Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of survival after heart transplantation.
Seropian, Ignacio M; Romeo, Francisco J; Pizarro, Rodolfo; Vulcano, Norberto O; Posatini, Ricardo A; Marenchino, Ricardo G; Berrocal, Daniel H; Belziti, Cesar A.
Afiliación
  • Seropian IM; Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Romeo FJ; Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Pizarro R; Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Vulcano NO; Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Posatini RA; Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Marenchino RG; Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Berrocal DH; Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Belziti CA; Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
ESC Heart Fail ; 5(1): 149-156, 2018 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28758719
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict outcome in heart failure (HF) patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTX). METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Data from 111 HF patients undergoing HTX 2010-2015 were retrospectively reviewed. NLR and PLR were calculated before HTX, immediately after HTX, and at 6 and 24 hours. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, and secondary endpoints were 1 year mortality and renal replacement therapy (RRT). Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis, and the predictive values of NLR and PLR for mortality were compared. The discriminatory performance for predicting in-hospital mortality was better for NLR [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.644, 95% confidence interval 0.492-0.797] than for PLR (AUC = 0.599, 95% confidence interval 0.423-0.776). Best cut-off value was 2.41 for NLR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 67%) and 92.5 for PLR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 68%). When divided according to best cut-off value, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the high NLR group (17.5% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.05), but not in the high PLR group (16.5% vs. 6.3%, P = ns). One year mortality was not significantly higher for either group (37.5% vs. 6.5% for NLR; 36.7% vs. 9.4% for PLR, P = ns for both), while RRT was significantly higher in both the NLR and PLR high groups (33.8% vs. 0%; 32.9% vs. 3.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that only high NLR (hazard ratio = 3.403, P < 0.05) and pre-transplant diabetes (hazard ratio = 3.364, P < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors for 1 year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

High NLR was a predictor for in-hospital mortality, and an independent prognostic factor for 1 year mortality. Both high NLR and high PLR were predictors for RRT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plaquetas / Linfocitos / Trasplante de Corazón / Insuficiencia Cardíaca / Neutrófilos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: En Revista: ESC Heart Fail Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plaquetas / Linfocitos / Trasplante de Corazón / Insuficiencia Cardíaca / Neutrófilos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: En Revista: ESC Heart Fail Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article