Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distal esophageal spasm and the Chicago classification: is timing everything?
De Schepper, H U; Ponds, F A M; Oors, J M; Smout, A J P M; Bredenoord, A J.
Afiliación
  • De Schepper HU; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ponds FA; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
  • Oors JM; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Smout AJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bredenoord AJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 28(2): 260-5, 2016 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26553751
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

According to the Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, distal esophageal spasm (DES) is defined as premature esophageal contractions (distal latency [DL] <4.5 s) for ≥20% of swallows, in the presence of a normal mean integral relaxation pressure (IRP). However, some patients with symptoms of DES have rapid contractions with a normal DL. The aim of this study was to characterize these patients and compare their clinical characteristics to those of patients classified as DES.

METHODS:

We retrospectively compared clinical characteristics and high-resolution manometry findings of patients with rapid contractions with normal latency to those meeting the Chicago classification criteria for DES. KEY

RESULTS:

Over a 3-year period, nine patients were diagnosed with DES and 14 showed rapid contractions in the distal esophagus with normal latency. The latter were younger than DES patients (60 ± 4 vs 72 ± 3 years, p < 0.05). Dysphagia and retrosternal pain occurred to a similar degree in both groups. Weight loss and abnormal barium esophagogram tended to be more frequent in DES patients. There was no difference in contractile front velocity (CFV) and in distal contractile integral (DCI) between patients with DES and rapid contractions with normal latency. Lower esophageal sphincter pressures were not different between groups. However, IRP was significantly higher in DES compared to rapid contractions with normal latency (11.7 ± 0.6 mmHg vs 7.6 ± 1.2 mmHg, p < 0.05), albeit still within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES These data suggest that patients with simultaneous contractions with normal latency represent a group of patients with many features similar to DES.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espasmo Esofágico Difuso / Esófago Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neurogastroenterol Motil Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espasmo Esofágico Difuso / Esófago Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neurogastroenterol Motil Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article