Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Psychiatry Res ; 279: 15-22, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31279246

RESUMEN

The theory and practice of psychiatric diagnosis are central yet contentious. This paper examines the heterogeneous nature of categories within the DSM-5, how this heterogeneity is expressed across diagnostic criteria, and its consequences for clinicians, clients, and the diagnostic model. Selected chapters of the DSM-5 were thematically analysed: schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders; bipolar and related disorders; depressive disorders; anxiety disorders; and trauma- and stressor-related disorders. Themes identified heterogeneity in specific diagnostic criteria, including symptom comparators, duration of difficulties, indicators of severity, and perspective used to assess difficulties. Wider variations across diagnostic categories examined symptom overlap across categories, and the role of trauma. Pragmatic criteria and difficulties that recur across multiple diagnostic categories offer flexibility for the clinician, but undermine the model of discrete categories of disorder. This nevertheless has implications for the way cause is conceptualised, such as implying that trauma affects only a limited number of diagnoses despite increasing evidence to the contrary. Individual experiences and specific causal pathways within diagnostic categories may also be obscured. A pragmatic approach to psychiatric assessment, allowing for recognition of individual experience, may therefore be a more effective way of understanding distress than maintaining commitment to a disingenuous categorical system.


Asunto(s)
Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Técnicas Psicológicas/clasificación , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos Bipolares y Relacionados/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/clasificación , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/diagnóstico
2.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 28(3): 213-20, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27490837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic validity of mixed features, excluding anxiety or psychomotor agitation in mood disorders, has not yet been fully examined. METHOD: PubMed and relevant English-language literature (regardless of year) were searched. Keywords were mixed or mixed state or mixed features or mixed episode and anxious or anxiety or agitation and bipolar disorder or depressive disorder or mood disorder or affective disorder. RESULTS: Most studies on anxiety or psychomotor agitation have included a significant correlation relevant to the "with mixed features" specifier, although it is common in both poles of mood episodes regardless of the predominant polarity. There is some confusion between the characteristic of classical mixed states and the definition of the mixed features specifier with the newly added anxious distress specifier in DSM-5, specifically, whether to include anxiety and agitation as significant characteristics. This change is of concern because a large proportion of patients with mixed features are now unspecified, and this may influence treatment planning and prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our review suggest that anxiety and psychomotor agitation can be core symptoms in mood episodes with mixed features and important clinical clues for prediction of treatment effects and disease course.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/psicología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos del Humor/diagnóstico , Agitación Psicomotora/psicología , Trastornos Bipolares y Relacionados/clasificación , Trastornos Bipolares y Relacionados/diagnóstico , Humanos , Trastornos del Humor/clasificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Compr Psychiatry ; 65: 136-40, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26774002

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A significant number of patients experience recurrent episodes of mania without depressive episodes. Evidence from the available literature suggests that these patients differ from typical "bipolar" or "manic-depressive" patients, but results have been inconsistent. The current study aims to add to this literature by comparing the demographic, clinical and risk factor profiles of patients with recurrent mania with and without depression. METHODS: 66 patients with a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder were divided into "unipolar mania" (recurrent mania alone, MA) and "bipolar" (both mania and depression, MD) sub-groups. Comorbid diagnoses were assessed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and genetic and environmental risk factors were explored using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), and an additional questionnaire designed for the purpose of the study. Differences between the MA and MD groups in terms of demographic variables, clinical profile, comorbidities and antecedent risk factors were explored. RESULTS: Patients with both mania and depression had higher frequencies of lifetime suicide attempts, antidepressant treatment, and catatonic symptoms. There was some evidence of an association between overcrowding in childhood and the presence of depressive episodes. No other differences in demographic, clinical or risk factor variables could be found between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with the view that unipolar mania is not a distinctive disorder, or even a distinctive subtype of bipolar disorder. However, this conclusion is provisional as it is based only on clinical and demographic data.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Bipolares y Relacionados/diagnóstico , Trastornos Bipolares y Relacionados/epidemiología , Catatonia/epidemiología , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Bipolares y Relacionados/tratamiento farmacológico , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Masculino , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
4.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 132(5): 335-44, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26016647

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Unipolar psychotic depression (PD) is a severe and debilitating syndrome, which requires intensive monitoring. The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the rating scales used to assess illness severity in PD. METHOD: Selective review of publications reporting results on non-self-rated, symptom-based rating scales utilized to measure symptom severity in PD. The clinical and psychometric validity of the identified rating scales was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 14 rating scales meeting the predefined criteria were included in the review. These scales grouped into the following categories: (i) rating scales predominantly covering depressive symptoms, (ii) rating scales predominantly covering psychotic symptoms, (iii) rating scales covering delusions, and (iv) rating scales covering PD. For the vast majority of the scales, the clinical and psychometric validity had not been tested empirically. The only exception from this general tendency was the 11-item Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS), which was developed specifically to assess the severity of PD. CONCLUSION: In PD, the PDAS represents the only empirically derived rating scale for the measurement of overall severity of illness. The PDAS should be considered in future studies of PD and in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Bipolares y Relacionados/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Psicometría/instrumentación , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA