Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of diagnostic methods for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-ßeta2 glycoprotein I antibodies in patients under routine evaluation for antiphospholipid syndrome.
Martins, Thomas B; Heikal, Nahla; Miller, Jason; Willis, Rohan; Schmidt, Robert L; Tebo, Anne E.
Afiliación
  • Martins TB; ARUP Institute of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Heikal N; ARUP Institute of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Miller J; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Willis R; Rheumatology/Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
  • Schmidt RL; ARUP Institute of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Tebo AE; ARUP Institute of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: anne.tebo@hsc.utah.edu.
Clin Chim Acta ; 485: 7-13, 2018 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29883633
BACKGROUND: We assessed the performance characteristics and correlations of the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) for detecting IgG and IgM antibodies to cardiolipin (aCL) and beta2 glycoprotein (anti-ß2GPI) antibodies in patients under routine evaluation for APS. METHODS: Patients (n = 216) referred to ARUP Laboratories for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and/or aCL or anti-ß2GPI IgG/IgM antibodies evaluation were assessed by ELISA and CIA methods. Diagnostic accuracies, correlations between methods and specific clinical manifestations in APS were investigated. RESULTS: The areas under the curve (%) for APS using LAC with CIA (74, 95% CI: 65-82) or ELISA (70, 95% CI: 61-79) aPLs were comparable. The overall agreements and linear regression correlations between methods for aPL antibody of the same specificity were variable: aCL IgG 87.3%; R2 = 0.7491, aCL IgM 71.6%; R2 = 0.2656, anti-ß2GPI IgG 77.2%; R2 = 0.7688 and anti-ß2GPI IgM 81.7%; R2 = 0.3305. CONCLUSIONS: With inclusion of LAC, the ELISA and CIA show comparable performance for the diagnosis of APS. However, correlations of APS-specific manifestations were dependent on method of detecting the aPL antibodies suggesting platforms may not be used interchangeable.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome Antifosfolípido / Anticuerpos Anticardiolipina / Beta 2 Glicoproteína I Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chim Acta Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome Antifosfolípido / Anticuerpos Anticardiolipina / Beta 2 Glicoproteína I Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chim Acta Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article