Predictors of Time to Return to Work Following Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Limb Injuries in a Cosmopolitan City in Western Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The management of upper limb injury is aimed at a timely return to work, and other activities of daily living. The modified hand injury severity score (MHISS) has been found to predict a return to work. Upper limb injuries are common in our subregion, but there is little or no data on the time to return to work. AIM: This study, therefore, aimed to determine the prevalence of return to work and to identify the predictors of time to return to work following reconstruction of upper limb injuries. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional analytic study carried out between April 2022 and March 2023. The statistical test was at a confidence interval of 95%, and statistical significance set at a P value of <0.05. RESULT: A total of 49 upper-limb-injured patients had reconstruction in the time under review. Male-to-female ratio was 4.4:1. The mean MHISS was 87.9 ± 79.2. Of the 43 patients who participated in the return-to-work analysis, 41.9% had returned to work, with a mean time of 14.3 ± 10.5 weeks. Work-related injuries (r = 0.357, P = 0.019), male gender (r = 0.354, P = 0.020), and MHISS (r = 0.333, P = 0.029) correlated significantly with late return to work. On multiple logistic regression, work-related injuries (ß =0.321, P = 0.037), MHISS (ß =0.376, P = 0.032), and male gender (ß =0.326, P = 0.044) were found to be the significant predictors of late return to work. CONCLUSION: There is a low prevalence of return to work, with a high mean time to return. Work-related injuries, MHISS, and male gender are significant predictors of time to return to work.

[Effectiveness of physical rehabilitation methods based on the impact of eccentric load in upper limb injuries]. / Effektivnost' fizicheskikh metodov reabilitatsii, osnovannykh na vozdeistvii ekstsentricheskikh nagruzok, pri travmakh verkhnikh konechnostei.

The rehabilitation of patients after upper limb injuries is becoming increasingly relevant in current medical practice considering that this pathology is often occurred in professional athletes, elderly people, people with active lifestyle. OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of isolated therapeutic exercises (TE) with eccentric muscle loads when using rubber cable compared to traditional TE to restore functional capabilities of patients after upper limb injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 38 patients with upper limb injuries diagnosed by orthopedic surgeon. Patients were randomly enrolled into group of isolated TE with eccentric muscle loads (group A, 20 patients, mean age 40.2±10.8 years) and group of traditional exercises (group B, 18 patients, mean age 38.6±12.3 years). The study consisted of anamnesis taking, clinical examination, functional tests applying (isometric dynamometry, joint mobility tests, functional scales and questionnaires). The rehabilitation effectiveness was assessed by comparing the indicators before and after treatment course. RESULTS: There has been a significant improvement in muscle strength, movement amplitude and decrease of pain syndrome in patients rehabilitated by eccentric muscle loads. A comparison with a control group using traditional TE methods confirmed the superiority of eccentric exercises in reducing recovery time and improving functional performance. CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the high effectiveness of eccentric muscular loads in the rehabilitation of patients after upper limb injuries. The method has shown significant improvement in clinical and functional indices, which allows to recommend it for inclusion in standard rehabilitation protocols. Further researches may extend application of this approach and reveal the TE effectiveness in other types of traumas and orthopedic injuries.

Greater length of hospital stay for concurrent hip and upper limb fractures compared to isolated hip fractures: a systematic review of 13 studies including 210,289 patients and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of concurrent upper limb and fragility hip fractures has not been well defined. A greater understanding of this can guide decision making in the early peri-operative period and subsequent rehabilitation of such patients. AIMS: To identify if patients with concurrent upper limb and fragility hip fractures have different outcomes and demographics than those with an isolated hip fracture. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to identify cohort and case-control studies, comparing concurrent hip and upper limb fractures with isolated hip fractures. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. Subgroup analyses were performed for concurrent distal radius and concurrent proximal humerus fractures. RESULTS: 13 studies were included reporting on 196,916 patients with an isolated hip fracture and 13,373 with concurrent hip and upper limb fractures. Patients with concurrent upper limb fractures had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (mean difference: 3.97 days, 95% CI: 1.36, 6.57, P=0.003) as compared to those with isolated hip fractures. Patients with concurrent upper limb fractures were significantly more likely to be female (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.70, P<0.00001), reside at home pre-injury (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.96, P=0.03) and have no cognitive impairment (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.84, P=0.006). Patients with concurrent distal radius fractures had significantly lower 90-day mortality (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.99, P=0.04) and 1-year mortality (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.90, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent fragility hip and upper limb fractures are associated with increased length of hospital stay. We recommend early, aggressive, individualised rehabilitation to help improve outcomes and early hospital discharge in this highly vulnerable patient group.

Efeitos de um protocolo de exercícios de força, flexibilidade e equilíbrio nas lesões de nervos periféricos: um estudo de caso / Effects of a strength, flexibility, and balance exercise protocol on peripheral nerve injuries: a case study

Introdução: As lesões de nervos periféricos são mais frequentes em membros superiores (MMSS), que são importantes para as atividades de vida diárias, equilíbrio e reflexos de proteção. Alterações no sistema de controle postural podem impactar na funcionalidade desses indivíduos. Portanto, é necessário alternativas para melhorar as alterações secundárias à lesão. Objetivo: Avaliar os efeitos de um protocolo de exercícios de força, flexibilidade e equilíbrio em paciente com lesão de nervos periféricos. Métodos: Estudo de caso de abordagem quantitativa realizado na Clínica Escola de Fisioterapia da Unochapecó, entre abril e julho de 2021, totalizando 30 intervenções de 60 minutos cada. A amostra foi constituída por um paciente do sexo masculino, 46 anos com diagnóstico de lesão de nervos periféricos no MMSS direito, decorrente de um acidente motociclístico. Foi realizada avaliação inicial, aplicação do protocolo, após a realização das escalas e testes: BESTest, MiniBESTest, Romberg-Barré, Dinamometria manual isométrica, Teste de Sentar e Alcançar e Mini-Exame do Estado Mental. O protocolo continha exercícios de força, flexibilidade e equilíbrio. Os dados foram analisados através de estatística descritiva comparativa, antes e após o protocolo (média e porcentagem). Resultados: Houve melhora na força muscular, flexibilidade toracolombar (aumento de 13 cm "61,90%") e testes de equilíbrio (15,81% BESTest, 21,42% MiniBESTest e 67,16% Romberg-Barré). Conclusão: O protocolo de exercícios refletiu positivamente na melhora da flexibilidade, força muscular e equilíbrio do paciente, tornando-se uma alternativa viável para melhorar as alterações secundárias a lesão. (AU)

Is Immobilization Necessary for Early Return to Work Following Distal Biceps Repair Using a Cortical Button Technique?: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in surgical fixation to repair distal biceps tendon ruptures have not fully translated to earlier postoperative mobilization; it is unknown whether earlier mobilization affords earlier functional return to work. This parallel-arm randomized controlled trial compared the impact of early mobilization versus 6 weeks of postoperative immobilization following distal biceps tendon repair. METHODS: One hundred and one male participants with a distal biceps tendon rupture that was amenable to a primary repair with use of a cortical button were randomized to early mobilization (self-weaning from sling and performance of active range of motion as tolerated during first 6 weeks) (n = 49) or 6 weeks of immobilization (splinting for 6 weeks with no active range of motion) (n = 52). Follow-up assessments were performed by a blinded assessor at 2 and 6 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months. At 12 months, distal biceps tendon integrity was verified with ultrasound. The primary outcome was return to work. Secondary outcomes were pain, range of motion, strength, shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) score, and tendon integrity. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. A linear mixed model for repeated measures was used to compare pain, range of motion, strength, and QuickDASH between the groups over time; return to work was assessed with use of independent t tests. RESULTS: The groups were similar preoperatively (p ≥ 0.16). The average age (and standard deviation) was 44.7 ± 8.6 years. Eighty-three participants (82%) were followed to 12 months. There were no differences between the groups in terms of return to work (p ≥ 0.83). Participants in the early mobilization group had significantly more passive forearm supination (p = 0.04), with passive forearm pronation (p = 0.06) and active extension and supination (p = 0.09) trending toward significantly greater range of motion in the early mobilization group relative to the immobilization group. Participants in the early mobilization group had significantly better QuickDASH scores over time than those in the immobilization group (p = 0.02). There were no differences between the groups in terms of pain (p ≥ 0.45), active range of motion (p ≥ 0.09), or strength (p ≥ 0.70). Two participants (2.0%, 1 in each group) had full-thickness tears on ultrasound at 12 months (p = 0.61). Compliance was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Early motion after distal biceps tendon repair with cortical button fixation is well tolerated and does not appear to be associated with adverse outcomes. No clinically important group differences were seen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors associated with unsuccessful return-to-work following work-related upper extremity injury.

BACKGROUND: Returning to work following occupational injury is a key outcome for both workers' compensation boards and injured workers. Predictive factors for returning remain unclear. AIMS: To describe factors associated with unsuccessful return-to-work (RTW) in a hand injury population to identify target areas through which occupational rehabilitation programmes can help injured workers achieve successful RTW outcomes. METHODS: Demographic data, functional, pain and psychosocial scores were recorded for injured workers discharged between April 2011 and September 2015 from a multidisciplinary upper extremity treatment programme. The primary outcome of RTW status was assessed at programme discharge. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with being unable to RTW. RESULTS: Of 872 participants who met the inclusion criteria, 65% were male and the mean age was 46 (standard deviation [SD] 11) years. In unadjusted bivariate analyses, the group with an unsuccessful RTW outcome had higher mean baseline pain, catastrophizing and QuickDASH scores; a higher baseline prevalence of depression, and reported a high level of pain more frequently than those who were working at discharge. In the adjusted logistic regression model, not working at baseline, higher QuickDASH score and presence of depression at baseline were independently associated with unsuccessful work status outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Negative baseline work status, greater self-reported functional disability and presence of depression were associated with greater odds of unsuccessful RTW following a workplace upper extremity injury. Integrating mental healthcare provision with occupational rehabilitation is a potential programmatic approach to improve RTW.

Triceps Tendon Ruptures: Risk Factors, Treatment, and Rehabilitation.

Triceps tendon ruptures (TTRs) are rare and often occur as a result of falling on an outstretched hand, forceful eccentric contraction, direct trauma to the elbow, or lifting against resistance. TTRs are most commonly seen in middle-aged men, football players, and weightlifters. Radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging may be utilized for diagnosis and to guide treatment. Acute partial TTRs may have good outcomes with nonoperative management. Surgery should be considered if nonoperative treatment is unsuccessful or if substantial musculotendinous retraction is present. Surgical repair is strongly recommended for complete TTRs.

Influence of Purposeful Activities on Upper Extremity Motor Performance: A Systematic Review.

Following upper extremity injury, exercise-approaches are commonly used to address motor impairments. Occupation-based approaches are also used but less widely promoted and their mechanisms of action not well-understood. Movement performed during purposeful activities and occupations may yield better motor performance than during nonpurposeful tasks. This review investigated the influence of engagement in purposeful activities and occupations on upper extremity motor performance in healthy and musculoskeletal populations. Databases were searched for studies in healthy or upper extremity musculoskeletal-injured adults that compared motor performance during purposeful activities against nonpurposeful movements. Twenty-one studies of moderate quality, conducted predominantly in healthy populations, were included. Upper extremity movement quantity and quality were enhanced when performed during purposeful conditions. Purposeful activities have potential to be used following injury to enhance movement and address motor impairments to a greater extent than is currently promoted. Research in musculoskeletal populations is required.

The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) Study: Outcomes of Amputation Compared with Limb Salvage Following Major Upper-Extremity Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Severe upper-extremity injuries account for almost one-half of all extremity trauma in recent conflicts in the Global War on Terror. Few long-term outcomes studies address severe combat-related upper-extremity injuries. This study's objective was to describe long-term functional outcomes of amputation compared with those of limb salvage in Global War on Terror veterans who sustained severe upper-extremity injuries. Limb salvage was hypothesized to result in better arm and hand function scores, overall functional status, and quality of life, with similar pain interference. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) study for a subset of 155 individuals who sustained major upper-extremity injuries treated with amputation or limb salvage. Participants were interviewed by telephone 40 months after injury, assessing social support, personal habits, and patient-reported outcome instruments for function, activity, depression, pain, and posttraumatic stress. Outcomes were evaluated for participants with severe upper-extremity injuries and were compared with participants with concomitant severe, lower-extremity injury. The analysis of outcomes comparing limb salvage with amputation was restricted to the 137 participants with a unilateral upper-extremity injury because of the small number of patients with bilateral upper-extremity injuries (n = 18). RESULTS: Overall, participants with upper-extremity injuries reported moderate to high levels of physical and psychosocial disability. Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores were high across domains; 19.4% screened positive for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and 12.3% were positive for depression. Nonetheless, 63.6% of participants were working, were on active duty, or were attending school, and 38.7% of participants were involved in vigorous recreational activities. No significant differences in outcomes were observed between patients who underwent limb salvage and those who underwent amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Severe, combat-related upper-extremity injuries result in diminished self-reported function and psychosocial health. Our results suggest that long-term outcomes are equivalent for those treated with amputation or limb salvage. Addressing or preventing PTSD, depression, chronic pain, and associated health habits may result in less disability burden in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Impact of Patient-Surgeon Relationship on Patient's Return to Work.

BACKGROUND: Upper-limb injuries and musculoskeletal disorders represent a major economic burden for both patients and society, largely due to limitations in returning to work. We hypothesized that a positive patient-surgeon relationship may facilitate patients' recovery and lead to a faster return to work. METHODS: This longitudinal observational study comprised 219 patients, from 8 French hand trauma centers, who were 18 to 55 years of age and were on sick leave from work because of an injury or musculoskeletal disorder of the upper limb. In addition to instruments measuring patients' functional scores and quality of life, the quality of the patient-surgeon relationship was assessed at enrollment using a specific questionnaire (Q-PASREL [Quality of PAtient-Surgeon RELationship]). Six months after enrollment, the return-to-work status was assessed. Logistic and Cox regression models were developed to identify predictors of return to work (yes/no) and the time off from work in days. RESULTS: Overall, 74% of the patients who returned to work within 6 months after enrollment had a high or medium-high Q-PASREL score, whereas 64% of the patients who were still on sick leave had a low or medium-low Q-PASREL score. The odds of patients with a low or medium-low Q-PASREL score returning to work were, respectively, 95% and 71% lower than the odds of patients with a high score doing so, with a percent difference of 56% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 40% to 71%) for low versus high (odds ratio [OR] = 0.05 [95% CI = 0.02 to 0.13]) and 25% (95% CI = 6% to 44%) for medium-low versus high (OR = 0.29 [95% CI = 0.11 to 0.76]). All Q-PASREL items and scores were significantly associated with return to work. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a lower Q-PASREL score and more severe disability were less likely to return to work within 6 months and had a longer time off from work. Efforts to improve the quality of patient-surgeon relationships may minimize the duration of sick leaves and accelerate patient recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Distance-Based Throwing Programs for Baseball Players From Little League to High School.

An estimated 2.4 million children play baseball in 80 countries. The majority of these children have experienced pain with throwing. A key component to a successful rehabilitation after an upper extremity injury for a baseball player is an interval throwing program, which allows a youth athlete to increase the demands of throwing in a progressive and controlled manner. Numerous interval throwing programs are designed for baseball players of high school age and older, but few exist for the baseball player who is skeletally immature. Our interval throwing programs take into consideration various field dimensions, injury types, and position requirements for youth. Our goal is to create a guide for rehabilitation specialists and players to return to throwing as quickly and safely as possible.

Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of grip strength test in patients with traumatic injuries in the upper extremity: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Grip strength (GS) test is an essential aspect of clinical practice with patients with upper extremity injuries. The random error of GS test was hypothesized to be proportional to the level of GS. The purpose of the current study was to estimate a precise range for the measurement error of GS in patients following traumatic injuries in the upper extremity. METHODS: Following traumatic injuries in the upper extremity, 109 participants completed GS tests twice one weekend apart. The Bland-Altman plot analysis was adopted to estimate the precise limits of agreement with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The mean of three consecutive trials had a higher intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.974 (95% CI = 0.963, 0.982) than those of one trial and the mean of the first two trials in injured upper extremities. When GS was ≤20 kg, the upper limit of agreement with 95% CI was estimated as (0.41 × average GS + 1.24), while the lower limit was estimated as (- 0.41 × average GS - 0.39). A table of one-to-one matches between averaged GS ≤ 20 kg and transformed ranges of random errors with 95% certainty was created; the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change with 95% certainty of GS test were 1.8 and 4.9 kg, respectively. When GS was > 20 kg, the width of agreement with 95% CI ranged from - 4.9 to 5.3 kg, and the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change with 95% certainty were 1.8 and 5.1 kg, respectively. CONCLUSION: The one-to-one match table can be considered as a practical tool to judge a change in GS score is real or due to random errors when it is ≤20 kg.

Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of CI Therapy for Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Motor Deficit: The Bringing Rehabilitation to American Veterans Everywhere Project.

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy) has been shown to reduce disability for individuals with upper extremity (UE) hemiparesis following different neurologic injuries. This article describes the study design and methodological considerations of the Bringing Rehabilitation to American Veterans Everywhere (BRAVE) Project, a randomized controlled trial of CI therapy to improve the motor deficit of participants with chronic and subacute traumatic brain injury. Our CI therapy protocol comprises 4 major components: (1) intensive training of the more-affected UE for target of 3 hour/day for 10 consecutive weekdays, (2) a behavioral technique termed shaping during training, (3) a "transfer package," 0.5 hour/day, of behavioral techniques to transfer therapeutic gains from the treatment setting to the life situation, and (4) prolonged restraint of use of the UE not being trained. The primary endpoint is posttreatment change on the Motor Activity Log, which assesses the use of the more-affected arm outside the laboratory in everyday life situations. Data from a number of secondary outcome measures are also being collected and can be categorized as physical, genomic, biologic, fitness, cognitive/behavioral, quality of life, and neuroimaging measures.

Comparison of outcomes between hip fracture patients with concurrent upper limb injuries and patients with an isolated hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent upper limb injuries can occur with hip fractures, and its incidence and effect on outcomes are unclear. The objective of this study was to review the number and types of upper limb injuries sustained by patients with hip fractures, and investigate how acute hospital stay, rehabilitation and patient outcomes are affected. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 820 patients with traumatic fracture of the hip over the age of 50. We reviewed the patients with concurrent upper limb injuries and compared patient outcomes - including mortality, acute length of stay in the orthopaedic ward, rehabilitation outcomes and rehabilitation length of stay. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (4.1%) with a hip fracture had a concurrent upper limb injury. Patients with and without concurrent upper limb injuries had similar acute length of stays on the orthopaedic ward (mean 5.2 versus 5.5 days, P = 0.4), and no significant difference in mortality rates at time of discharge (0% versus 3.8%, P = 0.4) and at 30 days (2.9% versus 9.1%, P = 0.2). However, they also required significantly longer rehabilitation (mean 34.6 versus 19.9 days, P = 0.009) even after other demographic factors including upper limb injury, older age and dementia were taken into consideration (multivariate linear model: concurrent upper limb injury, P = 0.0003; older age, P = 0.05; dementia, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: A concurrent upper limb injury is infrequent in the hip fracture population. Overall, these patients were previously higher functioning than the average hip fracture patient and required longer stays in inpatient rehabilitation than patients with isolated hip fractures.

Determining the minimal clinically important difference of the hand function sort questionnaire in vocational rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of the French version of the Hand Function Sort questionnaire (HFS-F). As a comparison, the MCID of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) was also estimated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included French-speaking patients hospitalized in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic pain of the upper limb after an accident. HFS-F and DASH scores were collected at admission and discharge; the Patient Global Impression of Change measure (PGIC; 7 levels) was collected at discharge. The MCID was estimated by 2 methods: the anchor-based method (receiver operating characteristic [ROC], delta (Δ) mean of scores) and the objective method based on the distribution of scores (standard error of measurement, SEM). RESULT: We included 225 patients. By the anchor-based method, the MCID for the HFS-F and DASH was +26 (SD 35) (P<10-4) and -13 (SD 13) (P<10-4), respectively, and by the ROC curve, it was +10 to +12 for the Δ-HFS-F and -7.5 to -5 for the Δ-DASH. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.726 [0.638-0.781] for Δ-HFS-F and 0.768 [0.701-0.83] for Δ-DASH. The correlations between the anchor and delta scores were>0.38 (P<10-4). The SEM was 16.2 for the HFS-F and -4.3 for the DASH. CONCLUSIONS: Values below the SEM must be rejected. Our anchor was significantly correlated with the outcome. Therefore, we propose an MCID for the HFS-F of 26, corresponding to approximately 10% progression of the score.

Individual Treatment of Delayed Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture: Case Report and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Complicated elbow injuries (elbow injuries with bone and soft tissue injury) with distal biceps tendon ruptures (DBTRs) are not uncommon. There are several treatment modalities in different situations of injuries. In this article, we reported 3 successful individual treatments of delayed DBTR with complicated elbow injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cases of complicated elbow injuries treated between 2010 and 2016 were reviewed. The delayed DBTR cases were summarized and treated. Mayo Elbow Performance Score value, range of motion, and visual analog scale score were used to assess outcomes after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: All 3 patients were male, aged 47 to 54 years (mean, 49.6 years). Patients received surgical treatments. After a mean follow-up of 13.7 months, in cases 1 and 2, Mayo Elbow Performance Score values improved by 50% and 100%, elbow flexion-extension arc were 115 degrees and 110 degrees, pronation-supination arc were 130 degrees and 120 degrees. Arthrodesis case reported pain relief; visual analog scale score for pain was 0 to 1. No postoperative complications were observed, and all patients were satisfied with the results. CONCLUSIONS: Individual treatment is advised in DBTR with complicated elbow injuries. Secondary treatment of DBTR can achieve satisfactory results using individual strategies depending on patients' overall condition.

Recovery in the first six months after hand and upper limb burns: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Hands are commonly involved in burn trauma. Occupational therapy in the acute phase aims to reduce the risk of deformities and facilitate return to usual occupations. This study aimed to describe usual occupational therapy care at a major adult burns service, and measure recovery from hand burns in the first six months post-acute hospital discharge. METHOD: To describe usual occupational therapy care, an audit of patient contact statistics over six months was undertaken, and occupational therapy staff were interviewed. To measure recovery, a prospective cohort study recruited adults hospitalised with hand/upper limb burns at the Victorian Adult Burns Service. Recruitment occurred over a four month period. Functional recovery was measured at three time points: discharge, three and six months post-discharge. Instruments included the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Functional Assessment for Burns. RESULTS: Usual care was calculated to be one 30 minute session of daily occupational therapy. Interventions were described using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication. Participants (N = 10) were aged 22-65 years and were treated for burns ranging from 2% to 40% total body surface area. Scores on the Functional Assessment for Burns suggested high functional independence at discharge. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores improved significantly at each time point, with most substantial improvement occurring between discharge and three months. Involvement of the first web-space was associated with poorer recovery in the first three months post-discharge (P = 0.04). Six participants (60%) had returned to work at the three month follow-up, and seven (70%) at six months. CONCLUSION: The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was responsive to recovery in the post-discharge period. Further research into upper limb recovery following burns is needed, including exploration of the relationship between recovery and first web space hand burns.

Chronic Pain Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Pain Following Stimulator Removal.

BACKGROUND Both spinal cord stimulators (SCS) and interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program (CPRP) are evidence-based treatments for chronic pain but differ on treatment foci. SCS focuses on decreasing the subjective pain experience as a means of improving function and quality of life. CPRP focuses on addressing the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors associated with chronic pain to improve function. Due to experimental constraints, these 2 treatment options are difficult to compare; however, this case report offers a unique opportunity to examine outcomes for both interventions in a sequential manner for changes in pain, function, and mood. CASE REPORT This single case study examined the separate and sequential outcomes of SCS and CPRP in a 26-year-old patient with a work-related injury resulting in chronic upper extremity pain. This patient was treated within an interdisciplinary CPRP following failure and removal of an SCS. Outcomes were measured by psychological assessments and return-to-work through a 6-month post-CPRP follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Pain intensity decreased following SCS placement and CPRP, while pain-related distress, pain interference, and overall affect improved only after CPRP, with sustained improvements at 6-month follow-up. Patient evidenced improvement following treatment with SCS and CPRP. SCS resulted in improvement in subjective pain and modest improved self-reported activity. CPRP demonstrated marked improvement in pain, self-reported function, and mood with patient eventually returning to work and maintaining most of these gains 6-months after completing CPRP treatment.

Changes in Throwing Arm Mechanics at Increased Throwing Distances During Structured Long-Toss.

BACKGROUND: Elbow injuries among adolescent baseball players have been outpacing those of college and professional players. In attempts to prevent injuries and maximize return-to-play potential following injury, attention has been focused on "return to throw" programs, which include long-toss throws. Because the few studies that were conducted on long-toss throwing focused primarily on college-aged athletes, it is not known what type of load is incurred at the elbow during interval throwing progression among high school baseball players. PURPOSE: To quantify the change in arm slot, arm speed, shoulder external rotation, and elbow varus torque across increasing throwing distances within a given athlete. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Ninety-five high school baseball players performed a long-toss protocol while wearing an inertial sensor and sleeve. Each participant was tested for 5 throws at distances of 9 m, 18 m, 27 m, 37 m, and 46 m. Linear mixed-effects models and likelihood ratio tests were used to estimate the within-participant relationship between throw distance and arm slot, arm speed, shoulder external rotation, and elbow varus torque. RESULTS: Arm slot ( P < .01), arm speed ( P < .01), shoulder external rotation ( P < .01), and elbow varus torque ( P < .01) were significantly associated with long-toss throw distance. As the throw distance increased, there was an increase in arm speed and shoulder external rotation and a decrease in arm slot for each distance. However, elbow varus torque increased with each distance up to 37 m and then remained the same at 46 m. CONCLUSION: The use of longer distances for conditioning and rehabilitation may be beneficial in increasing shoulder range of motion and arm speed; however, precaution needs to be taken, as throwing longer distances are accompanied by an increase in arm rotation, arm speed, and elbow torque, with a decrease in arm slot. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Return-to-throw programs have been utilized by sports medicine clinicians and coaches to help guide a player during rehabilitation. These programs involve throwing at increased efforts through increased distances with no immediate feedback on elbow stress. This investigation describes arm biomechanical changes during submaximum interval throwing and demonstrates a tool that can be utilized to measure arm stress in real time for clinicians and athletes progressing through an interval throwing program.

Elbow arthroscopy in children and adolescents: analysis of outcome and complications.

BACKGROUND: Chondral or osteochondral lesions, post-traumatic contracture and loose bodies of the elbow are often associated with chronic pain, stiffness, repetitive swelling and joint blockages. Therefore, arthroscopy of the elbow is often used in the elderly for the treatment of osteochondral defects or arthrolysis. There are only a few reports and studies about arthroscopic therapy of the elbow in children and adolescents. This study assesses the clinical outcome of arthroscopic therapy in this age group. METHODS: In a retrospective study, children and adolescents who underwent an elbow arthroscopy in the period from 2010 to 2014 were included. The children were evaluated using the validated outcome measures Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion, pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), quick dash and postoperative satisfaction. Furthermore, all complications were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 27 patients were included. The mean (range) age was 14 (11-17) years, with a follow-up of 45 months. Fourteen (52%) were female and thirteen children (48%) were male. Twenty children had an arthroscopy due to osteochondritis dissecans and seven children for post-traumatic pain and stiffness. The mean (standard deviation) MEPS improved from 65 (15) to 96 (8; p = .005). The OES and quick dash were 93 and 5.4. The mean extension improved from - 15° (± 13.8) to 3° (± 10.2; p < .001). The mean flexion improved from 131° (± 13.4) to 137° (± 9.5; p = .003). Average pain on VAS was postoperative .2 (± .5), and 81.5% of all children had excellent or good results. There were no complications such as damage of nerves or blood vessels observed. CONCLUSION: Elbow arthroscopy is an appropriate and safe treatment option in children and adolescents with good and excellent postoperative results.