Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.642
Filtrar
1.
Vaccine ; 42(22): 126185, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccination of dogs and cats is considered a mainstay of preventive health, providing benefit to individual animals and the population. This study aimed to assess temporal trends in vaccination and factors associated with vaccination uptake in a large veterinary visiting population of UK cats and dogs. METHODS: The electronic health records (EHRs) of 712,266 dogs and 306,888 cats (voluntarily contributed by 201 veterinary practices) were used to determine the proportion that had record of any type of veterinary vaccination either within one-year or within three-years of attending a participating veterinary practice. Socioeconomic and animal factors were also assessed for association with vaccination uptake using multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models. RESULTS: The percentage of animals vaccinated within one-year of consultation declined across the years 2016 to 2022, from 76.58% (95% CI 74.82-78.33) to 69.04% (95% CI 68.02-70.07) in dogs, and 69.54% (95% CI 67.89-71.19) to 66.12% (95% CI 64.83-67.41) in cats. The proportion of animals that had a vaccination recorded within a three-year window of a consultation for dogs ranged from 81.36% (95% CI 79.74-82.99)to 84.42% (95% CI 83.31-85.54) in the period from 2016 to 2022; for cats, this measure increased from 73.90% (95% CI 72.24-75.56) in 2016 to 77.85% (95% CI 76.46-79.25) in 2022. Aging was associated with reduced odds of animals having a vaccination recorded within one-year and three-years. In both species the odds of vaccination reduced as the level of socioeconomic deprivation assigned to the animal's area of residence increased. CONCLUSION: The results provide a baseline that can be used as a reference to continue to track vaccination uptake in the cat and dog population. Temporal trends suggest time between vaccinations has increased in recent years. Strategies to encourage owners to vaccinate their animals should consider targeting areas of high deprivation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos , Enfermedades de los Perros , Vacunación , Gatos , Perros , Animales , Reino Unido , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Gatos/prevención & control , Masculino , Femenino , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos
2.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 740-749, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39109453

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The study's objective was to examine national trends in patterns of under-vaccination in the United States. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The National Immunization Survey-Child (NIS-Child) is an annual cross-sectional survey that collects provider-verified vaccination records from a large national probability sample of children. Records from the 2011-2021 NIS-Child were used to assess receipt of the combined 7-vaccine series by age 24 months. Based on prior work, patterns indicative of hesitancy included zero vaccines, not starting ≥1 series, and consistent vaccine-limiting. Patterns indicative of practical issues included starting all series but missing doses. Up-to-date (UTD) was defined as receiving all doses in the combined 7-vaccine series. RESULTS: The study population comprised 127,257 children. Over the observation period, patterns indicative of hesitancy significantly decreased (p-trend < 0.0001), patterns indicative of practical issues significantly decreased (p-trend < 0.0001), and UTD significantly increased (p-trend < 0.0001). In 2021, the weighted percentage in each category was as follows: probable hesitancy 6.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.4%, 7.2%), probable practical issues 26.0% (95% CI 24.4%, 27.6%), and UTD 67.7% (95% CI 66.0%, 69.4%). CONCLUSION: Over an 11-year period, vaccination coverage in the United States for the combined 7-vaccine series has improved, with patterns suggestive of practical issues or hesitancy declining.


Asunto(s)
Vacunación , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Lactante , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Vacilación a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacilación a la Vacunación/tendencias , Esquemas de Inmunización , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias
3.
Ethiop J Health Sci ; 34(1): 105-109, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957337

RESUMEN

The National Immunization Program (NIP) was introduced in Ethiopia in 1980. The NIP has expanded the number of vaccines from six to more than 14 in 2023. However, decisions on new vaccine introduction and other vaccine-related matters were not systematically deliberated nationally. Thus, the need to establish a national body to deliberate on vaccine and vaccination matters, in addition to the global immunization advisory groups, has been emphasized in the last decade. This article presents the establishment and achievements of the Ethiopian NITAG. The E-NITAG was established in 2016 and maintained its active role in providing recommendations for new vaccine introduction and improving the delivery of routine vaccines. The external assessment indicated the E-NITAG was highly functional and played a critical role in enhancing the vaccination practice in Ethiopia, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The absence of a dedicated secretariat staff was the major bottleneck to expanding the role of the E-NITAG beyond responding to MOH requests. The E-NITAG must be strengthened by establishing a secretariat that can eventually grow as an independent institution to address complex vaccine-related issues the NIP needs to address.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos , COVID-19 , Programas de Inmunización , Humanos , Etiopía , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunación/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas/administración & dosificación
5.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2364480, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38972854

RESUMEN

Elderly individuals face a high risk of hospitalization and death related to influenza, thus prioritizing them for influenza vaccination. Due to variations in the influenza virus and waning protective antibodies, annual influenza vaccination is recommended. However, research on repeated influenza vaccination among elderly individuals in China is limited. From 2020 to 2022, the average influenza vaccination coverage among registered elderly individuals in Shanghai was 4.1%, showing a declining trend over time. In 2020, the rate of repeated influenza vaccination among elderly individuals was 28.35%, which rose to almost two-thirds both in 2021 and 2022. No increased risk of adverse events following immunization was observed after repeated influenza vaccination during this period. Our study also found that elderly individuals with Shanghai household registration, managed by community clinics, and older age tended to receive more doses of repeated influenza vaccination throughout the period from 2020 to 2022. Increasing influenza vaccine coverage among elderly individuals in Shanghai is both urgent and challenging. Health authorities should intensify educational and promotional campaigns to encourage uptake of annual repeated influenza vaccination among elderly individuals.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Cobertura de Vacunación , Humanos , China , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Femenino , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/tendencias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
BMJ Open ; 14(7): e073272, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955367

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the infant vaccination trends a year before and a year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in selected urban and rural communities in Ibadan, Nigeria. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study in which data were extracted from infant vaccination records. SETTING: Two rural and three urban vaccination centres in primary health clinics at Ibadan Southeast and Olúyòlé local government areas, respectively. PARTICIPANTS: Infant vaccination records 1 year before and 1 year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2019-February 2020 and March 2020-February 2021, respectively). OUTCOME MEASURES: Timeliness of vaccination (vaccination taken within 2 weeks of appointment) and vaccination completion according to the Nigerian routine infant vaccination schedule. RESULTS: 2000 vaccination records were included in the study (1013 (50.6%) for male infants). 840 (42.0%) of the records were from the rural immunisation clinics. There were 1194 (59.7%) and 806 (40.3%) records from before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. Before the pandemic, birth dose vaccines were timelier among infants from urban communities, while vaccines given at 6 weeks were timelier in the rural areas. Following the onset of the pandemic, the rural communities had a higher proportion of infants with timelier and complete vaccination except for the birth dose vaccines. Overall, there was higher vaccination completion before the pandemic, and this was higher in the rural compared with the urban communities both before (54.8% vs 11.7%) and after (23.6% vs 1.0%) the onset of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: A decline in infant vaccination uptake, timeliness and completion persisted 1 year after the COVID-19 pandemic onset, and urban communities were more affected. More efforts are required to ensure optimal infant vaccination, especially in urban communities, to forestall outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Población Rural , Población Urbana , Vacunación , Humanos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Lactante , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Esquemas de Inmunización , Recién Nacido , Pandemias
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2361946, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845409

RESUMEN

Introduction COVID-19 vaccines may be administered with other vaccines during the same healthcare visit. COVID-19 monovalent (Fall 2021) and bivalent (Fall 2022) vaccine recommendations coincided with annual seasonal influenza vaccination. Data describing the frequency of the co-administration of COVID-19 vaccines with other vaccines are limited. Methods We used V-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based U.S. safety surveillance system established by the CDC, to describe trends in the administration of COVID-19 vaccines with other vaccines reported to V-safe during December 14, 2020 - May 19, 2023. Results Of the 21 million COVID-19 vaccinations reported to V-safe, 2.2% (459,817) were administered with at least 1 other vaccine. Co-administration most frequently occurred during the first week of October 2023 (27,092; 44.1%). Most reports of co-administration included influenza vaccine (393,003; 85.5%). Co-administration was most frequently reported for registrants aged 6 months-6 years (4,872; 4.4%). Conclusion Reports of co-administration to V-safe peaked during October 2023, when influenza vaccination most often occurs, possibly reflecting increased opportunities for multiple vaccinations and greater acceptability of the co-administration of COVID-19 vaccine with other vaccines, especially influenza vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2356342, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780570

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted healthcare systems at all levels globally, notably affecting routine healthcare services, such as childhood vaccination. This study examined the impact of these disruptions on routine childhood vaccination programmes in Tanzania. We conducted a longitudinal study over four years in five Tanzanian regions: Mwanza, Dar es Salaam, Mtwara, Arusha, and Dodoma. This study analyzed the trends in the use of six essential vaccines: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV), Diphtheria Tetanus Pertussis, Hepatitis-B and Hib (DTP-HepB-Hib), measles-rubella (MR), Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV), and Rota vaccines. We evaluated annual and monthly vaccination trends using time-series and regression analyses. Predictive modeling was performed using an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. A total of 32,602,734 vaccination events were recorded across the regions from 2019 to 2022. Despite declining vaccination rates in 2020, there was a notable rebound in 2021, indicating the resilience of Tanzania's immunization program. The analysis also highlighted regional differences in vaccination rates when standardized per 1000 people. Seasonal fluctuations were observed in monthly vaccination rates, with BCG showing the most stable trend. Predictive modeling of BCG indicated stable and increasing vaccination coverage by 2023. These findings underscore the robustness of Tanzania's childhood immunization infrastructure in overcoming the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, as indicated by the strong recovery of vaccination rates post-2020. We provide valuable insights into the dynamics of vaccination during a global health crisis and highlight the importance of sustained immunization efforts to maintain public health.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunación , Humanos , Tanzanía/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Estudios Longitudinales , Lactante , Preescolar , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , Niño , Vacuna BCG/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BCG/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Pandemias/prevención & control
9.
Rev Med Suisse ; 20(872): 876-880, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693800

RESUMEN

Vaccine could take a central role in the strategy to reduce the burden of dengue. The development of an effective and safe vaccine must address various immunological challenges. Several vaccines are currently in development. To date, two live-attenuated vaccines have been deployed. Both have an effectiveness that varies depending on the serotypes. The deployment of the Dengvaxia vaccine, which began in 2015, was marked by a major safety alert leading to its use being restricted to previously dengue-seropositive people over 9 years old. The Qdenga vaccine is currently being deployed. There is for now insufficient data to ensure its safety in seronegative people. Some travelers, who have previously been infected with dengue, are a group for whom a vaccination recommendation applies.


Les vaccins pourraient occuper une place centrale dans la stratégie de réduction du fardeau de la dengue. Le développement d'un vaccin efficace et sûr est complexe car il doit relever plusieurs défis immunologiques. Différents vaccins sont en développement. À ce jour, deux vaccins vivants atténués ont été déployés. Tous deux ont une efficacité qui varie selon les sérotypes. Le déploiement du vaccin Dengvaxia, débuté en 2015, a été marqué par une alerte de sécurité majeure conduisant à restreindre son usage aux personnes de plus de 9 ans, préalablement séropositives pour la dengue. Le vaccin Qdenga est en cours de déploiement. Le recul est insuffisant pour assurer son innocuité chez les séronégatifs. Certains voyageurs, ayant déjà été infectés par la dengue, constituent un groupe pour lequel une recommandation vaccinale s'applique.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Dengue , Dengue , Vacunas Atenuadas , Humanos , Vacunas contra el Dengue/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra el Dengue/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Dengue/efectos adversos , Dengue/prevención & control , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/tendencias
10.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1371258, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784590

RESUMEN

Introduction: Routine immunization programs have focused on increasing vaccination coverage, which is equally important for decreasing vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). We estimated the trends and projections of age-appropriate vaccination coverage at the regional and national levels, as well as place of residence and wealth index in LMICs. Methods: In total, 174 nationally representative household surveys from 2000 to 2020 from 41 LMICs were included in this study. Bayesian hierarchical regression models were used to estimate trends and projections of age-appropriate vaccination. Results: The trend in coverage of age-appropriate Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), third dose of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP3), third dose of polio (polio3), and measles-containing vaccine (MCV) increased rapidly from 2000 to 2020 in LMICs. Findings indicate substantial increases at the regional and national levels, and by area of residence and socioeconomic status between 2000 and 2030. The largest rise was observed in East Africa, followed by South and Southeast Asia. However, out of the 41 countries, only 10 countries are estimated to achieve 90% coverage of the BCG vaccine by 2030, five of DTP3, three of polio3, and none of MCV. Additionally, by 2030, wider pro-urban and -rich inequalities are expected in several African countries. Conclusion: Significant progress in age-appropriate vaccination coverage has been made in LMICs from 2000 to 2020. Despite this, projections show many countries will not meet the 2030 coverage goals, with persistent urban-rural and socioeconomic disparities. Therefore, LMICs must prioritize underperforming areas and reduce inequalities through stronger health systems and increased community engagement to ensure high coverage and equitable vaccine access.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Programas de Inmunización , Cobertura de Vacunación , Humanos , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/tendencias , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Asia , África del Sur del Sahara , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , Lactante , Preescolar , Teorema de Bayes , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias
11.
Epilepsy Behav ; 154: 109763, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554646

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate the impact of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, its related social restriction measure (national lockdown) and vaccination campaign on emergency department (ED) accesses for epileptic seizures. METHODS: Retrospective observational analysis conducted on a consecutive cohort of patients who sought medical care at the ED of the General Hospital of Merano, Italy, from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021. We investigated the monthly ED attendances for epileptic seizures between the periods before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the national lockdown (March 2020) using an interrupted time-series analysis with data standardized for 1000 accesses/month. As a further temporal cutoff, we used the start of the national vaccination campaign. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021, a total of 415,005 ED attendances were recorded; 1,254 (0.3 %) were due to epileptic seizures. No significant difference was found in the rate of standardized ED accesses for epileptic seizures in March 2020 (time point of interest) to the pre-pandemic trend (0.33/1000; 95 %CI: -1.05 to 1.71; p = 0.637). Similarly, there was no difference between the pre- and post-pandemic trends (-0.02/1000; 95 %CI: -0.11 to 0.06; p = 0.600). When adopting January 2021 as time point of interest, we found no difference to the pre-vaccination trend (0.83/1000; 95 %CI: -0.48 to 2.15), and no difference in the pre- and post-vaccination trends (-0.12/1000; 95 %CI: -0.27 to 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and its related social restrictions (lockdown), as well as the COVID-19 national vaccination campaign, had little impact on ED accesses for epileptic seizures.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Epilepsia , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Italia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , Anciano
13.
Chest ; 165(6): 1341-1351, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38145716

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Challenges with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization, access, and hesitancy have influenced vaccination uptake. RESEARCH QUESTION: Was the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine rollout on COVID-19 monthly admission and mortality trends different between Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We used interrupted time series analysis to conduct an ancillary study of the Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study registry supplemented by electronic health record data from five participating Mayo Clinic sites in Florida, Arizona, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. We included hospitalized patients with COVID-19 admitted between April 2020 and December 2021. Our primary outcome was the impact of vaccine rollout on admission trends. Our secondary outcome was the impact of vaccine rollout on mortality trends. RESULTS: This interrupted time series analysis includes 6,442 patients. Vaccine rollout was associated with improved monthly hospital admission trends among both Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. Among Hispanic patients, pre-vaccine rollout, monthly admissions increased by 12.9% (95% CI, 8.1%-17.9%). Immediately after vaccine rollout, patient admissions declined by -66.3% (95% CI, -75.6% to -53.9%). Post-vaccine rollout, monthly admissions increased by 3.7% (95% CI, 0.2%-7.3%). Among non-Hispanic patients, pre-vaccine rollout, monthly admissions increased by 35.8% (95% CI, 33.4%-38.1%). Immediately after vaccine rollout, patient admissions declined by -75.2% (95% CI, -77.6% to -72.7%). Post-vaccine rollout, monthly admissions increased by 5.6% (95% CI, 4.5%-6.7%). These pre-vaccine rollout admission trends were significantly different (P < .001). Post-vaccine rollout, the change in admission trend was significantly different (P < .001). The associated beneficial impact from vaccine rollout on monthly hospital admission trends among Hispanic patients was significantly lower. The trend in monthly mortality rate was fourfold greater (worse) among Hispanic patients (8.3%; 95% CI, 3.6%-13.4%) vs non-Hispanic patients (2.2%; 95% CI, 0.6%-3.8%), but this was not shown to be related to vaccine rollout. INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine rollout was associated with improved COVID-19 admission trends among non-Hispanic vs Hispanic patients. Vaccine rollout was not shown to influence mortality trends in either group, which were four times higher among Hispanic patients. Improved vaccine rollout may have reduced disparities in admission trends for Hispanic patients, but other factors influenced their mortality trends.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hispánicos o Latinos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/mortalidad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Pueblos de América del Norte
16.
Vaccine ; 41(36): 5322-5329, 2023 08 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In December 2020 the U.S. began a massive COVID-19 vaccination campaign, an action that researchers felt could catalyze inequalities in COVID-19 vaccination utilization. While vaccines have the potential to be accessible regardless of social status, the objective of this study was to examine how and when socioeconomic status (SES) and racial/ethnic inequalities would emerge in vaccination distribution. METHODS: Population vaccination rates reported at the county level by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention across 46 states on 3/30/2021. Correlates included SES, the share of the population who were Black, Hispanic, Female, or aged ≥65 years, and urbanicity (thousands of residents per square mile). Multivariable-adjusted analyses relied on zero-inflated negative binomial regression to estimate the odds of providing any vaccine, and vaccination rate ratios (aVRR) comparing the distribution rate for vaccinations across the U.S. RESULTS: Across the U.S., 16.3 % of adults and 37.9 % of adults aged 65 and older were vaccinated in lower SES counties, while 20.45 % of all adults and 48.15 % of adults aged 65 and older were vaccinated in higher SES counties. Inequalities emerged after 41 days, when < 2 % of Americans were vaccinated. Multivariable-adjusted analyses revealed that higher SES was associated with improved vaccination distribution (aVRR = 1.127, [1.100-1.155], p < 1E-06), while increases in the percent reporting Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity was associated with lower vaccination distribution (aVRR = 0.998, [0.996-0.999], p = 1.03E-04). CONCLUSIONS: Social inequalities in COVID-19 vaccines reflect an inefficient and inequitable distribution of these technologies. Future efforts to improve health should recognize the central role of social factors in impacting vaccine delivery.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunación , Vacunas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Negro o Afroamericano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias
17.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(13)2023 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37446157

RESUMEN

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of morbidity and death worldwide. Recent studies have demonstrated that this chronic inflammatory disease of the arterial wall can be controlled through the modulation of immune system activity. Many patients with cardiovascular disease remain at elevated risk of recurrent events despite receiving current, state-of-the-art preventive medical treatment. Much of this residual risk is attributed to inflammation. Therefore, finding new treatment strategies for this category of patients became of common interest. This review will discuss the experimental and clinical data supporting the possibility of developing immune-based therapies for lowering cardiovascular risk, explicitly focusing on vaccination strategies.


Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Inmunomodulación , Humanos , Aterosclerosis/inmunología , Aterosclerosis/prevención & control , Aterosclerosis/terapia , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Inflamación , Vacunación/tendencias , Inmunidad Innata/inmunología , Inmunidad Adaptativa/inmunología , Inmunidad Humoral/inmunología , Autoantígenos/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Vacunas/inmunología , Vacunas/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA