Injections of the Hand and Wrist: Part I. Trigger Finger, First Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis, and Palmar Fibromatosis.

Family physicians are well-positioned to provide injections for patients who have pain due to hand and finger conditions, especially when initial treatments such as splinting and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are ineffective. Corticosteroid injections can offer pain relief; however, potential risks such as infection, cartilage damage, and skin depigmentation should be discussed. Techniques and procedures for injections vary. Corticosteroid injections for ste-nosing flexor tenosynovitis (trigger finger) can be performed with or without ultrasound guidance. To maximize benefits of corticosteroid injection for carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis, topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other conservative treatment modalities should be used concurrently. Because of the risks of disease recurrence and adverse effects, corticosteroid injections for palmar fibromatosis should be approached with caution in the context of shared decision-making.

Epidemiology of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Trigger Finger in South Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and trigger finger are representative pathologic conditions of the hand. Although several studies have evaluated the epidemiology of these diseases as nationwide population-based research, they had several limitations including old data and short study period. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 20 years diagnosed with CTS or trigger finger between 2009 and 2019 using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. The annual incidence of these diseases was standardized based on age and sex. The proportion of patients who received corticosteroid injections or surgery within 1 year of their diagnoses was calculated annually. Results: The mean annual incidence of CTS was 360.26 per 100,000 person-years and that of trigger finger was 63.09 per 100,000 person-years. The annual incidence of CTS (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.979; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.972-0.985; p < 0.001) and trigger finger (IRR, 0.976; 95% CI, 0.967-0.985; p < 0.001) significantly decreased. The proportion of patients who received corticosteroid injections for CTS significantly increased (relative risk [RR], 1.025; 95% CI, 1.020-1.031; p < 0.001), while the number of surgeries significantly decreased (RR, 0.949; 95% CI, 0.940-0.957; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients who received corticosteroid injections for trigger finger significantly increased (RR, 1.021; 95% CI, 1.009-1.033; p < 0.001), while the number of surgeries did not change significantly (RR, 1.006; 95% CI, 0.988-1.023; p = 0.523). Conclusions: In the past 10 years, the incidence of CTS and trigger finger decreased. The portion of patients who received corticosteroid injections increased for both diseases, but the portion of patients who had surgery decreased for CTS within 1 year after diagnosis. This study provides insight into the epidemiology of these diseases in an Asian population and may inform estimates of healthcare costs.

[The diabetic hand - a forgotten complication]. / Den diabetiska handen ­ ett i dag bortglömt syndrom.

The term ¼the diabetic hand« traditionally denotes complications affecting the hand in individuals with diabetes mellitus, such as restricted finger movement, numbness, and pain. Trigger finger, Dupuytren's disease, carpal tunnel syndrome, ulnar nerve entrapment, and osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint are all conditions that are more prevalent among individuals with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. This overview aims to shed light on a somewhat neglected area in diabetes complications, i.e. the diabetic hand, to increase the knowledge among physicians and surgeons as well as nurses, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists treating patients with diabetes.

Trigger finger - Poor outcome of surgery associated with younger age, pain, psoriatic arthritis and atopic disease.

Background: Trigger finger, or stenosing tendovaginitis, is one of the most common causes of hand disability, where a finger or thumb painfully snaps and locks due to a tendon-sheath size mismatch at the A1 pulley. The exact aetiology of trigger finger is unknown, though it is associated with factors like diabetes, rheumatic disease and carpal tunnel syndrome. The main purpose of this prospective study was to explore clinical characteristics and comorbidities in a cohort of 139 patients who underwent surgery for trigger finger and find factors of importance for the outcome 1 year postoperatively. Methods: Pain, range of motion, hand function evaluated by the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire as well as Quinnell grade of triggering were examined preoperatively. Symptom duration, working status, medical history and comorbidities at baseline were also noted. Further, range of motion was evaluated 3 months after surgery, pain and hand function were evaluated 3 and 12 months after surgery. An outcome scale with three levels was defined. The development of any new comorbidities was monitored during an extended postoperative observation period, with a mean duration of 70 months (range: 56-88 months). Results: Poor outcome was strongly associated with younger age (P = 0.0009), a high level of preoperative pain in the operated hand (P = 0.0027), psoriatic arthritis (P = 0.021) and atopic disease (P = 0.028; odds ratio [OR]: 3.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-13.04). A low range of motion preoperatively did not affect the outcome. Carpal tunnel syndrome was the most common comorbidity but did not affect the outcome. A good preoperative range of motion, good hand function and less pain were associated with better outcomes. Conclusion: Younger age, a high level of preoperative pain, psoriatic arthritis and atopic disease were factors associated with a worse outcome of trigger finger surgery. Pain and disability decreased 3 months postoperatively and continued to decrease between 3 and 12 months.

Following carpel tunnel release, what factors affect whether patients return to the same or different hand surgeon for a subsequent procedure?

BACKGROUND: Following carpal tunnel release (CTR), patients may be indicated for subsequent hand surgery (contralateral CTR and/or trigger finger release [TFR]). While surgeons typically take pride in patient loyalty, the rate of returning to the same hand surgeons has not been previously characterized. METHODS: Patients undergoing CTR were isolated from 2010-2021 PearlDiver M151 dataset. Subsequent CTR or TFR were identified and characterized as being performed by the same or different surgeon, with patient factors associated with changing to a different surgeon determined by multivariable analyses. RESULTS: In total, 1,121,922 CTR patients were identified. Of these, subsequent surgery was identified for 307,385 (27.4%: CTR 289,455 [94.2%] and TFR 17,930 [5.8%]). Of the patients with a subsequent surgery, 257,027 (83.6%) returned to the same surgeon and 50,358 (16.4%) changed surgeons. Multivariable analysis found factors associated with changing surgeon (in order of decreasing odds ration [OR]) to be: TFR as the second procedure (OR 2.98), time between surgeries greater than 2-years (OR 2.30), Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index (OR 1.14 per 2-point increase), and male sex (OR 1.06), with less likely hood of changing for those with Medicare (OR 0.95 relative to commercial insurance) (p<0.001 for each). Pertinent negatives included: age, Medicaid, and having a 90-day adverse event after the index procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Over fifteen percent of patients who required a subsequent CTR or TFR following CTR did not return to the same surgeon. Understanding what factors lead to outmigration of patients form a practice may help direct efforts for patient retention.

Local ketorolac infiltration for postoperative pain in open trigger finger surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesia is crucial for effective postoperative pain management in minor hand surgeries, enhancing patient satisfaction. The use of local wound infiltration with Ketorolac as an adjuvant pain management strategy is proposed for open trigger finger release surgery. This study aims to compare pain scores and functional outcomes between local wound infiltration with Ketorolac and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. METHODS: This study is a double-blind, parallel design, randomized controlled trials. Sixty-nine patients underwent trigger finger surgery between December 2021 and October 2022 were randomized into one of three groups: oral Ibuprofen alone group, local Ketorolac alone group and local Ketorolac with oral Ibuprofen group. The assessment included postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, grip strength, mobility of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. and complications. RESULTS: NRS pain scores during movement of the operated fingers were significantly lower at 6 h in local Ketorolac alone group and local Ketorolac with oral Ibuprofen group compared to oral Ibuprofen alone group. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative DASH scores, grip strength, mobility of PIP joints, and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Local infiltration of Ketorolac as an adjunct in postoperative pain management has been shown to provide superior analgesia during finger movement within the initial 6 h following trigger finger surgery, in comparison to oral NSAIDs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thaiclinicaltrials.org identifier: TCTR20210825002. Registered 25/08/2021. https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20210825002.

Prevalence and Characteristics by Age and Sex in Pediatric Trigger Digits: Nationwide Analysis Using Korea Health Insurance Dataset.

Background: Pediatric trigger digit (TD) does not appear at birth but is diagnosed after birth by finding a flexion contracture of the thumb or other fingers. The reported incidence of pediatric TDs varies from 0.5 to 5 cases per 1,000 live births without sex-specific predominance. We performed a nationwide large-scale study to determine the prevalence and incidence of pediatric TDs and analyzed operative treatment for pediatric TDs using the National Health Insurance data of South Korea. Methods: Patients with pediatric TDs, aged 0-10 years between 2011 and 2020, were included in this study. Children born between 2011 and 2015 were set as the reference population and followed up until 2020. We calculated the prevalence and incidence rates of pediatric TDs according to age and sex and analyzed the operation rate, age at surgery, time interval from initial diagnosis to surgery, and follow-up period. Patient selection and treatment were based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Results: The prevalence rates of pediatric TDs ranged from 0.063% to 0.084%. Girls had a higher prevalence rate (0.066%-0.094%) than boys (0.060%-0.075%). The total incidence rate was 77.6/100,000 person-years, and the incidence rate was higher in girls (84.8) than in boys (70.7). Among 2,181,814 children born between 2011 and 2015, 12,729 were diagnosed with pediatric TDs, of which 1,128 (8.9%) underwent operative management. The means of age at initial diagnosis, age at surgery, and the time interval between diagnosis and operation were 2.76 ± 1.91 years, 3.79 ± 2.19 years, and 1.15 ± 1.71 years, respectively. Conclusions: High prevalence and incidence rates of pediatric TDs were found in 2- to 3-year-old patients. Among pediatric patients, 8.9% underwent operative management that was most frequently conducted between 2 and 3 years of age (within 1 year of initial diagnosis).

Relative motion splints versus metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splints in the management of trigger finger: Study protocol for a randomized comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports the use of hand-based metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) blocking splints as an intervention for trigger finger (TF). In practice, finger-based relative motion (RM) splints are also implemented without evidence. PURPOSE: This randomized comparative trial (RCT) aims to evaluate implementation of MCPJ blocking and RM splints for effectiveness, function, occupational performance and wearability after 6 weeks of TF management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Priori analysis determined 36 individuals were needed for random assignment to the RM or MCPJ blocking splint groups. Individuals must be aged ≥21 years, and diagnosed with TF involving ≥1 finger. For blinding purposes, the primary author screens for eligibility, fabricates the splints and educates. Therapist A administers the primary outcome measures Week-1 and Week-6-stage of stenosing tenosynovitis and secondary outcome measures- number of triggering events in 10 active fists, visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, splint comfort and satisfaction, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Therapist B in Week-3 instructs participants in deep tissue massage and administers splint wearability VASs. The RM pencil test is used to determine the affected finger(s) MCPJ splint position i.e., more extension or flexion based on participant response. The MCPJ blocking splint holds the MCPJ in a neutral position. Analysis involves a mixed-effects ANOVA to compare Week-1 and Week-6 primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Recruitment and data collection are ongoing. DISCUSSION: Biomechanically RM splints control tendon excursion and reduce passive tendon tension while allowing unencumbered finger motion and hand function. Hence clinicians use RM splints as an intervention for TF, despite the lack of implementation evidence. This RCT implements a function-focused as well as patient-centered approach with partial blinding of assessors and participants. CONCLUSION: We anticipate that this study will provide evidence for the implementation of RM splints to manage adults with TF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05763017).

The prevalence of spontaneous resolution among pediatric trigger thumb: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Trigger thumb is a prevalent hand condition observed in children, and its management remains a topic of considerable debate, ranging from mere observation to surgical intervention. In recent times, there has been a growing interest in exploring nonoperative treatments as alternatives to surgical procedures for managing pediatric trigger thumb. Gaining insight into the prevalence of spontaneous resolution in pediatric trigger thumb is of paramount importance. However, the literature presents a wide variation in estimates regarding the prevalence of this spontaneous resolution, highlighting the need for further investigation and consensus. The aim of this review was to estimate the overall prevalence of spontaneous resolution among pediatric trigger thumb. METHODS: This study meticulously followed the PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all relevant studies up to May 2024.Inclusion criteria were studies reported only observation spontaneous resolution pediatric trigger thumb, aged up to 14 years, reported at least 10 thumbs and followed up time at least 3 months. Confounded intervention treatment measure studies were excluded. To synthesize the prevalence rates from individual studies, we employed a random-effects meta-analysis. In order to uncover the sources of heterogeneity and to compare prevalence estimates across different groups, we performed sensitivity and subgroup analyses. To meticulously evaluate the quality of the included studies, the Joanna Briggs Institute's quality assessment checklist was employed. Furthermore, to assess the heterogeneity among the studies, both Cochran's Q test and the I² statistic were utilized. RESULTS: A total of eleven studies were included for the final analysis, with 599 pediatric trigger thumbs. Our final meta-analysis showed that more than one-third of these pediatric trigger thumb cases resolved spontaneously, with a resolution rate of 43.5% (95% CI 29.6-58.6). Subgroup analyses showed that in terms of age at the first visit, the prevalence of spontaneous resolution in the less than 24 months group and in the 24 months or older group was 38.7%(95% CI 18.1-64.4)and 45.8%(95% CI 27.4-65.4), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups(P = 0.690). When analyzing follow up time, the prevalence of spontaneous resolution in the 24 months or longer group and in the less than 24 months group was 58.9%(95% CI 41.6-74.2)and 26.8%(95% CI 14.7-43.8), respectively.There was significant statistical differences between the two groups(P = 0.009). Based on the initial severity of interphalangeal (IP) joint flexion contracture, the prevalence of spontaneous resolution in the 30 degrees or less group and in the other measurements group was 54.1%(95% CI 31.5-75.1)and 37.1%(95% CI 21.9-55.4), respectively.There was no significant difference between the two groups(P = 0.259). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that a significant proportion of pediatric trigger thumbs resolve spontaneously. This finding highlights the benefits of early observation in managing this condition. By prioritizing non-operative observation, both parents and surgeons are better equipped to make informed decisions regarding the treatment of pediatric trigger thumb, potentially reducing the need for surgical intervention.

Risk of Upper Limb Diseases in Osteoarthritis Patients: A Propensity-score-matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease that significantly impacts quality of life, particularly when affecting the hands. However, whether patients with OA are associated with higher risk of developing upper limb disorders, specifically trigger finger (TF) and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of upper limb disease in OA patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the US Collaborative Network, a subset of the TriNetX research network, we identified patients diagnosed with OA and matched them 1:1 with non-OA controls based on propensity scores. Matching covariates included age, sex, race, and comorbidities. The cohort consisted of 1,554,182 patients in each group. The hazard ratio of TF and CTS, as well as related surgical interventions, was assessed over a 5-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Patients with OA had a 1.30-fold increased risk of TF [95% confidence interval (CI)=1.27-1.33] and a 1.50-fold increased risk of CTS (95%CI=1.48-1.53) compared to controls. The hazard ratios for undergoing surgical interventions were 1.61 for TF (95%CI=1.51-1.71) and 1.97 for CTS (95%CI=1.78-2.19). These risks remained significant across various sensitivity analyses and stratifications according to age and sex. CONCLUSION: OA significantly increases the risk of TF and CTS. These findings highlight the need for vigilant monitoring and management of upper limb disorders in OA patients to improve overall patient care and outcomes. Future research is warranted to focus on pathological mechanisms of OA and their impact on upper limb health to develop targeted interventions.

Misconceptions about trigger finger: a scoping review. Definition, pathophysiology, site of lesion, etiology. Trigger finger solving a maze.

Trigger finger (TF) is a disorder characterized by snapping or locking a finger. It has a prevalence of greater than 3% in the general population; however, this estimate could be increased to 5% up to 20% in diabetic patients. Some unreal ambiguity about definition, pathophysiology, site of lesion, and etiology are found among researchers and clinicians, leading to a lack of understanding of all aspects of the disease and improper management as many clinicians proceed to anti-inflammatory medications or steroids injection without in-depth patient evaluation. Original articles cited up to 2022, found through a Google search using the specified keywords, have been used in this review. Close-access articles were accessed through our researcher account with the Egyptian Knowledge Bank. In this review, we will focus on pathophysiology to present all possible findings and etiology to represent all risk factors and associated diseases to assess and confirm a diagnosis and the exact location of pathology hence better treatment modalities and reducing the recurrence of the pathology.

Effect of CURES Legislation on Narcotic Prescriptions After Soft-tissue Hand Surgery.

California's Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES) was mandated in 2018 to monitor and limit opiate prescriptions. This study evaluated the effects of this legislation on postoperative opioid prescriptions of patients undergoing soft tissue hand surgery. Patients receiving carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, and ganglion excisions 18 months prior to and 18 months after CURES were selected. The primary outcome was milligram morphine equivalent (MME) prescribed at the surgical encounter and at first postoperative visit. There were 758 patients in the pre-CURES cohort and 701 patients in the post-CURES cohort. In the pre-CURES cohort, there was 116.9 ± 123.8 MME prescribed post op and 10.2 ± 70.8 at first follow-up, whereas post-CURES had 58.8 ± 68.4 MME and 1.1 ± 14.1 for post-op and first follow-up respectively. Findings of this study indicate state regulations may play a role in reducing narcotic consumption following soft tissue hand surgery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):122-124, 2024).

[Click phenomenon in acquired Jaensch-Brown syndrome and trigger finger/thumb: the Notta syndrome]. / "Klick"-Phänomen beim erworbenen Jaensch-Brown-Syndrom und schnellenden Finger/Daumen: dem Notta-Syndrom.

CLINICAL FEATURES: The click phenomenon occurs when an acquired mechanical restriction of the elevation in adduction of the eye or of the extension of the finger/thumb, is forcefully overcome. The common cause is a nodule either of the superior oblique tendon posterior to the trochlea in the case of a Jaensch-Brown syndrome or of the digital flexor tendon anterior to the A1 annular pulley in the case of a trigger finger. Both locations share similar anatomical conditions for the development of the nodule and the pathomechanism of the click. RESULTS: From these identical findings in the eye and the hand in small children it can be assumed that the results from the studies of the hand in newborns and infants with a trigger thumb/finger are also applicable to the situation of the eye. 1. This motility disorder is not congenital. This is most likely due to an incomplete development at the time of birth of the sliding factors needed for a free passage of the tendon through the trochlea and the A1 annular pulley. 2. A distinction must be made between stages 0-3: stage 0 = no more restriction of the motility and no click phenomenon; stage 1 = forced active extension/elevation possible; stage 2 = only passive extension/elevation, each with a click phenomenon; stage 3 = no extension/elevation possible and no click phenomenon. 3. In most cases in early childhood there is a spontaneous complete recovery (75% after 6-7 years). In the eye this spontaneous course can only limitedly be shortened with motility exercises in combination with segmental occlusion. CONCLUSION: The click phenomenon is a symptom of stages 1 and 2 of an acquired mechanical restriction of the elevation in adduction of the eye or the extension of the finger/thumb. It should not be called a syndrome.

Ultrasound-guided vs. non-guided trigger finger release: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Trigger finger (TF) is a common hand condition that can be treated with surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether ultrasound-guided (US-guided) percutaneous surgery is superior to other conventional surgical methods. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing US-guided TF release with blind percutaneous or open approaches. We combined Risk Ratios (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) across studies. Data processing and analysis were conducted using R software, version 4.3.1. RESULTS: Our analysis included eight RCTs and two observational studies with 555 patients. US-guided surgery significantly reduced postoperative DASH scores (MD -3.75 points; 95% CI = -7.48, -0.02; p < 0.01), shortened time to resume activities (MD -11.52 days; 95% CI = -16.13, -6.91; p < 0.01), hastened discontinuation of oral analgesics (MD -4.44 days; 95% CI = -8.01, -0.87; p < 0.01), and improved patient satisfaction scores (RR 1.13; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.23; p = 0.75). There were no significant differences in VAS scores, time to movement recovery, or surgical success rate. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release is a safe, effective, and superior alternative for treating TF compared to other methods, leading to improved DASH scores, quicker recovery, faster cessation of oral analgesics, and enhanced patient satisfaction.

The Association of Surgical Setting With Opioid Prescribing Patterns Following Wide-Awake Trigger Finger Release.

INTRODUCTION: Wide-awake and office-based hand surgeries are increasingly common. The association of these techniques with postoperative pain and pain control has garnered recent attention. A prior study demonstrated that office-based trigger finger release (TFR) were associated with decreased perioperative opioid prescriptions compared to those performed in the operating room. The current study provides an in-depth analysis of the association between surgical setting and perioperative opioid prescriptions for wide-awake TFR. METHODS: Patients undergoing TFR between 2010 and 2021 were identified in PearlDiver, a national administrative claims database. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, <6 months of preoperative data, <1 month of postoperative data, bilateral TFR, and concomitant hand surgery. To identify wide-awake cases, patients with procedural codes for general anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, sedation and regional blocks were excluded. Patients were stratified by surgical setting (office or operating room), then matched based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, and geographic region. Patients with prior opioid prescriptions, opioid dependence, opioid abuse, substance use disorder, chronic back/neck pain, generalized anxiety, and major depression were identified. Perioperative opioid prescriptions (those filled within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery) were characterized. RESULTS: There were 16,604 matched wide-awake TFR patients in each cohort. In the cohort of office-based patients, 4,993 (30%) filled a prescription for perioperative opioids, in contrast to 8,763 (53%) patients who underwent surgery in the operating room. This disparity was statistically significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analysis indicated that office-based surgeries were linked to lower morphine milligram equivalents (MME) in opioid prescriptions than those performed in operating rooms (median of 140 vs 150, respectively). However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that opioid prescriptions for office-based surgeries were actually associated with greater MME. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing office-based TFR were less likely to fill perioperative opioid prescriptions but were prescribed opioids with greater MME. In wide-awake TFR, it appears that a disparity may exist in patient and provider beliefs about postoperative pain control. Future patient- and provider-level investigations may produce insights into perceptions of postoperative pain and pain control, which may be useful for reducing opioid prescriptions across surgical settings.

Risk of hand and forearm conditions due to vibrating hand-held tools exposure: a retrospective cohort study from Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: The occurrence of hand and forearm disorders related to vibration exposure, adjusted for relevant background factors, is scarcely reported. We analysed the prevalence of such conditions in a large population cohort, stratified by sex, and associations with exposure to vibrating hand-held tools. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Individuals in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study cohort (MDCS; inclusion 1991-1996; followed until 2018) were asked, 'does your work involve working with vibrating hand-held tools?' (response: 'not at all', 'some' and 'much'). Data were cross-linked with national registers to identify treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ulnar nerve entrapment (UNE), Dupuytren's disease, trigger finger or first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-1) osteoarthritis (OA). Cox regression models, unadjusted and adjusted (age, sex, prevalent diabetes, smoking, hypertension and alcohol consumption), were performed to analyse the effects of reported vibration exposure. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals in the MDCS who had answered the questionnaire on vibration exposure (14 342 out of the originally 30 446 individuals in MDCS) were included in the study. RESULTS: In total, 12 220/14 342 individuals (76%) reported 'no' exposure, 1392/14 342 (9%) 'some' and 730/14 342 (5%) 'much' exposure to vibrating hand-held tools. In men, 'much' exposure was independently associated with CTS (HR 1.71 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.62)) and UNE (HR 2.42 (95% CI 1.15 to 5.07)). 'Some' exposure was independently associated with UNE in men (HR 2.10 (95% CI 1.12 to 3.95)). 'Much' exposure was independently associated with trigger finger in women (HR 2.73 (95% CI 1.49 to 4.99)). We found no effect of vibration exposure on Dupuytren's disease or CMC-1 OA. 'Much' vibration exposure predicted any hand and forearm diagnosis in men (HR 1.44 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.80)), but not in women. CONCLUSIONS: Vibration exposure by hand-held tools increases the risk of developing CTS and UNE and any common hand and forearm conditions in men, whereas women only risk trigger finger and CMC-1 OA. Adjustment for relevant confounders in vibration exposure is crucial.

Testosterone Replacement Therapy and Associated Rates of Trigger Finger, de Quervain Tenosynovitis, and Their Subsequent Management.

PURPOSE: Anabolic steroid therapy has been associated with tendon injury, but there is a paucity of evidence associating physiologic testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) with tenosynovitis of the hand, specifically trigger finger and de Quervain tenosynovitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between TRT and tenosynovitis of the hand. METHODS: This was a one-to-one exact matched retrospective cohort study using a large nationwide claims database. Records were queried between 2010 and 2019 for adult patients who filled a prescription for TRT for 3 consecutive months. Rates of new onset trigger finger and de Quervain tenosynovitis and subsequent steroid injection or surgery were identified using ICD-9, ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology billing codes. Single-variable chi-square analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare rates in the TRT and control cohorts while controlling for potential confounding variables. Both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) are reported for each comparison. RESULTS: In the adjusted analysis, patients undergoing TRT were more than twice as likely to develop trigger finger compared to their matched controls. TRT was also associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing de Quervain tenosynovitis. Of the patients diagnosed with either trigger finger or de Quervain tenosynovitis over the 2-year period, patients with prior TRT were roughly twice as likely to undergo steroid injections or surgical release for both trigger finger and de Quervain tenosynovitis compared to the controls. CONCLUSIONS: TRT is associated with an increased likelihood of both trigger finger and de Quervain tenosynovitis, and an increased likelihood of requiring surgical release for both conditions. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Open Versus Percutaneous Fixation of Trigger Finger: Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: With variable and conflicting results to date, it remains unclear whether the percutaneous or open surgical A1 pulley release technique is superior regarding safety and efficacy. The goal of this meta-analysis was to compare the two techniques. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched through August 2023. Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the eight included studies and 548 total patients, there were 278 subjects in the percutaneous release group and 270 subjects in the open release group. There was no significant difference between the two surgical techniques in postoperative rates of revision, complications, or pain. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found no significant difference between open and percutaneous techniques regarding the need for revision procedures, complications, or postoperative pain. Therefore, both open and percutaneous releases are appropriate. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.

A Delayed Diagnosis of Bilateral Pediatric Trigger Thumbs: A Case Report and Literature Review.

We describe the case of a 6-year-old female who presented with tender nodules and fixed flexion of her thumbs, diagnosed as bilateral pediatric trigger thumb. Though present since infancy, her condition was not diagnosed in prior clinical visits. Pediatric trigger digit is a clinical diagnosis, often missed if the digit's range of motion is not assessed routinely. Given the duration, pain, and severity of her condition, conservative management was deferred, and she was referred for surgery. An approach to clinical management is discussed. Ultimately, further study is required to develop structured management guidelines for pediatric trigger digit.