Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of a novel polyp "ruler snare" improves estimation of colon polyp size.
Kaz, Andrew M; Anwar, Asma; O'Neill, Darby Robinson; Dominitz, Jason A.
Afiliación
  • Kaz AM; Gastroenterology Section, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Anwar A; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • O'Neill DR; Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, The Everett Clinic, Everett, Washington, USA.
  • Dominitz JA; Gastroenterology Section, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 83(4): 812-6, 2016 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26382052
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Prior studies have demonstrated that endoscopists' estimates of polyp size are imprecise. The aim of this study was to determine whether a modified polypectomy "ruler snare" improves the accuracy of assessment of polyp size in real time without the use of additional devices.

METHODS:

Ten artificial polyps of predetermined sizes (4 to 25 mm) were affixed to the inside of a colon model. A standard polypectomy snare was modified by adding 5-mm graduated markings to the distal end of the plastic sheath. Study participants estimated the sizes of the artificial polyps during simulated colonoscopies, first using a standard snare and then with the modified ruler snare.

RESULTS:

Thirty-four private practice and academic gastroenterologists participated in the study. Endoscopists' ability to accurately classify polyps by size (diminutive, small, or large) improved from 48.5% to 60.3% with the ruler snare (P = .002). The greatest improvement in precision was seen among the large polyps, where accuracy increased from 35.9% to 58.2% with use of the ruler snare (P < .0001). Participants underestimated polyp size by a mean of 3.6 mm (interquartile range, -5 to -2 mm) with the standard snare and 1.8 mm (interquartile range, -3 to 0 mm) with the ruler snare, which corresponded to a 44.2% improvement in accuracy with the ruler snare (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The modified ruler snare improved polyp size assessment compared with a standard snare, particularly with large polyps. Overall, although size estimation continues to be imprecise, the addition of calibrated markings to a polypectomy snare is a simple and likely low-cost means to improve neoplasia surveillance recommendations.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pólipos del Colon / Colonoscopía / Carga Tumoral / Precisión de la Medición Dimensional Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pólipos del Colon / Colonoscopía / Carga Tumoral / Precisión de la Medición Dimensional Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article