Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection correlates with high MFI donor-specific antibody development following lung transplantation with consequential graft loss and shortened CLAD-free survival.

BACKGROUND: Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are common following lung transplantation (LuTx), yet their role in graft damage is inconclusive. Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) is the main read-out of DSA diagnostics; however its value is often disregarded when analyzing unwanted post-transplant outcomes such as graft loss or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Here we aim to evaluate an MFI stratification method in these outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of 87 LuTx recipients has been analyzed, in which a cutoff of 8000 MFI has been determined for high MFI based on clinically relevant data. Accordingly, recipients were divided into DSA-negative, DSA-low and DSA-high subgroups. Both graft survival and CLAD-free survival were evaluated. Among factors that may contribute to DSA development we analyzed Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infection in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens. RESULTS: High MFI DSAs contributed to clinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and were associated with significantly worse graft (HR: 5.77, p < 0.0001) and CLAD-free survival (HR: 6.47, p = 0.019) compared to low or negative MFI DSA levels. Analysis of BAL specimens revealed a strong correlation between DSA status, P. aeruginosa infection and BAL neutrophilia. DSA-high status and clinical AMR were both independent prognosticators for decreased graft and CLAD-free survival in our multivariate Cox-regression models, whereas BAL neutrophilia was associated with worse graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: P. aeruginosa infection rates are elevated in recipients with a strong DSA response. Our results indicate that the simultaneous interpretation of MFI values and BAL neutrophilia is a feasible approach for risk evaluation and may help clinicians when to initiate DSA desensitization therapy, as early intervention could improve prognosis.

Prognosis of Lung Transplantation in Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Interstitial Lung Disease: A Meta-Analysis Based on Cohort Studies.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to examine the prognosis of patients with acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) treated with lung transplantation compared to those with stable interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We conducted a detailed search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with the primary outcomes being overall survival (OS), acute cellular rejection (ACR), primary graft dysfunction (PGD), and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Five cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 183 patients enrolled in the AE-ILD group and 337 patients in the stable-ILD group. The results showed that in regard to perioperative outcomes, the AE-ILD group did not differ from the stable-ILD group in the incidence of ACR (relative risks [RR] = 0.34, p = 0.44) and the incidence of PGD Ⅲ (RR = 0.53, p = 0.43), but had a longer LOS (mean difference = 9.15, p = 0.02). Regarding prognosis, the two also did not differ in 90-day OS (RR = 0.97, p = 0.59), 1-year OS (RR = 1.05, p = 0.66), and 3-year OS (RR = 0.91, p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Our study concluded that the efficacy of lung transplantation in patients with AE-ILD is not inferior to that of patients with stable ILD. Lung transplantation is one of the potential treatments for patients with AE-ILD.

Driving pressure association with mortality in post-lung transplant patients: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between driving pressure (ΔP) and 90-day mortality in patients following lung transplantation (LTx) in patients who developed primary graft dysfunction (PGD). METHODS: This prospective, observational study involved consecutive patients who, following LTx, were admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2022 to January 2023. Patients were separated into two groups according to ΔP at time of admission (i.e., low, ≤15 cmH2O or high, >15 cmH2O). Postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 104 patients were involved in the study, and of these, 69 were included in the low ΔP group and 35 in the high ΔP group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 90-day mortality showed a statistically significant difference between groups with survival better in the low ΔP group compared with the high ΔP group. According to Cox proportional regression model, the variables independently associated with 90-day mortality were ΔP and pneumonia. Significantly more patients in the high ΔP group than the low ΔP group had PGD grade 3 (PGD3), pneumonia, required tracheostomy, and had prolonged postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) time, postoperative ventilator time, and ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Driving pressure appears to have the ability to predict PGD3 and 90-day mortality of patients following LTx. Further studies are required to confirm our results.

