Safety and Usefulness of Intracoronary Acetylcholine 200 µg Into the Left Coronary Artery as Vasoreactivity Testing: Comparisons With Intracoronary Acetylcholine Maximum 100 µg.

OBJECTIVES: We retrospectively analyzed the usefulness and safety of intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) 200 µg into the left coronary artery (LCA) as vasoreactivity testing compared with intracoronary ACh 100 µg. METHODS: We recruited 1433 patients who had angina-like chest pain and intracoronary ACh testing in the LCA, including 1234 patients with a maximum ACh 100 µg and 199 patients with a maximum ACh 200 µg. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 µg into the LCA. Positive spasm was defined as ≥ 90% stenosis, usual chest pain, and ischemic electrocardiogram (ECG) changes. RESULTS: The incidence of coronary constriction ≥ 90%, usual chest pain, and ischemic ECG changes with a maximum ACh of 100 µg was markedly higher than that with a maximum ACh of 200 µg. The frequency of unusual chest pain in patients with a maximum ACh of 200 µg was higher than that in those with a maximum ACh of 100 µg (13% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). In patients with rest angina, positive spasm of maximum ACh 100 µg was significantly higher than that of maximum ACh 200 µg, whereas there was no difference regarding positive spasm in patients with atypical chest pain between the two ACh doses. Major complications (1.38% vs. 1.51%, p = 0.8565) and the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (1.81% vs. 2.63%, p = 0.6307) during ACh testing in the LCA were not different between the two maximum ACH doses. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary ACh 200 µg into the LCA is clinically useful and safe for vasoreactivity testing when intracoronary ACh 100 µg dose not provoke spasms.

Long-term outcomes of ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of myocardial ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) and its underlying vasomotor disorders, vasospastic angina (VSA) and microvascular angina (MVA), is not well defined. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the long-term prognosis of patients with INOCA. METHODS: We included studies evaluating the prognosis of patients with INOCA published between January 1984 and August 2023 in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases. Studies were selected if they included patients who fulfilled the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) criteria for either possible or definitive VSA or MVA. The primary outcomes were composite of all-cause death and myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) at annual intervals up to 5-year follow-up. The incidence of primary outcomes for INOCA, each INOCA endotype and by method used to determine the diagnosis was calculated using the random effects model. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies (17 302 patients) meeting the eligibility criteria were selected. The rate of all-cause death and MI with VSA was 0.7 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.0)/100 patient-years and with MVA was 1.1 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.5)/100 patient-years (p>0.05). The rate of MACE with VSA was 1.1 (95% CI 0.5 to 1.9)/100 patient-years and with MVA was 2.5 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.6)/100 patient-years (p=0.025). Patients with reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) had higher all-cause death and MI rates than patients whose diagnosis of MVA was established based on an abnormal exercise or imaging stress test (4.7 (95% CI 2.0 to 8.4) vs 0.5 (95% CI 0.1 to 1.1) vs 1.1 (95% CI 0.5 to 2.0)/100 patient-years, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients with INOCA have a low rate of MACEs, but patients with MVA, especially those with reduced CFR, have a significantly higher rate of MACE than other subgroups, although there is high heterogeneity among the included studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021275070.

Unusual Recurrent Multivessel Coronary Artery Spasm: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Coronary artery spasms (CAS) can manifest in various forms, from silent ischemia to severe cardiac events like myocardial infarction and sudden death. This case involves a 56-year-old male with recurrent ischemic chest pain and varying ECG signs. Cardiac catheterization revealed multiple coronary spasms that resolved spontaneously or with intracoronary nitroglycerin. The report emphasizes the severe presentations of multiple CAS and the importance of thorough diagnostic evaluation to avoid unnecessary interventions, highlighting the diagnostic challenges in managing such cases.

Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Utility of Coronary Angiography Versus Coronary Function Testing in Women With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of women referred for invasive coronary angiography have angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries, which includes coronary microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic angina, and other vasomotor disorders. We sought to determine the real-world diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography and coronary function testing in women with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2018 to 2023, we enrolled 198 women who underwent either coronary angiography (CA) alone (n=99) or coronary function testing (CFT; n=99). Mean±SD age was 62±10 years (CA alone) compared with 57±10 years (CFT). Coronary angiography was interpreted as nonobstructive coronary artery disease more frequently after CA alone (79% versus 52%). Of the women who underwent CFT, 82% (N=81) were found to have vasomotor disorders, including coronary microvascular dysfunction (27%), vasospastic angina (32%), mixed coronary microvascular dysfunction/vasospastic angina (16%), endothelial dysfunction (10%; without spasm), elevated resting flow (2%), or symptomatic myocardial bridging (4%). Compared with women undergoing CA alone, medications were changed more frequently after CFT at 24 hours (41% versus 65%; P=0.001) and between 24 hours and 30 days (30% versus 44%; P=0.04) with intensification of antianginal therapy (79% versus 92%; P<0.0001) and increased use of calcium channel blockers (36% versus 63%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that women presenting with suspected ischemic heart disease undergoing CA alone only received an anatomic diagnosis, whereas >80% of women undergoing CFT received a specific diagnosis of a coronary vasomotor disorder and greater intensification of antianginal therapy.

[Vasospastic angina : an underdiagnosed pathology]. / Vasospasme coronarien : une pathologie sous-diagnostiquée.

Vasospastic angina (VSA) was first described in 1959 by Myron Prinzmetal as "the variant form of angina pectoris" on the sole basis of medical history and ECG. This condition is currently categorized as an endotype of myocardial infarction without coronary obstruction (Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA)). Diagnostic criteria have been suggested by expert consensus. Provocative testing during coronary angiography is the gold standard test but is rarely used. The clinical presentation is often neglected, and the diagnosis is missed. However, VSA may lead to life-threatening arrhythmias. There are simple and effective therapies that are markedly different from those for the atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.

Le vasospasme coronarien (VC) a été décrit pour la première fois en 1959 par Myron Prinzmetal comme « la forme variante de l'angine de poitrine ¼ sur la seule base de l'anamnèse et de l'ECG. Le VC est actuellement classé comme un endotype de l'infarctus du myocarde sans obstruction coronaire (Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA)). Des critères diagnostiques ont été proposés par des consensus d'experts. Le test de provocation lors de la coronarographie est l'examen de choix mais est rarement employé. La symptomatologie est souvent méconnue et le diagnostic n'est pas suffisamment évoqué. Pourtant, le VC peut conduire à des arythmies potentiellement fatales. Nous disposons de moyens thérapeutiques simples et efficaces, qui diffèrent sensiblement de ceux de la maladie coronarienne athérosclérotique.

Familial catamenial coronary spasms.

Coronary artery spasms represent important causes of myocardial ischaemia and infarction in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. They are notably seen in younger people and occur almost equally in men and women. Besides traditional risk factors (ie, smoking), female hormones might also play a role.We report of two young sisters who presented with myocardial infarction caused by catamenial coronary spasms (CS), that is, during menstruation. In one of these women, this resulted in heart failure with a severely reduced ejection fraction and ultimately a heart transplant because of intractable ventricular arrhythmias.CS might result from changing hormone levels (especially oestrogen) during menstruation. Increased awareness of the occurrence of catamenial CS is essential for diagnosis and consequent treatment with coronary vasodilators and/or specific oestrogen/progesterone regimens.

Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Associated with Coronary Vasospasm in a Patient with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection.

A 70-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for restoration of sinus rhythm from atrial fibrillation by direct current counter shocks. On admission, he had a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and syncope during bed rest. Electrocardiography revealed polymorphic ventricular tachycardia after ST-segment elevation with a normal QT interval. Coronary angiography revealed coronary vasospasm. Coronary vasospasm may be a cause of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in COVID-19 patients.

The Diagnostic Value of ECG Characteristics for Vasospastic and Microvascular Angina: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Coronary vascular dysfunction comprises VSA and/or MVA and is more common in women than in men with angina without obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). Invasive coronary function testing is considered the reference test for diagnosis, but its burden on patients is large. We aimed to investigate the potential of electrocardiography (ECG) as noninvasive marker for vasospastic angina (VSA) and microvascular angina (MVA) diagnosis. METHODS: We systematically screened Pubmed and EMBASE databases for studies reporting on ECG characteristics in ANOCA patients with (a suspicion of) coronary vascular dysfunction. We assessed study quality using QUADAS-2. We extracted data on diagnostic values of different ECG characteristics and analyzed whether the studies were sex-stratified. RESULTS: Thirty publications met our criteria, 13 reported on VSA and 17 on MVA. The majority addressed repolarization-related ECG parameters. Only 1 of the 13 VSA papers and 4 of the 17 MVA papers showed diagnostic accuracy measures of the ECG characteristics. The presence of early repolarization, T-wave alternans, and inverted U waves showed of predictive value for VSA diagnosis. The QTc interval was predictive for MVA diagnosis in all six studies reporting on QTc interval. Sex-stratified results were reported in only 5 of the 30 studies and 3 of those observed sex-based differences. CONCLUSIONS: ECG features are not widely evaluated in diagnostic studies for VSA and MVA. Those features predictive for VSA and MVA diagnosis mostly point to repolarization abnormalities and may contribute to noninvasive risk stratification.

Out-of-season, multiserotype acute coxsackie B myocarditis with concomitant thyrotoxicity.

Acute viral myocarditis and hyperthyroidism can present with acute coronary syndrome. However, the link between hyperthyroidism and myocarditis has hardly been explored apart from a small collection of published case reports. We report a case where a patient presents with severe chest pain and was found to have concomitant severe coronary vasospasm and acute myocarditis and was diagnosed with Graves' disease.

Lack of Class I Vasoreactivity Testing for Diagnosing Patients With Coronary Artery Spasm.

BACKGROUND: Vasoreactivity testing, such as intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) or ergometrine (EM), is defined as Class I for the diagnosis of patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) according to recommendations from the Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study (COVADIS) group and guidelines from the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). HYPOTHESIS: Although vasoreactivity testing is a clinically useful tool, it carries some risks and limitations in diagnosing coronary artery spasm. METHODS: Previous reports on vasoreactivity testing for diagnosing the presence of coronary spasm are summarized from the perspective of Class I. RESULTS: There are several problems such as reproducibility, underestimation, overestimation, and inconclusive/nonspecific results associated with daily spasm. Because provoked spasm caused by intracoronary ACh is not always similar to that caused by intracoronary EM, possibly due to different mediators, supplementary use of these vasoreactivity tests is necessary for cardiologists to diagnose VSA when a provoked spasm is not revealed by each vasoactive agent. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiologists should understand the imperfection of these vasoreactivity tests when diagnosing patients with VSA.

Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery (INOCA): Non-invasive versus invasive techniques for diagnosis and the role of #FullPhysiology.

Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is an increasingly recognized entity. It encompasses different pathophysiological subtypes (i.e., endotypes), including coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), vasospastic angina (VSA) and mixed entities resulting from the variable combination of both. Diagnosing INOCA and precisely characterizing the endotype allows for accurate medical treatment and has proven prognostic implications. A breadth of diagnostic technique is available, ranging from non-invasive approaches to invasive coronary angiography adjuvated by functional assessment and provocative tests. This review summarizes the strength and limitations of these methodologies and provides the rationale for the routine referral for invasive angiography and functional assessment in this subset of patients.

Prevalence of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Sydney Experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) frequently have coronary vasomotor disorders (CVaD), characterised by transient pathological vasoconstriction and/or impaired microvascular vasodilatation. Functional coronary angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing CVaD. Despite recommendations, testing is only available at a limited number of Australian and New Zealand centres. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CVaDs in an Australian ANOCA population and identify predictive factors associated with specific endotypes. METHOD: Functional coronary angiography was performed in patients with suspected ANOCA. Vasoreactivity testing was performed using intracoronary acetylcholine provocation. A pressure-temperature sensor guidewire was used for coronary physiology assessment. Comprehensive clinical data on patient characteristics, cardiac risk factors, and symptom profiles was collected before testing. RESULTS: This prospective observational study at Royal Prince Alfred and Concord Repatriation General Hospital included 110 patients (58±13 years with 63.6% women), with 81.8% (90/110) having a CVaD. Regarding specific ANOCA endotypes, microvascular angina (MVA) occurred in 31.8% (35/110) of cases, vasospastic angina (VSA) in 25.5% (28/110) and a mixed presentation of MVA and VSA in 24.5% (27/110) of patients. Patients with CVaD were found to be older (59±11 vs 51±15, p=0.024), overweight (61.1% vs 15.0%, p<0.001) and had a worse quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Levels; 0.61 vs 0.67, p=0.043). MVA was associated with being overweight (odds ratio [OR] 4.2 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-9.3]; p=0.015) and ischaemia on stress testing (OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.1-4.3]; p=0.028), while VSA was associated with smoking (OR 9.1 [95% CI 2.21-39.3]; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary vasomotor disorders are highly prevalent among ANOCA patients. This study highlights the importance of increasing national awareness and the use of functional coronary angiography to evaluate and manage this unique cohort.

A case of early repolarization syndrome in which hyponatremia and coronary vasospasms induced ventricular fibrillation.

A 60-year-old man was referred to our hospital presenting with unconsciousness due to severe hyponatremia. The twelve­lead ECG on admission exhibited prominent J waves in the inferolateral leads. During the treatment for hyponatremia, ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred and the electrogram (ECG) after the VF incident exhibited marked ST elevation in the inferolateral leads. An Ach provocation test induced vasospasms in the right and left coronary arteries and J wave augmentation, suggesting a high risk for vasospastic angina. Finally, a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator was implanted in the patient. We hereby discuss the possible contribution of hyponatremia to VF episodes in early repolarization syndrome based on the present case.

Multivessel Coronary Function Testing Increases Diagnostic Yield in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Invasive CFT is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with ANOCA. Most institutions recommend only testing the left coronary circulation. Therefore, it is unknown whether testing multiple coronary territories would increase diagnostic yield. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of multivessel, compared with single-vessel, invasive coronary function testing (CFT) in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). METHODS: Multivessel CFT was systematically performed in patients with suspected ANOCA. Vasoreactivity testing was performed using acetylcholine provocation in the left (20 to 200 µg) and right (20 to 80µg) coronary arteries. A pressure-temperature sensor guidewire was used for coronary physiology assessment in all three epicardial vessels. RESULTS: This multicenter study included a total of 228 vessels from 80 patients (57.8 ± 11.8 years of age, 60% women). Compared with single-vessel CFT, multivessel testing resulted in more patients diagnosed with coronary vasomotor dysfunction (86.3% vs 68.8%; P = 0.0005), coronary artery spasm (60.0% vs 47.5%; P = 0.004), and CMD (62.5% vs 36.3%; P < 0.001). Coronary artery spasm (n = 48) predominated in the left coronary system (n = 38), though isolated right coronary spasm was noted in 20.8% (n = 10). Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), defined by abnormal index of microcirculatory resistance and/or coronary flow reserve, was present 62.5% of the cohort (n = 50). Among the cohort with CMD, 27 patients (33.8%) had 1-vessel CMD, 15 patients (18.8%) had 2-vessel CMD, and 8 patients (10%) had 3-vessel CMD. CMD was observed at a similar rate in the territories supplied by all 3 major coronary vessels (left anterior descending coronary artery = 36.3%, left circumflex coronary artery = 33.8%, right coronary artery = 31.3%; P = 0.486). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel CFT resulted in an increased diagnostic yield in patients with ANOCA compared with single-vessel testing. The results of this study suggest that multivessel CFT has a role in the management of patients with ANOCA.

The Great Masquerade: Not All Coronary Artery Stenosis Are Created Equal.

We present the case of a 60-year-old male, with active smoking and cocaine use disorder, who reported progressive chest pain. Various anatomical and functional cardiac imaging, performed to further evaluate chest pain etiology, revealed changing severity and distribution of left main artery (LMA) stenosis, raising suspicion for vasospasm. Intracoronary nitroglycerin relieved the vasospasm, with resolution of the LMA pseudostenosis. A diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VA) led to starting appropriate medical therapy with lifestyle modification counselling. This case highlights VA, a frequently underdiagnosed etiology of angina pectoris. We discuss when to suspect VA, its appropriate work-up, and management.

Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR): Study design and rationale.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a prevalent condition among patients with cardiovascular risk factors, leading to a reduced quality of life and an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Novel invasive techniques have emerged to more accurately diagnose CMD. However, CMD's natural history remains poorly understood due to limited data. To address this knowledge gap, the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR) was established with the primary aim of standardizing comprehensive coronary functional testing and understanding of CMD. DESIGN: CMDR is a prospective, multicenter registry enrolling an unlimited number of consecutive subjects who undergo comprehensive invasive hemodynamic assessment of the entire coronary arterial vasculature. Patients undergoing acetylcholine provocation test for coronary vasospasm will also be included. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 30 days and annually for up to 5 years. The primary endpoint is Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina grade over time. Secondary endpoints, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalizations, medication changes, and subsequent coronary interventions, will be analyzed to establish long-term safety and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing invasive CMD assessment. SUMMARY: CMDR aims to characterize the clinical and physiologic profile of patients undergoing comprehensive invasive coronary functional testing, simultaneously providing crucial longitudinal information on the natural history and outcomes of these patients. This will shed light on CMD's course and clinical implications, which, in turn, holds the potential to significantly improve diagnostic and treatment strategies for CMD patients, ultimately leading to the enhancement of their overall prognosis and quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05960474.