Low-velocity penetrating brain injury: a review of the literature and illustrative case.

INTRODUCTION: Low-velocity penetrating brain injury (LVPBI) is a class of brain injury where a foreign object violates the skull and damages the brain. Such injuries are rare and consequently understudied. CASE: As such, we report an illustrative case of a 29-year-old female with a dense, plastic spike penetrating her right orbit and into her midbrain. After assessment with a CT scan and angiography, the object was removed with careful attention to possible vascular injury. The patient had an uncomplicated post-operative course and received antibiotic and antiepileptic prophylaxis. She was discharged on post-operative day 5, experiencing only mild left-sided weakness. DISCUSSION: Common concerns regarding LVPBI include infection, post-traumatic epilepsy, and vascular injury. A review of published LVPBI cases over the past 20 years demonstrated that most cases (55.2%) are due to accidents. Of patients undergoing surgery, 43.4% underwent a craniotomy, and 22.8% underwent a craniectomy. Despite the grave nature of LVPBI, only 13.5% of the patients died. Additionally, 6.5% of patients developed an infection over their clinical course. CONCLUSION: In all, more reported cases further paint a picture of the current state of management and outcomes regarding LVPBI, paving the way for more cohesive guidelines to ensure the best possible patient outcomes.

Ethical Issues Regarding Neurosurgical Management of Penetrating Brain Injury in the French Armed Forces.

Combat penetrating brain injury (PBI) differs significantly from PBI in civilian environments. Differences include technical factors such as the weapons involved, strained resource environments, and limited medical materials and human resources available. Ethical issues regarding the management of PBI in military settings may occur. This case study examines the case of a 20-year-old member of the French Armed Forces that suffered a penetrating brain injury in a combat situation. The four-quadrant method along with the four principles of medical ethics (respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice) was used to analyze this case and to apply ethics to the practice of military medicine. Nowadays, we possess the medical and surgical resources as well as the aeromedical evacuation capability to save the life of a soldier with a penetrating craniocerebral wound. Nonetheless, the functional outcome of this type of wound places military doctors in an ethical dilemma. The line of conduct and clinical protocol established by the French Medical Health Service is to manage all PBIs when the patient's life can be saved and to provide all available financial and social support for the rehabilitation of patients and their family.

Comparative Effectiveness of Early Neurosurgical Intervention in Civilian Penetrating Brain Injury Management.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of early vs no-neurosurgical intervention in civilians with penetrating brain injury (PBI). METHODS: We collected data from the National Trauma Data Bank for PBI between 2017 and 2019. A total of 10 607 cases were identified; 1276 cases met the following criteria: age 16-60 years, an intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) of >2 days, a Glasgow Coma Scale of 3-12, and at least one reactive pupil on presentation. Patients with withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 72 hours were excluded, leaving 1231 patients for analysis. Neurosurgical intervention was defined as an open-approach cranial procedure involving release, drainage, or extirpation of brain matter performed within 24 hours. Outcomes of interest were mortality, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, ICU LOS, and dispositional outcome. RESULTS: The target population was 1231 patients (84.4% male; median [IQR] age, 29 [18] years); 267 (21.7%) died, and 364 (29.6%) had a neurosurgical intervention within the first 24 hours. 1:1 matching yielded 704 patients (352 in each arm). In the matched cohort (mortality 22.6%), 64 patients who received surgery (18.2%) died compared with 95 (27%) in the nonsurgical group. Survival was more likely in the surgical group (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, CI 1.16-2.38, P < .01; number needed to treat 11). Dispositional outcome was not different. Overlap propensity score-weighted analysis (1231 patients) resulted in higher odds of survival in the surgical group (OR 1.8, CI 1.16-2.80, P < .01). The E-value for the OR calculated from the matched data set was 2.83. Early neurosurgical intervention was associated with longer ICU LOS (median 12 days [7.0, 19.0 IQR] vs 8 days [4.0, 15.0 IQR], P < .05). CONCLUSION: Management including early neurosurgical intervention is associated with decreased mortality and increased ICU LOS in matched cohorts of PBI.

Diagnosis and management of occult non-missile penetrating brain injury.

Penetrating brain injury (PBI) is a subtype of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that has been steadily increasing in prevalence and causing significant mortality in trauma patients. In an emergent setting, it is important to determine the mechanism of injury and decide whether a PBI or a blunt TBI has occurred in order to guide diagnostic imaging and subsequent treatment. In cases where a PBI has been likely or has occurred, it is important to initiate treatment expeditiously as rapid interventions have been shown to lead to better outcomes. However, in cases of unwitnessed pediatric trauma, it can be difficult to ascertain the specific method of injury due to a lack of reliable sources. In such cases of unwitnessed trauma, PBI should be included in the differential of any orbitocranial injury. In this series, we present two cases of unwitnessed pediatric orbitocranial injury that highlight the importance of gathering a detailed history, obtaining appropriate imaging studies, and using physician intuition.

Neurosurgical management of penetrating brain injury during World War I: A historical cohort.

During World War I, 25% of penetrating injuries were in the cephalic region. Major Henri Brodier described his surgical techniques in a book in which he reported every consecutive penetrating brain injury (PBI) that he operated on from August 1914 to July 1916. The aim was to collate his data and discuss significant differences in management between soldiers who survived and those who died. We conducted a retrospective survey that included every consecutive PBI patient operated on by Henri Brodier from August 1914 to April 1916 and recorded in his book. We reported medical and surgical management. Seventy-seven patients underwent trepanation by Henri Brodier for PBI. Regarding injury mechanism, 66 procedures (86%) were for shrapnel injury. Regarding location, 21 (30%) involved the whole convexity. Intracranial venous sinus wound was diagnosed intraoperatively in 11 patients (14%). Postoperatively, 7 patients (9%) had seizures, 5 (6%) had cerebral herniation, 3 (4%) had cerebral abscess, and 5 (6%) had meningitis. No patients with abscess or meningitis survived. No significant intergroup differences were found for injury mechanism or wound location, including the venous sinus. Extensive initial surgery with debridement must be prioritized. Infectious complications must not be neglected. We should not forget the lessons of the past when managing casualties in present-day and future conflicts.

Transorbital penetrating head injury by a wooden chopstick in the cavernous sinus: a case report and literature review.

Penetrating head injury is a relatively rare condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although the immediate treatment of penetrating head injury is needed, surgical strategies are varied based on the trajectory of the penetrating objects in the cranium. We present a case of 24-year-old man who sustained a transorbital penetrating injury caused by a wooden chopstick. Neuroimages revealed a linear lesion extending from the left intraorbital segment to the cavernous sinus passing through the superior orbital fissure. The foreign body was successfully removed via the transcranial approach without complications. A careful management based on the perioperative images and correct diagnosis is necessary to avoid unfavorable complications. Four cases of transorbital penetrating injuries have been previously reported, in which the foreign body penetrated through the superior orbital fissure and lodged in the cavernous sinus. The frontotemporal craniotomy with extradural approach can be a useful option to remove foreign bodies around the cavernous sinus regions.

The Origin of Surrealism: Rethinking Apollinaire's Penetrating Brain Injury with Current Knowledge Regarding White Matter Tracts.

The French poet Apollinaire enrolled in the French army during World War I. In 1916, he sustained a penetrating brain injury when a fragment of shrapnel pierced his helmet in the right temporal region. Neurosurgical techniques were at that time standardized to manage the significant number of war-related neurosurgical casualties. Apollinaire, who experienced transient fainting followed by left-sided hemiparesis 2 months after his trauma, underwent trepanation. The poet's personality and behavior changed dramatically after his trauma. These neurobehavioral changes, associated with preserved cognition and no other neurologic dysfunction, were later described as Apollinaire syndrome. These personality changes were accompanied by flourishing writing changes. Hence, 15 months after his penetrating brain injury, the poet introduced the term "surrealism" to the world in his play The Breasts of Tiresias, giving birth to a major movement that paved the way for the 20th century. Linguistic shifts such as phonologic and semantic word games were at the forefront of the narrative process of the play. Traumatic brain injury often leads to cognitive impairment. In the case of Apollinaire, if the ballistic trauma were also responsible for diffuse axonal injury, it could have also led to semantic and social cognition impairment, in addition to the neuropsychological disorders that had already been widely documented by his friends and family. The world will always remember Apollinaire's writing genius as deeply associated with the birth of surrealism. But what if the poet's new writing style was caused, at least in part, by the unexpected help of a lost shrapnel fragment?

New surgical technique for non-missile trauma hemostasis as a result of sewing needle.

