Current management of carotid body tumors.

Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are neoplasms that occur at the bifurcation of the carotid artery and are pathologically classified as paragangliomas. In the 4th edition of the WHO classification, paragangliomas are categorized as neoplasms with malignant potential. Clinically, about 5% of CBTs present with malignant features such as metastasis. Currently, it is challenging to distinguish between tumors with benign courses and those that present malignantly. Recent advances in genetic testing have elucidated the genetic characteristics of paragangliomas, including carotid body tumors. Over 20 genes have been identified as being involved in tumor development. Particularly in head and neck paragangliomas, abnormalities in genes related to succinate dehydrogenase are frequently observed. Research is ongoing to understand the mechanisms by which these genes contribute to tumor development. The definitive treatment for CBTs is surgical resection. These tumors are prone to bleeding and often adhere firmly to the carotid artery, making intraoperative bleeding control challenging. The risk of lower cranial nerve paralysis is relatively high, and there is a risk of stroke because of manipulation of the carotid artery. Preoperative evaluation with angiography is essential, and a multi-disciplinary surgical team approach is necessary. In cases where the tumor is difficult to resect or has metastasized, radiation therapy or chemotherapy are employed. Clinical trials involving targeted molecular therapies and radiopharmaceuticals have recently been conducted, with some applied clinically. The development of various new treatments is anticipated, providing hope for therapeutic options in refractory cases.

Malignant carotid body tumors: What we know, what we do, and what we need to achieve. A systematic review of the literature.

Malignant carotid body tumors (MCBT) are rare and diagnosed after detection of nodal or distant metastases. This systematic review (SR) focuses on MCBT initially approached by surgery. Preferred Reporting Items for SR and Meta-Analysis (MA) guided the articles search from 2000 to 2023 on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Among 3548 papers, 132 (337 patients) were considered for SR; of these, 20 (158 patients) for MA. Malignancy rate was 7.3%, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) mutation 17%, age at diagnosis between 4th and 6th decades, with a higher prevalence of females. MCBTs were mostly Shamblin III, with nodal and distant metastasis in 79.7% and 44.7%, respectively. Malignancy should be suspected if CBT >4 cm, Shamblin III, painful or otherwise symptomatic, at the extremes of age, bilateral, with multifocal disease, and SDHx mutations. Levels II-III clearance should be performed to exclude nodal metastases and adjuvant treatments considered on a case-by-case basis.

SDH deficiency is very common in carotid body paragangliomas: Genetic counseling and testing should be offered to all patients.

BACKGROUND: Collectively, germline pathogenic variants in succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) genes are the most common cause of hereditary paragangliomas. Loss of immunohistochemical expression of SDHB protein (termed SDH deficiency) occurs whenever there is biallelic inactivation of any SDH gene. We sought to estimate the prevalence of SDH deficiency in patients with carotid body paragangliomas. METHODS: We identified all carotid body paragangliomas that had undergone surgical excision at our institution over the last 30 years. If SDHB immunohistochemistry was not performed at the time of excision, it was performed on archived material. RESULTS: There were 64 carotid body paragangliomas identified in the 62 patients. Two-thirds of the patients were female, and 43 (67%) were SDH-deficient. CONCLUSION: Up to two-thirds of all carotid body paragangliomas are associated with SDH deficiency. Therefore, genetic testing and counseling should be offered to all patients with carotid body paragangliomas, regardless of age or family history.

Non-Functional Carotid Body Tumors in Patients Without Somatic Mutations May Be Considered for Non-Operative Management.

BACKGROUND: Carotid Body Tumors (CBT) are rare neuroendocrine paragangliomas which are typically asymptomatic and benign, with a low rate of biochemical functionality. Historically, early surgical excision was recommended to prevent development of CBT-related complications. Yet, CBT resection can result in significant cranial nerve and vascular injuries. Recent work has shown successful primary observation without resection of non-carotid body, cranial paragangliomas with slow growth and low rate of neuropathies. We hypothesize that primary observation of CBT is safe and may be considered for majority of CBT. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients at a multi-hospital healthcare system with radiologic identification and/or diagnostic or procedural billing codes for CBT (2000-2019). Tumor size (greatest diameter), associated symptoms, and interventions were recorded at the initial evaluation and throughout follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression investigated the risk of initial surgical resection. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients (mean age, 59 ± 19 years; 67% female), with 123 CBT (mean diameter 23 ± 12 mm; 52% right) were initially evaluated by otolaryngologists (51%), vascular surgeons (25%), neurosurgeons (8%), or other (16%) medical providers. Fity-five CBT were initially resected, 63 observed, and 5 irradiated. Initial resection was associated with younger age (adjusted odd ratios aOR, 0.95 [95% confidence intervals CI, 0.92-0.97]), male sex (aOR, 4.82 [95% CI, 1.47-15.75]), and evaluation by a vascular surgeon (aOR, 6.17 [95% CI, 2.04-18.63]). Overall median follow-up was 4.7 (IQR, 2.6-9.1) years. Initially observed CBT were on an average stable in size (mean 1 ± 5 mm/year), none became biochemically active, and 2 patients became symptomatic. At the final follow-up, 63 (51%) underwent surgical resection, 54 (44%) observation, and 6 (5%) radiation therapy. Of the 63 surgically resected CBT, 5 (8%) patients had malignant CBT of which 3 (60%) had known somatic mutations (polymerase epsilon [n = 1], succinate dehydrogenase-D gene [n = 2]). Thirty percent of CBT resections had in-hospital postoperative complications, notably including 1 stroke which occurred in an initially observed patient and 16 cranial nerve complications which all occurred in immediately resected patients. Three resected CBT locally recurred, only 1 of which had malignant pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with newly diagnosed CBT require biochemical functionality and somatic mutation testing. In the absence of these findings, initial observation of CBTs with annual imaging and symptom monitoring may be considered an alternative to immediate resection which demonstrates a high risk of clinically meaningful postoperative complications.

Bilateral Giant Familial Carotid Body Tumors With Concomitant Skull-Base Paraganglioma and Facial Nerve Palsy.

Carotid body tumors, rare neck paragangliomas arising from the common carotid artery bifurcation, can be classified as sporadic, hyperplastic, or familial. The familial type is often bilateral and associated with germline mutation of the mitochondrial enzyme succinate dehydrogenase. We report the rare case of a 42-year-old man who presented with bilateral giant familial carotid body tumors associated with a concomitant skull-base paraganglioma, left-sided facial nerve palsy, and an incomplete circle of Willis. We describe the excision of the tumors in 2 stages (the left mass and associated paraganglioma first and the right mass second), 6 months apart, with use of general anesthesia, and we discuss other operative considerations.

Identification of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) Mutation in Carotid Body Paraganglioma.

Carotid body paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors that develop within the adventitia of the medial aspect of the carotid bifurcation. Carotid body PGLs comprise about 65% of head and neck paragangliomas, however, their genetic background remains elusive. In the present study, we report one case of carotid body PGL with a somatic mutation in the gene encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2). The missense mutation in IDH2 resulted in R172G amino acid substitution, which exhibits neomorphic activity and production of D-2-hydroxyglutarate.

Improving Outcomes in Carotid Body Tumors Treatment: The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how a multidisciplinary approach, including patients and familiar genetic counseling, preoperative succinate-dehydrogenase (SDH) gene mutation analysis, preoperative adjunctive endovascular procedures (PAEPs) and postoperative rehabilitative team may affect the outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for carotid body tumors (CBTs). METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive CBT resections were performed from January 1995 to December 2019 in a single center institution. Two groups of patients were compared: group A (1995-2003; n = 10) and group B (2004-2019; n = 47), treated before and after the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach to CBTs. Group A and group B were evaluated retrospectively and prospectively for SDH mutations, respectively. PAEPs (external carotid artery stenting, percutaneous transfemoral embolization or direct percutaneous puncture of the tumor with simultaneous embolization) were performed only in patients of group B, when the size of the tumor exceeded the 45 mm. Primary endpoints were blood loss (BL) and cranial nerve injuries. Secondary endpoint was the number of new silent masses (NSMs) discovered after genetic evaluation. RESULTS: SDH mutations were found in 2 patients of group A and in 11 patients of group B. There were no significant differences in mass diameter between the groups. A significant difference regarding the surgical procedure time was observed in the 2 groups, with a higher time in the group A (Group A: 180 ± 77.3; Group B: 138 ± 54.5, P= 0.04). BL was significantly lower in group B (203 ± 69.5 mL vs. 356 ± 102 mL; P = 0.0001), as well as for patients underwent PAEPs vs. those underwent direct surgery (n = 15, 149 ± 53 mL vs. n = 42, 273 ± 88 mL; P = 0.0001). No differences between transient and persistent cranial nerve injuries were observed between the 2 groups. Carotid reconstruction was necessary for 2 patients of group A (n = 2 vs. n = 0; P = 0.02). Unilateral tumor recurrence was detected in 7 patients, with a significantly higher rate (P ≤ 0.002) in patients carrying SDH mutations compared to those without SDH mutation (wild-type). SDH mutations detected in the groups lead to discover 7 NSMs (group A n = 1 vs. group B n = 6; P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: The impact of the multidisciplinary team suggests that surgical resection still remains the gold standard for the treatment of CBTs, but the use of PAEPs in selected cases may reduce surgical procedure time, BL and the need for reconstructive carotid surgery. Genetic counseling and SDH gene analysis allow to diagnose NSMs in asymptomatic patients. Larger studies should be considered to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitative program.

Immunohistochemistry and Mutation Analysis of SDHx Genes in Carotid Paragangliomas.

Carotid paragangliomas (CPGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors often associated with mutations in SDHx genes. The immunohistochemistry of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) subunits has been considered a useful instrument for the prediction of SDHx mutations in paragangliomas/pheochromocytomas. We compared the mutation status of SDHx genes with the immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of SDH subunits in CPGLs. To identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in SDHx genes, exome sequencing data analysis among 42 CPGL patients was performed. IHC staining of SDH subunits was carried out for all CPGLs studied. We encountered SDHx variants in 38% (16/42) of the cases in SDHx genes. IHC showed negative (5/15) or weak diffuse (10/15) SDHB staining in most tumors with variants in any of SDHx (94%, 15/16). In SDHA-mutated CPGL, SDHA expression was completely absent and weak diffuse SDHB staining was detected. Positive immunoreactivity for all SDH subunits was found in one case with a variant in SDHD. Notably, CPGL samples without variants in SDHx also demonstrated negative (2/11) or weak diffuse (9/11) SDHB staining (42%, 11/26). Obtained results indicate that SDH immunohistochemistry does not fully reflect the presence of mutations in the genes; diagnostic effectiveness of this method was 71%. However, given the high sensitivity of SDHB immunohistochemistry, it could be used for initial identifications of patients potentially carrying SDHx mutations for recommendation of genetic testing.

Head and Neck Paraganglioma Atypically Carrying a Succinate Dehydrogenase Subunit B Mutation (L157X).

A 53-year-old woman was admitted to a hospital for gradual left-ear hearing loss over 2 years. Head computed tomography revealed a 2-cm mass along the left jugular bulb and another at the right carotid bulb. The right tumor was resected; the pathological diagnosis was carotid body paraganglioma. Mutations of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) were suspected, but SDHB staining remained in the tumor. Genetic testing identified a known SDHB mutation (L157X). The patient had head and neck paraganglioma with an SDHB mutation (L157X) more typical of an SDHD mutation. SDHB immunohistochemistry is useful for detecting SDHx mutations, but careful interpretation is needed.

Carotid Body Tumor - radiological imaging and genetic assessment.

Carotid Body Tumor i.e. Paraganglioma is a challenging entity from the point of multidisciplinary diagnosis. The main treatment option i.e. surgery yields intraoperative risk,related to cranial nerve palsy and vascular morbidity.Bifurcation of Common Carotid Artery especially at the Carotid Body is the place where Head and Neck Paraganglioma is most frequently seen i.e. 60% of incidence [19]. Indeed, the knowledge of genetic germline SDH mutations, which cause deregulation of hypoxia-induced factors yields better understanding of the tumor nature. It is recommended to conduct selective neck dissection in regions IIA, IIB, III to exlude malignant transformation and metastasis, due to malignant potential of Carotid Body Tumors, especially in case of SDHB mutation. SDHD mutation is the main cause of hereditary HNPGLs. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and angiography yield thorough assessment of paraganglioma extension. In large size tumors, embolization of supplying artery under guidance of angiography may be considered. In case of Carotid Body Tumor, differential diagnosis should include: carotid artery aneurysm, lymphadenopathy, Schwannoma of the hypoglossal nerve or acessory thyroid gland.

SDHD gene mutation in Mexican population with carotid body tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Among the U.S. population, the p81L SDHD (11q23) gene mutation is present in 6-36% of patients with sporadic carotid body tumor (CBT), but in familial cases is high as 80%. That is why the P81L mutation is used as a screening method for carotid body tumor in the U.S. METHODS: We included 25 patients who underwent resection of a CBT from January 2010 to June 2015. After informed consent, a blood sample was taken for genetic testing on real-time polymerase chain reaction, in order to identify p81L mutation in the SDHD gene. The information was analyzed with descriptive statistics, using central tendency and description measures. RESULTS: In our group, 92% were females, a mean age of 55.5 years, and 52% were Shamblin type II. The most common place of residence was Mexico City, 8% of the patients had family history, about 20% of the patients had a contralateral tumor and 16% had antecedent of another kind of tumor, 4 (16%) p81L SDHD gene mutations were detected, all of them were heterozygous. CONCLUSIONS: The p81L mutation in the SDHD gene was found in the Mexican population in higher grade that in the U.S. population, which explain the high incidence of this pathology in our country, but we need more studies about this subject.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La mutación p81L del gen SDHD (11q23) se encuentra presente en el 6-36% de los pacientes con tumores del cuerpo carotídeo (TCC) esporádicos y hasta en el 80% de los que presentan TCC familiares. En los EE.UU. se usa como método de cribado para TCC. MÉTODO: Se incluyeron 25 pacientes consecutivos operados de resección de TCC entre enero de 2010 y junio de 2015. Se les tomó muestra sanguínea venosa que se sometió a reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real para identificar la mutación p81L del gen SDHD (11q23). La información se analizó con estadística descriptiva mediante medidas de tendencia central y dispersión. RESULTADOS: Del grupo en estudio, el 92% eran mujeres, la edad promedio era de 55.5 años y el 52% tenían tumor Shamblin tipo II. El lugar de residencia más frecuente fue la Ciudad de México. El 8% presentaban antecedentes familiares, el 20% tumor bilateral y el 16% presentaron un tumor en otra región. Se encontró la mutación p81L del gen SDHD (11q23) en el 16% de los pacientes de forma heterocigota. CONCLUSIONES: La mutación p81L del gen SDHD se encuentra presente en la población mexicana en un grado más elevado que lo reportado en los EE.UU., lo que podría explicar la alta incidencia en nuestro medio.

Mutational load in carotid body tumor.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumor (CBT) is a rare neoplasm arising from paraganglion located near the bifurcation of the carotid artery. There is great intra-tumor heterogeneity, and CBT development could be associated with both germline and somatic allelic variants. Studies on the molecular genetics of CBT are limited, and the molecular mechanisms of its pathogenesis are not fully understood. This work is focused on the estimation of mutational load (ML) in CBT. METHODS: Using the NextSeq 500 platform, we performed exome sequencing of tumors with matched lymph node tissues and peripheral blood obtained from six patients with CBT. To obtain reliable results in tumors with low ML, we developed and successfully applied a complex approach for the analysis of sequencing data. ML was evaluated as the number of somatic variants per megabase (Mb) of the target regions covered by the Illumina TruSeq Exome Library Prep Kit. RESULTS: The ML in CBT varied in the range of 0.09-0.28/Mb. Additionally, we identified several pathogenic/likely pathogenic somatic and germline allelic variants across six patients studied (including TP53 variants). CONCLUSIONS: Using the developed approach, we estimated the ML in CBT, which is much lower than in common malignant tumors. Identified variants in known paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma-causative genes and novel genes could be associated with the pathogenesis of CBT. The obtained results expand our knowledge of the mutation process in CBT as well as the biology of tumor development.

SDHD gene mutation in Mexican population whit carotid body tumor. / Mutación del gen SDHD en población mexicana con tumor del cuerpo carotídeo

Introduction: Among the U.S. population, the p81L SDHD (11q23) gene mutation is present in 6-36% of patients with sporadic carotid body tumor (CBT), but in familial cases is high as 80%. That is why the P81L mutation is used as a screening method for carotid body tumor in the U.S. Methods: We included 25 patients who underwent resection of a CBT from January 2010 to June 2015. After informed consent, a blood sample was taken for genetic testing on real-time polymerase chain reaction, in order to identify p81L mutation in the SDHD gene. The information was analyzed with descriptive statistics, using central tendency and description measures. Results: In our group, 92% were females, a mean age of 55.5 years, and 52% were Shamblin type II. The most common place of residence was Mexico City, 8% of the patients had family history, about 20% of the patients had a contralateral tumor and 16% had antecedent of another kind of tumor, 4 (16%) p81L SDHD gene mutations were detected, all of them were heterozygous. Conclusions: The p81L mutation in the SDHD gene was found in the Mexican population in higher grade that in the U.S. population, which explain the high incidence of this pathology in our country, but we need more studies about this subject.

Introducción: La mutación p81L del gen SDHD (11q23) se encuentra presente en el 6-36% de los pacientes con tumores del cuerpo carotídeo (TCC) esporádicos y hasta en el 80% de los que presentan TCC familiares. En los EE.UU. se usa como método de cribado para TCC. Método: Se incluyeron 25 pacientes consecutivos operados de resección de TCC entre enero de 2010 y junio de 2015. Se les tomó muestra sanguínea venosa que se sometió a reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real para identificar la mutación p81L del gen SDHD (11q23). La información se analizó con estadística descriptiva mediante medidas de tendencia central y dispersión. Resultados: Del grupo en estudio, el 92% eran mujeres, la edad promedio era de 55.5 años y el 52% tenían tumor Shamblin tipo II. El lugar de residencia más frecuente fue la Ciudad de México. El 8% presentaban antecedentes familiares, el 20% tumor bilateral y el 16% presentaron un tumor en otra región. Se encontró la mutación p81L del gen SDHD (11q23) en el 16% de los pacientes de forma heterocigota. Conclusiones: La mutación p81L del gen SDHD se encuentra presente en la población mexicana en un grado más elevado que lo reportado en los EE.UU., lo que podría explicar la alta incidencia en nuestro medio.

Multifocal Paraganglioma and Pheochromocytoma Due to Truncated SDHD Mutation.

OBJECTIVE: Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) are rare autosomal dominant disorders derived from the neural crest chromaffin tissues of the autonomic nervous system. The succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit D (SDHD) gene has been implicated as one of the pathogenic genes. Although more than 100 SDHD mutations have been reported, the phenotype-genotype association remains unclear. METHODS: We reported a case of a patient who presented with multifocal PPGLs and with a rare SDHD mutation, and reviewed the phenotype-genotype association of SDHD. RESULTS: We identified a pathogenic variant of SDHD (c.170-1G>T, NM_003002.3), which caused the complete deletion of exon 3 in the transcript and resulted in a shorter and unstable SDHD mRNA. And truncated SDHD mutations were prone to cause multifocal PPGL, whereas missense SDHD mutations usually caused unifocal lesions. CONCLUSION: This is the first report linking the c.170-1G>T variant to multifocal tumors. We recommend whole-body imaging examinations and close, regular follow-up for these patients, given the risk of multifocal tumor development.

Exome analysis of carotid body tumor.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumor (CBT) is a form of head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) arising at the bifurcation of carotid arteries. Paragangliomas are commonly associated with germline and somatic mutations involving at least one of more than thirty causative genes. However, the specific functionality of a number of these genes involved in the formation of paragangliomas has not yet been fully investigated. METHODS: Exome library preparation was carried out using Nextera® Rapid Capture Exome Kit (Illumina, USA). Sequencing was performed on NextSeq 500 System (Illumina). RESULTS: Exome analysis of 52 CBTs revealed potential driver mutations (PDMs) in 21 genes: ARNT, BAP1, BRAF, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, CSDE1, FGFR3, IDH1, KIF1B, KMT2D, MEN1, RET, SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SETD2, TP53BP1, TP53BP2, and TP53I13. In many samples, more than one PDM was identified. There are also 41% of samples in which we did not identify any PDM; in these cases, the formation of CBT was probably caused by the cumulative effect of several not highly pathogenic mutations. Estimation of average mutation load demonstrated 6-8 mutations per megabase (Mb). Genes with the highest mutation rate were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Exome analysis of 52 CBTs for the first time revealed the average mutation load for these tumors and also identified potential driver mutations as well as their frequencies and co-occurrence with the other PDMs.

Current surgical management of carotid body tumors.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare. Management guidelines may include genetic testing for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) mutations. We performed an institutional review of the surgical management of CBT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis (1994-2015) of CBT excisions at our institution was performed. Data obtained included demographics, genetic testing (if performed), intraoperative details, postoperative morbidity, and long-term outcomes. Data from the first CBT excision were included in patients with bilateral tumors. Genetic testing was routinely offered in patients with a family history of CBT or multiple paragangliomas. RESULTS: A total of 183 CBTs (124 female [67.7%]) were excised. A neck mass was present in 106 patients (57.9%), 24 patients (12.1%) presented with tenderness or neck pain, and 3 (1.6%) presented with cranial nerve dysfunction. Computed tomography (57.9%) or magnetic resonance imaging (51.3%) were the most commonly used imaging modalities. Preoperative angiography was performed in 73 patients (39.8%), and 62 of them (84.5%) underwent embolization or internal carotid balloon occlusion testing, or both. Mean tumor diameter was 3.2 cm (range, 0.6-7.2 cm). There were 71 (38.8%), 75 (41%), and 37 (20.2%) Shamblin type 1, 2, and 3 tumors, respectively. Average operating time was 224 minutes (range, 52-696 minutes). Average blood loss was 143.9 mL (range, 10-2000 mL). Arterial reconstruction with an interposition graft was required in 10, and patch angioplasty was performed in four. Cranial nerve injury was permanent in 10 (5.5%), and the rate of stroke was 1% (n = 2). A total of 382 lymph nodes were excised, and all were benign. There were no deaths ≤30 days. Only one patient presented with malignant disease 2 years after CBT excision, and this patient did not undergo genetic testing. Thirty-four (18.6%) had a family history of CBT. SDH testing was performed in 18 patients, and 17 tested positive. Positive genetic testing had a correlation with earlier age at operation (P < .0001). Mean age at diagnosis of patients with SDH mutations was 38.0 years, and patients without known SDH mutations presented at a mean age of 50.3 years. In patients with SDH mutations, tumor diameter, operating time, blood loss, and distribution of Shamblin type 1, 2, and 3 lesions were not significantly different compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: CBT can be treated with minimal morbidity and mortality; however, the subgroup of patients with positive SDH mutations may represent a variant group of younger patients. Vascular surgeons should be aware of genetic testing to identify patients and family members who should undergo additional preoperative testing and monitoring for other paragangliomas. Concomitant lymph node dissection does not appear to add value in absence of clinic suspicion for malignancy.

[The carotid body paraganglioma: a rare swelling of the neck]. / Een paraganglioom van het glomus caroticum: een zeldzame zwelling in de hals.

BACKGROUND: A carotid body paraganglioma is a rare tumour of the neck, which occurs at the level of the carotid bifurcation. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 52-year-old man was referred with a 10-year history of a swelling on the right side of his neck. Imaging revealed that this was a carotid body paraganglioma. The tumour showed no hormonal activity and there were no other paraganglioma localisations. We removed the tumour surgically, and histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of paraganglioma. Genetic investigation revealed that the patient was a carrier of a mutation in the succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit D (SDHD) gene. CONCLUSION: A paraganglioma of the carotid body is usually benign and slow-growing. It is familial in about 50% of cases, with a characteristic mutation in the SDHD-gene. Surgical removal is often the treatment of choice. If there is too high a risk of injury due to surgery, or in cases of inoperability, a "wait and see" policy with radiological follow-up is implemented. Diagnostics, treatment and follow-up demand a multidisciplinary approach.

Resection of a large carotid paraganglioma in Carney-Stratakis syndrome: a multidisciplinary feat.

A 39-year-old man was referred to the vascular surgeons with a right-sided cervical mass, palpitations, headaches and sweating. He had presented with abdominal discomfort 12 months earlier. Investigations had revealed a gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) and left adrenalectomy. CT of the neck with contrast demonstrated a large right carotid paraganglioma, extending superiorly from below the carotid bifurcation to encase the internal carotid artery. Genetic screening confirmed the diagnosis of Carney-Stratakis syndrome, an SDH-D germline mutation leading to GIST and multifocal paragangliomas. Successful surgical excision required considerable multidisciplinary teamwork between neuroendocrinologists, anaesthetists and surgeons. The tumour was highly vascular and involved the right carotid body, hypoglossal and vagus nerves. Access was challenging and maxillofacial surgical expertise were required for division of the mandible. The patient made a good recovery following speech and swallowing rehabilitation.