Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
Pelletier-Galarneau, Matthieu; Hunter, Chad R R N; Ascah, Kathryn J; Beanlands, Rob S B; Dwivedi, Girish; deKemp, Robert A; Chow, Benjamin J W; Ruddy, Terrence D.
Afiliación
  • Pelletier-Galarneau M; Division of Nuclear Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Hunter CRRN; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.
  • Ascah KJ; Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Beanlands RSB; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.
  • Dwivedi G; Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • deKemp RA; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.
  • Chow BJW; Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ruddy TD; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(5)2017 May 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28465300
BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor used in acute coronary syndromes to reduce platelet activity and to decrease thrombus formation. Ticagrelor is associated with a reduction in mortality incremental to that observed with clopidogrel, potentially related to its non-antiplatelet effects. Evidence from animal models indicates that ticagrelor potentiates adenosine-induced myocardial blood flow (MBF) increases. We investigated MBF at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized double-blinded crossover study included 22 patients who received therapeutic interventions of ticagrelor 90 mg orally twice a day for 10 days and clopidogrel 75 mg orally once a day for 10 days, with a washout period of at least 10 days between the treatments. Global and regional MBF and myocardial flow reserve were measured using rubidium 82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography at baseline and during intermediate- and high-dose adenosine. Global MBF was significantly greater with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (1.28±0.55 versus 1.13±0.47 mL/min per gram, P=0.002) at intermediate-dose adenosine and not different at baseline (0.65±0.19 versus 0.60±0.15 mL/min per gram, P=0.084) and at high-dose adenosine (1.64±0.40 versus 1.61±0.19 mL/min per gram, P=0.53). In regions with impaired myocardial flow reserve (<2.5), MBF was greater with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel during intermediate and high doses of adenosine (P<0.0001), whereas the differences were not significant at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor potentiates global and regional adenosine-induced MBF increases in patients with stable coronary artery disease. This effect may contribute to the incremental mortality benefit compared with clopidogrel. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01894789.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Ticlopidina / Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria / Adenosina / Circulación Coronaria / Vasos Coronarios Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Am Heart Assoc Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Ticlopidina / Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria / Adenosina / Circulación Coronaria / Vasos Coronarios Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Am Heart Assoc Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article