Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.438
Filtrar
1.
CNS Neurosci Ther ; 30(7): e14855, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38992889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: G1 is a specific agonist of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1), which binds and activates GPER1 to exert various neurological functions. However, the preventive effect of G1 on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and its mechanisms are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the protective effect of G1 against synaptic and mitochondrial impairments and to investigate the mechanism of G1 to improve PTSD from brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB) signaling. METHODS: This study initially detected GPER1 expression in the hippocampus of single prolonged stress (SPS) mice, utilizing both Western blot and immunofluorescence staining. Subsequently, the effects of G1 on PTSD-like behaviors, synaptic, and mitochondrial functions in SPS mice were investigated. Additionally, the involvement of BDNF/TrkB signaling involved in the protection was further confirmed using GPER1 antagonist and TrkB inhibitor, respectively. RESULTS: The expression of GPER1 was reduced in the hippocampus of SPS mice, and G1 treatment given for 14 consecutive days significantly improved PTSD-like behaviors in SPS mice compared with model group. Electrophysiological local field potential (LFP) results showed that G1 administration for 14 consecutive days could reverse the abnormal changes in the gamma oscillation in the CA1 region of SPS mice. Meanwhile, G1 administration for 14 consecutive days could significantly improve the abnormal expression of synaptic proteins, increase the expression of mitochondria-related proteins, increase the number of synapses in the hippocampus, and ameliorate the damage of hippocampal mitochondrial structure in SPS mice. In addition, G15 (GPER1 inhibitor) and ANA-12 (TrkB inhibitor) blocked the ameliorative effects of G1 on PTSD-like behaviors and aberrant expression of hippocampal synaptic and mitochondrial proteins in SPS mice and inhibited the reparative effects of G1 on structural damage to hippocampal mitochondria, respectively. CONCLUSION: G1 improved PTSD-like behaviors in SPS mice, possibly by increasing hippocampal GPER1 expression and promoting BDNF/TrkB signaling to repair synaptic and mitochondrial functional impairments. This study would provide critical mechanism for the prevention and treatment of PTSD.


Asunto(s)
Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo , Hipocampo , Mitocondrias , Receptores de Estrógenos , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Sinapsis , Animales , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/metabolismo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo/metabolismo , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/antagonistas & inhibidores , Ratones , Masculino , Mitocondrias/efectos de los fármacos , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Sinapsis/efectos de los fármacos , Sinapsis/metabolismo , Hipocampo/metabolismo , Hipocampo/efectos de los fármacos , Receptor trkB/metabolismo , Receptor trkB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL
2.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0303425, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843149

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nurses, the largest workforce in healthcare, are at high risk of depression, anxiety, burnout, and suicidal ideation. Suicide among nurses is higher than the general population. This randomized controlled trial pairs the MINDBODYSTRONG© cognitive-behavioral skills building program with the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention's (AFSP) Modified Interactive Screening Program (mISP) to reduce depression, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and burnout, and improve healthy lifestyle beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and job satisfaction in nurses with moderate to high risk of suicide. AIMS: This study aims to determine the effects of the mISP combined with the digitized MINDBODYSTRONG© program versus the mISP alone on depression, suicidal ideation, burnout, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, healthy lifestyle beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and job satisfaction in 364 U.S. nurses. METHODS: A digitized version of MINDBODYSTRONG© combined with the mISP screening and referral platform will be compared to the AFSP mISP alone through a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Follow-up post-intervention data will be collected at week eight and months three, six, and 12. DISCUSSION: If successful, this study's findings could assist nurses who are hesitant to use conventional mental health resources by providing them with confidential aid and learning opportunities to reduce suicidality, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and burnout and improve healthy lifestyle beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and job satisfaction. TRIAL/STUDY REGISTRATION: The Ohio State University Protocol Record 2021B0417, Modified Interactive Screening Program Plus MINDBODYSTRONG: A Mental Health Resiliency Intervention for Nurses, is registered and posted at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05582343. First posted date is October 17, 2022.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Salud Mental , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Depresión , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Ansiedad , Ideación Suicida , Prevención del Suicidio , Femenino , Resiliencia Psicológica , Adulto , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 5: CD013613, 2024 05 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767196

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute traumatic stress symptoms may develop in people who have been exposed to a traumatic event. Although they are usually self-limiting in time, some people develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a severe and debilitating condition. Pharmacological interventions have been proposed for acute symptoms to act as an indicated prevention measure for PTSD development. As many individuals will spontaneously remit, these interventions should balance efficacy and tolerability. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and acceptability of early pharmacological interventions for prevention of PTSD in adults experiencing acute traumatic stress symptoms. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trial Register (CCMDCTR), CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and two other databases. We checked the reference lists of all included studies and relevant systematic reviews. The search was last updated on 23 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials on adults exposed to any kind of traumatic event and presenting acute traumatic stress symptoms, without restriction on their severity. We considered comparisons of any medication with placebo, or with another medication. We excluded trials that investigated medications as an augmentation to psychotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Using a random-effects model, we analysed dichotomous data as risk ratios (RR) and calculated the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial/harmful outcome (NNTB/NNTH). We analysed continuous data as mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD). Our primary outcomes were PTSD severity and dropouts due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included PTSD rate, functional disability and quality of life. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight studies that considered four interventions (escitalopram, hydrocortisone, intranasal oxytocin, temazepam) and involved a total of 779 participants. The largest trial contributed 353 participants and the next largest, 120 and 118 participants respectively. The trials enrolled participants admitted to trauma centres or emergency departments. The risk of bias in the included studies was generally low except for attrition rate, which we rated as high-risk. We could meta-analyse data for two comparisons: escitalopram versus placebo (but limited to secondary outcomes) and hydrocortisone versus placebo. One study compared escitalopram to placebo at our primary time point of three months after the traumatic event. There was inconclusive evidence of any difference in terms of PTSD severity (mean difference (MD) on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS, score range 0 to 136) -11.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) -24.56 to 1.86; 1 study, 23 participants; very low-certainty evidence), dropouts due to adverse events (no participant left the study early due to adverse events; 1 study, 31 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and PTSD rates (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.03 to 13.08; NNTB 37, 95% CI NNTB 15 to NNTH 1; 1 study, 23 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not assess functional disability or quality of life. Three studies compared hydrocortisone to placebo at our primary time point of three months after the traumatic event. We found inconclusive evidence on whether hydrocortisone was more effective in reducing the severity of PTSD symptoms compared to placebo (MD on CAPS -7.53, 95% CI -25.20 to 10.13; I2 = 85%; 3 studies, 136 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and whether it reduced the risk of developing PTSD (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.38; NNTB 14, 95% CI NNTB 8 to NNTH 5; I2 = 36%; 3 studies, 136 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Evidence on the risk of dropping out due to adverse events is inconclusive (RR 3.19, 95% CI 0.13 to 75.43; 2 studies, 182 participants; low-certainty evidence) and it is unclear whether hydrocortisone might improve quality of life (MD on the SF-36 (score range 0 to 136, higher is better) 19.70, 95% CI -1.10 to 40.50; 1 study, 43 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No study assessed functional disability. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides uncertain evidence regarding the use of escitalopram, hydrocortisone, intranasal oxytocin and temazepam for people with acute stress symptoms. It is therefore unclear whether these pharmacological interventions exert a positive or negative effect in this population. It is important to note that acute traumatic stress symptoms are often limited in time, and that the lack of data prevents the careful assessment of expected benefits against side effects that is therefore required. To yield stronger conclusions regarding both positive and negative outcomes, larger sample sizes are required. A common operational framework of criteria for inclusion and baseline assessment might help in better understanding who, if anyone, benefits from an intervention. As symptom severity alone does not provide the full picture of the impact of exposure to trauma, assessment of quality of life and functional impairment would provide a more comprehensive picture of the effects of the interventions. The assessment and reporting of side effects may facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of tolerability.


Asunto(s)
Sesgo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático Agudo , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático Agudo/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Citalopram/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Placebos/uso terapéutico
4.
Soins Psychiatr ; 45(352): 36-39, 2024.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719359

RESUMEN

The aim of the psychotrauma prevention algorithm is to limit the occurrence of psychotrauma in a subject who has experienced a serious life event, by carrying out an initial assessment to define the severity criterion and the monitoring modality best suited to his or her clinical condition. This approach is in line with the philosophy of outreach and the ethics of concern. Recontacting the patient during the course of treatment helps to maintain the therapeutic link and prevent any deterioration in his condition, thus limiting the risk of his traumatic state becoming chronic.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/enfermería , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Francia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Persona de Mediana Edad
5.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e083261, 2024 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760028

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Common mental health conditions (CMHCs), including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), are highly prevalent in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Preventive strategies combining psychological interventions with interventions addressing the social determinants of mental health may represent a key strategy for effectively preventing CMHCs. However, no systematic reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of these combined intervention strategies for preventing CMHCs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focused on the effectiveness of interventions that combine preventive psychological interventions with interventions that address the social determinants of mental health in LMICs. Primary outcome is the frequency of depression, anxiety or PTSD at postintervention as determined by a formal diagnostic tool or any other standardised criteria. We will search Epistemonikos, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, ClinicalTrials.gov (Ctgov), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Two reviewers will independently extract the data and evaluate the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2. Random-effects meta-analyses will be performed, and certainty of evidence will be rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study uses data from published studies; therefore, ethical review is not required. Findings will be presented in a published manuscript. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023451072.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Intervención Psicosocial/métodos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Salud Mental , Depresión/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
6.
S Afr Fam Pract (2004) ; 66(1): e1-e7, 2024 Feb 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND:  Since 2020, the world has been battling the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The mortality and morbidity at the height of the pandemic sparked generalised fear and uncertainty about the future. Concerns were raised about the psychological impact of the pandemic on workers in healthcare systems globally. This study was conducted to establish the degree of psychological impact of the pandemic on frontline health workers in Lesotho. METHODS:  The study used a quantitative cross-sectional survey design. The Kessler psychological distress screening tool (K-10) and the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist for civilians (PCL-C) were administered to screen for psychological distress among clinical staff at St. Joseph's Hospital in Roma and its four Health Centres. Additional open- and closed-ended questions were added for context. Data were analysed using Fisher's exact tests, Pearson chi-square tests and correlation studies. RESULTS:  Of the 101 participants, 42 (41.6%) scored ≥ 24 on the K-10 scale (95% CI: 32.0% - 51.2%) indicating moderate to severe psychological distress and 32 (31.7%) scored ≥ 50 on the PCL-C checklist suggesting severe PTSD (95% CI: 24.5% - 42.9%). High scores on the K-10 were found more among men than women (17 [37.8%] vs. 4 [7.1%]; p ≤ 0.001). Post-traumatic stress disorder was more in the younger age group (p ≤ 0.03), in those reporting anxiety (p = 0.005) and those with more co-morbidities (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION:  This study revealed the grave psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on frontline clinical health workers in Lesotho.Contribution: These data will assist health leaders and policymakers to implement mental health support interventions for health workers in future.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Distrés Psicológico , Romaní , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Transversales , Lesotho/epidemiología , Depresión
8.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 15(1): 2328956, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38533843

RESUMEN

ABSTRACTBackground: Many healthcare workers (HCWs) endured psychologically traumatic events at work during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. For some, these events are re-experienced as unwanted, recurrent, and distressing intrusive memories. Simple psychological support measures are needed to reduce such symptoms of post-traumatic stress in this population. A novel intervention to target intrusive memories, called an imagery-competing task intervention (ICTI), has been developed from the laboratory. The intervention includes a brief memory reminder cue, then a visuospatial task (Tetris® gameplay using mental rotation instructions for approximately 20 min) thought to interfere with the traumatic memory image and reduce its intrusiveness. The intervention has been adapted and evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with Swedish HCWs (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04460014).Objective: We aimed to explore how HCWs who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced the use of a brief intervention to reduce their intrusive memories of work-related trauma.Method: Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used for in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of HCWs who used the intervention. Seven participants from the RCT were interviewed by an independent researcher without prior knowledge of the intervention. Interviews were conducted via telephone and transcribed verbatim.Results: Four general themes were generated: 'Triggers and troublesome images', 'Five Ws regarding support - what, when, why, by/with who, for whom', 'Receiving it, believing it, and doing it' and 'The intervention - a different kind of help'; the last two included two subthemes each. The results reflect participants' similarities and differences in their lived experiences of intrusive memories, support measures, and intervention impressions and effects.Conclusion: HCWs' experiences of the novel ICTI reflect a promising appraisal of the intervention as a potential help measure for reducing intrusive memories after trauma, and gives us a detailed understanding of HCWs' needs, with suggestions for its adaption for future implementation.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04460014.


Many healthcare workers experience images or 'flashbacks' of traumatic experiences from their work during the COVID-19 pandemic.To ensure that individual needs are met, there is a need to tailor and refine current psychological support measures and their use for healthcare workers.The imagery-competing task intervention was perceived as acceptable, indicating its potential utility as a help measure to reduce intrusive memories after trauma.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Trauma Psicológico , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Trauma Psicológico/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Pandemias
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S1116-S1127, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38233316

RESUMEN

Psychological birth trauma and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder represent a substantial burden of disease with 6.6 million mothers and 1.7 million fathers or co-parents affected by childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder worldwide each year. There is mounting evidence to indicate that parents who develop childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder do so as a direct consequence of a traumatic childbirth experience. High-risk groups, such as those who experience preterm birth, stillbirth, or preeclampsia, have higher prevalence rates. The main risks include antenatal factors (eg, depression in pregnancy, fear of childbirth, poor health or complications in pregnancy, history of trauma or sexual abuse, or mental health problems), perinatal factors (eg, negative subjective birth experience, operative birth, obstetrical complications, and severe maternal morbidity, as well as maternal near misses, lack of support, dissociation), and postpartum factors (eg, depression, postpartum physical complications, and poor coping and stress). The link between birth events and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder provides a valuable opportunity to prevent traumatic childbirths and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder from occurring in the first place. Childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder is an extremely distressing mental disorder and has a substantial negative impact on those who give birth, fathers or co-parents, and, potentially, the whole family. Still, a traumatic childbirth experience and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder remain largely unrecognized in maternity services and are not routinely screened for during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In fact, there are gaps in the evidence on how, when, and who to screen. Similarly, there is a lack of evidence on how best to treat those affected. Primary prevention efforts (eg, screening for antenatal risk factors, use of trauma-informed care) are aimed at preventing a traumatic childbirth experience and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder in the first place by eliminating or reducing risk factors for childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Secondary prevention approaches (eg, trauma-focused psychological therapies, early psychological interventions) aim to identify those who have had a traumatic childbirth experience and to intervene to prevent the development of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Tertiary prevention (eg, trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing) seeks to ensure that people with childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder are identified and treated to recovery so that childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder does not become chronic. Adequate prevention, screening, and intervention could alleviate a considerable amount of suffering in affected families. In light of the available research on the impact of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder on families, it is important to develop and evaluate assessment, prevention, and treatment interventions that target the birthing person, the couple dyad, the parent-infant dyad, and the family as a whole. Further research should focus on the inclusion of couples in different constellations and, more generally, on the inclusion of more diverse populations in diverse settings. The paucity of national and international policy guidance on the prevention, care, and treatment of psychological birth trauma and the lack of formal psychological birth trauma services and training, highlight the need to engage with service managers and policy makers.


Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Parto , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol ; 397(1): 133-144, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37382600

RESUMEN

Current pharmacological treatments against post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) lack adequate efficacy. As a result, intense research has focused on identifying other molecular pathways mediating the pathogenesis of this condition. One such pathway is neuroinflammation, which has demonstrated a role in PTSD pathogenesis by causing synaptic dysfunction, neuronal death, and functional impairment in the hippocampus. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors (PDEIs) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents against neuroinflammation in other neurological conditions. Furthermore, PDEIs have shown some promise in animal models of PTSD. However, the current model of PTSD pathogenesis, which is based on dysregulated fear learning, implies that PDE inhibition in neurons should enhance the acquisition of fear memory from the traumatic event. As a result, we hypothesized that PDEIs may improve PTSD symptoms through inhibiting neuroinflammation rather than long-term potentiation-related mechanisms. To this end, we tested the therapeutic efficacy of cilostazol, a selective inhibitor of PDE3, on PTSD-related anxiety symptoms in the underwater trauma model of PTSD. PDE3 is expressed much more richly in microglia and astrocytes compared to neurons in the murine brain. Furthermore, we used hippocampal indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO) expression and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß) concentration as indicators of neuroinflammation. We observed that cilostazol pretreatment prevented the development of anxiety symptoms and the increase in hippocampal IDO and IL-1ß following PTSD induction. As a result, PDE3 inhibition ameliorated the neuroinflammatory processes involved in the development of PTSD symptoms. Therefore, cilostazol and other PDEIs may be promising candidates for further investigation as pharmacological therapies against PTSD.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Ratones , Animales , Cilostazol/farmacología , Cilostazol/uso terapéutico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/metabolismo , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Hipocampo/metabolismo
11.
J Nurs Adm ; 54(1): 16-24, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38078959

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of Transcendental Meditation® (TM®) practice on the multidimensional well-being of nurse clinicians affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND: The health of clinical nurses has substantial impact on both the availability of a nursing workforce and the quality and safety of patient care. TM improved health and coping strategies across many populations. METHODS: Clinical nurses were recruited from 3 Magnet®-designated hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Well-being outcomes included flourishing, burnout, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Participants were randomized following completion of baseline surveys into immediate (intervention) or delayed (control) TM instruction. Surveys were repeated at 1 and 3 months following baseline survey or TM instruction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance compared differences in groups over time. RESULTS: Across the 3 sites, there were 104 clinical nurse participants. Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed significant medium to large effects in improvement over time in well-being measures for the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: TM improved multidimensional well-being of clinical nurses by reducing posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and burnout and improving flourishing. TM is easy to practice anywhere. The benefits are immediate and cumulative. Organizations and individual nurses can use TM to support clinical nurses in the difficult and meaningful work of patient care, especially in challenging times. Future studies may consider the feasibility of integrating TM into clinical shifts and evaluating its impact on patient and organizational outcomes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Meditación , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Meditación/métodos , Pandemias , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control
12.
J Intensive Care Med ; 39(3): 268-276, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38105524

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) have post-traumatic stress (PTS) rates up to 64%, and up to 28% of them meet criteria for PTS disorder (PTSD). We aim to examine whether a prior trauma history and increased physiologic parameters due to a heightened sympathetic response are associated with later PTS. Our hypothesis was children with history of prehospitalization trauma, higher heart rates, blood pressures, cortisol, and extrinsic catecholamine administration during PICU admission are more likely to have PTS after discharge. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study of children admitted to the PICU at an urban, quaternary, academic children's hospital. Children aged 8 to 17 years old without developmental delay, severe psychiatric disorder, or traumatic brain injury were included. Children's prehospitalization trauma history was assessed with a semistructured interview. All in-hospital variables were from the electronic medical record. PTS was present if children had 4 of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria for PTSD. Student's t- and chi-squared tests were used to compare the presence or absence of prior trauma and all of the PICU-associated variables. RESULTS: Of the 110 children at baseline, 67 had 3-month follow-up. In the latter group, 46% met the criteria for PTS, mean age of 13 years (SD 3), 57% male, a mean PRISM III score of 4.9 (SD 4.3), and intensive care unit length of stay 6.5 days (SD 7.8). There were no statistically significant differences in the demographics of the children with and without PTS. The only variable to show significance was trauma history; children with prehospitalization trauma were more likely to have PTS at 3-month follow-up (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Prehospitalization trauma history was associated with the presence of PTS after admission to the PICU. This study suggests future studies should shift to the potential predictive benefit of screening children for trauma history upon PICU admission.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Femenino , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Alta del Paciente , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico
13.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(6): 610-641.e14, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38122842

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Women can develop posttraumatic stress disorder in response to experienced or perceived traumatic, often medically complicated, childbirth; the prevalence of these events remains high in the United States. Currently, no recommended treatment exists in routine care to prevent or mitigate maternal childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that evaluated any therapy to prevent or treat childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. DATA SOURCES: PsycInfo, PsycArticles, PubMed (MEDLINE), ClinicalTrials.gov, CINAHL, ProQuest, Sociological Abstracts, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for eligible trials published through September 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Trials were included if they were interventional, if they evaluated any therapy for childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder for the indication of symptoms or before posttraumatic stress disorder onset, and if they were written in English. METHODS: Independent coders extracted the sample characteristics and intervention information of the eligible studies and evaluated the trials using the Downs and Black's quality checklist and Cochrane's method for risk of bias evaluation. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pooled effect sizes of secondary and tertiary prevention trials. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies (32 randomized controlled trials, 9 nonrandomized trials) were reviewed. They evaluated brief psychological therapies including debriefing, trauma-focused therapies (including cognitive behavioral therapy and expressive writing), memory consolidation and reconsolidation blockage, mother-infant-focused therapies, and educational interventions. The trials targeted secondary preventions aimed at buffering childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder usually after traumatic childbirth (n=24), tertiary preventions among women with probable childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder (n=14), and primary prevention during pregnancy (n=3). A meta-analysis of the combined randomized secondary preventions showed moderate effects in reducing childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms when compared with usual treatment (standardized mean difference, -0.67; 95% confidence interval, -0.92 to -0.42). Single-session therapy within 96 hours of birth was helpful (standardized mean difference, -0.55). Brief, structured, trauma-focused therapies and semi-structured, midwife-led, dialogue-based psychological counseling showed the largest effects (standardized mean difference, -0.95 and -0.91, respectively). Other treatment approaches (eg, the Tetris game, mindfulness, mother-infant-focused treatment) warrant more research. Tertiary preventions produced smaller effects than secondary prevention but are potentially clinically meaningful (standardized mean difference, -0.37; -0.60 to -0.14). Antepartum educational approaches may help, but insufficient empirical evidence exists. CONCLUSION: Brief trauma-focused and non-trauma-focused psychological therapies delivered early in the period following traumatic childbirth offer a critical and feasible opportunity to buffer the symptoms of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Future research that integrates diagnostic and biological measures can inform treatment use and the mechanisms at work.


Asunto(s)
Parto , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Femenino , Embarazo , Parto/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos
14.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 14(2): 2251250, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38154074

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following a traumatic event, 40-80% of the patients with acute stress disorder (ASD) will develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 67% at 6 months. Alpha1-blockers are effective in treating some symptoms of PTSD but their usefulness in acute stress situations remains unclear. We hypothesized that reducing noradrenergic hyperactivity with an alpha1-blocker during the acute phase after a traumatic event could prevent the transition to PTSD in patients with ASD. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a 1-month course of alpha1-blocker (prazosin) to prevent the transition to PTSD in patients with ASD at 6 months. METHOD: In a monocentric open-label prospective pilot study, 15 patients with ASD were included within 3-7 days of exposure to a traumatic event. After enrolment, they received prazosin LP at home at bedtime at 2.5 mg/day for 7 days and then 5 mg/day for 21 days. Incidence of PTSD was assessed at 6 months using the Clinician Administrated PTSD Scale (CAPS). RESULTS: At 6 months, 22% of patients who completed the study (2/9) met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. This rate was significantly lower than that observed in previous studies (67%; p = .047). The treatment was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings indicating the safety of prazosin and suggesting its potential to prevent the development of PTSD in ASD require to be replicated in large-scale randomized placebo-controlled studies.Trial registration: The study was pre-registered on a public database (www.clinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03045016).


Alpha1-blockers are safe and well tolerated in patients with acute stress disorder.The use of alpha1-blockers 3­7 days after traumatic exposure is worthy of study.Alpha1-blockers could prevent the transition to PTSD in ASD patients at 6 months.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático Agudo , Humanos , Prazosina/uso terapéutico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
16.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37899567

RESUMEN

Extensive burns can cause nonnegligible acute and chronic damage to central nervous system of patients. The damage of central nervous system may have a profound impact on patients, including neurobehavioral changes such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorder. These changes may persist after injury, greatly affecting patients' integration into society and return to work. This paper systematically reviewed the clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, and current intervention methods of mental disorders in patients with extensive burns, aiming to provide a basis for further understanding, prevention, and treatment of patients with mental disorders after burns.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Ansiedad , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos de Ansiedad/complicaciones , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Quemaduras/terapia , Quemaduras/patología
17.
Psychiatr Danub ; 35(Suppl 2): 141-149, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37800217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a trauma- or stressor-related mental health condition with high socioeconomic burden. We aimed in this review to identify promising genetic markers predisposing for PTSD, which might serve in the design subsequent studies aiming to develop PTSD prevention and remediation measures. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our search queries in the PubMed database yielded 547 articles, of which 20 met our inclusion criteria for further analysis: published between 2018 and 2022, original research, containing molecular-genetic and statistical data, containing diagnosis verification methods, PTSD as a primary condition, and a sample of at least 60 patients. RESULTS: Among the 20 analyzed studies were reports of significant associations between PTSD and: FKBP5 variants rs9470080, regardless of the C or T allele; two FKBP5 haplotypes (A-G-C-C and A-G-C-T); gene-gene DRDхANNK1-COMT (rs1800497 × rs6269) and OXTR-DRD2 (rs2268498 × rs1801028); C-allele of CRHR1 (rs1724402). Other findings, such as the association of FKBP5 haplotypes (A-G-C-C, A-G-C-T) and the FKBP5-CRHR1 genotype, were of lesser statistical significance and less extensively studied. CONCLUSIONS: Although our literature analysis implicates certain genetic factors in PTSD, our understanding of the polygenic nature underlying the disorder remains limited, especially considering the hitherto underexplored epigenetic mechanisms. Future research endeavors should prioritize exploring these aspects to provide a more nuanced understanding of PTSD and its genetic underpinnings.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/genética , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Haplotipos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Genotipo , Alelos
18.
Intensive Care Med ; 49(11): 1317-1326, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37870597

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization is challenging for the family members of the patients. Most family members report some level of anxiety and depression, sometimes even resulting in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). An association has been reported between lack of information and PTSD. This study had three aims: to quantify the psychological burden of family members of critically ill patients, to explore whether a website with specific information could reduce PTSD symptoms, and to ascertain whether a website with information about intensive care would be used. METHOD: A multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in Austria and Switzerland. RESULTS: In total, 89 members of families of critically ill patients (mean age 47.3 ± 12.9 years, female n = 59, 66.3%) were included in the study. 46 relatives were allocated to the intervention website and 43 to the control website. Baseline Impact of Event Scale (IES) score was 27.5 ± 12.7. Overall, 50% showed clinically relevant PTSD symptoms at baseline. Mean IES score for the primary endpoint (~ 30 days after inclusion, T1) was 24 ± 15.8 (intervention 23.9 ± 17.9 vs. control 24.1 ± 13.5, p = 0.892). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS - Deutsch (D)) score at T1 was 12.2 ± 6.1 (min. 3, max. 31) and did not differ between groups. Use of the website differed between the groups (intervention min. 1, max. 14 vs. min. 1, max. 3; total 1386 "clicks" on the website, intervention 1021 vs. control 365). Recruitment was prematurely stopped in February 2020 due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CONCLUSION: Family members of critically ill patients often have significant PTSD symptoms and online information on critical illness did not result in reduced PTSD symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ansiedad/psicología , Cuidados Críticos/psicología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Método Doble Ciego
19.
J Glob Health ; 13: 06033, 2023 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616126

RESUMEN

Background: Though the severe prevention and control measures faced by Chinese nurses had changed during the normalisation stage of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, they still worked under great stress. Due to a lack of related evidence, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and correlates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among Chinese nurses during the normalisation of COVID-19 pandemic prevention and control measures. Methods: Using convenience sampling, we recruited 784 nurses in Jiangsu province, China to complete a survey via their mobile devices. We used a demographic questionnaire, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and The Impact of Event Scale-Revised to collect data and applied binary logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with PTSD. Results: The prevalence of PTSD was 26.4%. Married nurses were less likely to experience PTSD than unmarried ones (odds ratio (OR) = 0.573; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.33-0.99, P = 0.046). Social support (OR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.94-0.98, P = 0.000) and resilience (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.97-0.99, P = 0.004) were significant predictors of PTSD. Conclusions: PTSD remained prevalent among Chinese nurses as COVID-19 pandemic prevention and control measures became normalised, with an incidence rate of 26.4%. Resilience, social support, and marital status were factors associated with PTSD. Chinese hospital management must intervene to improve resilience and social support for nurses to reduce symptoms of PTSD.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Prevalencia , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control
20.
Transl Psychiatry ; 13(1): 281, 2023 08 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37580354

RESUMEN

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating condition that occurs following exposure to traumatic events. Current treatments, such as psychological debriefing and pharmacotherapy, often have limited efficacy and may result in unwanted side effects, making early intervention is a more desirable strategy. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of a single dose of pulsed (10 Hz) 810 nm laser-phototherapy (P-PT) as an early intervention for preventing PTSD-like comorbidities in rats induced by single inescapable electric foot shock following the single prolonged stress (SPS&S). As indicated by the results of the open filed test, elevated plus maze test, and contextual fear conditioning test, P-PT prevented the development of anxiety and freezing behaviors in rats exposed to the SPS&S. We also compared the effects of P-PT and continuous wave 810 nm laser-phototherapy (CW-PT) in preventing PTSD-like comorbidities in rats. The results revealed that P-PT was effective in preventing both freezing and anxiety behavior in stressed rats. In contrast, CW-PT only had a preventive effect on freezing behavior but not anxiety. Additionally, P-PT significantly reduced the c-fos expression in cingulate cortex area 1(Cg1) and infralimbic cortex (IL) of stressed rats, while CW-PT had no significant effects on c-fos expression. Taken together, our results demonstrate that P-PT is a highly effective strategy for preventing the occurrence of PTSD-like comorbidities in rats.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Ratas , Animales , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Ansiedad/psicología , Miedo , Fototerapia , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA