Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Androgen suppression plus radiation versus radiation alone for patients with stage D1/pathologic node-positive adenocarcinoma of the prostate: updated results based on national prospective randomized trial Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31.
Lawton, Colleen A; Winter, Kathryn; Grignon, David; Pilepich, Miljenko V.
Afiliación
  • Lawton CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. colleen@mcw.edu
J Clin Oncol ; 23(4): 800-7, 2005 Feb 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15681524
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To update the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external-beam irradiation versus radiation alone on a group of histologically lymph node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A national prospective randomized trial (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31) of standard external-beam irradiation plus immediate androgen suppression versus external-beam irradiation alone was initiated in 1985 for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred seventy-three patients in this trial had histologically involved lymph nodes. Ninety-eight patients received radiation plus immediate androgen suppression (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist), whereas 75 patients received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at the time of relapse.

RESULTS:

With a median follow-up of 6.5 years for all patients and 9.5 years for living patients, estimated progression-free survival with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 1.5 ng/mL at 5 and 9 years was 54% and 33%, respectively, for patients who received immediate LHRH agonist versus 10% [corrected] and 4% for patients who received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at time of relapse (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis revealed radiation therapy and immediate hormonal manipulation as having a statistically significant impact on all end points analyzed absolute survival, disease-specific failure, metastatic failure, and biochemical control with PSA less than 4 ng/mL and less than 1.5 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION:

Pending the results of randomized trials, patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate who have pathologically involved pelvic lymph nodes (pathologic node-positive or clinical stage D1) should be considered for external-beam irradiation plus immediate hormonal manipulation rather than radiation alone with hormone manipulation at the time of relapse.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Adenocarcinoma / Goserelina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Adenocarcinoma / Goserelina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Article