Traumas are the most important cause of mortality in the pediatric population. Bleeding is an important complication, especially in traumatic brain injuries with coagulation problem addition. Low-velocity penetrating brain injuries may be caused by sewing needles, nails, and knives. There are few studies in the literature for this injury type. This study presented a surgical technique and treatment to increase hemostasis in a 2-year-old patient after a sewing needle injury.

Surviving a Self-inflicted Transorbital Pen Intrusion to the Cerebellum: Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Although intracranial traumas by penetrating foreign objects are not absolute rarities, the nature of trauma, the kind of object, and its trajectory make them a one of a kind case every time they occur. Whereas high-velocity traumas mostly result in fatalities, it is the low-velocity traumas that demand an individualized surgical strategy. METHODS: We present a case report of a 33-year-old patient who was admitted to our department with a self-inflicted transorbital pen injury to the brain. The authors recall the incident and the technique of the pen removal. RESULTS: Large surgical exposure of the pen trajectory was considered too traumatic. Therefore, we opted to remove the pen and have an immediate postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Due to its fragility, the pen case could only be removed with a screwdriver, inserted into the case. Post-op CT scan showed a small bleeding in the right peduncular region, which was treated conservatively. The patient was transferred back to intensive care unit and woken up the next day. She lost visual function on her right eye, but suffered from no further neurologic deficit. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of removal of intracranial foreign bodies is no routine procedure. Although some would favor a large surgical exposure, we could not think of an approach to do so without maximum surgical efforts. We opted for a minimal surgical procedure with immediate CT scan and achieved an optimal result. We find this case to be worth considering when deciding on a strategy in the future.

Construction Industry-Associated Penetrating Craniocerebral Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Various high-energy tasks in the construction industry can lead to craniocerebral injuries. Construction industry-associated penetrating craniocerebral injuries due to metal foreign bodies have unique characteristics. However, no norms exist for removing metal foreign bodies and preventing secondary trauma. This study aimed to explore the characteristics and treatment of construction industry-associated penetrating craniocerebral injuries due to metal foreign bodies. METHODS: Data of patients who suffered from penetrating injuries due to metal foreign bodies and were treated in the Zhongshan People's Hospital from 2001 to 2021 were collected based on the causes of injuries to explore disease characteristics and therapeutic effects. RESULTS: A total of six patients with penetrating craniocerebral injuries due to metal foreign bodies, who underwent surgeries, were included in the study. Five patients recovered well after the surgery, and one patient died. In four patients, intracranial infection complicated the course after surgery, and two patients had delayed intracranial hematoma. CONCLUSION: Patients with construction industry-associated penetrating craniocerebral injuries due to metal foreign bodies are prone to coma and intracranial vascular injuries. Early surgical removal and prevention of intracranial infection are key to achieving good therapeutic effects.

Intracranial penetrating injury by clothes fork in an infant: case report and review of the literature.

Nonmissile intracranial penetrating injury (IPI) in pediatric population is rare. Here, we report the exceedingly rare case of a 5-month-old infant sustained by a metallic clothes fork penetrating into his left forehead. The little baby was identified to carry a traumatic hemorrhagic shock, and a multidisciplinary team (MDT) was immediately established response for whole-course evaluation and decision-making. Computed tomography revealed that the clothes fork had impaled into the left frontal bone and brain parenchyma with about 3.2 cm inside the cranial vault. The infant underwent emergency surgery, and the clothes fork was removed jointly by MDT members under general anesthesia in the retrograde direction. His recovery was uneventful and was followed up 2 years without growth and developmental abnormality. As an extremely rare entity with distinct age-related characteristics, a MDT approach is a best choice and effective strategy to manage infant nonmissile IPI, including preoperative management, surgical treatment, and even following rehabilitation.

Simple wound closure compared with surgery for civilian cranial gunshot wounds.

OBJECTIVE: A carefully selected subset of civilian cranial gunshot wound (CGSW) patients may be treated with simple wound closure (SWC) as a proactive therapy, but the appropriate clinical scenario for using this strategy is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare SWC and surgery patients in terms of their neurological outcomes and complications, including infections, seizures, and reoperations. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective review of the prospectively maintained institutional traumatic brain injury and trauma registries. Included were adults who sustained an acute CGSW defined as suspected or confirmed dural penetration. Excluded were nonfirearm penetrating injuries, patients with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3, patients with an initial GCS score of 4 and nonreactive pupils, and patients who died within 48 hours of presentation. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were included; 17 (25.4%) were treated with SWC and 50 (74.6%) were treated with surgery. The SWC group had a lower incidence of radiographic mass effect (3/17 [17.6%] SWC vs 31/50 [62%] surgery; absolute difference 44.4, 95% CI -71.9 to 16.8; p = 0.002) and lower incidence of involvement of the frontal sinus (0/17 [0%] SWC vs 14/50 [28%] surgery; absolute difference 28, 95% CI -50.4 to 5.6; p = 0.01). There were no differences in the frequency of Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended scores ≥ 5 between the SWC and surgery groups at 30 days (4/11 [36.4%] SWC vs 12/35 [34.3%] surgery; OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.3-4.5; p > 0.99), 60 days (2/7 [28.6%] SWC vs 8/26 [30.8%] surgery; OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-3.4; p > 0.99), and 90 days (3/8 [37.5%] SWC vs 12/26 [46.2%] surgery; OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.1-3.6; p > 0.99). There were no differences in the incidence of infections (1/17 [5.9%] SWC vs 6/50 [12%] surgery; OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-4.1; p = 0.67), CSF fistulas (2/11 [11.6%] SWC vs 3/50 [6%] surgery; OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.3-13.7; p = 0.60), seizures (3/17 [17.6%] SWC vs 9/50 [18%] surgery; OR 1, 95% CI 0.2-4.1; p > 0.99), and reoperations (3/17 [17.6%] SWC vs 4/50 [8%] surgery; OR 2.5, 95% CI 0.5-12.4; p = 0.36) between the SWC and surgery groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were important clinically relevant differences between the SWC and surgery groups. SWC can be considered a safe and efficacious proactive therapy in a carefully selected subset of civilian CGSW patients.

Successful resuscitation and multidisciplinary management of penetrating brain injury caused by tire explosion: A case report.

RATIONALE: Penetrating brain injury (PBI) is a rare trauma that presents as a difficult and serious surgical emergency for neurosurgeons in clinical practice. Our patient was admitted with a PBI caused by a tire explosion, which is an extremely rare cause of injury. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a case of a 28-year-old male patient who suffered a PBI when a tire exploded while it was being inflated with a high-pressure air pump. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with PBI presenting with multiple comminuted skull fractures, massive bone fragments with foreign bodies penetrating the underlying brain tissue of the top right frontal bone, multiple cerebral contusions, and intracranial hematoma. INTERVENTIONS: Emergency combined multidisciplinary surgery was performed for the removal of the fragmented bone pieces, hematoma, and foreign bodies; decompression of the debridement flap; reconstruction of the anterior skull base; and repair of the dura mater. OUTCOMES: The patient was successfully resuscitated and discharged 1 month later and is now recovering well. LESSONS: Patients with PBI are critically ill. Therefore, timely, targeted examinations and appropriate multidisciplinary interventions through a green channel play a key role in assessing the condition, developing protocols, and preventing complications.

From Henry Shrapnel (1761-1842) to today's neurosurgery: how antipersonnel weapons have laid the foundation of clinical and surgical management of head injury fractures and penetrating brain injuries.

Henry Shrapnel invented an antipersonnel weapon capable of defragmenting with the explosion of charge. Modern grenades or improvised explosive devices may be seen as an evolution of Shrapnel's ammunition. Starting by analyzing the ballistics of these weapons, it is possible to understand the historical evolution of the management of skull fractures and penetrating brain injuries (PBIs). A circular crack line with a splinter at the center, depressed in bone, was a characteristic feature of fractures due to Shrapnel's bullet. Three longitudinal fissures, one medial and two lateral, may be present due to tangential blows. Craniectomy and/or fracture reduction were almost always necessary in these cases. The first document describing medical examination and therapeutic strategies for head-injured patients dates back to 1600 bc (the Edwin Smith Papyrus). Several doctors from the past century, such as Puppe, Matson, and Cushing, proposed different theories about skull fractures and the management of craniocerebral injuries, paving the way for diagnosing and treating these injuries. Shrapnel fractures required wider craniotomies and in the past surgeons had to deal with more severe injuries. Based on past military experiences during what could be called the postshrapnel age, guidelines for the management of PBIs were introduced in 2001. In these guidelines various concepts were reviewed, such as the importance of antibiotics and seizure prevention; included as well were prognostic factors such as hypotension, coagulopathy, respiratory distress, and Glasgow Coma Scale score. Furthermore, they highlight how it has not been possible to reach a common viewpoint on surgical management. Nevertheless, in contrast with the past, it is preferable to be less aggressive regarding retained fragments if there is no intracranial mass effect. Although military situations were useful in building basic principles for PBI guidelines, civilian PBIs differ noticeably from military ones. Therefore, there is a need to review modern guidelines in order to apply them in every situation.

Outcomes Following Penetrating Brain Injuries in Military Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: While neurosurgeons are experienced in treating penetrating brain injuries (PBIs) in civilian settings, much less is known about management and outcomes of PBIs in military settings. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data extracted included surgical management, age, gender, location/type of injury, initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and outcomes. The primary outcomes were last reported Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) and mortality. The secondary outcomes included central nervous system infections, seizures, and cerebrospinal fluid leak/fistula. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for outcome analysis. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 1738 patients treated for PBIs in military settings were included. The weighted mean age was 27.8 years, 86.7% were male, and 64.3% underwent neurosurgical intervention. Most patients (64.3%) presented with a GCS score >8, while 31.0% presented in a coma (GCS score <8). Over a median last follow-up time of 9 months, 68.6% achieved a favorable (GOS = 4-5) outcome and 34.2% achieved a poor (GCS score = 1-3) outcome. The overall mortality was 18.0%. A meta-analysis was performed using 5 of 12 studies to evaluate the effect of the presenting GCS score on primary outcomes. Patients with an initial GCS score <8 had statistically significant lower odds of a favorable (GOS = 4-5) outcome (OR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-0.19; P: 0.000) and higher odds of mortality (OR: 28.46; 95% CI: 8.62-94; P: 0.000) than patients with an initial GCS score >8. The pooled rates of central nervous system infection, seizures, and cerebrospinal fluid leak/fistula were 13.8%, 13.2%, and 5.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this first systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following combat-related PBIs, a GCS score >8 at presentation was found to be an important predictor of a favorable GOS and decreased mortality.

Management of migrating intracranial bullet fragments in a 13-year-old female after firearm brain injury: technical and surgical nuances.

INTRODUCTION: We present the challenges and nuances of management in a rare case of multiple migrating intracranial fragments after pediatric gunshot wound to the head (GSWH). CASE PRESENTATION: A 13-year-old girl suffered left parietal GSWH, with new neurologic decline 3 days after initial debridement. Serial imaging showed the largest intracranial fragments had migrated into the left trigone, and descended further with head of bed (HOB) elevation. HOB was iteratively decreased, with concurrent intracranial pressure monitoring. After extubation, with an alert and stable neurologic exam, HOB was decreased to -15 degrees, allowing gravity-assisted migration of the fragments to an anatomically favorable position within the left occipital horn. The patient underwent occipital craniotomy for fragment retrieval on hospital day 27. Two large and >20 smaller fragments were retrieved using neuronavigation and intraoperative ultrasound. Forensics showed these to be .45 caliber handgun bullet fragments. The patient recovered well after 2-months of intensive inpatient rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: During new neurologic decline after GSWH, bullet migration must be considered and serial cranial imaging is requisite. Surgical retrieval of deep fragments requires judicious planning to minimize further injury. Tightly controlled HOB adjustments with gravity assistance for repositioning of fragments may have utility in optimizing anatomic favorability prior to surgery.

Surgical Reconstruction of a Traumatic Superior Sagittal Sinus Injury Using Synthetic Vascular Graft in a Resource-Limited Civilian Field Hospital During the Syrian Civil War.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic dural sinus injuries following penetrating brain injury are rare but are often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The management of significant defects is operative and can be challenging. In modern civilian practice, patients with these injuries typically receive extensive preoperative investigation and advanced perioperative monitoring. METHODS: We report a case of successful operative management in a frontline civilian field hospital of a 33-year-old man who sustained a shrapnel injury to the junction of the middle and posterior thirds of the superior sagittal sinus during the Syrian Civil War. RESULTS: The injury was repaired successfully with a polytetrafluoroethylene graft. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. Anticoagulation was commenced 2 days postoperatively. The patient was discharged 5 days postoperatively with a GCS of 15 and mild weakness of the limbs bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate repair of dural sinus injuries is feasible in the context of a low-resource wartime environment and should be attempted without delay. To our knowledge, this is the first case of successful use of a synthetic vascular graft for repair of a dural venous sinus injury in an ill-equipped hospital.