Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.950
Filtrar
1.
S Afr J Surg ; 62(2): 70, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838127

RESUMEN

SUMMARY: We present a previously healthy 13-year-old male, who sustained a handlebar injury after falling from his bicycle. The computerised tomography (CT) scan indicated a probable pancreatic neoplasm associated with a retroperitoneal haematoma which was, following resection, confirmed histologically to be a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. These are rare tumours of the pancreas, especially in young males. The rarity of this neoplasm and the mechanism that led to its presentation make this an interesting and unique case.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adolescente , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/cirugía , Ciclismo/lesiones
2.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1161-1166, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs) are rare but require a variety of operative techniques to repair including bone anchor fixation (BAF) when tissue tears off bony structures. This study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of BAF technique for blunt TAWH repair. Bone anchor fixation and no BAF repairs were compared, hypothesizing increased hernia recurrence with BAF repair. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the WTA blunt TAWH multicenter study was performed including all patients who underwent repair of their TAWH. Patients with BAF were compared to those with no BAF with bivariate analyses. RESULTS: 176 patients underwent repair of their TAWH with 41 (23.3%) undergoing BAF. 26 (63.4%) patients had tissue fixed to bone, with 7 of those reinforced with mesh. The remaining 15 (36.6%) patients had bridging mesh anchored to bone. The BAF group had a similar age, sex, body mass index, and injury severity score compared to the no BAF group. The time to repair (1 vs 1 days, P = .158), rate of hernia recurrence (9.8% vs 12.7%, P = .786), and surgical site infection (SSI) (12.5% vs 15.6%, P = .823) were all similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This largest series to date found nearly one-quarter of TAWH repairs required BAF. Bone anchor fixation repairs had a similar rate of hernia recurrence and SSI compared to no BAF repairs, suggesting this is a reasonable option for repair of TAWH. However, future prospective studies are needed to compare specific BAF techniques and evaluate long-term outcomes including patient-centered outcomes such as pain and quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Anclas para Sutura , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Abdominal/etiología , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología
4.
S Afr J Surg ; 62(1): 29-36, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Selective non-operative management (SNOM) of penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) is routinely practised in our trauma centre. This study aims to report the outcomes of patients who have failed SNOM. METHODS: Patients presenting with PAT from 1 May 2015 - 31 January 2018 were reviewed. They were categorised into immediate laparotomy and delayed operative management (DOM) groups. Outcomes compared were postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 944 patients with PAT were reviewed. After excluding 100 patients undergoing damage control surgery, 402 (47.6%) and 542 (52.4%) were managed non-operatively and operatively, respectively. In the SNOM cohort, 359 (89.3%) were managed successfully without laparotomy. Thirty-seven (86.0%) patients in the DOM group had a therapeutic laparotomy, and six (14.0%) had an unnecessary laparotomy. Nine (20.9%) patients in the DOM group developed complications. The DOM group had lesser complications. However, the two groups had no difference in hospital length of stay (LOS). There was no mortality in the non-operative management (NOM) group. CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrated no mortality and less morbidity in the DOM group when appropriately selected compared to the immediate laparotomy group. This supports the selective NOM approach for PAT in high volume trauma centres.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Humanos , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Laparotomía , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Centros Traumatológicos
5.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e083135, 2024 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580358

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Trauma contributes to the greatest loss of disability-adjusted life-years for adolescents and young adults worldwide. In the context of global abdominal trauma, the trauma laparotomy is the most commonly performed operation. Variation likely exists in how these patients are managed and their subsequent outcomes, yet very little global data on the topic currently exists. The objective of the GOAL-Trauma study is to evaluate both patient and injury factors for those undergoing trauma laparotomy, their clinical management and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We describe a planned prospective multicentre observational cohort study of patients undergoing trauma laparotomy. We will include patients of all ages who present to hospital with a blunt or penetrating injury and undergo a trauma laparotomy within 5 days of presentation to the treating centre. The study will collect system, patient, process and outcome data, following patients up until 30 days postoperatively (or until discharge or death, whichever is first). Our sample size calculation suggests we will need to recruit 552 patients from approximately 150 recruiting centres. DISCUSSION: The GOAL-Trauma study will provide a global snapshot of the current management and outcomes for patients undergoing a trauma laparotomy. It will also provide insight into the variation seen in the time delays for receiving care, the disease and patient factors present, and patient outcomes. For current standards of trauma care to be improved worldwide, a greater understanding of the current state of trauma laparotomy care is paramount if appropriate interventions and targets are to be identified and implemented.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas Penetrantes , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Laparotomía/métodos , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
6.
J Surg Res ; 298: 341-346, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663260

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hospital overcrowding is common and can lead to delays in intensive care unit (ICU) admission, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality in medical and surgical patients. Data on delayed ICU admission are limited in the postsurgical trauma cohort. Damage control laparotomy with temporary abdominal closure (DCL-TAC) for severely injured patients is often followed by an aggressive early resuscitation phase, usually occurring in the ICU. We hypothesized that patients who underwent DCL-TAC with initial postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay would have worse outcomes than those directly admitted to ICU. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified all trauma patients who underwent DCL-TAC at a level 1 trauma center over a 5 y period. Demographics, injuries, and resuscitation markers at 12 and 24 h were collected. Patients were stratified by location after index laparotomy (PACU versus ICU) and compared. Outcomes included composite morbidity and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Of the 561 patients undergoing DCL-TAC, 134 (24%) patients required PACU stay due to ICU bed shortage, and 427 (76%) patients were admitted directly to ICU. There was no difference in demographics, injury severity score, time to resuscitation, complications, or mortality between PACU and ICU groups. Only 46% of patients were resuscitated at 24 h; 76% underwent eventual primary fascial closure. Under-resuscitation at 24 h (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.95, P = 0.03), increased age (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-10.55, P < 0.0001), and increased injury severity score (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.07, P < 0.0001) were associated with mortality on multivariable logistic regression. The median time in PACU was 3 h. CONCLUSIONS: PACU hold is not associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing DCL-TAC. While ICU was designed for the resuscitation of critically ill patients, PACU is an appropriate alternative when an ICU bed is unavailable.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Laparotomía , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
7.
World J Surg ; 48(6): 1315-1322, 2024 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570898

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In this diagnostic accuracy study, we examined the effectiveness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASW) who exhibit unclear findings on physical examination yet remain hemodynamically stable. METHODS: Over a 7-year period, patients with AASW were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups as surgical (SG) and nonsurgical group (nSG). The SG were also divided into two groups as therapeutic surgery (TS) group and the non-therapeutic surgery (nTS) group. The groups were compared in terms of NLR, PLR values and SII scores. RESULTS: In a retrospective analysis of 199 patients with AASW, NLR, PLR and SII obtained during clinical follow-up of patients with AASW in whom the necessity for immediate surgery was unclear significantly predicted therapeutic surgery (p < 0.001 for all). These parameters did not show a significant difference in predicting the need for surgery at the admission. NLR showed an AUC of 0.971 and performed significantly better than PLR and SII (AUC = 0.874 and 0.902, respectively) in predicting TS. The optimal cut-off value for NLR was 3.33, with a sensitivity of 98.2%, a specificity of 90%, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02. Time from admission to surgery was significantly shorter in the TS group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: NLR, PLR and SII values may be useful in predicting therapeutic surgery during clinical follow-up in AASW patients with unclear physical examination findings and in whom immediate surgical decisions cannot be made.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Neutrófilos , Heridas Punzantes , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Heridas Punzantes/cirugía , Heridas Punzantes/sangre , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfocitos , Recuento de Linfocitos , Inflamación/sangre , Recuento de Plaquetas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adulto Joven , Plaquetas , Recuento de Leucocitos
9.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(3): 582-584, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591304

RESUMEN

Pancreaticoureteric Fistula (PUF) is a very rare complication secondary to penetrating abdominal trauma involving the ureter and pancreatic parenchyma. Pancreatic injuries carry h igh morbidity due to the involvem ent of surrounding structures and are d ifficult to diagnose due to thei r retroperitoneal location. A case of a patient is reported at Civil Hospital, Hyderabad who presented with a history of firearm injury and missed pancreatic duct involvement on initial exploration that eventually led to the development of Pan creaticoureteric Fistula. He was managed v ia p erc ut aneous nep hrostomy ( PCN ) for the right ureteric injury and pancreatic duct (PD) stenting was done for distal main pancreatic duct injury (MPD).


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Armas de Fuego , Fístula , Enfermedades Pancreáticas , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Masculino , Humanos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Páncreas/cirugía , Conductos Pancreáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Conductos Pancreáticos/cirugía , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía
10.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1787-1790, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532253

RESUMEN

Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the abdomen is a rare yet highly morbid complication following blunt and penetrating trauma requiring damage control laparotomy. We present the case of a 22-year-old man, 20 months after life-threatening motor vehicle crash with major vascular injury requiring multiple abdominal surgeries. The patient was initially treated at a community hospital and subsequently developed a chronic left lower quadrant enterocutaneous fistula, accompanied by a gradually worsening diffuse abdominal pain. He was referred to our tertiary care center with extensive skin breakdown and an inability to control the fistula despite numerous wound care consultations. He also had severe abdominal deformities due to HO in the abdominal wall, peritoneum, paraspinal muscles, and parapelvic regions. As HO is largely underreported, it is crucial to refer those patients, once medically stabilized, to tertiary care centers for surveillance and possible treatment when symptomatic.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparotomía , Osificación Heterotópica , Humanos , Osificación Heterotópica/etiología , Osificación Heterotópica/cirugía , Osificación Heterotópica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Laparotomía/métodos , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Adulto Joven , Accidentes de Tránsito , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones
11.
Am Surg ; 90(7): 1934-1936, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523121

RESUMEN

Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) is a rapid triage tool aiding the detection of life-threatening injuries. In academic settings, residents perform most eFAST; however, the ACGME has no recommendations for eFAST training standards. We surveyed general surgery programs (GSPs) regarding eFAST training and established a baseline for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for resident-performed eFAST. US GSP eFAST surveys were conducted by email and phone. We prospectively collected patient variables and evaluated resident performance from May to September 2022 and 2023 at an academic level I trauma center. A total of 60/339 general surgery residency programs (GSRPs) responded: Ten use Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) only, n = 7 group training, n = 8 on-the-job only, and n = 33 several methods. Resident-performed eFAST had accuracy = 85.6%, sensitivity = 35.6%, specificity = 97.2%, PPV = 75%, and NPV = 87%. General surgery residency program training in eFAST is non-standardized. Sensitivity was considerably lower than the literature suggests. Positive resident-performed eFAST is generally accurate. We recommend a standardized approach to resident training in eFAST.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación Enfocada con Ecografía para Trauma , Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Cirugía General/educación , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Triaje
12.
Am Surg ; 90(7): 1960-1962, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537664

RESUMEN

Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing traumatic exploratory laparotomy. The goal of this study was to compare antibiotic usage and subsequent outcomes in patients undergoing traumatic exploratory laparotomy. A retrospective chart analysis and a chi-square test of independence were performed to examine the relation between preoperative cefoxitin versus ceftriaxone and metronidazole and the rate of SSI development. 323 patients were analyzed, 111 patients receiving cefoxitin and 212 patients receiving ceftriaxone and metronidazole. The proportion of patients who developed SSI was 16.2% for the cefoxitin group and 9.9% for the ceftriaxone and metronidazole group, X2 (1, N = 323) = 2.7, P = .098, thus displaying no statistical difference in the development of SSIs between patients in the cefoxitin group when compared to the ceftriaxone and metronidazole group.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefoxitina , Ceftriaxona , Laparotomía , Metronidazol , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/administración & dosificación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cefoxitina/uso terapéutico , Cefoxitina/administración & dosificación , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Laparotomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones
13.
World J Surg ; 48(3): 568-573, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the early 2000s, substantial variations were reported in the management of pediatric patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI). The purpose of this study was to assess the recent trends and disparities between different types of trauma centers. We hypothesized that there would be persistent disparities despite decreased trends in the rate of splenectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. We included patients (age ≤18 years) with high-grade BSI (Abbreviated Injury Scale 3-5) between 2014 and 2021. The patients were divided into three groups based on trauma center types (adult trauma centers [ATCs], mixed trauma centers [MTCs], and pediatric trauma centers [PTCs]). The primary outcome was the splenectomy rate. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between trauma center types and clinical outcomes. Additionally, the trends in the rate of splenectomy at ATCs, MTCs, and PTCs were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 6601 patients with high-grade BSI were included in the analysis. Overall splenectomy rates were 524 (17.5%), 448 (16.3%), and 32 (3.7%) in the ATC, MTC, and PTC groups, respectively. ATCs and MTCs had significantly higher splenectomy rates compared to PTCs (ATCs: OR = 5.72, 95%CI = 3.78-8.67, and p < 0.001 and MTCs: OR = 4.50, 95%CI = 2.97-6.81, and p < 0.001), while decreased trends in the splenectomy rates were observed in ATCs and MTCs (ATCs: OR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.87-0.97, and p = 0.003 and MTCs: OR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.87-0.98, and p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested persistent disparities between different trauma center types in the management of children with high-grade BSI.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Anomalías del Sistema Digestivo , Heridas no Penetrantes , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Centros Traumatológicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Bazo/cirugía , Bazo/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Esplenectomía , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía
14.
Surg Clin North Am ; 104(2): 437-449, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453312

RESUMEN

This article delves into the role of minimally invasive surgeries in trauma, specifically laparoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). It discusses the benefits of laparoscopy over traditional laparotomy, including its accuracy in detecting peritoneal violation and intraperitoneal injuries caused by penetrating trauma. The article also explores the use of laparoscopy as an adjunct to nonoperative management of abdominal injuries and in cases of blunt trauma with unclear abdominal injuries. Furthermore, it highlights the benefits of VATS in diagnosing and treating thoracic injuries, such as traumatic diaphragmatic injuries, retained hematomas, and persistent pneumothorax.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparoscopía , Traumatismos Torácicos , Heridas Penetrantes , Humanos , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía
15.
Am J Surg ; 231: 125-131, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38309996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Algorithms for managing penetrating abdominal trauma are conflicting or vague regarding the role of laparoscopy. We hypothesized that laparoscopy is underutilized among hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds. METHODS: Trauma Quality Improvement Program data (2016-2019) were used to identify stable (SBP ≥110 and GCS ≥13) patients ≥16yrs with stab wounds and an abdominal procedure within 24hr of admission. Patients with a non-abdominal AIS ≥3 or missing outcome information were excluded. Patients were analyzed based on index procedure approach: open, therapeutic laparoscopy (LAP), or LAP-conversion to open (LCO). Center, clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared according to surgical approach and abdominal AIS using non-parametric analysis. RESULTS: 5984 patients met inclusion criteria with 7 â€‹% and 8 â€‹% receiving therapeutic LAP and LCO, respectively. The conversion rate for patients initially treated with LAP was 54 â€‹%. Compared to conversion or open, therapeutic LAP patients had better outcomes including shorter ICU and hospital stays and less infection complications, but were younger and less injured. Assessing by abdominal AIS eliminated ISS differences, meanwhile LAP patients still had shorter hospital stays. At time of admission, 45 â€‹% of open patients met criteria for initial LAP opportunity as indicated by comparable clinical presentation as therapeutic laparoscopy patients. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopy remains infrequently utilized despite its increasing inclusion in current guidelines. Additional opportunity exists for therapeutic laparoscopy in trauma, which appears to be a viable alternative to open surgery for select injuries from abdominal stab wounds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparoscopía , Heridas Penetrantes , Heridas Punzantes , Humanos , Laparotomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas Punzantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/etiología
16.
Surgery ; 175(5): 1424-1431, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal infection is a common complication of blunt abdominal trauma. Early detection and intervention can reduce the incidence of intra-abdominal infection and improve patients' prognoses. This study aims to construct a clinical model predicting postsurgical intra-abdominal infection after blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 553 patients with blunt abdominal trauma from the Department of General Surgery of 7 medical centers (2011-2021). A 7:3 ratio was used to assign patients to the derivation and validation cohorts. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether intra-abdominal infection occurred after blunt abdominal trauma. Multivariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used to select variables to establish a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated, and the validity of the model was further evaluated by the validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 113 were diagnosed with intra-abdominal infection (20.4%). Age, prehospital time, C-reactive protein, injury severity score, operation duration, intestinal injury, neutrophils, and antibiotic use were independent risk factors for intra-abdominal infection in blunt abdominal trauma patients (P < .05). The area under the receiver operating curve (area under the curve) of derivation cohort and validation cohort was 0.852 (95% confidence interval, 0.784-0.912) and 0.814 (95% confidence interval, 0.751-0.902). The P value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was .135 and .891 in the 2 cohorts. The calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram had a high consistency between prediction and practical observation. The decision curve analysis also showed that the nomogram had a better potential for clinical application. To facilitate clinical application, we have developed an online at https://nomogramcgz.shinyapps.io/IAIrisk/. CONCLUSION: The nomogram is helpful in predicting the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infection in patients with blunt abdominal trauma and provides guidance for clinical decision-making and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Infecciones Intraabdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Nomogramas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/diagnóstico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/etiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía
17.
Surgery ; 175(4): 955-962, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We have developed an algorithmic approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including subtotal cholecystectomy, as a bailout strategy when the Critical View of Safety cannot be safely achieved due to significant inflammation and fibrosis of the hepatocystic triangle. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study comparing postoperative outcomes in patients with severe cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy or laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy at St. Joseph's Health Centre from May 2016 to July 2021, as well as against a historical cohort. We further stratified laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy cases based on fenestrating or reconstituting subtype. RESULTS: The cohort included a total of 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 31 patients who underwent laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. Bile leaks (25.8% vs 1.0%, relative risk 3.5, 95% confidence interval 3.5-208.4) were more common in the laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy group. Postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (22.6% vs 3.8%, relative risk 5.9, 95% confidence interval 1.9-18.9) and biliary stent insertion (19.4% vs 1.0%, relative risk 20.3, 95% confidence interval 2.5-162.5) were also more common in the laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy group. Bile leaks in laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy were only documented in the fenestration subtype, most of which were successfully managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and biliary stenting. Compared to our previous study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis between 2010 and 2016, there has been a decrease in postoperative laparoscopic cholecystectomy complications, subtotal cholecystectomy cases, and no bile duct injuries. CONCLUSION: Following our algorithmic approach to safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy has helped to prevent bile duct injury. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the gold standard for the management of severe cholecystitis; however, in extreme cases, laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe bailout strategy with manageable morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistitis , Humanos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colecistectomía/métodos , Colecistitis/cirugía , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía
18.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(2)2024 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417934

RESUMEN

Handlebar injury is an uncommon mechanism of blunt injury with a recognised risk of injury to groin vasculature. We describe two cases involving bicycle handlebar injury to the groin and their different respective outcomes. Patient A sustained a significant limb-threatening injury following significant arterial and venous disruption. Surgical intervention was able to restore arterial flow via interpositional vein graft, while venous injuries were ligated. As a result, the patient was discharged with a viable limb and a non-disabling swelling from venous pathology. Patient B, of identical age, also sustained a bicycle handlebar injury to the groin but without the need for surgical intervention. Active observation and the use of repeat imaging suggested spontaneous cessation of any minor arterial bleeding; the patient made a rapid recovery and was discharged soon thereafter. These cases highlight the variability in outcome stemming from this injury mechanism and that early recognition is vital for limb viability.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Ciclismo/lesiones , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Páncreas , Ingle/lesiones
19.
J Trop Pediatr ; 70(2)2024 02 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366669

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate determinants impacting the surgical management of splenic trauma in paediatric patients by scrutinizing age distribution, etiological factors and concomitant injuries. The analysis seeks to establish a foundation for delineating optimal operative timing. METHODS: A cohort of 262 paediatric cases presenting with splenic trauma at our institution from January 2011 to December 2021 underwent categorization into either the conservative or operative group. RESULTS: Significantly disparate attributes between the two groups included age, time of presentation, blood pressure, haemoglobin levels, blood transfusion requirements, thermal absorption, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification and associated injuries. Logistic regression analysis revealed age, haemoglobin levels, AAST classification and blood transfusion as autonomous influencers of surgical intervention (OR = 1.024, 95% CI: 1.011-1.037; OR = 1.067, 95% CI: 1.01-1.127; OR = 0.2760, 95% CI: 0.087-0.875; OR = 7.873, 95% CI: 2.442-25.382; OR = 0.016, 95% CI: 0.002-0.153). The AAST type and age demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.782 and 0.618, respectively. CONCLUSION: Age, haemoglobin levels, AAST classification and blood transfusion independently influence the decision for surgical intervention in paediatric patients with splenic trauma. Age and AAST classification emerge as viable parameters for assessing and prognosticating the likelihood of surgical intervention in this patient cohort.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Niño , Bazo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Hemoglobinas , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
20.
J Am Coll Surg ; 238(6): 1106-1114, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323622

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of pediatric patients with high-grade blunt pancreatic injury (BPI) involving the main pancreatic duct remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the nationwide trends in the management of pediatric high-grade BPI at pediatric (PTC), mixed (MTC), and adult trauma centers (ATC). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study of the National Trauma Data Bank. We included pediatric patients (age 16 years or less) sustaining high-grade BPI (Abbreviated Injury Scale 3 or more) from 2011 to 2021. Patients who did not undergo pancreatic operation were categorized into the nonoperative management (NOM) group. Trauma centers were defined as PTC (level I/II pediatric only), MTC (level I/II adult and pediatric), and ATC (level I/II adult only). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients undergoing NOM, and secondary outcomes included the use of ERCP and in-hospital mortality. A Cochran-Armitage test was used to analyze the trend. RESULTS: A total of 811 patients were analyzed. The median age was 9 years (interquartile range 6 to 13), 64% were male patients, and the median injury severity score was 17 (interquartile range 10 to 25). During the study period, there was a significant upward linear trend in the use of NOM and ERCP among the overall cohort (range 48% to 66%; p trend = 0.033, range 6.1% to 19%; p trend = 0.030, respectively). The significant upward trend for NOM was maintained in the subgroup of patients at PTC and MTC (p trend = 0.037), whereas no significant trend was observed at ATC (p trend = 0.61). There was no significant trend in in-hospital mortality (p trend = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: For the management of pediatric patients with high-grade BPI, this study found a significant trend toward increasing use of NOM and ERCP without mortality deterioration, especially at PTC and MTC.


Asunto(s)
Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Páncreas , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Adolescente , Páncreas/lesiones , Páncreas/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA