Novel pseudorabies virus variant with defects in TK, gE and gI protects growing pigs against lethal challenge.

One of the distinct features of the emerging Chinese pseudorabies virus (PRV) variant is its ability to cause severe neurological signs and high mortality in growing pigs in Bartha-K61-vaccinated pig farms. Either single- or multiple-gene-deleted live vaccine candidates have been developed; however, none was evaluated thoroughly in growing pigs. Here, we generated rSMXΔgI/gEΔTK, an attenuated PRV variant with defects in TK, gI and gE genes. The growth kinetics of the attenuated virus was similar to the wild type (wt) strain. It was safe for 1-day-old piglets. Twenty one-day-old weaned pigs were immunized intramuscularly either with 10(6.0) TCID50 of rSMXΔgI/gEΔTK or one dose of commercial Bartha-K61 vaccine, or with DMEM, and were challenged intranasally with 10(7.0) TCID50 wt virus at 28 days post vaccination. rSMXΔgI/gEΔTK elicited higher level neutralization antibody against both PRV variant SMX and Bartha-K61 strain, while Bartha-K61 vaccine elicited lower neutralization activity of antibody against SMX. After challenge, all pigs in rSMXΔgI/gEΔTK group survived without any clinical signs, while unvaccinated group showed 100% mortality, and Bartha-K61 group showed severe respiratory symptoms and 3 out of 5 pigs exhibited severe neurological signs. Pigs in rSMXΔgI/gEΔTK group gained significantly higher body weight and diminished viral excretion titer and period, compared with Bartha-K61 group. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of rSMXΔgI/gEΔTK was also evaluated in sheep and compared with local vaccine in growing pigs. These data suggest that the attenuated strain rSMXΔgI/gEΔTK is a promising live marker vaccine candidate for PR control in the context of emerging PRV variants.

Comprehensive evaluation of the adenovirus/alphavirus-replicon chimeric vector-based vaccine rAdV-SFV-E2 against classical swine fever.

Classical swine fever (CSF) is an economically important, highly contagious swine disease caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Marker vaccines and companion serological diagnostic tests are thought to be a promising strategy for future control and eradication of CSF. Previously, we have demonstrated that an adenovirus-vectored Semliki forest virus replicon construct expressing the E2 glycoprotein from CSFV, rAdV-SFV-E2, induced sterile immunity against a lethal CSFV challenge. In this study, we further evaluated the vaccine with respect to its safety, number and dose of immunization, and effects of maternally derived antibodies, re-immunization of the vaccine or co-administration with pseudorabies vaccine on the vaccine efficacy. The results showed that: (1) the vaccine was safe for mice, rabbits and pigs; (2) two immunizations with a dose as low as 6.25×10(5) TCID(50) or a single immunization with a dose of 10(7) TCID(50) rAdV-SFV-E2 provided complete protection against a lethal CSFV challenge; (3) maternally derived antibodies had no inhibitory effects on the efficacy of the vaccine; (4) the vaccine did not induce interfering anti-vector immunity; and (5) co-administration of rAdV-SFV-E2 with a live pseudorabies vaccine induced antibodies and protection indistinguishable from immunization with either vaccine administered alone. Taken together, the chimeric vaccine represents a promising marker vaccine candidate for control and eradication of CSF.

Safety and immunogenicity of recombinant Rift Valley fever MP-12 vaccine candidates in sheep.

The safety and immunogenicity of two authentic recombinant (ar) Rift Valley fever (RVF) viruses, one with a deletion in the NSs region of the S RNA segment (arMP-12ΔNSs16/198) and the other with a large deletion of the NSm gene in the pre Gn region of the M RNA segment (arMP-12ΔNSm21/384) of the RVF MP-12 vaccine virus were tested in crossbred ewes at 30-50 days of gestation. First, we evaluated the neutralizing antibody response, measured by plaque reduction neutralization (PRNT(80)), and clinical response of the two viruses in groups of four ewes each. The virus dose was 1×10(5)plaque forming units (PFU). Control groups of four ewes each were also inoculated with a similar dose of RVF MP-12 or the parent recombinant virus (arMP-12). Neutralizing antibody was first detected in 3 of 4 animals inoculated with arMP-12ΔNSm21/384 on Day 5 post inoculation and all four animals had PRNT(80) titers of ≥1:20 on Day 6. Neutralizing antibody was first detected in 2 of 4 ewes inoculated with arMP-12ΔNSs16/198 on Day 7 and all had PRNT(80) titers of ≥1:20 on Day 10. We found the mean PRNT(80) response to arMP-12ΔNSs16/198 to be 16- to 25-fold lower than that of ewes inoculated with arMP-12ΔNSm21/384, arMP-12 or RVF MP-12. No abortions occurred though a single fetal death in each of the arMP-12 and RVF MP-12 groups was found at necropsy. The poor PRNT(80) response to arMP-12ΔNSs16/198 caused us to discontinue further testing of this candidate and focus on arMP-12ΔNSm21/384. A dose escalation study of arMP-12ΔNSm21/384 showed that 1×10(3)plaque forming units (PFU) stimulate a PRNT(80) response comparable to doses of up to 1×10(5)PFU of this virus. With further study, the arMP-12ΔNSm21/384 virus may prove to be a safe and efficacious candidate for a livestock vaccine. The large deletion in the NSm gene may also provide a negative marker that will allow serologic differentiation of naturally infected animals from vaccinated animals.

A safe foot-and-mouth disease vaccine platform with two negative markers for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals.

Vaccination of domestic animals with chemically inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is widely practiced to control FMD. Currently, FMD vaccine manufacturing requires the growth of large volumes of virulent FMDV in biocontainment-level facilities. Here, two marker FMDV vaccine candidates (A(24)LL3D(YR) and A(24)LL3B(PVKV)3D(YR)) featuring the deletion of the leader coding region (L(pro)) and one of the 3B proteins were constructed and evaluated. These vaccine candidates also contain either one or two sets of mutations to create negative antigenic markers in the 3D polymerase (3D(pol)) and 3B nonstructural proteins. Two mutations in 3D(pol), H(27)Y and N(31)R, as well as RQKP(9-12)→PVKV substitutions, in 3B(2) abolish reactivity with monoclonal antibodies targeting the respective sequences in 3D(pol) and 3B. Infectious cDNA clones encoding the marker viruses also contain unique restriction endonuclease sites flanking the capsid-coding region that allow for easy derivation of custom designed vaccine candidates. In contrast to the parental A(24)WT virus, single A(24)LL3D(YR) and double A(24)LL3B(PVKV)3D(YR) mutant viruses were markedly attenuated upon inoculation of cattle using the natural aerosol or direct tongue inoculation. Likewise, pigs inoculated with live A(24)LL3D(YR) virus in the heel bulbs showed no clinical signs of disease, no fever, and no FMD transmission to in-contact animals. Immunization of cattle with chemically inactivated A(24)LL3D(YR) and A(24)LL3B(PVKV)3D(YR) vaccines provided 100% protection from challenge with parental wild-type virus. These attenuated, antigenically marked viruses provide a safe alternative to virulent strains for FMD vaccine manufacturing. In addition, a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay targeted to the negative markers provides a suitable companion test for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals.

Comparative evaluation of live marker vaccine candidates "CP7_E2alf" and "flc11" along with C-strain "Riems" after oral vaccination.

Due to the tremendous socio-economic impact of classical swine fever (CSF) outbreaks, emergency vaccination scenarios are continuously under discussion. Unfortunately, all currently available vaccines show restrictions either in terms of marker capacities or immunogenicity. Recent research efforts were therefore directed at the design of new modified live marker vaccines. Among the most promising candidates the chimeric pestiviruses "CP7_E2alf" and "flc11" were identified. Within an international research project, these candidates were comparatively tested in challenge experiments after a single oral vaccination. Challenge infection was carried out with highly virulent CSF virus strain "Koslov", 14 or 21 days post vaccination (dpv), respectively. Safety, efficacy, and marker potential were addressed. All assessments were done in comparison with the conventional "gold standard" C-strain "Riems" vaccine. In addition to the challenge trials, multiple vaccinations with both candidates were performed to further assess their marker vaccine potential. All vaccines were safe and yielded full protection upon challenge 21 days post vaccination. Neither serological nor virological investigations showed major differences among the three vaccines. Whereas CP7_E2alf also provided clinical protection upon challenge at 14 days post vaccination, only 50% of animals vaccinated with flc11, and 83% vaccinated with C-strain "Riems" survived challenge at this time point. No marked differences were seen in protected animals. Despite the fact that all multiple-vaccinated animals stayed sero-negative in the accompanying marker test, the discriminatory assay remains a weak point due to delayed or inexistent detection of some of the vaccinated and subsequently infected animals. Nevertheless, the potential as live marker vaccines could be confirmed for both vaccine candidates. Future efforts will therefore be directed at the licensing of "Cp7_E2alf" as the first live marker vaccine for CSF.

Innocuousness and safety of classical swine fever marker vaccine candidate CP7_E2alf in non-target and target species.

Chimeric pestivirus CP7_E2alf is a promising live marker vaccine candidate against classical swine fever. Prior to a possible application in the field, several safety aspects have to be addressed. Due to the fact that CP7_E2alf is based on a bovine viral diarrhea virus backbone, its behavior in ruminants is of particular interest. In the framework of this study, its innocuousness in non-target species was addressed by inoculation of calves, young goats, lambs, and rabbits. To this means, high titres of CP7_E2alf were applied orally to three animals of each species. Additional animals were left as unvaccinated contact controls. During the study, all animals remained clinically healthy, and neither fever nor leukopenia were observed. Virus could not be isolated from purified white blood cells or from nasal or faecal excretions. Moreover, none of the animals (inoculated or contact control) seroconverted. In the target species, innocuousness, shedding and transmission of vaccine virus was addressed in different animal trials that were carried out primarily for the purpose of efficacy, potency or duration of immunity studies. In all experiments, CP7_E2alf proved to be completely safe for the vaccinees and unvaccinated contact controls. Furthermore, no shedding or transmission was detected in any of the experiments. Even after parental vaccination, vaccine virus genome was barely detectable in blood or organ samples of vaccinated animals. Thus, CP7_E2alf can be regarded as completely safe for both target and non-target species.

Classical swine fever (CSF) marker vaccine. Trial II. Challenge study in pregnant sows.

The efficacy of two marker vaccines against classical swine fever (CSF) was tested in a large scale laboratory trial in several National Swine Fever Laboratories (NSFL) of the EU member states. The vaccines were: BAYOVAC CSF Marker (Vaccine A) from Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany and PORCILIS PESTI (Vaccine B) from Intervet, Boxmeer, The Netherlands. At the NSFL of Belgium, The Netherlands and Germany experiments were carried out to examine the ability of the vaccines to prevent transplacental transmission of CSF virus. In Belgium and The Netherlands pregnant sows were vaccinated once and challenged with virulent CSF virus 14 days later, which was around day 60 of gestation. At the NSFL in Germany sows were vaccinated twice, on days 25 and 46 of pregnancy and were challenged fourteen days after booster vaccination (day 60 of gestation). Apart from minor inflammatory reactions in some sows, no reactions post vaccination were noticed in either vaccine group. Sows vaccinated with Vaccine A were better protected against clinical CSF than sows vaccinated with Vaccine B. The antibody response after vaccination with Vaccine A was more pronounced than after vaccination with Vaccine B. After single vaccination six out of eight sows vaccinated with Vaccine A and all eight sows vaccinated with Vaccine B had viraemic piglets. After double vaccination one out of four litters from sows vaccinated with Vaccine A and four out of five litters from sows vaccinated with Vaccine B were found to be viraemic. However, both vaccines reduced the transmission probability significantly (Vaccine A: P=0.004, Vaccine B: P=0.024) after booster vaccination. However, Vaccine A appeared in this regard more potent as the estimated probability of fetal infections was lower. Nevertheless the risk of virus spreading after vaccination via transplacental transmission is still present and has to be addressed from an epidemiological point of view.

[Did vaccination with an infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) marker vaccine on thirteen cattle farms give rise to chronic wasting among dairy cattle?]. / Dertien rundveebedrijven waar koeien ziek zouden zijn geworden na vaccinatie tegen infectieuze bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR).

At the end of May 1999 the author was asked by the Dutch Animal Health Service (GD) to evaluate problems with 'chronic wasting' cows on 13 farms. The cows were thought to have become ill after vaccination with an IBR marker vaccine. On nine farms a number of cows aborted shortly after vaccination. On eight farms lameness was a problem, as was mastitis. Diarrhoea occurred on four farms. A number of farms had problems with stillbirth, subfertility, abomasal displacement, and decreasing body condition. It was concluded that the abortions, stillbirth, and weak calves at birth in the first weeks after vaccination might be associated with the vaccination. However, the author found no indication that the other problems were associated with the vaccination. This was because the symptoms on the 13 farms were not uniform, and many of the herds already had problems before the herd was vaccinated. The 'chronic wasting' problem cannot be attributed to vaccination with the IBR marker vaccine. 'Chronic wasting' concerns a multifactorial complex of diseases, and has always been present, but has increased in incidence in the last years as a result of 'Holsteinization', a very high milk production, longer periods of housing indoors (and in many cases insufficient quality of the stable and cubicles), a too high work load, and insufficient management.

[Comparison of performance of dairy herds that were or were not vaccinated with a bovine herpes virus 1 marker vaccine in 1998]. / Vergelijking van de bedrijfskengetallen van melkveebedrijven die in 1998 wel of niet hebben gevaccineerd met BHV1 markervaccin.

This study analysed the effects of the use of bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) marker vaccine on the performance of dairy cattle. In Spring of 1999, vaccination of 12 herds with the BHV1 marker vaccine resulted in severe animal health problems and mortality. The vaccines used on these farms were all from a batch that appeared to be contaminated with bovine virus diarrhoea virus type 2. This led to a general call to farmers and veterinary practitioners to report side-effects of this vaccine. As a result, more than 7000 farmers reported symptoms. The information was obtained by means of a questionnaire; there was no control group. To determine the effects of the use of the marker vaccine, it was necessary to perform a study based on objectively acquired information. The information collected by the Royal Dutch Cattle Syndicate and the office of Identification and Registration was complied into herd indices on production, udder health, reproduction, and culling. Two groups of dairy farms that had used the BHV1 marker vaccine (attenuated and inactivated vaccine) were compared with farms that were certified BHV1-free. The analyses were performed based on intra-herd comparisons, meaning that per herd each index calculated over a certain period of time after the use of the marker vaccine was compared to a similar period of time prior to the use of the marker vaccine. A total of 144 comparisons were made. Seven comparisons were statistically significant. In two comparisons, the results were in favour of the BHV1-free farms and in five comparisons, the result were in favour of the vaccinated farms. Thus use of the BHV1 marker vaccine could not be proven to affect herd performance. The sensitivity of the tests was very high, so with a high level of probability even very small differences in indices between groups would have been detected.

[Management and herd performance of dairy herds with and without chronic wasting disease]. / Bedrijfsvoering en kengetallen van tot slijterbedrijven verworden melkveebedrijven.

'Chronic wasting' in cattle acquired a special meaning in the Netherlands in 1999. It was used to define animal health problems that were thought to be associated with the use of bovine herpesvirus 1 marker vaccine. Criteria have not been set by which an objectively independent inventory of the problems could be made. The objective of this study was to determine management factors associated with the problem of 'chronic wasting' prior to the use of the BHV1 marker vaccine. Knowledge about these factors could be helpful for generating additional hypotheses about the aetiology of chronic wasting in cattle. A total of 188 farms participated in the study, of which 94 had severe problems with chronic wasting. The other half consisted of control farms matched with the case farms that did not report problems after the use of the BHV1 marker vaccine. Data analyses were performed over the period before (and not at the time of) 'chronic wasting' problems. Data were collected from various sources. A questionnaire was used to collect information on farm management practice. In addition, information on laboratory submissions for 1996 to 1998, animal movements in 1998, roughage analyses of 1997 and 1998, expenses for animal health in 1998, and herd performance in 1995 to 1999 was collected. In the analyses, a distinction was made between information obtained objectively and subjectively. Herds with problems of 'chronic wasting' were larger than herds without wasting problems (animals, surface) but not more intensively managed. 'Wasting' herds had a lower performance in terms of fertility and udder health. In addition, these herds had more contact with other herds through the purchase of animals. There were no differences in farm management practices related to disease control and prevention. Additional studies are required with regard to the patho-physiology of chronic wasting cows. The role of herd size needs more study.

[Vaccination of calves with contaminated batches of bovine herpes virus 1 vaccines did not result in infection with bovine virus diarrhea virus]. / Vaccinatie van kalveren met bovine herpesvirus 1 vaccins afkomstig van gecontamineerde charges leidde niet tot besmetting met bovine virus diarree virus.

The aim of the experiment was to study whether bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) marker vaccine batches known to be contaminated with bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV) type 1 could cause BVD in cattle. For this purpose, four groups of cattle were used. The first group (n = 4 calves, the positive control group), was vaccinated with vaccine from a batch contaminated with BVDV type 2. The second group (n = 4 calves, the negative control group), was vaccinated with vaccine from a batch that was not contaminated with BVDV. The third group (n = 39 calves), was vaccinated with a vaccine from one of four batches contaminated with BVDV type 1 (seronegative experimental group). The fourth group (n = 6 seropositive heifers), was vaccinated with a vaccine from one of three batches known to be contaminated with BVDV type 1. All cattle were vaccinated with an overdose of the BHV1 marker vaccine. At the start of the experiment, all calves except those from group 4 were seronegative for BVDV and BHV1. The calves from group 4 had antibodies against BVDV, were BVDV-free and seronegative to BHV1. After vaccination, the positive control calves became severely ill, had fever for several days, and BVDV was isolated from nasal swabs and white blood cells. In addition, these calves produced antibodies to BVDV and BHV1. No difference in clinical scores of the other groups was seen, nor were BVDV or BVDV-specific antibody responses detected in these calves; however, they did produce antibodies against BHV1. The remainder of each vaccine vial used was examined for the presence of infectious BVDV in cell culture. From none of the vials was BVDV isolated after three subsequent passages. This indicates that BVDV was either absent from the vials or was present in too low an amount to be isolated. Thus vaccination of calves with vaccines from BHV1 marker vaccine batches contaminated with BVDV type 1 did not result in BVDV infections.

[The effect of a high dose bovine herpes virus 1 marker vaccine in pregnant heifers: virological, bacteriological, immunological, and pathological findings]. / De effecten van vaccinatie met een hoge dosis BHV1-markervaccin in hoogdrachtige vaarzen: virologische, bacteriologische, immunologische en pathologische bevindingen.

To determine a possible relationship between the compulsory vaccination against bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1) and cattle wasting disease, the effects of BHV1 vaccination on heifers were investigated. Twenty heifers in the third trimester of pregnancy were randomly allotted to a vaccine and a control group. The vaccine group was vaccinated twice with a 50-fold dose of BHV1 vaccine and the control group was inoculated with the diluent. The experiment was performed double blind. After vaccination, the cows were examined daily and condition scores were determined weekly. Blood, milk, and faeces samples were collected weekly for virological, bacteriological, and immunological investigation. The heifers were euthanized either 9 or 13 weeks after the first inoculation and pathological, virological, and bacteriological examination was performed. No differences were detected between the vaccine group and the control group. No concurrent infections were detected and there were no indications of immunosuppression after vaccination. No relationship between the BHV1 vaccination and wasting disease in cattle was detected.

[Possibilities for further research of chronic wasting in dairy cows]. / Mogelijkheden voor nader onderzoek naar de slijterproblematiek.

In this study, we reviewed the research that has been conducted in relationship with the problem of 'chronic wasting' in dairy cows in the Netherlands as was experienced during 1998 and 1999. Emphasis was drawn towards three aspects of this 'chronic wasting'; the definition, the magnitude, and the possible cause or causes. It appeared that a clear, objective definition of 'chronic wasting' in cows, and of farms with a problem of 'chronic wasting' cows is still lacking. Furthermore, the incidence (of the problem) was restricted to approximately 150 dairy farms at most. Currently, no farms with 'chronic wasting' cows are known. Combined with the uncertainty in the definition, this will hamper future research. Many of the studies were related to the hypothesis that the vaccination with the BHV1 marker vaccine had caused 'chronic wasting' in the cows. None of the results, however, substantiated this hypothesis. Other possible causes have hardly been investigated and further research would be needed to evaluate the role of nutrition, infectious agents, and genetics. However, due to the waning of the phenomenon, the availability of data and controls will be limiting.