Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy and reproducibility of the Etest to detect drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae to contemporary treatment.
Papp, John R; Rowlinson, Marie-Claire; O'Connor, Norman P; Wholehan, Jason; Razeq, Jafar H; Glennen, Anita; Ware, Dapne; Iwen, Peter C; Lee, Lillian V; Hagan, Celia.
Afiliación
  • Papp JR; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Rowlinson MC; Bureau of Public Health Laboratories, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • O'Connor NP; State Laboratory Division, Hawaii Department of Health, Pearl City, HI, USA.
  • Wholehan J; Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Razeq JH; Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Glennen A; Present address: Department of Public Health, Rocky Hill, CT, USA.
  • Ware D; Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  • Iwen PC; Mississippi Public Health Laboratories, Jackson, MS, USA.
  • Lee LV; Nebraska Public Health Laboratory, Omaha, NE, USA.
  • Hagan C; New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, NY, USA.
J Med Microbiol ; 67(1): 68-73, 2018 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29219803
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a sexually transmitted bacterial pathogen that continues to evolve to become resistant to known antibiotics. In preparing for potential emergence, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that clinical laboratories maintain or develop protocols to assess antibiotic susceptibly for this organism. This study examines the intra-laboratory variability of using the Etest method to provide consistent MIC values for N. gonorrhoeae and also compared the results of the Etest to known agar dilution MIC values.

METHODOLOGY:

Clinical N. gonorrhoeae isolates, 100 paired duplicates, were tested by eight laboratories for antibiotic susceptibility to ceftriaxone, cefixime and azithromycin using Etest strips.Results/Key findings. Overall, >80 % of the paired Etest MIC values were within one log2 dilution of the replicate. When compared to the agar dilution reference method, the cefixime Etest MIC values were consistently underreported by one dilution (seven laboratories) or two dilutions (one laboratory). The azithromycin Etest MIC values agreed 90.7 % with the agar dilution MIC values while the agreement with ceftriaxone was 90.9 %.

CONCLUSION:

Overall, the Etest method yielded reproducible MIC values within each laboratory with the azithromycin and ceftriaxone MIC results consistent to the reference agar dilution method while the cefixime result tended to provide a lower MIC value.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana / Antibacterianos / Neisseria gonorrhoeae Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Med Microbiol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana / Antibacterianos / Neisseria gonorrhoeae Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Med Microbiol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article