[The comparison of different bronchial aspirate culturing methods in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)]. / Porownanie roznych sposobow pobierania materialu z drzewa oskrzelowego do badan mikrobiologicznych.
Anestezjol Intens Ter
; 43(2): 74-9, 2011.
Article
en Pl
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22011866
BACKGROUND: Although broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) culture and protected specimen brush (PSB) are regarded as the most effective methods in the diagnosis of VAP, a simple endotracheal aspiration (EA) is frequently performed during routine care, because of its simplicity and low cost. We compared the effectiveness of EA with BAL and PSB in VAP patients. METHODS: Sixty-one adult VAP patients, ventilated for longer than 48 h, were cultured with all three methods. RESULTS: Positive cultures were obtained from 63.9% of patients, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most common pathogen. There was a high positive correlation between simple aspirates and BAL (k 0.817, CI 0.664-0.840, p <0.001) and aspirates and PSB (k 0.667, CI 0.483-0.871, p <0.001). CONCLUSION: Because of the high sensitivity of bronchial aspirate culturing, compared to BAL and PSB, it can be used successfully in most cases.
Buscar en Google
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar
/
Ventiladores Mecánicos
/
Lavado Broncoalveolar
/
Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
País/Región como asunto:
Europa
Idioma:
Pl
Revista:
Anestezjol Intens Ter
Asunto de la revista:
ANESTESIOLOGIA
Año:
2011
Tipo del documento:
Article