Early Extubation: Who Qualifies Postoperatively in Lung Transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: Early extubation has been adopted in many settings within cardiothoracic surgery, with several advantages for patients. We sought to determine the association of timing of extubation in lung transplant recipients' short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Adult, primary lung transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Recipients were stratified based on the duration of postoperative ventilation: 1) None (NV); 2) <5 Days (<5D); and 3) 5+ Days (5+D). Comparative statistics were performed, and both unadjusted and adjusted survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier Methods and a Cox proportional hazard model. A multivariable model including recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics was created to examine factors associated with NV. RESULTS: 28,575 recipients were identified (NV = 960, <5D = 21,959, 5+D = 5656). The NV group had shorter median length of stay (P < 0.01) and lower incidence of postoperative dialysis (P < 0.01). The NV and <5D groups had similar survival, while 5+D recipients had decreased survival (P < 0.01). The multivariable model demonstrated increased donor BMI, center volume, ischemic time, single lung transplant, and transplantation between 2011 and 2015 were associated with NV (P < 0.01 for all). Use of donation after cardiac death donors and transplantation between 2016 and 2021 was associated with postoperative ventilator use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients extubated early after lung transplantation have a shorter median length of stay without an associated increase in mortality. While not all patients are appropriate for earlier extubation, it is possible to extubate patients early following lung transplant. Further efforts are necessary to help expand this practice and ensure its' success for recipients.

Survival Tree Provides Individualized Estimates of Survival After Lung Transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Identifying contributors to lung transplant survival is vital in mitigating mortality. To enhance individualized mortality estimation and determine variable interaction, we employed a survival tree algorithm utilizing recipient and donor data. METHODS: United Network Organ Sharing data (2000-2021) were queried for single and double lung transplants in adult patients. Graft survival time <7 d was excluded. Sixty preoperative and immediate postoperative factors were evaluated with stepwise logistic regression on mortality; final model variables were included in survival tree modeling. Data were split into training and testing sets and additionally validated with 10-fold cross validation. Survival tree pruning and model selection was based on Akaike information criteria and log-likelihood values. Estimated survival probabilities and log-rank pairwise comparisons between subgroups were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 27,296 lung transplant patients (8175 single; 19,121 double lung) were included. Stepwise logistic regression yielded 47 significant variables associated with mortality. Survival tree modeling returned six significant factors: recipient age, length of stay from transplant to discharge, recipient ventilator duration post-transplant, double lung transplant, recipient reintubation post-transplant, and donor cytomegalovirus status. Eight subgroups consisting of combinations of these factors were identified with distinct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. CONCLUSIONS: Survival trees provide the ability to understand the effects and interactions of covariates on survival after lung transplantation. Individualized survival probability with this technique found that preoperative and postoperative factors influence survival after lung transplantation. Thus, preoperative patient counseling should acknowledge a degree of uncertainty given the influence of postoperative factors.

Impact of Prolonged Cold Ischemia Time on Long-Term Survival in Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cold ischemia time (CIT) influences short- and long-term outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Most studies proved that prolonged CIT causes increased mortality. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prolonged CIT on patient survival time after lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: The retrospective study group consisted of 139 patients who underwent double LTx in a single center between January 2018 and August 2022. Prolonged ischemic time (PIT) was defined as total ischemic time >6 hours and divided into smaller time intervals according to increasing PIT (6-8, 8-10, 10-12, >12 hours). The assessed outcomes were 1- and 4-year survival. RESULTS: Among the study group, PIT was observed in 98% (n = 137), and its average value was 10.33 hours. The prolonged CIT of 6 to 8 hours occurred in 10% (n = 14), 8 to 10 hours in 34% (n = 47), 10 to 12 hours in 36% (n = 49), and >12 hours in 20% (n = 27). In a comparison of 1-year survival between the PIT 6- to 10-hour group and the >10-hour arm (88% vs 78%), the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION: PIT is a risk factor for reduced long-term survival in LTx recipients. Increasing PIT may be associated with higher mortality at 1 and 4 years. All efforts to reduce the duration of ischemic time can benefit patient survival after LTx.

Management of immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients and COVID-19 outcomes: an observational retrospective cohort-study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of immunosuppression management on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study in a cohort of 358 lung transplant recipients (LTx) over the period from March 2020 to April 2022. All included symptomatic patients had at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 rt-PCR. We used a composite primary outcome for COVID-19 including increased need for oxygen since the hospital admission, ICU transfer, and in-hospital mortality. We assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses the risk factors for poor outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, we included 91 LTx who contracted COVID-19. The COVID-19 in-hospital mortality rate reached 4.4%. By hierarchical clustering, we found a strong and independent association between the composite poor outcome and the discontinuation of at least one immunosuppressive molecule among tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and everolimus. Obesity (OR = 16, 95%CI (1.96; 167), p = 0.01) and chronic renal failure (OR = 4.6, 95%CI (1.4; 18), p = 0.01) were also independently associated with the composite poor outcome. Conversely, full vaccination was protective (OR = 0.23, 95%CI (0.046; 0.89), p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The administration of immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, cyclocporine or everolimus can have a protective effect in LTx with COVID-19, probably related to their intrinsic antiviral capacity.

Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection and Mixed Infections Are Risk Factors for Poor Outcome After Lung Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we analyzed the effects of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and mixed infection on the perioperative prognosis of lung transplant recipients and studied statistics on antibiotic resistance in P aeruginosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective casecontrol study. We collected data on lung transplant recipients with combined lower respiratory tract P aeruginosa infection within 48 hours after lung transplant at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from August 2018 to April 2022. We grouped recipients according to P aeruginosa resistance to carbapenem antibiotics and summarized the clinical characteristics of carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa infection. We analyzed the effects of carbapenemresistant P aeruginosa infection and mixed infections on all-cause mortality 30 days after lung transplant by Cox regression. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to plot survival curves. RESULTS: Patients in the carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa group had a higher all-cause mortality rate than those in the carbapenem-sensitive P aeruginosa group at both 7 days (6 patients [22.3%] vs 2 patients [4.5%]; P = .022) and 30 days (12 patients [44.4%] vs 7 patients [15.9%]; P = .003) after lung transplant. In multivariate analysis, both carbapenemresistant P aeruginosa infection and P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection were independent risk factors for death 30 days after transplant in lung transplant recipients (P < .05). In subgroup analysis, carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection increased the risk of death 30 days after transplant in lung transplant recipients compared with carbapenem-sensitive P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection (12 patients [60%] vs 6 patients [19.4%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Combined lower respiratory tract carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa infection and P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection early after lung transplant increased the risk of 30-day mortality after lung transplant.

A single-centre analysis of lung transplantation outcomes in recipients aged 70 or older.

OBJECTIVES: As life expectancies continue to increase, a greater proportion of older patients will require lung transplants (LTs). However, there are no well-defined age cutoffs for which LT can be performed safely. At our high-volume LT centre, we explored outcomes for LT recipients ≥70 vs <70 years old. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of survival after LT among older recipients. Data were stratified by recipient age (≥70 vs <70 years old) and procedure type (single versus double LT). Demographics and clinical variables were compared using Chi-square test and 2 sample t-test. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test with propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 988 LTs were performed at our centre over 10 years, including 289 LTs in patients ≥70 years old and 699 LTs in patients <70 years old. The recipient groups differed significantly by race (P < 0.0001), sex (P = 0.003) and disease aetiology (P < 0.0001). Older patients were less likely to receive a double LT compared to younger patients (P < 0.0001) and had lower rates of intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (P = 0.019) and shorter length of stay (P = 0.001). Both groups had overall high 1-year survival (85.8% vs 89.1%, respectively). Survival did not differ between groups after propensity matching (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed high survival for older and younger LT recipients. There were no statistically significant differences observed in survival between the groups after propensity matching, however, a trend in favour of younger patients was observed.

Single lung transplantation using a lung graft from a donor whose contralateral lung is not suitable for lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the post-transplant survival of untwinned single lung transplantation (SLT) to twinned SLT. In untwinned SLT, the contralateral lung is judged unsuitable for transplantation and might affect the lung graft within the donor body and recipient survival after SLT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 SLT recipients at our center, divided into untwinned SLT and twinned SLT groups. The demographics of donors and recipients, surgical characteristics, complications, mortality, and survival rates were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in recipient and donor demographics between the two groups. Surgical characteristics showed no significant differences. Microbiological findings of the transplanted lungs indicated a low incidence of positive cultures in both groups. 3-month to 1-year mortality and overall survival rates were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: At our institution, both untwinned and twinned SLT procedures exhibited excellent survival rates without significant differences between the two procedures. The favorable outcomes observed may be associated with the strategic advantages of Japan's MC system and the diligent management of marginal donor lungs although this requires further investigation to elucidate the specific contributory factors.

Impact of Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Lung Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) are acute, significant respiratory deteriorations in patients with IPF and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. It remains unclear how AE-IPF impacts lung transplant (LTX) outcomes. METHODS: All adult patients who were listed for LTX between July 2005 and October 2020 at the Loyola University Medical Center with a diagnosis of IPF were included. Pretransplant characteristics and posttransplant outcomes were gathered via retrospective chart review. The primary outcome was short- and long-term survival for patients transplanted during stable IPF versus those with AE-IPF. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were included in this study, 17.6% of whom were transplanted during AE-IPF. AE-IPF patients were more likely to have higher oxygen needs pretransplant, have higher lung allocation score, and were more likely to be intubated or be on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as compared with stable IPF patients. Survival by AE status at transplant did not differ at 90 d or 1 y posttransplantation. There were also no significant differences in rates of severe primary graft dysfunction or acute rejection within 1 y. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AE-IPF were more likely to have higher oxygenation requirements and higher lung allocation score at the time of LTX than those with stable IPF. Despite this, there were no differences in survival at 90 d, 1 y, or 3 y, or differences in incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction or acute cellular rejection. Transplantation of patients with AE-IPF has clinical outcomes comparable with transplantation of patients with stable IPF. This contrasts with previous studies examining LTX in patients with AE-IPF.

Short-term outcomes after third-time lung transplantation: A single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Reoperative lung transplantation (LTx) survival has improved over time such that a growing number of patients may present for third-time LTx (L3Tx). To understand the safety of L3Tx, we evaluated perioperative outcomes and 3-year survival after L3Tx at a high-volume US LTx center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent bilateral L3Tx at our institution. Using an optimal matching technique, a primary LTx (L1Tx) cohort was matched 1:2 and a second-time LTx (L2Tx) cohort 1:1. Recipient, operative, and donor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and 3-year survival were compared among L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx groups. RESULTS: Eleven L3Tx, 11 L2Tx, and 22 L1Tx recipients were included. Among L3Tx recipients, median age at transplant was 37 years and most (73%) had cystic fibrosis. L3Tx was performed median 6.0 and 10.6 years after L2Tx and L1Tx, respectively. Compared to L1Tx and L2Tx recipients, L3Tx recipients had greater intraoperative transfusion requirements, a higher incidence of postoperative complications, and a higher rate of unplanned reoperation. Rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, reintubation, and in-hospital mortality were similar among groups. There were no differences in 3-year patient (log-rank p = 0.61) or rejection-free survival (log-rank p = 0.34) after L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, L3Tx was associated with similar perioperative outcomes and 3-year patient survival compared to L1Tx and L2Tx. L3Tx represents the only safe treatment option for patients with allograft failure after L2Tx; however, further investigation is needed to understand the long-term survival and durability of L3Tx.

Outcomes Following Lung Transplant for COVID-19-Related Complications in the US.

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the use of lung transplant as a lifesaving therapy for patients with irreversible lung injury. Limited information is currently available regarding the outcomes associated with this treatment modality. Objective: To describe the outcomes following lung transplant for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, lung transplant recipient and donor characteristics and outcomes following lung transplant for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis were extracted from the US United Network for Organ Sharing database from March 2020 to August 2022 with a median (IQR) follow-up period of 186 (64-359) days in the acute respiratory distress syndrome group and 181 (40-350) days in the pulmonary fibrosis group. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional regression models were used to examine the association of certain variables with overall survival. Exposures: Lung transplant following COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival and graft failure rates. Results: Among 385 included patients undergoing lung transplant, 195 had COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (142 male [72.8%]; median [IQR] age, 46 [38-54] years; median [IQR] allocation score, 88.3 [80.5-91.1]) and 190 had COVID-19-related pulmonary fibrosis (150 male [78.9%]; median [IQR] age, 54 [45-62]; median [IQR] allocation score, 78.5 [47.7-88.3]). There were 16 instances of acute rejection (8.7%) in the acute respiratory distress syndrome group and 15 (8.6%) in the pulmonary fibrosis group. The 1-, 6-, and 12- month overall survival rates were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94) for the acute respiratory distress syndrome cohort and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90) for the pulmonary fibrosis cohort. Freedom from graft failure rates were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93) in the 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up periods in the acute respiratory distress cohort and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74-0.91) in the pulmonary fibrosis cohort, respectively. Receiving a graft from a donor with a heavy and prolonged history of smoking was associated with worse overall survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome cohort, whereas the characteristics associated with worse overall survival in the pulmonary fibrosis cohort included female recipient, male donor, and high recipient body mass index. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, outcomes following lung transplant were similar in patients with irreversible respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and those with other pretransplant etiologies.

A Framework for Using Real-World Data and Health Outcomes Modeling to Evaluate Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Models.

OBJECTIVES: We propose a framework of health outcomes modeling with dynamic decision making and real-world data (RWD) to evaluate the potential utility of novel risk prediction models in clinical practice. Lung transplant (LTx) referral decisions in cystic fibrosis offer a complex case study. METHODS: We used longitudinal RWD for a cohort of adults (n = 4247) from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry to compare outcomes of an LTx referral policy based on machine learning (ML) mortality risk predictions to referral based on (1) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) alone and (2) heterogenous usual care (UC). We then developed a patient-level simulation model to project number of patients referred for LTx and 5-year survival, accounting for transplant availability, organ allocation policy, and heterogenous treatment effects. RESULTS: Only 12% of patients (95% confidence interval 11%-13%) were referred for LTx over 5 years under UC, compared with 19% (18%-20%) under FEV1 and 20% (19%-22%) under ML. Of 309 patients who died before LTx referral under UC, 31% (27%-36%) would have been referred under FEV1 and 40% (35%-45%) would have been referred under ML. Given a fixed supply of organs, differences in referral time did not lead to significant differences in transplants, pretransplant or post-transplant deaths, or overall survival in 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Health outcomes modeling with RWD may help to identify novel ML risk prediction models with high potential real-world clinical utility and rule out further investment in models that are unlikely to offer meaningful real-world benefits.

Volatile organic compound profiling to explore primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Delineating basic mechanisms and molecular signatures of PGD remain a fundamental challenge. This pilot study examines if the pulmonary volatile organic compound (VOC) spectrum relate to PGD and postoperative outcomes. The VOC profiles of 58 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blind bronchial aspirate samples from 35 transplant patients were extracted using solid-phase-microextraction and analyzed with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The support vector machine algorithm was used to identify VOCs that could differentiate patients with severe from lower grade PGD. Using 20 statistically significant VOCs from the sample headspace collected immediately after transplantation (< 6 h), severe PGD was differentiable from low PGD with an AUROC of 0.90 and an accuracy of 0.83 on test set samples. The model was somewhat effective for later time points with an AUROC of 0.80. Three major chemical classes in the model were dominated by alkylated hydrocarbons, linear hydrocarbons, and aldehydes in severe PGD samples. These VOCs may have important clinical and mechanistic implications, therefore large-scale study and potential translation to breath analysis is recommended.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Underwent Lung Transplant.

