Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.103
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 983, 2024 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39285384

RESUMEN

To assess the safety of varicella vaccine (VarV) by conducting post-marketing surveillance on adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in Jiangsu Province, China. METHODS: We utilized the AEFI Information System of mainland China to monitor and categorize adverse reactions associated with VarV. RESULTS: The incidence rate of AEFI was significantly higher after the first dose (48.79/100,000 doses) compared to the second dose (45.18/100,000 doses) (χ2 = 4.63, P = 0.031). Regional variations in AEFI incidence were observed within Jiangsu Province. Common reactions comprised 90.96% of AEFIs, while rare reactions and coincidental events accounted for 6.59% and 0.51%, respectively. Notably, there were no adverse events linked to vaccine quality, program errors, psychogenic reactions, or fatalities. Over 96% of AEFIs occurred within three days of VarV administration, with redness at the injection site (2.6 cm to 5 cm in diameter) being the most frequently observed symptom. CONCLUSION: VarV demonstrates a commendable safety profile. Although there was a slight increase in AEFI incidence between 2022 and 2023, common vaccine reactions were predominantly observed, and the rates of rare reactions remained very low.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Humanos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , China/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Niño , Preescolar , Incidencia , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/epidemiología , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1437485, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39148653

RESUMEN

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have led to substantial decreases in case numbers of infectious diseases in several countries worldwide. As NPIs were gradually lifted, intense or out-of-season outbreaks of respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases were reported, raising the hypothesis of a potential catch-up effect of infections. By analysing surveillance data from the federal reporting system for notifiable infectious diseases, we aimed to assess the potential impact of lifting COVID-19 associated NPIs on notifications of selected infectious diseases in Bavaria, 2022. Methods: We compared influenza, chickenpox, norovirus gastroenteritis, rotavirus gastroenteritis weekly case numbers in a pre-pandemic period (2016-2019) and 2022 using two time series analyses approaches: (i) a predictive model forecasting weekly case numbers for the pandemic years 2020-2022, based on 2016-2019 data, (ii) interrupted time series model, based on 2016-2022 data, including a term per pandemic period. Results: In 2022, incidence rates were higher compared to pre-pandemic period for influenza (IRR = 3.47, 95%CI: 1.49-7.94) and rotavirus gastroenteritis (IRR = 1.36, 95%CI: 0.95-1.93), though not significant for rotavirus gastroenteritis. Conversely, case numbers remained significantly below pre-pandemic levels for chickenpox (IRR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.41-0.65) and norovirus gastroenteritis (IRR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.42-0.82). Seasonality changed notably for influenza, showing an earlier influenza wave compared to pre-pandemic periods. Conclusion: The lifting of NPIs was associated with heterogenic epidemiological patterns depending on the selected disease. The full impact of NPIs and their discontinuation may only become clear with continued monitoring and assessment of potential additional contributing factors.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Alemania/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Gastroenteritis/virología , Notificación de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Incidencia , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control
5.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0309154, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39159217

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of varicella in Canada has decreased by almost 99% since vaccination was introduced. However, variation in the timing and eligibility of vaccination programs across the country has resulted in some cohorts being under-vaccinated and therefore potentially susceptible to infection. METHODS: We used nationally representative specimens from the Biobank of Statistics Canada's Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) as well as residual specimens from Ontario collected between 2009-2014 to estimate population immunity across age-groups and geography, and identify any groups at increased risk of varicella infection. RESULTS: The weighted proportion of specimens with antibody levels above the threshold of protection was 93.6% (95% CI: 92.4, 95.0). Protection was lowest among those aged 3-5 years (54.3%; 95% CI: 47.3, 61.4), but increased with age. Individuals born outside Canada had more than twice the odds of varicella susceptibility than those born in Canada (aOR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.4, 5.0; p = 0.004). There were no differences by sex or geography within Canada, and there were no statistically significant differences when Ontario CHMS sera were compared to Ontario residual sera, apart from in participants aged 12-19 year age-group, for whom the CHMS estimate (91.2%; 95% CI: 86.7, 95.7) was significantly higher (p = 0.03) than that from residual specimens (85.9%, 95% CI: 81.1, 90.8). DISCUSSION: Varicella immunity in Canada is changing. Children appear to have low population immunity, placing them at greater risk of infection and at increased risk of severe disease as they age. Our results underscore the importance of performing periodic serosurveys to monitor further population immunity changes as the proportion of vaccine-eligible birth-cohorts increases, and to continually assess the risk of outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Humanos , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/prevención & control , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Masculino , Canadá/epidemiología , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lactante , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Vacunación , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología
6.
Vaccine ; 42(22): 126199, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121697

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: An effective vaccine for chicken pox has been included in immunisation schedules since the 1990s. In the UK the recommendation for routine inclusion came in November 2023; it has not yet been implemented. We explored paediatricians' attitudes towards the vaccine and their personal and professional use; as this has been shown to be an influential factor in parents' vaccine decision making. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey using a structured questionnaire exploring attitudes and knowledge towards the chicken pox vaccine of UK based paediatricians between June and September 2023. RESULTS: We received 272 responses, 211 female (78%), 228 based in England (85%) with remainder in Wales (23), Scotland (8) and Northern Ireland (9); 150 (56%) reporting practicing paediatrics <10 years. The majority (n = 207; 78%) agreed that the chicken pox vaccine should be included in the UK routine schedule. Half the cohort, 52% (n = 135), reported having their own children vaccinated against chicken pox, 73% of those with appropriately aged children. Most, 86% (n = 225), recommended the vaccine to family and friends routinely or when asked; however, 42% (n = 108) did not feel able to advise patients' parents due to insufficient information. Of those who do not recommend the vaccine to family and friends, 22 (59%) reported insufficient information to discuss in a professional setting. Of those who did not think it should be included, or were unsure, 38/55 (69%) also felt they had insufficient information to advise parents regarding the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst many paediatricians choose to vaccinate their children and agreed the chicken pox vaccine should be added to the routine schedule, the proportion disagreeing is not insignificant. Targeted education to improve paediatricians' knowledge of the chicken pox vaccine and their confidence discussing it should be implemented prior to the national roll out.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pediatras , Humanos , Pediatras/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Varicela/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Reino Unido , Adulto , Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2367283, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39051458

RESUMEN

As of 2024, Thailand has not incorporated the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) vaccine into the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI). This study aimed to evaluate VZV seroprevalence across all age groups in Chonburi Province, Thailand, during the post-COVID-19 era, and to support the development of a vaccination plan against VZV. A total of 950 participants were enrolled from October 2022 to January 2023. VZV antibody levels were measured using ELISA kits (EUROIMMUN, Lübeck, Germany), with seropositivity set at ≥110 IU/L. The overall VZV seropositivity rate was 64.8%, similar to rates in 1994 and 2014. However, seropositivity rates for the 5-9, 10-14, and 15-19 age groups were significantly higher in the 1994 study, and for the 10-14 and 15-19 age groups in the 2014 study, indicating a declining trend among young Thai individuals. The seropositivity rate increased with age, with a seroprevalence exceeding 80% in individuals aged 30 years and older. Our study found a significant association between the history of varicella and seropositivity. Thus, a positive history may indicate immunity. In conclusion, a significant portion of Thai adolescents are still vulnerable to varicella, highlighting the crucial role of vaccination in averting serious illness.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Humanos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Tailandia/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/prevención & control , Lactante , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2364485, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053454

RESUMEN

The objective of the study is to analyze the implementation effect of the Live Attenuated Varicella Vaccine (VarV) Vaccination Program for eligible children in Bao'an District, Shenzhen, and evaluate the vaccine effectiveness. Children's vaccination data was obtained from the Shenzhen Immunization Planning Information Management System, while varicella case data came from the China Disease Prevention and Control Information System. The Joinpoint regression method examined vaccination rate trends, and a retrospective cohort study assessed vaccine effectiveness. After program implementation, VarV vaccination rates significantly increased, surpassing provincial and national averages. Overall incidence declined 54.6% across age groups, with the largest reductions among 7- and 6-year-olds. One year post-vaccination, single-dose vaccine effectiveness was 91.1% (95% CI: 79.2% to 96.2%). However, two doses remained 91.4% effective(95% CI: 89.1% to 93.2%) after 7 years. Overall, Shenzhen's VarV program achieved positive results. For children under six, routine immunization with two doses of VarV should be strengthened. Furthermore, we recommend that physicians conduct thorough inquiries to ascertain patients' vaccination history and previous varicella infections. This will enable doctors to provide tailored vaccination recommendations based on comprehensive, practical evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunación , Vacunas Atenuadas , Humanos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , China/epidemiología , Niño , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Adolescente , Incidencia
9.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(5): e14833, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39039719

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Administration of live vaccines following liver transplant (LT) has historically not been recommended due to concerns regarding risk of vaccine-attenuated disease. However, there is evidence suggesting that in select transplant recipients live vaccinations can be administered safely. Studies in other regions have indicated that despite this evidence many clinicians remain hesitant to administer live vaccinations. METHOD: A REDCap survey was distributed to gastroenterologists, pediatricians, and infectious diseases physicians at pediatric centers across Australia and New Zealand via email between September and November 2023. The survey included a series of questions regarding live vaccine and varicella postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) practices in pediatric LT recipients and barriers to live vaccine administration in this cohort. RESULTS: There was a total of 16 responses to the survey, from 10 different pediatric centers, including 10/11 pediatric gastroenterology centers and all four pediatric LT centers in the region. Only 31% (5/16) of respondents (from 3/10 different centers) offer live vaccines. The main barrier to live vaccine administration was clinician reluctance and the main reason for not offering live vaccines was insufficient safety data. Sixty-nine percent (11/16) of respondents take vaccination status and/or serology into account when deciding whether to offer varicella PEP to this cohort. Respondents universally offer varicella zoster immunoglobulin as PEP, though 31% (5/16) also offer antiviral medication. CONCLUSIONS: Many clinicians in our region remain hesitant to provide live vaccines to pediatric LT recipients, with concerns regarding insufficient safety data. Updated local guidelines may help to address this.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Trasplante de Hígado , Profilaxis Posexposición , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Australia , Nueva Zelanda , Varicela/prevención & control , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Niño , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/uso terapéutico , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(5): e14822, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054880

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) pretransplant immunization rates, exposures, and posttransplant disease are poorly characterized among pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients in the two-dose varicella vaccine era. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the electronic health records among children <18 years old who received SOT from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2021, was performed at a single center to assess for missed pretransplant varicella vaccination opportunities, characterize VZV exposures, and describe posttransplant disease. RESULTS: Among 525 children, 444 were ≥6 months old (m.o.) at SOT with a documented VZV vaccine status. Eighty-five (19%) did not receive VZV Dose One; 30 out of 85 (35%) could have been immunized. Infants 6-11 m.o. accounted for 14 out of 30 (47%) missed opportunities. Among children ≥12 m.o. with documented Dose Two status (n = 383), 72 had missed vaccination opportunities; 57 out of 72 (79%) were children 1-4 years old. Most children had unclassifiable pre-SOT serostatus as varicella serology was either not obtained/documented (n = 171) or the possibility of passive antibodies was not excluded (n = 137). Of those with classified serology (n = 188), 69 were seroimmune. Forty-seven of 525 (9%) children had recorded VZV exposures; two developed varicella-neither had documented pre-SOT seroimmunity nor had received post-exposure prophylaxis. Nine additional children had medically attended disease: four primary varicella and five zoster. Of the 11 cases, 10 had cutaneous lesions without invasive disease; one had multi-dermatomal zoster with transaminitis. Seven (64%) received treatment exclusively outpatient. CONCLUSIONS: VZV exposure and disease still occur. Optimizing immunization among eligible candidates and ensuring patients have a defined VZV serostatus pretransplantation remain goals of care.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Trasplante de Órganos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Preescolar , Niño , Lactante , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Varicela/prevención & control , Vacunación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Infección por el Virus de la Varicela-Zóster/inmunología
11.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1320407, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38894987

RESUMEN

Objective: Varicella, a highly contagious viral disease caused by the varicella-zoster virus (VZV), affects millions globally, with a higher prevalence among children. After the initial infection, VZV lies dormant in sensory ganglia and has the potential to reactivate much later, causing herpes zoster (HZ). Vaccination is one of the most effective methods to prevent varicella, and the two-dose varicella vaccine (VarV) regimen is widely used around the world. In China, the VarV has been included in the national immunization programme with a recommended single-dose regimen. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the two-dose vs. one-dose VarV regimen in children in Shanghai, China. Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in Shanghai, China, from September 2018 to December 2022. The study enrolled children aged 3-18 years who had received either the one-dose, two-dose, or 0-dose VarV regimen. Vaccination history, varicella infection status, and relevant variables, including demographic information (name, date of birth and sex) and medical history (clinical features of varicella and illness duration) were collected through medical record review and parental interviews. Results: A total of 3,838 children were included in the study, with 407 in the 0-dose regimen group, 2,107 in the one-dose regimen group and 1,324 in the two-dose regimen group. The corresponding incidence density in these groups was 0.13, 0.05 and 0.03 cases per 1,000 person-days, respectively. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 81.7% (95%CI: 59.3-91.8%) for the two-dose regimen and 60.3% (95%CI: 29.3-77.7%) for the one-dose regimen, compared to the 0-dose regimen. The two-dose VarV regimen showed a protective effectiveness of 47.6% (95%CI: 2.5-71.9%) compared to the one-dose VarV regimen. Conclusion: This study provides evidence supporting the greater effectiveness of the two-dose VarV regimen in preventing varicella infection compared to the one-dose regimen.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Humanos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , China/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Niño , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Adolescente , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología
13.
Viruses ; 16(6)2024 May 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932134

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the SKYVaricella vaccine in healthy Vietnamese children aged 12 months to 12 years. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm study involved 201 children divided into two groups: 60 children aged 12 months to 5 years and 141 children aged 6 to 12 years. Safety was assessed through immediate reactions, solicited adverse events within 7 days, and unsolicited events up to Day 42. Immunogenicity was evaluated by seroconversion rates (SCR) and geometric mean titer (GMT) increments using fluorescent antibody-to-membrane antigen (FAMA) on the day of vaccination (D0) and 42 days after vaccination (D42). RESULTS: All participants completed the follow-up. Immediate adverse events included pain (8.0%), redness (8.0%), and swelling (20.9%) at the injection site. Within 7 days, pain (17.9%) and swelling (12.4%) were mild and self-resolving. Unsolicited adverse events were infrequent and mild. Both age groups achieved 100% SCR. GMT of varicella-zoster virus antibodies increased from 1.37 (SD 1.97) at D0 to 18.02 (SD 2.22) at D42, a 13.12-fold rise. No Grade 3 adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The SKYVaricella vaccine shows a robust immunogenic response and favorable safety profile in Vietnamese children aged 12 months to 12 years. These findings endorse its potential inclusion in pediatric vaccination programs as a reliable preventive option against varicella.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna contra la Varicela , Vacunas Atenuadas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Vietnam , Niño , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Lactante , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Vacunación , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/inmunología , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Pueblos del Sudeste Asiático
14.
Vaccine ; 42(22): 125996, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824086

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immunization against vaccine-preventable diseases prior to pregnancy is an important measure of primary prevention both for the mother and the unborn child. We analyzed immunity rates against measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and pertussis in pregnant employees in Germany prior to significant changes in legal conditions in 2020, to provide a basis of comparison for future research. METHODS: We analyzed occupational-medical routine data in three collectives of pregnant women with an occupational risk of infection in the years 2018 and 2019: 1: hospital staff with regular access to an in-house company physician (n = 148); 2: employees in childcare with regular access to external occupational-health services (n = 139); 3: teachers with no regular access to occupational healthcare (n = 285). Immune status was assessed by a physician based on vaccination certificates, laboratory results, and medical documentation on prior infections. We compared immunity rates against measles, rubella, varicella, and pertussis as well as full immunity against all targeted vaccine-preventable diseases. RESULTS: Altogether, n = 572 pregnant women were included in our study. Of these women, 96.5 % were immune to rubella, 95.8 % to varicella, 88.3 % to measles, 82.7 % to mumps, and 67.8 % to pertussis. Only 56.2 % of the women had full immunity against all targeted vaccine-preventable diseases. Collective 1 showed the highest immunity rates against measles and pertussis as well as the highest rate of full immunity against all targeted vaccine-preventable diseases. The immunity rates against rubella and varicella did not differ significantly between the collectives. With the exception of rubella, the lowest immunity rates during pregnancy were found in Collective 3. CONCLUSION: We found pregnancy-relevant immunity gaps in all our study groups with significant differences between the collectives. Considering the potentially devastating consequences of infections during pregnancy, all medical professionals and health-policy makers should be involved in an increased effort to improve vaccination rates prior to pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Sarampión , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Vacunación , Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación , Humanos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Embarazo , Sarampión/prevención & control , Sarampión/inmunología , Adulto , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/inmunología , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/epidemiología , Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación/prevención & control , Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación/inmunología , Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación/epidemiología , Paperas/prevención & control , Paperas/inmunología , Mujeres Embarazadas , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Tos Ferina/inmunología , Adulto Joven
15.
Vaccine ; 42(19): 3968-3973, 2024 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734496

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Universal varicella vaccination has been introduced in many countries, but there are a number of important differences in their vaccination strategies. It is essential to establish a vaccination program that can maximize the benefits of varicella vaccine, but there is a lack of comprehensive research on the effectiveness of varicella vaccine in different vaccination status. METHODS: Using data from population-based surveillance platforms we conducted a 1:2 matched case-control study. The cases were clinically diagnosed varicella with onset from 2017 to 2021, 1-14 years old in Chaoyang District, Beijing. The controls were matched according to date of birth (±1 month), sex and residence. The vaccination data of the subjects were obtained from the Childhood Immunization Information Management System in Beijing. Using conditional logistic regression models with or without interaction terms, we evaluated the effectiveness of varicella vaccine in different vaccination status. RESULTS: A total of 2528 cases and 5056 controls were enrolled. This study found that whether the time since last vaccination was adjusted had a substantial effect on the comparing vaccine effectiveness (VE) between subgroups. After adjustment for the time since last vaccination, 1) the incremental VE of 2-dose was 49.6 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 38.8-58.6) compared with 1-dose (93.9 % vs. 88.0 %); 2) Among children who received one dose, the risk of chickenpox in children vaccinated at 18-23 months was 1.382 (95 %CI, 1.084-1.762) times that in children vaccinated at 12-17 months. 3) the VE with less than one, two, and three year intervals is higher than that with six-year-intervals (P < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing VE between subgroups of different vaccination status, the time since last vaccination should be adjusted. The first dose of varicella vaccine should be given as early as the second year of life, and the second dose can improve vaccine effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Vacunación , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Adolescente , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Inmunización , Beijing , Esquemas de Inmunización
16.
Vaccine ; 42(19): 4046-4055, 2024 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762358

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In South Korea, the National Immunization Program has included one-dose varicella vaccination for 1-year-olds since 2005. This study examines the potential impact of introducing a two-dose varicella vaccination for children, along with zoster vaccination for adults, using either the zoster vaccine live (ZVL) or recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). METHODS: The investigation considered four strategies in a base case scenario. The first involved introducing zoster vaccination for 60-year-olds, with a 60 % coverage. The second strategy combined zoster vaccination with a second-dose varicella vaccination for 4-year-olds, with a 90 % coverage. An age-structured model spanning 50 years was employed, assuming a zoster vaccine catch-up campaign over the initial 5 years. Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted, assessing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs), and net loss under different ages at zoster vaccination (50, 60, 65, and 70 years) and varying willingness-to-pay (WTP) levels from ₩40 million ($34,998) to ₩84 million ($74,000). RESULTS: All strategies were cost-effective and significantly reduced herpes zoster (HZ) incidence, preventing approximately 3,077,000 to 7,609,000 cases, depending on the chosen strategy. The combined strategy prevented around 4,950,000 varicella and 653,000 HZ cases additionally. RZV outperformed ZVL by preventing twice as many HZ cases and offering greater QALY gains. However, ZVL was more cost-effective due to its lower cost. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that RZV became more cost-effective at higher WTP thresholds, exceeding ₩60.9 million ($53,193) in terms of ICER and ₩62.5 million ($54,591) for INMBs and net loss. The optimal age for zoster vaccination was 60 years concerning ICER but 50 years regarding INMB. CONCLUSIONS: Combining RZV with a two-dose varicella vaccination strategy reduced the disease burden and improved QALY more effectively, though ZVL remained more cost-effective at lower WTP levels. Decisions regarding vaccination policies should be balanced between the public health needs and WTP levels.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Modelos Teóricos , Vacunación , Humanos , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/economía , República de Corea/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/economía , Vacuna contra la Varicela/economía , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/economía , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Preescolar , Anciano , Vacunación/economía , Vacunación/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Niño , Lactante , Adulto , Incidencia , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11929, 2024 05 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789451

RESUMEN

Italy implemented two-dose universal varicella vaccination (UVV) regionally from 2003 to 2013 and nationally from 2017 onwards. Our objective was to analyze regional disparities in varicella outcomes resulting from disparities in vaccine coverage rates (VCRs) projected over a 50-year time-horizon (2020-2070). A previously published dynamic transmission model was updated to quantify the potential public health impact of the UVV program in Italy at the national and regional levels. Four 2-dose vaccine strategies utilizing monovalent (V) and quadrivalent (MMRV) vaccines were evaluated for each region: (A) MMRV-MSD/MMRV-MSD, (B) MMRV-GSK/MMRV-GSK, (C) V-MSD/MMRV-MSD, and (D) V-GSK/MMRV-GSK. Costs were reported in 2022 Euros. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted 3% annually. Under strategy A, the three regions with the lowest first-dose VCR reported increased varicella cases (+ 34.3%), hospitalizations (+ 20.0%), QALYs lost (+ 5.9%), payer costs (+ 22.2%), and societal costs (+ 14.6%) over the 50-year time-horizon compared to the three regions with highest first-dose VCR. Regions with low first-dose VCR were more sensitive to changes in VCR than high first-dose VCR regions. Results with respect to second-dose VCR were qualitatively similar, although smaller in magnitude. Results were similar across all vaccine strategies.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Varicela , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/economía , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/economía , Cobertura de Vacunación/economía , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Preescolar , Vacunación/economía , Masculino , Adolescente , Lactante , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Programas de Inmunización/economía
18.
Przegl Epidemiol ; 77(4): 489-495, 2024 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés, Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783658

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Chickenpox is a highly contagious disease, but one that can be effectively prevented by vaccination. In Poland, vaccination against the disease is recommended, paid for, and chickenpox remains very common. In recent years, starting in 2002, the upward trend in the incidence of chickenpox has continued, except in 2020. In 2020, there was a decrease in incidence. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate epidemiological indicators of chickenpox in Poland in 2021 compared to previous years, taking into account the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The evaluation of the epidemiological situation of chickenpox in Poland in 2021 was carried out based on the results of the analysis of aggregate data published in the annual bulletins: "Infectious Diseases and Poisons in Poland in 2021" and "Immunization in Poland in 2021". In addition, recommendations from the 2021 Immunization Program are described. RESULTS: 57,669 cases of chickenpox were registered in Poland in 2021, 42% less than in the previous year. The incidence of chickenpox in 2021 was 151.1 per 100,000, which was lower than in 2020, as well as in 2019, when it was 470.6/100,000. The lowest incidence was registered in Lower Silesia Province - 99.2/100,000, while the highest in Silesia Province - 215.8/100,000. The highest incidence was in children aged 0-4 years (18,028). The incidence of chickenpox in males was higher than in females (159.5 vs. 143.3/100 thousand), and urban residents were higher than rural residents (152.1 vs. 149.6/100 thousand). Hospitalization due to chickenpox in 2021 included 210 people, which accounted for 0.36% of the total number of registered cases. CONCLUSIONS: In 2021, there was a decrease in the number of chickenpox cases compared to the previous year. The lower incidence may have been the result of a decrease in the transmission of the chickenpox virus, the decrease in the number of cases has to do with, among other things, the restrictions put in place in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, which result in, among other things, reduced human contact, the wearing of masks and increased social distance.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Población Rural , Población Urbana , Humanos , Polonia/epidemiología , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Incidencia , Niño , Lactante , Preescolar , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recién Nacido , Distribución por Edad , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Anciano , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Vacuna contra la Varicela/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Rev Med Virol ; 34(3): e2538, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658176

RESUMEN

Serious adverse events following vaccination include medical complications that require hospitalisation. The live varicella vaccine that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States in 1995 has an excellent safety record. Since the vaccine is a live virus, adverse events are more common in immunocompromised children who are vaccinated inadvertently. This review includes only serious adverse events in children considered to be immunocompetent. The serious adverse event called varicella vaccine meningitis was first reported in a hospitalised immunocompetent child in 2008. When we carried out a literature search, we found 15 cases of immunocompetent children and adolescents with varicella vaccine meningitis; the median age was 11 years. Eight of the children had received two varicella vaccinations. Most of the children also had a concomitant herpes zoster rash, although three did not. The children lived in the United States, Greece, Germany, Switzerland, and Japan. During our literature search, we found five additional cases of serious neurological events in immunocompetent children; these included 4 cases of progressive herpes zoster and one case of acute retinitis. Pulses of enteral corticosteroids as well as a lack of herpes simplex virus antibody may be risk factors for reactivation in immunocompetent children. All 20 children with adverse events were treated with acyclovir and recovered; 19 were hospitalised and one child was managed as an outpatient. Even though the number of neurological adverse events remains exceedingly low following varicella vaccination, we recommend documentation of those caused by the vaccine virus.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela , Meningitis Viral , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Aciclovir/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Varicela/prevención & control , Varicela/virología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Meningitis Viral/virología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/virología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Activación Viral/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA