Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Comparative analysis of methods of diagnosis of chlamydia infection]. / Sravnitel'nyi analiz metodov diagnostiki khlamidioza.
Klin Lab Diagn ; (2): 36-8, 2001 Feb.
Article en Ru | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11338541
ABSTRACT
In case of a correct sampling, the diagnostic value of optic and electron microscopy for detecting Chlamydia infection is not inferior to that of direct microimmunofluorescence (DMIF) and higher than that of enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Optic microscopy showed that basal vaginal epithelium and buccal mucosa can be infected with Chlamydia. Provazek bodies were detected in the buccal mucosa of the overwhelming majority of patients with genital chlamydiasis. These results were confirmed by DMIF and EIA. Since none of the diagnostic methods is 100% reliable, we recommend using two

methods:

inexpensive optic microscopy and polymerase chain reaction or DMIF.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por Chlamydia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: Ru Revista: Klin Lab Diagn Asunto de la revista: TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Año: 2001 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por Chlamydia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: Ru Revista: Klin Lab Diagn Asunto de la revista: TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Año: 2001 Tipo del documento: Article