Effects of Low-Dose Ketamine Infusion on the Positive and Negative Domains of Hopelessness and Suicidal Thoughts.

Background: Low-dose ketamine infusion has been demonstrated to exert antisuicidal effects on patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and strong suicidal ideation. Although evidence suggests an association between hopelessness and suicidality, very few studies have investigated the antihopelessness effects of ketamine.Methods: This study included 84 patients with TRD and strong suicidal ideation. The diagnosis of depression was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder. They were randomly assigned to receive a single infusion of either 0.5 mg/kg ketamine or 0.045 mg/kg midazolam. Hopelessness and suicidal symptoms were assessed at baseline, at 240 minutes postinfusion, and on Days 2, 3, 7, and 14 postinfusion. The assessments were performed using the self-report Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) and Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory (PANSI). The analysis focused on the positive and negative domains of the BHS and PANSI, respectively. The clinical trial was conducted between August 15, 2018, and November 30, 2021.Results: Statistical analyses performed using a generalized linear model revealed that the ketamine group had significantly higher PANSI-positive (P = .008) and lower PANSI-negative (P = .015) suicidal ideation scores on Day 2 postinfusion than did the midazolam group. At 240 minutes postinfusion, the ketamine group had significantly lower BHS-negative domain scores than did the midazolam group (P = .031). Notably, the observed ketamine-induced reduction in hopelessness at 240 minutes postinfusion was associated with its antisuicidal effect on Day 2 postinfusion.Discussion: A single infusion of low-dose ketamine resulted in a brief (∼4 hours) yet significant reduction in hopelessness. Subjective antisuicidal effects of ketamine were noted on Day 2 postinfusion. Further studies are needed to elucidate the neuromechanisms underlying the antihopelessness and antisuicidal effects of ketamine.Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry identifiers: UMIN000033916 and UMIN000033760.

Eye-tracking evidence of a relationship between attentional bias for emotional faces and depression severity in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

In a retrospective study, 54 patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD) completed a free-viewing task in which they had to freely explore pairs of faces (an emotional face (happy or sad) opposite to a neutral face). Attentional bias to emotional faces was calculated for early and sustained attention. We observed a significant negative correlation between depression severity as measured by the 10-item Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and sustained attention to happy faces. In addition, we observed a positive correlation between depression severity and sustained attention to sad faces. No significant correlation between depression severity and early attention was found for either happy or sad faces. Although conclusions from the current study are limited by the lack of comparison with a control group, the eye-tracking free-viewing task appears to be a relevant, accessible and easy-to-use tool for measuring depression severity through emotional attentional biases in TRD.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Modulates Inflammation in Treatment-Resistant Depression Patients: A Pilot Study.

Vagal neurostimulation (VNS) is used for the treatment of epilepsy and major medical-refractory depression. VNS has neuropsychiatric functions and systemic anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this study is to measure the clinical efficacy and impact of VNS modulation in depressive patients. Six patients with refractory depression were enrolled. Depression symptoms were assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating, and anxiety symptoms with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. Plasmas were harvested prospectively before the implantation of VNS (baseline) and up to 4 years or more after continuous therapy. Forty soluble molecules were measured in the plasma by multiplex assays. Following VNS, the reduction in the mean depression severity score was 59.9% and the response rate was 87%. Anxiety levels were also greatly reduced. IL-7, CXCL8, CCL2, CCL13, CCL17, CCL22, Flt-1 and VEGFc levels were significantly lowered, whereas bFGF levels were increased (p values ranging from 0.004 to 0.02). This exploratory study is the first to focus on the long-term efficacy of VNS and its consequences on inflammatory biomarkers. VNS may modulate inflammation via an increase in blood-brain barrier integrity and a reduction in inflammatory cell recruitment. This opens the door to new pathways involved in the treatment of refractory depression.

Change in neurocognitive functioning in patients with treatment-resistant depression with serial intravenous ketamine infusions: The Bio-K multicenter trial.

This nonrandomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial explored the impact of intravenous (IV) ketamine on cognitive function in adults (n = 74) with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Patients received three IV ketamine infusions during the acute phase and, if remitted, four additional infusions in the continuation phase (Mayo site). Cognitive assessments using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) were conducted at baseline, end of the acute phase, and end of the continuation phase (Mayo site). Results showed a significant 53 % (39/74) remission rate in depression symptoms after the acute phase. In adjusted models, baseline language domain score was associated with a higher odd of remission (Odds Ratio, 1.09, 95 % CI = 1.03-1.17, p = 0.004) and greater improvement in MADRS at the end of the acute phase (ß =-0.97; 95 % CI, -1.74 to -0.20; P = 0.02). The likelihood of remission was not significantly associated with baseline immediate or delayed memory, visuospatial/constructional, or attention scores. In the continuation phase, improvements in immediate and delayed memory and attention persisted, with additional gains in visuospatial and language domains. Limitations included an open-label design, potential practice effects, and ongoing psychotropic medication use. Overall, the study suggests cognitive improvement, not deterioration, associated with serial IV ketamine administrations for TRD. These findings encourage future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to examine any potential for deleterious effect with recurrent ketamine use for TRD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03156504.

Cognitive outcomes from the randomised, active-controlled Ketamine for Adult Depression Study (KADS).

BACKGROUND: Due to its rapid antidepressant effect, ketamine has recently been clinically translated for people with treatment-resistant depression. However, its cognitive profile remains unclear, particularly with repeated and higher doses. In the present study, we report the cognitive results from a recent large multicentre randomised controlled trial, the Ketamine for Adult Depression Study (KADS). METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel group, multicentre phase 3 trial study we investigated potential cognitive changes following repeated treatment of subcutaneous racemic ketamine compared to an active comparator, midazolam, over 4 weeks, which involved two cohorts; Cohort 1 involved a fixed dose treatment protocol (0.5 mg/kg ketamine), Cohort 2 involved a dose escalation protocol (0.5-0.9 mg/kg) based on mood outcomes. Participants with treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) were recruited from 7 mood disorder centres and were randomly assigned to receive ketamine (Cohort 1 n = 33; Cohort 2 n = 53) or midazolam (Cohort 1 n = 35; Cohort 2 n = 53) in a 1:1 ratio. Cognitive measurements were assessed at baseline and at the end of randomised treatment. RESULTS: Results showed that in Cohort 1, there were no differences between ketamine and midazolam in cognitive outcomes. For Cohort 2, there was similarly no difference between conditions for cognitive outcomes. LIMITATIONS: The study included two Cohorts with different dosing regimes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the cognitive safety of repeated fixed and escalating doses at least in the short-term in people with treatment resistant MDD.

Ketamine in multiple treatment-resistant depressed inpatients: A naturalistic cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has emerged as an effective treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant depression. However, there is limited evidence of the benefits of ketamine in inpatients with multiple treatment resistance (MTR), who far exceed the formal criteria for treatment resistance and suffer from extensive psychiatric comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this naturalistic study was to provide preliminary evidence for the use of ketamine in the treatment of MTR depression in a naturalistic inpatient setting. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients (mean age 45.1 ± 13.8 years) were treated with intravenous or intranasal ketamine (1068 administrations) twice weekly for five weeks, followed by maintenance therapy if clinically indicated. Treatment effects were assessed with the BDI, and side effects were assessed by clinicians. We analyzed dose- and route of application-related changes in depression severity, response and remission rates as well as effects on suicidality and frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: Depression severity and suicidality decreased in the acute treatment phase and these changes persisted during the maintenance therapy phase. A total of 28.9 % of the patients met the criteria for response, and 15 % met the criteria for remission. The initial treatment response was highly predictive of the outcome at the end of the acute treatment phase. None of the reported side effects required medical intervention. High-dose intravenous ketamine (0.75-1 mg/kg) resulted in the most pronounced clinical effects. LIMITATIONS: This observational, retrospective, and naturalistic study may be subject to bias and did not allow control of external variables. CONCLUSIONS: We outlined a clinically feasible, high-dose ketamine treatment regimen for hospitalized patients with MTR depression.

Psychological aspects and psychotherapy for TRD.

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) refers to depression that persists even after the patient has undergone adequate trials of two or more antidepressants at appropriate doses and duration. While there may be controversy around this definition, it reflects the real-world clinical situation where drug therapy is often the primary treatment strategy for major depressive disorder. It's important to note that when a patient is diagnosed with TRD, a comprehensive evaluation of their psychosocial aspects should be carried out. Appropriate psychosocial interventions should also be provided to address the patient's needs. Various psychotherapy models have been proven effective in treating TRD, but not all of them have undergone empirical testing. As a result, some psychotherapy models may be underestimated in treating TRD. Clinicians should consult reference materials and assess the patient's psychosocial aspects to select the most appropriate psychotherapy model for TRD patients. Collaboration with psychologists, social workers, and occupational therapists can also provide valuable input in the decision-making process. This ensures that TRD patients receive comprehensive and effective care.

Baseline cognitive function predicts full remission of suicidal symptoms among patients with treatment-resistant depression and strong suicidal ideation after low-dose ketamine infusion.

BACKGROUND: Whether pretreatment working memory and response inhibition function are associated with the rapid and sustained antisuicidal effect of low-dose ketamine among patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and strong suicidal ideation is unclear. METHODS: We enrolled 65 patients with TRD, comprising 33 who received a single infusion of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine and 32 who received a placebo infusion. The participants performed working memory and go/no-go tasks prior to infusion. We assessed suicidal symptoms at baseline and on postinfusion Days 2, 3, 5, and 7. RESULTS: The full remission of suicidal symptoms persisted for 3 days after a single ketamine infusion and the ketamine-related antisuicidal effect persisted for 1 week. Lower cognitive impairment at baseline (indicated by a higher rate of correct responses on a working memory task) was associated with the rapid and sustained antisuicidal effect of low-dose ketamine in patients with TRD and strong suicidal ideation. DISCUSSION: Patients with TRD and strong suicidal ideation but low cognitive impairment may benefit the most from the antisuicidal effect of low-dose ketamine.

A comparative analysis of antidepressant and anti-suicidal effects of repeated ketamine infusions in elderly and younger adults with depression.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the differences in safety and antidepressant effects of multi-infusion ketamine treatment between elderly and young adults with depression. METHODS: The safety, antidepressant, and anti-suicidal effects of multi-infusion ketamine were compared between 19 elderly (≥50 years) and 116 younger (<50 years) adults with depression; all were treated with six ketamine infusions (0.5 mg/kg). Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was used to measure the depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation was measured with Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI)-part 1, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) item 3, and (MADRS) item 10. Dissociative and psychotomimetic symptoms were evaluated based on the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)-four items. RESULTS: Multi-Ketamine infusions resulted in a lower (trend) antidepressant response (37.1 % versus 57.8 %) and antidepressant remission (15.8 % versus 47.4 %) in elderly patients with depression compared with younger patients with depression (all ps > 0.05). Interestingly, elderly patients with depression had a higher MADRS score after six ketamine infusions compared with younger patients (p = 0.04). No significant differences in SSI-part 1 scores, HAMD item 3 scores, MADRS item 10 scores, CADSS scores, and BPRS-four items scores were found between the two groups at any assessment point (all ps > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that repeated-dose infusions of ketamine may be a feasible treatment strategy in elderly Chinese patients with depression; however, elderly patients with depression may be less responsive to ketamine compared with younger adults with depression.

Treatment-Resistant Late-Life Depression: A Review of Clinical Features, Neuropsychology, Neurobiology, and Treatment.

Major depression is common in older adults (≥ 60 years of age), termed late-life depression (LLD). Up to 30% of these patients will have treatment-resistant late-life depression (TRLLD), defined as depression that persists despite two adequate antidepressant trials. TRLLD is challenging for clinicians, given several etiological factors (eg, neurocognitive conditions, medical comorbidities, anxiety, and sleep disruption). Proper assessment and management is critical, as individuals with TRLLD often present in medical settings and suffer from cognitive decline and other marks of accelerated aging. This article serves as an evidence-based guide for medical practitioners who encounter TRLLD in their practice.

Long-term benzodiazepine prescription in treatment-resistant depression: A national FACE-TRD prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepine long-term use (BLTU) is a public health challenge. We lack data on the consequences of LBTU on the trajectory of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of BLTU in a nationwide non-selected population of patients with TRD, to determine the rate of patients succeeding at withdrawing benzodiazepines at one year and to determine if persistent BLTU is associated with poorer mental health outcomes. METHOD: The FACE-TRD cohort is a national cohort of TRD patients recruited in 13 resistant depression expert centers between 2014 and 2021 and followed-up at one year. A standardized one-day long comprehensive battery was carried out, including trained-clinician and patient-reported outcomes, and patients were reevaluated at one year. RESULTS: At baseline, 45.2% of the patients were classified in the BLTU group. In multivariate analysis, compared to patients without BLTU, patients with BLTU were more frequently classified in the "low physical activity" group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.885, p = 0.036), and had higher primary healthcare consumption (B = 0.158, p = 0.031) independently of age, sex and antipsychotic consumption. We found no significant difference for personality traits, suicidal ideation, impulsivity, childhood trauma exposure, earlier age at first major depressive episode, anxiety and sleep disorders (all p > 0.05). Despite recommendations for withdrawal, <5% of BLTU patients withdraw benzodiazepines during the one-year follow-up. Persistent BLTU at one-year was associated with higher depression severity (B = 0.189, p = 0.029), higher clinical global severity (B = 0.210, p = 0.016), higher state-anxiety (B = 0.266, p = 0.003), impaired sleep quality (B = 0.249, p = 0.008), increased peripheral inflammation (B = 0.241, p = 0.027), lower functioning level (B = -0.240, p = 0.006), decreased processing speed (B = -0.195, p = 0.020) and verbal episodic memory (B = -0.178, p = 0.048), higher absenteeism and productivity loss (B = 0.595, p = 0.016) and lower subjective global health status (B = -0.198, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Benzodiazepines are over-prescribed in TRD (in almost a half of the patients). Despite recommendations for withdrawal and psychiatric follow-up, <5% of patients successfully stopped taking benzodiazepines at one-year. Maintaining BLTU may contribute to the worsening of clinical and cognitive symptoms and of daily functioning in TRD patients. Progressive and planed withdrawal of benzodiazepines seems therefore strongly recommended in TRD patients with BLTU. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological alternatives should be promoted when possible.

Intravenous ketamine for treatment-resistant depression patients who have failed to respond to transcranial magnetic stimulation: A case series.

BACKGROUND: For individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become a well-established approach. In the past decade, intravenous (IV) racemic ketamine has also emerged as a potential treatment for TRD. Currently, little data is available on the clinical effects of IV racemic ketamine in TRD patients who experienced TMS-failure. METHODS: Twenty-one (21) TRD patients who had failed to respond to a standard course of high-frequency left-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex TMS were subsequently scheduled to received IV racemic ketamine infusions. The IV racemic ketamine protocol consisted of 0,5 mg/kg infusions over 60 min, 3 times a week over 2 weeks. RESULTS: Treatment was safe with minimal side-effects. Mean baseline MADRS score was 27.6 ± 6.4 (moderate depression), decreasing down to 18.6 ± 8.9 (mild depression) post-treatment. Mean percent improvement was 34.5 % ± 21.1 from baseline to post-treatment. Paired sample t-test showed significant MADRS score decrease pre- to post-treatment [t(20) = 7.212, p < .001]. Overall, four (4) patients (19.0 %) responded and two (2) of those achieved remission (9.5 %). LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this case series include its retrospective and uncontrolled open-label nature, the lack of self-rating and standardized adverse events questionnaires, as well as follow-ups beyond the immediate treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Novel ways to increase the clinical effects of ketamine are being explored. We discuss potential combination approaches of ketamine with other modalities to augment its effects. Given the global burden of TRD, novel approaches are needed to curb the current mental health epidemic around the world.

Cognitive outcomes of transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant cause of workforce loss, and is associated with cognitive impairments which can continue even after the elimination of mood and behavioural symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on cognitive functions in treatment resistant depression. METHODS: This randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted at a university hospital, department of psychiatry (tertiary centre) between October 2019 and July 2020. The study included 30 patients with depressive disorder, aged 18-50 years, who did not respond to at least two antidepressant medications for at least 8 weeks (one drug used was serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor [SNRI]; and 15 healthy control subjects. The patients were separated into two equal groups in a double-blind, random manner, and 20 sessions of repeated TMS was applied to one group, and 20 sessions of sham TMS to the other. The Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Stroop test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Digit Span Test (DST), Trail Making Test A-B, and Verbal Memory Processes Test (VMPT) were applied to the patients before and after the TMS procedure. RESULTS: The decrease in the HAM-D score was greater in the active magnetic stimulation (25 trains, 10 Hz, 110% motor threshold intensity) group, and with the exception of verbal memory processes, better performance was obtained by the active magnetic stimulation group than the sham group in the cognitive function tests. DISCUSSION: TMS was seen toimprove the cognitive defects present in the active phase of treatment-resistant depression, and therefore TMS could provide early improvement in cognitive functions in clinical use. Key words: Depression, transcranial magnetic stimulation, neurocognitive functi.

Serum soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 was not altered by rTMS in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

AIM: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is one of the most effective and minimally invasive treatments for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of rTMS in patients with TRD remains unclear. In recent years, the pathogenesis of depression has been closely associated with chronic inflammation and microglia are believed to play an important role in chronic inflammation. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) plays an important role in microglial neuroinflammatory regulation. In this study, we investigated the changes in peripheral soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) before and after rTMS treatment in patients with TRD. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with TRD were enrolled in this frequency (10 Hz) rTMS study. Depressive symptoms, cognitive function, and serum sTREM2 concentrations were measured at baseline and the end of the 6-week rTMS treatment. RESULTS: This study showed that rTMS ameliorated depressive symptoms and partially improved cognitive dysfunction in TRD. However, rTMS treatment did not alter serum sTREM2 levels. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first sTREM2 study in patients with TRD who underwent rTMS treatment. These results suggest that serum sTREM2 may not be relevant for the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of rTMS in patients with TRD. Future studies should confirm the present findings using a larger patient sample and a sham rTMS procedure, as well as CSF sTREM2. Furthermore, a longitudinal study should be conducted to clarify the effects of rTMS on sTREM2 levels.

Antidepressant and anti-suicidal effects of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression associated with psychiatric and personality comorbidities: A double-blind randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of ketamine treatment on depression and suicidal ideation in treatment resistant depression (TRD) and to determine whether they are influenced by other psychiatric and personality comorbidities. METHODS: A randomized double-blind parallel-arm controlled study on 36 patients with TRD. Patients were divided into two treatment groups: ketamine (K group) and placebo (P group). Patients in the K and P groups received one infusion of medicine per week for two weeks. All participants were assessed using the Structured Interview for the Five-Factor Personality Model (SIFFM), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Suicide Probability Scale (SPS), and Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL 90). RESULTS: After treatment, there was a significant decrease in the total HDRS and SPS scores in the K group compared to the P group, but the magnitude of response was not influenced by the presence of other psychiatric symptoms. Regression model, only receive ketamine treatment was significant factor for improve suicide and depression scores. LIMITATIONS: lack of data on other outcomes that are important to patients (e.g., quality of life, cognition) and need for a larger sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine infusions in TRD reduce suicidal ideation and depression despite the presence other psychiatric and personality disorders.

Single-Dose Psilocybin for a Treatment-Resistant Episode of Major Depression.

BACKGROUND: Psilocybin is being studied for use in treatment-resistant depression. METHODS: In this phase 2 double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults with treatment-resistant depression to receive a single dose of a proprietary, synthetic formulation of psilocybin at a dose of 25 mg, 10 mg, or 1 mg (control), along with psychological support. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 3 in the total score on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS; range, 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression). Secondary end points included response at week 3 (≥50% decrease from baseline in the MADRS total score), remission at week 3 (MADRS total score ≤10), and sustained response at 12 weeks (meeting response criteria at week 3 and all subsequent visits). RESULTS: A total of 79 participants were in the 25-mg group, 75 in the 10-mg group, and 79 in the 1-mg group. The mean MADRS total score at baseline was 32 or 33 in each group. Least-squares mean changes from baseline to week 3 in the score were -12.0 for 25 mg, -7.9 for 10 mg, and -5.4 for 1 mg; the difference between the 25-mg group and 1-mg group was -6.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.2 to -2.9; P<0.001) and between the 10-mg group and 1-mg group was -2.5 (95% CI, -6.2 to 1.2; P = 0.18). In the 25-mg group, the incidences of response and remission at 3 weeks, but not sustained response at 12 weeks, were generally supportive of the primary results. Adverse events occurred in 179 of 233 participants (77%) and included headache, nausea, and dizziness. Suicidal ideation or behavior or self-injury occurred in all dose groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 trial involving participants with treatment-resistant depression, psilocybin at a single dose of 25 mg, but not 10 mg, reduced depression scores significantly more than a 1-mg dose over a period of 3 weeks but was associated with adverse effects. Larger and longer trials, including comparison with existing treatments, are required to determine the efficacy and safety of psilocybin for this disorder. (Funded by COMPASS Pathfinder; EudraCT number, 2017-003288-36; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03775200.).

Effectiveness of Standard Sequential Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation vs Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation in Older Adults With Depression: The FOUR-D Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

Importance: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common in older adults. Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 48 minutes has demonstrated efficacy in TRD. Theta burst stimulation (TBS), a newer form of rTMS, can also be delivered bilaterally using left intermittent TBS and right continuous TBS for only 4 minutes. Objective: To establish the effectiveness and tolerability of TBS compared with standard rTMS in older adults with TRD. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized noninferiority trial with open treatment and blinded assessors, recruitment occurred between December 2016 and March 2020. The trial was conducted at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and included outpatients 60 years and older with a diagnosis of depression, moderate severity, and nonresponse to 1 or more antidepressant trial of adequate dosage and duration or intolerance of 2 or more trials. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive a course of 4 to 6 weeks of either bilateral standard rTMS or TBS. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; secondary outcome measures included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (16-item) (self-report), and dropout rates. A noninferiority margin of 2.75 points was used for the primary outcome. All participants who attained the primary completion point of 4 weeks were analyzed. Results: A total of 87 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [6.7] years; 47 [54.0%] female) were randomized to standard bilateral rTMS and 85 (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [5.3] years; 45 [52.9%] female) to TBS, of whom 85 (98%) and 79 (93%) were assessed for the primary outcome, respectively, whereas tolerability was assessed in all randomized participants. In the rTMS group, 4 (4.6%) were American Indian, reported other, or preferred not to answer; 5 (5.8%) were Asian; and 78 (89.7%) were White. In the TBS group, 6 (7.1%) were Asian, 2 (2.4%) were Black or reported other, and 77 (90.3%) were White. Mean (SD) Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total scores improved from 25.6 (4.0) to 17.3 (8.9) for rTMS and 25.7 (4.7) to 15.8 (9.1) for TBS (adjusted difference, 1.55; lower 95% CI -0.67), establishing noninferiority for TBS. The all-cause dropout rates were relatively similar between groups (rTMS: 2 of 87 [2.3%]; TBS: 6 of 85 [7.1%]; P = .14; χ2 = 2.2). Conclusions and Relevance: In older adults with TRD, bilateral TBS compared with standard bilateral rTMS achieved noninferior reduction in depression symptoms. Both treatments had low and similar dropout rates. Using TBS rather than rTMS could increase access to treatment several-fold for older adults with TRD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02998580.

rTMS combined with CBT as a next step in antidepressant non-responders: a study protocol for a randomized comparison with current antidepressant treatment approaches.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders, however, current treatment options are insufficiently effective for about 35% of patients, resulting in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a form of non-invasive neuromodulation that is effective in treating TRD. Not much is known about the comparative efficacy of rTMS and other treatments and their timing within the treatment algorithm, making it difficult for the treating physician to establish when rTMS is best offered as a treatment option. This study aims to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of rTMS (in combination with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and continued antidepressant medication), compared to the next step in the treatment algorithm. This will be done in a sample of patients with treatment resistant non-psychotic unipolar depression. METHODS: In this pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial 132 patients with MDD are randomized to either rTMS or the next pharmacological step within the current treatment protocol (a switch to a tricyclic antidepressant or augmentation with lithium or a second-generation antipsychotic). Both groups also receive CBT. The trial consists of 8 weeks of unblinded treatment followed by follow-up of the cohort at four and 6 months. A subgroup of patients (n = 92) will have an extended follow-up at nine and 12 months to assess effect decay or retention. We expect that rTMS is more (cost-)effective than medication in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with TRD. We will also explore the effects of both treatments on symptoms associated with depression, e.g. anhedonia and rumination, as well as the effect of expectations regarding the treatments on its effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The present trial aims to inform clinical decision making about whether rTMS should be considered as a treatment option in patients with TRD. The results may improve treatment outcomes in patients with TRD and may facilitate adoption of rTMS in the treatment algorithm for depression and its implementation in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered within the Netherlands Trial Register (code: NL7628 , date: March 29th 2019).

Health-related quality of life burden associated with treatment-resistant depression in UK patients: Quantitative results from a mixed-methods non-interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and its more intractable variant, treatment-resistant depression (TRD), are common conditions that adversely affect patient well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to quantify the impact of MDD and particularly TRD on the HRQoL, functioning and productivity of UK patients to support clinical and reimbursement decisions and policymaking. METHODS: 148 patients with clinician-verified symptomatic (non-treatment-resistant) MDD (Patients-MDD; n = 61) or TRD (Patients-TRD; n = 87) were recruited from ten clinical sites. Participants completed validated patient-reported outcome measures assessing depressive symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), HRQoL (EQ-5D-5 L/abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire [WHOQOL-BREF]) and work productivity/activity impairment (WPAI:D). RESULTS: Patients-TRD and Patients-MDD reported similar levels of depressive symptom severity (mean PHQ-9 16.2/16.6, respectively). However, HRQoL was significantly poorer for Patients-TRD compared with Patients-MDD, both in the overall cohort (median EQ-5D-5 L utility 0.606/0.721, respectively [p = 0.021]; WHOQOL-BREF overall score 55.2/58.8 [p = 0.024]) and in patients with a PHQ-9 score ≥15 (median EQ-5D-5 L utility 0.415/0.705, respectively [p<0.001]). Although a numerically lower proportion of Patients-TRD were employed (45% vs 57% of Patients-MDD; p = 0.204), employed Patients-MDD reported significantly higher absenteeism and work productivity loss. LIMITATIONS: A minority of patients screened as having symptomatic MDD or TRD self-reported low PHQ-9 symptom severity. This was addressed with a subgroup analysis of patients with more severe depression. CONCLUSIONS: TRD is associated with an added patient HRQoL burden, above that observed for non-treatment-resistant MDD. This highlights the unmet need for greater access to improved treatment, including new treatment options for Patients-TRD.