and long-term outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Most studies proved that prolonged CIT causes increased mortality. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prolonged CIT on patient survival time after lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: The retrospective study group consisted of 139 patients who underwent double LTx in a single center between January 2018 and August 2022. Prolonged ischemic time (PIT) was defined as total ischemic time >6 hours and divided into smaller time intervals according to increasing PIT (6-8, 8-10, 10-12, >12 hours). The assessed outcomes were 1- and 4-year survival. RESULTS: Among the study group, PIT was observed in 98% (n = 137), and its average value was 10.33 hours. The prolonged CIT of 6 to 8 hours occurred in 10% (n = 14), 8 to 10 hours in 34% (n = 47), 10 to 12 hours in 36% (n = 49), and >12 hours in 20% (n = 27). In a comparison of 1-year survival between the PIT 6- to 10-hour group and the >10-hour arm (88% vs 78%), the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION: PIT is a risk factor for reduced long-term survival in LTx recipients. Increasing PIT may be associated with higher mortality at 1 and 4 years. All efforts to reduce the duration of ischemic time can benefit patient survival after LTx.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Fría , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: As life expectancies continue to increase, a greater proportion of older patients will require lung transplants (LTs). However, there are no well-defined age cutoffs for which LT can be performed safely. At our high-volume LT centre, we explored outcomes for LT recipients ≥70 vs <70 years old. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of survival after LT among older recipients. Data were stratified by recipient age (≥70 vs <70 years old) and procedure type (single versus double LT). Demographics and clinical variables were compared using Chi-square test and 2 sample t-test. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test with propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 988 LTs were performed at our centre over 10 years, including 289 LTs in patients ≥70 years old and 699 LTs in patients <70 years old. The recipient groups differed significantly by race (P < 0.0001), sex (P = 0.003) and disease aetiology (P < 0.0001). Older patients were less likely to receive a double LT compared to younger patients (P < 0.0001) and had lower rates of intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (P = 0.019) and shorter length of stay (P = 0.001). Both groups had overall high 1-year survival (85.8% vs 89.1%, respectively). Survival did not differ between groups after propensity matching (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed high survival for older and younger LT recipients. There were no statistically significant differences observed in survival between the groups after propensity matching, however, a trend in favour of younger patients was observed.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Puntaje de Propensión , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is one of the most common treatment options for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the choice between single and double lung transplantation for these patients remains a matter of debate. Therefore, we performed a systematic search of medical databases for studies on single lung transplantation, double lung transplantation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: The rate ratio and hazard ratio of survival were analyzed. The meta-analysis included 15 case-control and retrospective registry studies. RESULTS: The rate ratios of the 3-year survival (0.937 and P = 0.041) and 5-year survival (0.775 and P = 0.000) were lower for single lung transplantation than for double lung transplantation. However, the hazard ratio did not differ significantly between the two. CONCLUSIONS: Double lung transplantation was found to provide better benefits than single lung transplantation in terms of the long-term survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Trasplante de Pulmón/métodos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the post-transplant survival of untwinned single lung transplantation (SLT) to twinned SLT. In untwinned SLT, the contralateral lung is judged unsuitable for transplantation and might affect the lung graft within the donor body and recipient survival after SLT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 SLT recipients at our center, divided into untwinned SLT and twinned SLT groups. The demographics of donors and recipients, surgical characteristics, complications, mortality, and survival rates were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in recipient and donor demographics between the two groups. Surgical characteristics showed no significant differences. Microbiological findings of the transplanted lungs indicated a low incidence of positive cultures in both groups. 3-month to 1-year mortality and overall survival rates were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: At our institution, both untwinned and twinned SLT procedures exhibited excellent survival rates without significant differences between the two procedures. The favorable outcomes observed may be associated with the strategic advantages of Japan's MC system and the diligent management of marginal donor lungs although this requires further investigation to elucidate the specific contributory factors.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/métodos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Selección de Donante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Factores de Tiempo , Japón , Factores de Riesgo , Pulmón/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) are acute, significant respiratory deteriorations in patients with IPF and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. It remains unclear how AE-IPF impacts lung transplant (LTX) outcomes. METHODS: All adult patients who were listed for LTX between July 2005 and October 2020 at the Loyola University Medical Center with a diagnosis of IPF were included. Pretransplant characteristics and posttransplant outcomes were gathered via retrospective chart review. The primary outcome was short- and long-term survival for patients transplanted during stable IPF versus those with AE-IPF. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were included in this study, 17.6% of whom were transplanted during AE-IPF. AE-IPF patients were more likely to have higher oxygen needs pretransplant, have higher lung allocation score, and were more likely to be intubated or be on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as compared with stable IPF patients. Survival by AE status at transplant did not differ at 90 d or 1 y posttransplantation. There were also no significant differences in rates of severe primary graft dysfunction or acute rejection within 1 y. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AE-IPF were more likely to have higher oxygenation requirements and higher lung allocation score at the time of LTX than those with stable IPF. Despite this, there were no differences in survival at 90 d, 1 y, or 3 y, or differences in incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction or acute cellular rejection. Transplantation of patients with AE-IPF has clinical outcomes comparable with transplantation of patients with stable IPF. This contrasts with previous studies examining LTX in patients with AE-IPF.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/cirugía , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Rechazo de Injerto , Factores de Riesgo , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Factores de Tiempo , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/etiología , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/mortalidad , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study compared utilization and outcomes of the 2 widely utilized ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) platforms in the United States: a static platform and a portable platform. METHODS: Adult (age 18 years or older) bilateral lung-only transplants utilizing EVLP between February 28, 2018, and December 31, 2022, in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. Predischarge acute rejection, intubation at 72 hours posttransplant, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours posttransplant, primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours posttransplant, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality were evaluated using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Overall, 607 (6.3%) lung transplants during the study period used EVLP (51.2% static, 48.8% portable). Static EVLP was primarily utilized in the eastern United States, whereas portable EVLP was primarily utilized in the western United States. Static EVLP donors were more likely to be donation after circulatory death (33.4% vs 26.0%; P = .005), have a >20 pack-year smoking history (13.5% vs 6.5%; P = .005), and be extended criteria donors (92.3% vs 85.0%; P = .013), whereas portable EVLP donors were more likely to be older than age 55 years (14.2% vs 8.0%; P = .02). Transplants utilizing the static and portable platforms had similar risk of acute rejection, intubation at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours, and posttransplant mortality at 30 days and 1 year (all P values > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The static and portable platforms had significant differences in donor characteristics and geographic distributions of utilization. Despite this, posttransplant survival was similar between the 2 EVLP platforms.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Perfusión , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Pulmón/tendencias , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Perfusión/métodos , Perfusión/mortalidad , Perfusión/efectos adversos , Perfusión/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Bases de Datos Factuales , Factores de Riesgo , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reoperative lung transplantation (LTx) survival has improved over time such that a growing number of patients may present for third-time LTx (L3Tx). To understand the safety of L3Tx, we evaluated perioperative outcomes and 3-year survival after L3Tx at a high-volume US LTx center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent bilateral L3Tx at our institution. Using an optimal matching technique, a primary LTx (L1Tx) cohort was matched 1:2 and a second-time LTx (L2Tx) cohort 1:1. Recipient, operative, and donor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and 3-year survival were compared among L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx groups. RESULTS: Eleven L3Tx, 11 L2Tx, and 22 L1Tx recipients were included. Among L3Tx recipients, median age at transplant was 37 years and most (73%) had cystic fibrosis. L3Tx was performed median 6.0 and 10.6 years after L2Tx and L1Tx, respectively. Compared to L1Tx and L2Tx recipients, L3Tx recipients had greater intraoperative transfusion requirements, a higher incidence of postoperative complications, and a higher rate of unplanned reoperation. Rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, reintubation, and in-hospital mortality were similar among groups. There were no differences in 3-year patient (log-rank p = 0.61) or rejection-free survival (log-rank p = 0.34) after L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, L3Tx was associated with similar perioperative outcomes and 3-year patient survival compared to L1Tx and L2Tx. L3Tx represents the only safe treatment option for patients with allograft failure after L2Tx; however, further investigation is needed to understand the long-term survival and durability of L3Tx.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Reoperación , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the use of lung transplant as a lifesaving therapy for patients with irreversible lung injury. Limited information is currently available regarding the outcomes associated with this treatment modality. Objective: To describe the outcomes following lung transplant for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, lung transplant recipient and donor characteristics and outcomes following lung transplant for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis were extracted from the US United Network for Organ Sharing database from March 2020 to August 2022 with a median (IQR) follow-up period of 186 (64-359) days in the acute respiratory distress syndrome group and 181 (40-350) days in the pulmonary fibrosis group. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional regression models were used to examine the association of certain variables with overall survival. Exposures: Lung transplant following COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival and graft failure rates. Results: Among 385 included patients undergoing lung transplant, 195 had COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (142 male [72.8%]; median [IQR] age, 46 [38-54] years; median [IQR] allocation score, 88.3 [80.5-91.1]) and 190 had COVID-19-related pulmonary fibrosis (150 male [78.9%]; median [IQR] age, 54 [45-62]; median [IQR] allocation score, 78.5 [47.7-88.3]). There were 16 instances of acute rejection (8.7%) in the acute respiratory distress syndrome group and 15 (8.6%) in the pulmonary fibrosis group. The 1-, 6-, and 12- month overall survival rates were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94) for the acute respiratory distress syndrome cohort and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90) for the pulmonary fibrosis cohort. Freedom from graft failure rates were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93) in the 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up periods in the acute respiratory distress cohort and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74-0.91) in the pulmonary fibrosis cohort, respectively. Receiving a graft from a donor with a heavy and prolonged history of smoking was associated with worse overall survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome cohort, whereas the characteristics associated with worse overall survival in the pulmonary fibrosis cohort included female recipient, male donor, and high recipient body mass index. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, outcomes following lung transplant were similar in patients with irreversible respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and those with other pretransplant etiologies.