Importance: Lung transplantation is a potentially lifesaving treatment for patients who are critically ill due to COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but there is limited information about the long-term outcome. Objective: To report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS and underwent a lung transplant at a single US hospital. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective case series of 102 consecutive patients who underwent a lung transplant at Northwestern University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, between January 21, 2020, and September 30, 2021, including 30 patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS. The date of final follow-up was November 15, 2021. Exposures: Lung transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were collected and analyzed. Outcomes of lung transplant, including postoperative complications, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and survival, were recorded. Results: Among the 102 lung transplant recipients, 30 patients (median age, 53 years [range, 27 to 62]; 13 women [43%]) had COVID-19-associated ARDS and 72 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 22 to 74]; 32 women [44%]) had chronic end-stage lung disease without COVID-19. For lung transplant recipients with COVID-19 compared with those without COVID-19, the median lung allocation scores were 85.8 vs 46.7, the median time on the lung transplant waitlist was 11.5 vs 15 days, and preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used in 56.7% vs 1.4%, respectively. During transplant, patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS received transfusion of a median of 6.5 units of packed red blood cells vs 0 in those without COVID-19, 96.7% vs 62.5% underwent intraoperative venoarterial ECMO, and the median operative time was 8.5 vs 7.4 hours, respectively. Postoperatively, the rates of primary graft dysfunction (grades 1 to 3) within 72 hours were 70% in the COVID-19 cohort vs 20.8% in those without COVID-19, the median time receiving invasive mechanical ventilation was 6.5 vs 2.0 days, the median duration of intensive care unit stay was 18 vs 9 days, the median post-lung transplant hospitalization duration was 28.5 vs 16 days, and 13.3% vs 5.5% required permanent hemodialysis, respectively. None of the lung transplant recipients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS demonstrated antibody-mediated rejection compared with 12.5% in those without COVID-19. At follow-up, all 30 lung transplant recipients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS were alive (median follow-up, 351 days [IQR, 176-555] after transplant) vs 60 patients (83%) who were alive in the non-COVID-19 cohort (median follow-up, 488 days [IQR, 368-570] after lung transplant). Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center case series of 102 consecutive patients who underwent a lung transplant between January 21, 2020, and September 30, 2021, survival was 100% in the 30 patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS as of November 15, 2021.

Expanded indications for lung transplantation for pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are associated with poor survival and can be treated by lung transplantation (LT). However, the indications for LT in patients with pulmonary complications after HSCT remain unclear due to low number of cases. HSCT is frequently conducted for hematologic malignancies, which have different recurrence patterns from solid-organ malignancies. Some patients also experience ABO blood type changes post-HSCT. This study aimed to reassess the indication of LT for pulmonary complications post-HSCT, focusing on disease-free interval (DFI) and ABO-incompatibility. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were performed in patients who underwent LT for post-HSCT pulmonary complications. In patients with previous hematologic malignancy, indication was based on estimated recurrence rate instead of DFI. Donors were selected based on the recipient anti-A/B antibody profile rather than ABO type. Post-LT survival and complication rates were examined. RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients undergoing LT after HSCT (including 31 with previous hematologic malignancy) were analyzed. The median DFI between HSCT and LT was 64.5 months. Thirteen patients with previous hematologic malignancy had DFI <5 years but none experienced recurrence. There was no significant difference in 5-year post-LT survival between patients undergoing (74.7%) and not undergoing HSCT (68.4%). There was no significant difference in survival between patients with DFI ≥5 years (63.8%) and patients with DFI <5 years (83.3%). Five patients underwent LTs from major ABO-incompatible donors, but none developed incompatibility-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Indications based on estimated recurrence rates and recipients' anti-A/B antibody profiles may increase the use of LT for patients after HSCT.

Factors associated with short- versus long-term survival after lung transplant.

OBJECTIVE: A small but growing proportion of lung transplant recipients survive longer than a decade post-transplant. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with survival beyond a decade after lung transplant. METHODS: We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for adult (age ≥18 years) recipients undergoing first-time isolated lung transplantation between the introduction of the Lung Allocation Score in 2005 and 2009. Recipients were stratified into 3 cohorts: those who survived less than 1 year, 1 to 10 years, and greater than 10 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with early mortality (<1 year) and long-term (>10 years) survival. RESULTS: A total of 5171 lung transplant recipients and their associated donors met inclusion criteria, including 964 (18.6%) with early mortality, 2843 (55.0%) with intermediate survival, and 1364 (26.3%) long-term survivors. Factors independently associated with early mortality included donor Black race, cigarette use, arterial oxygen partial pressure/fractional inspired oxygen ratio, diabetes, recipient Lung Allocation Score, total bilirubin, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge requirement, single lung transplantation, and annual lung transplant center volume. The only factors independently associated with long-term survival among those who survived at least 1 year was donor age and single lung transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients undergoing lung transplantation after the implementation of the Lung Allocation Score, approximately one-quarter survived 10 years post-transplant. There was minimal overlap between the factors associated with 1-year and 10-year survival. Of note, the Lung Allocation Score was not associated with long-term survival. Further research is needed to better refine patient selection and optimize management strategies to increase the number of long-term survivors.