Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 142
Filtrar
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 106(6): 534-539, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563079

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Time-to-theatre (TTT) is a key performance indicator of theatre efficiency and delayed TTT incurs significant costs and poor clinical outcomes. An increasing Irish population in conjunction with an ageing population puts increasing pressure on emergency surgical services across Ireland. We examined our institution's experience with introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective theatre lists for acute surgical patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic, prospectively maintained databases was performed between 1 February 2018 and 31 January 2020. A cost analysis was conducted to assess the economic impact of delayed TTT. The cost-saving benefit of introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective Kaizen lists was then calculated and compared with 2012-2014 figures from our institution. RESULTS: In total, 6,679 procedures were performed. Overall mean TTT was 16h, 10h shorter than before the introduction of a second emergency theatre and Kaizen theatre lists (p < 0.001). Patients aged >65 years, who are historically a significantly disadvantaged group, had a shorter TTT following the introduction of a second emergency theatre. The economic advantage of a second emergency theatre resulted in a cost saving of €3,674,538 over 24 months. CONCLUSION: Investment in emergency surgical services resulted in more efficient access to emergency theatres. There was a reduction in out-of-hours operating across all specialties and across the more at-risk groups such as those over the age of 65, who had an overall reduction in TTT. This had significant financial benefits and likely reduced the clinical risk associated with delayed TTT and out-of-hours operating.


Asunto(s)
Quirófanos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Irlanda , Anciano , Quirófanos/economía , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Tiempo de Tratamiento/economía , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Am Surg ; 88(3): 439-446, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34732080

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older adults (OAs) ≥ 65 years of age, representing the fastest growing segment in the United States, are anticipated to require a greater percentage of emergency general surgery procedures (EGSPs) with an associated increase in health care costs. The aims of this study were to identify the frequency of EGSP and charges incurred by OA compared to their younger counterparts in the state of Maryland. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission from 2009 to 2018 was undertaken. Patients undergoing urgent or emergent ESGP were divided into 2 groups (18-64 years and ≥65 years). Data collected included demographics, APR-severity of illness (SOI), APR-risk of mortality (ROM), the EGSP (partial colectomy [PC], small bowel resection [SBR], cholecystectomy, operative management of peptic ulcer disease, lysis of adhesions, appendectomy, and laparotomy), length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges. P-values (P < .05) were significant. RESULTS: Of the 181,283 patients included in the study, 55,401 (38.1%) were ≥65 years of age. Older adults presented with greater APR-SOI (major 37.7% vs 21.3%, extreme 5.2% vs 9.3%), greater APR-ROM (major 25.3% vs 8.7%, extreme 22.3% vs 5.3%), underwent PC (24.5% vs 10.9%) and SBR (12.8% vs 7.0%) more frequently, and incurred significantly higher median hospital charges for every EGSP, consistently between 2009 and 2018 due to increased LOS and complications when compared to those ≤65 years of age. CONCLUSION: These findings stress the need for validated frailty indices and quality improvement initiatives focused on the care of OAs in emergency general surgery to maximize outcomes and optimize cost.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Apendicectomía/economía , Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colecistectomía/economía , Colecistectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colectomía/métodos , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Precios de Hospital , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/cirugía , Laparotomía/economía , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adherencias Tisulares/cirugía , Adulto Joven
3.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0249031, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755716

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-utility of a multi-professional simulation training programme for obstetric emergencies-Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training (PROMPT)-with a particular focus on its impact on permanent obstetric brachial plexus injuries (OBPIs). DESIGN: A model-based cost-utility analysis. SETTING: Maternity units in England. POPULATION: Simulated cohorts of individuals affected by permanent OBPIs. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to estimate the cost-utility of adopting annual, PROMPT training (scenario 1a) or standalone shoulder dystocia training (scenario 1b) in all maternity units in England compared to current practice, where only a proportion of English units use the training programme (scenario 2). The time horizon was 30 years and the analysis was conducted from an English National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services perspective. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to account for uncertainties in the model parameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes for the entire simulated period included the following: total costs for PROMPT or shoulder dystocia training (including costs of OBPIs), number of OBPIs averted, number of affected adult/parental/dyadic quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and the incremental cost per QALY gained. RESULTS: Nationwide PROMPT or shoulder dystocia training conferred significant savings (in excess of £1 billion ($1.5 billion)) compared to current practice, resulting in cost-savings of at least £1 million ($1.5 million) per any type of QALY gained. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated similar findings. CONCLUSION: In this model, national implementation of multi-professional simulation training for obstetric emergencies (or standalone shoulder dystocia training) in England appeared to both be cost-saving when evaluating their impact on permanent OBPIs.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Modelos Económicos , Obstetricia/economía , Entrenamiento Simulado/economía , Adulto , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
6.
PLoS Med ; 18(1): e1003514, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439870

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with multimorbidities have the greatest healthcare needs and generate the highest expenditure in the health system. There is an increasing focus on identifying specific disease combinations for addressing poor outcomes. Existing research has identified a small number of prevalent "clusters" in the general population, but the limited number examined might oversimplify the problem and these may not be the ones associated with important outcomes. Combinations with the highest (potentially preventable) secondary care costs may reveal priority targets for intervention or prevention. We aimed to examine the potential of defining multimorbidity clusters for impacting secondary care costs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used national, Hospital Episode Statistics, data from all hospital admissions in England from 2017/2018 (cohort of over 8 million patients) and defined multimorbidity based on ICD-10 codes for 28 chronic conditions (we backfilled conditions from 2009/2010 to address potential undercoding). We identified the combinations of multimorbidity which contributed to the highest total current and previous 5-year costs of secondary care and costs of potentially preventable emergency hospital admissions in aggregate and per patient. We examined the distribution of costs across unique disease combinations to test the potential of the cluster approach for targeting interventions at high costs. We then estimated the overlap between the unique combinations to test potential of the cluster approach for targeting prevention of accumulated disease. We examined variability in the ranks and distributions across age (over/under 65) and deprivation (area level, deciles) subgroups and sensitivity to considering a smaller number of diseases. There were 8,440,133 unique patients in our sample, over 4 million (53.1%) were female, and over 3 million (37.7%) were aged over 65 years. No clear "high cost" combinations of multimorbidity emerged as possible targets for intervention. Over 2 million (31.6%) patients had 63,124 unique combinations of multimorbidity, each contributing a small fraction (maximum 3.2%) to current-year or 5-year secondary care costs. Highest total cost combinations tended to have fewer conditions (dyads/triads, most including hypertension) affecting a relatively large population. This contrasted with the combinations that generated the highest cost for individual patients, which were complex sets of many (6+) conditions affecting fewer persons. However, all combinations containing chronic kidney disease and hypertension, or diabetes and hypertension, made up a significant proportion of total secondary care costs, and all combinations containing chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension had the highest proportion of preventable emergency admission costs, which might offer priority targets for prevention of disease accumulation. The results varied little between age and deprivation subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Key limitations include availability of data only from hospitals and reliance on hospital coding of health conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that there are no clear multimorbidity combinations for a cluster-targeted intervention approach to reduce secondary care costs. The role of risk-stratification and focus on individual high-cost patients with interventions is particularly questionable for this aim. However, if aetiology is favourable for preventing further disease, the cluster approach might be useful for targeting disease prevention efforts with potential for cost-savings in secondary care.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Multimorbilidad/tendencias , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform ; 92(2): 99-105, 2021 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33468290

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In-flight medical emergencies (IFMEs) average 1 of every 604 flights and are expected to increase as the population ages and air travel increases. Flight diversions, or the rerouting of a flight to an alternate destination, occur in 2 to 13% of IFME cases, but may or may not be necessary as determined after the fact. Estimating the effect of IFME diversions compared to nonmedical diversions can be expected to improve our understanding of their impact and allow for more appropriate decision making during IFMEs.METHODS: The current study matched multiple disparate datasets, including medical data, flight plan and track data, passenger statistics, and financial data. Chi-squared analysis and independent samples t-tests compared diversion delays and costs metrics between flights diverted for medical vs. nonmedical reasons. Data were restricted to domestic flights between 1/1/2018 and 6/30/2019.RESULTS: Over 70% of diverted flights recover (continue on to their intended destination after diverting); however, flights diverted due to IFMEs recover more often and more quickly than do flights diverted for nonmedical reasons. IFME diversions introduce less delay overall and cost less in terms of direct operating costs and passenger value of time (averaging around 38,000) than do flights diverted for nonmedical reasons.DISCUSSION: Flights diverted due to IFMEs appear to have less impact overall than do flights diverted for nonmedical reasons. However, the lack of information related to costs for nonrecovered flights and the decision factors involved during nonmedical diversions hinders our ability to offer further insights.Lewis BA, Gawron VJ, Esmaeilzadeh E, Mayer RH, Moreno-Hines F, Nerwich N, Alves PM. Data-driven estimation of the impact of diversions due to in-flight medical emergencies on flight delay and aircraft operating costs. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(2):99105.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Aeroespacial/economía , Viaje en Avión , Aeronaves/economía , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Viaje
8.
Front Public Health ; 8: 617166, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33344410

RESUMEN

Objectives: During public health emergencies, people often scramble to buy scarce goods, which may lead to panic behavior and cause serious negative impacts on public health management. Due to the absence of relevant research, the internal logic of this phenomenon is not clear. This study explored whether and why public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic stimulate consumers' preference for scarce products. Methods: Applying the questionnaire survey method, two online surveys were conducted on the Credamo data platform in China. The first survey was launched in February and collected psychological and behavioral data from 1,548 participants. Considering the likelihood of population relocation due to the pandemic, a follow-up survey was conducted in August with 463 participants who had participated in the first survey and had not relocated to other cities between February and August. The hypotheses were tested with these data through stepwise regression analysis, bootstrapping, and robustness testing. Results: Pandemic severity was found to positively affect scarce consumption behavior and the effect was found to be situational; this indicates that the impact of the pandemic on scarce consumption was only significant during the pandemic. Further, it was found that materialism plays a mediating role in the relationship between pandemic severity and scarce consumption. Finally, the need to belong was found to play a moderating role between pandemic severity and materialism. Conclusion: This study findings imply that the scarce consumption behavior during public health emergencies can be reduced by decreasing materialism and increasing the need to belong. These findings may aid government leaders in managing public health emergencies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/psicología , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Urgencias Médicas/psicología , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , China , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938582

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a lifelong, relapsing-remitting disease. Patients non-responsive to pharmacological treatment may require a colectomy. We estimated pre-colectomy and post-colectomy healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and costs in England. DESIGN/METHOD: A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study indexing adult patients with UC undergoing colectomy (2009-2015), using linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink/Hospital Episode Statistics data, was conducted. HCRU, healthcare costs and pharmacological treatments were evaluated during 12 months prior to and including colectomy (baseline) and 24 months post-colectomy (follow-up; F-U), comparing baseline/F-U, emergency/elective colectomy and subtotal/full colectomy using descriptive statistics and paired/unpaired tests. RESULTS: 249 patients from 26 165 identified were analysed including 145 (58%) elective and 184 (74%) full colectomies. Number/cost of general practitioner consultations increased post-colectomy (p<0.001), and then decreased at 13-24 months (p<0.05). From baseline to F-U, the number of outpatient visits, number/cost of hospitalisations and total direct healthcare costs decreased (all p<0.01). Postoperative HCRU was similar between elective and emergency colectomies, except for the costs of colectomy-related hospitalisations and medication, which were lower in the elective group (p<0.05). Postoperative costs were higher for subtotal versus full colectomies (p<0.001). At 1-12 month F-U, 30%, 19% and 5% of patients received aminosalicylates, steroids and immunosuppressants, respectively. CONCLUSION: HCRU/costs increased for primary care in the first year post-colectomy but decreased for secondary care, and varied according to the colectomy type. Ongoing and potentially unnecessary pharmacological therapy was seen in up to 30% of patients. These findings can inform patients and decision-makers of potential benefits and burdens of colectomy in UC.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Recursos en Salud/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0230989, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324761

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Large-scale emergency assistance programmes in Somalia use a variety of transfer modalities including in-kind food provision, food vouchers, and cash transfers. Evidence is needed to better understand whether and how such modalities differ in reducing the risk of acute malnutrition in vulnerable groups, such as the 800,000 pregnant and lactating women affected by the 2017/18 food crisis. METHODS: Changes in diet and acute malnutrition status were assessed among pregnant and lactating women receiving similarly sized household transfers over a four-month period (total value of ~US$450 per household) delivered either as food vouchers or as mixed transfers consisting of in-kind food, vouchers, and cash. Baseline and endline comparisons were conducted for 514 women in Wajid, Somalia. Primary study outcomes were Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women, meal frequency, and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), with MUAC<21.0 cm classified as acute malnutrition. Adjusted analyses consisted of difference-in-difference analysis using linear and logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting based on propensity scores to account for the non-randomized design. FINDINGS: No significant difference in change in dietary quality was observed between food voucher and mixed transfer recipients; a significant difference in change in mean meal frequency was observed (0.3 meals/day, CI: 0.1-0.5, p = 0.001) and the mixed transfer group had significantly greater meal frequency at endline (p<0.001). Mean MUAC increased significantly among both voucher (0.9cm, CI: 0.6-1.3, p = 0.001) and mixed transfer recipients (1.3cm, CI: 1.1-1.5, p = 0.001) over the intervention period in adjusted analysis, however, the difference in magnitude of change between the two groups was not statistically significant (0.4cm, CI: -0.1-0.08, p = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of the 2017/18 Somalia food crisis, the modality of assistance provided to pregnant and lactating women (mixed transfers or food-vouchers) made no difference in preventing acute malnutrition and protecting nutritional status.


Asunto(s)
Asistencia Alimentaria/economía , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Dieta , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Humanos , Lactancia , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Estado Nutricional , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Somalia , Adulto Joven
13.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0232243, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32339213

RESUMEN

In the United States (US), the lifetime incidence of incarceration is 6.6%, exceeding that of any other nation. Compared to the general US population, incarcerated individuals are disproportionally affected by chronic health conditions, mental illness, and substance use disorders. Barriers to accessing medical care are common in correctional facilities. We sought to characterize the local incarcerated patient population and explore barriers to medical care in these patients. We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study by reviewing the medical records of incarcerated patients presenting to the adult emergency department (ED) of a single academic, tertiary care facility with medical or psychiatric (med/psych) and trauma-related emergencies between January 2012 and December 2014. Data on demographics, medical complexity, trauma intentionality, and barriers to medical care were analyzed using descriptive statistics, unpaired student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables, and chi-square analysis or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Trauma patients were younger with fewer medical comorbidities and were less likely to be admitted to the hospital than med/psych patients. 47.8% of injuries resulted from violence or were self-inflicted. Most trauma-related complaints were managed by the emergency medicine physician in the ED. While barriers to medical care were not correlated with hospital admission, 5.4% of med/psych and 2.9% of trauma patients reported barriers as a contributing factor to the ED encounter. Med/psych patients commonly reported a lack of access to medications, while trauma patients reported a delay in medical care. Trauma-related presentations were less medically complex than med/psych-related complaints. Medical management of most injuries required no hospital resources outside of the ED, indicating a potential role for outpatient management of trauma-related complaints. Additional opportunities for health care improvement and cost savings include the implementation of programs that target violence, prevent injuries, and promote the continuity of medical care while incarcerated.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo/economía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/economía , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto Joven
14.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 609, 2019 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31464616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are a number of limitations to the present primary eye care system in the UK. Patients with minor eye conditions typically either have to present to their local hospital or GP, or face a charge when visiting eye care professionals (optometrists). Some areas of the UK have commissioned enhanced community services to alleviate this problem; however, many areas have not. The present study is a needs assessment of three areas (Leeds, Airedale and Bradford) without a Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS), with the aim of determining whether such a service is clinically or economically viable. METHOD: A pro forma was developed for optometrists and practice staff to complete when a patient presented whose reason for attending was due to symptoms indicative of a problem that could not be optically corrected. This form captured the reason for visit, whether the patient was seen, the consultation funding, the outcome and where the patient would have presented to if the optometrists could not have seen them. Optometrists were invited to participate via Local Optical Committees. Results were submitted via a Google form or a Microsoft Excel document and were analysed in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients were managed in optometric practice. Nine and 16% of patients required subsequent referral to their General Practitioner or hospital ophthalmology department, respectively. Should they not have been seen, 34% of patients would have presented to accident and emergency departments and 59% to their general practitioner. 53% of patients paid privately for the optometrist appointment, 28% of patients received a free examination either through use of General Ophthalmic Service sight tests (9%) or optometrist good will (19%) and 19% of patients did not receive a consultation and were redirected to other providers (e.g. pharmacy, accident and emergency or General Practitioner). 88% of patients were satisfied with the level of service. Cost-analyses revealed a theoretical cost saving of £3198 to the NHS across our sample for the study period, indicating cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This assessment demonstrates that a minor eye condition service in the local areas would be economically and clinically viable and well received by patients.


Asunto(s)
Oftalmopatías/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatías/terapia , Evaluación de Necesidades , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/economía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra , Oftalmopatías/economía , Médicos Generales/economía , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Oftalmología/estadística & datos numéricos , Optometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur ; 32(6): 1013-1021, 2019 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31282259

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to examine from the viewpoint of resource utilization the Japanese surgical payment system which was revised in April 2016. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors collected data from surgical records in the Teikyo University electronic medical record system from April 1 till September 30, 2016. The authors defined the decision-making unit as a surgeon with the highest academic rank in the surgery. Inputs were defined as the number of medical doctors who assisted surgery, and the time of operation from skin incision to closure. An output was defined as the surgical fee. The authors calculated each surgeon's efficiency score using output-oriented Charnes-Cooper-Rhodes model of data envelopment analysis. The authors compared the efficiency scores of each surgical specialty using the Kruskal-Wallis and the Steel method. FINDINGS: The authors analyzed 2,558 surgical procedures performed by 109 surgeons. The difference in efficiency scores was significant (p = 0.000). The efficiency score of neurosurgery was significantly greater than obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, orthopedics, emergency surgery, urology, otolaryngology and plastic surgery (p<0.05). ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The authors demonstrated that the surgeons' efficiency was significantly different among their specialties. This suggests that the Japanese surgical reimbursement scales fail to reflect resource utilization despite the revision in 2016.


Asunto(s)
Recursos en Salud/economía , Costos de Hospital , Quirófanos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Eficiencia Organizacional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Innovación Organizacional , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
Dermatology ; 235(4): 276-286, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31163441

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is associated with psychosocial distress. Little is known about the relationship between psoriasis and mental health (MH) emergencies. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of psoriasis and MH hospitalizations in the USA. METHODS: Data from the 2002-2012 National Inpatient Sample were analyzed, including an approximately 20% sample of all US hospitalizations (n = 87,053,155 children and adults). RESULTS: Hospitalization for MH disorders occurred more commonly in those with psoriasis compared to those without psoriasis (4.04 vs. 2.21%). In multivariable logistic regression models, psoriasis was associated with higher odds of admission for any MH disorder overall (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.32 [2.24-2.41]), as well as 9 of the 15 MH-specific disorders examined. Associated MH disorders included: anxiety, schizophrenia, personality disorder, depression, substance use disorders, history of MH disorder, alcohol-related disorders, adjustment disorders, and cognitive disorders. Children with versus those without psoriasis were also more likely to have a primary hospitalization for any MH disorder (2.82 [2.24-3.56]). Psoriasis inpatients were also more likely to have a primary hospitalization for any MH disorder compared to those with alopecia areata (1.99 [1.45-2.74]) or hidradenitis suppurativa (3.97 [3.49-4.52]). Psoriasis patients hospitalized with any MH disorder had higher mean [95% confidence interval] cost of inpatient care (USD 11,004 [10,846-11,241] vs. 9,547 [8,730-10,364]; p < 0.0001) compared to those without psoriasis, with USD 1,610,860 excess costs annually, with the majority of the costs coming from depression and mood disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adults with psoriasis had increased hospitalization for multiple MH disorders, which were associated with a considerable financial burden.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Psoriasis/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Costo de Enfermedad , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
17.
Ann Plast Surg ; 83(1): 40-42, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31192878

RESUMEN

Although the upper extremity is the most commonly injured part of the body, many studies have indicated that there is a lack of emergency hand coverage in the United States. In 2010, our laboratory evaluated on-call hand coverage in Tennessee (TN) and found that only 7% of hospitals had a hand surgeon on call for emergency cases at all times. In 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was implemented with the goal of increasing overall access to care and decreasing health care costs. Hand surgeons were surveyed on their attitudes toward the ACA, and the majority of surgeons surveyed disagreed or strongly disagree that the ACA would improve access to emergent hand surgery. This study aimed to determine if there has been an increase in emergency hand coverage in TN since the implementation of the ACA. A survey was administered to all hospitals in TN with both an emergency department and operating room to determine the percentage of TN hospitals offering elective hand surgery and on-call emergency hand coverage. With 94% of TN hospitals responding to the emergency department survey, we determined that there has been a 138% significant increase in the percentage of hospitals reporting 24/7 emergency hand coverage by a hand specialist since our last study in 2010. There has also been a significant increase in elective hand coverage in TN, although much smaller at 13% since 2010. This study suggests that there has been an overall increase in access to hand care in TN since the implementation of the ACA, most profoundly seen in the increase in hand specialists available for emergent cases.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Traumatismos de la Mano/cirugía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Traumatismos de la Mano/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tennessee
18.
Clin Transplant ; 33(7): e13596, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31102488

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Heart transplantation (HT) is the treatment of choice for selected cases of advanced heart failure. There is an increasing rate of emergency HT in our country. The aim of this study was to determine the cost of HT in our hospital according to emergent vs. elective transplantation status. METHODS: The costs of all consecutive HTs performed in our center between January 2010 and May 2015 were analyzed. The cost of elective and emergent HT was compared. RESULTS: HT mean cost at our institution was €62 203 ± 47 976. Elective HT mean cost was €47 540 ± 25 140, whereas emergent HT cost was €102 733 ± 68 050 (emergency status 1, as regional priority, was €66 077 ± 28 067 and emergency status 0, as the highest national priority, was €136 056 ± 77 080; P < 0.001). Increased emergent HT cost was mainly related to a longer admission (32 ± 24 days vs. 69 ± 53 days; P = 0.006; accounting for a cost of €14 517 ± 12 475 vs. €37 846 ± 31 702; P < 0.001) and increased drug-related expenses (€6622 ± 7465 vs. €15,171 ± 15,758; P < 0.02). Elective HT survival rate was 96%, compared to 68% for emergent HT; P = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: Elective HT showed a high survival rate with a relatively low and less variable cost, leading to a favorable economic balance in today's public health reimbursement system. In contrast, emergent HT showed a higher cost and a lower survival rate. New treatment strategies should be identified for heart failure patients at risk of requiring emergency HT.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Urgencias Médicas/economía , Trasplante de Corazón/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA