Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of EPA's endocrine screening battery and recommendations for further review.
Schapaugh, Adam W; McFadden, Lisa G; Zorrilla, Leah M; Geter, David R; Stuchal, Leah D; Sunger, Neha; Borgert, Christopher J.
Afiliación
  • Schapaugh AW; Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: adam.schapaugh@monsanto.com.
  • McFadden LG; The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, USA.
  • Zorrilla LM; Bayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Geter DR; Bayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Stuchal LD; Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Sunger N; Department of Health, West Chester University, PA, USA.
  • Borgert CJ; Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Applied Pharmacology and Toxicology, Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 72(3): 552-61, 2015 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26044367
EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program Tier 1 battery consists of eleven assays intended to identify the potential of a chemical to interact with the estrogen, androgen, thyroid, or steroidogenesis systems. We have collected control data from a subset of test order recipients from the first round of screening. The analysis undertaken herein demonstrates that the EPA should review all testing methods prior to issuing further test orders. Given the frequency with which certain performance criteria were violated, a primary focus of that review should consider adjustments to these standards to better reflect biological variability. A second focus should be to provide detailed, assay-specific direction on when results should be discarded; no clear guidance exists on the degree to which assays need to be re-run for failing to meet performance criteria. A third focus should be to identify permissible differences in study design and execution that have a large influence on endpoint variance. Experimental guidelines could then be re-defined such that endpoint variances are reduced and performance criteria are violated less frequently. It must be emphasized that because we were restricted to a subset (approximately half) of the control data, our analyses serve only as examples to underscore the importance of a detailed, rigorous, and comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the battery.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bioensayo / Pruebas de Toxicidad / Disruptores Endocrinos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bioensayo / Pruebas de Toxicidad / Disruptores Endocrinos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article