Assessment of diagnostic methods for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-ßeta2 glycoprotein I antibodies in patients under routine evaluation for antiphospholipid syndrome.
Clin Chim Acta
; 485: 7-13, 2018 Oct.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-29883633
BACKGROUND: We assessed the performance characteristics and correlations of the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) for detecting IgG and IgM antibodies to cardiolipin (aCL) and beta2 glycoprotein (anti-ß2GPI) antibodies in patients under routine evaluation for APS. METHODS: Patients (nâ¯=â¯216) referred to ARUP Laboratories for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and/or aCL or anti-ß2GPI IgG/IgM antibodies evaluation were assessed by ELISA and CIA methods. Diagnostic accuracies, correlations between methods and specific clinical manifestations in APS were investigated. RESULTS: The areas under the curve (%) for APS using LAC with CIA (74, 95% CI: 65-82) or ELISA (70, 95% CI: 61-79) aPLs were comparable. The overall agreements and linear regression correlations between methods for aPL antibody of the same specificity were variable: aCL IgG 87.3%; R2â¯=â¯0.7491, aCL IgM 71.6%; R2â¯=â¯0.2656, anti-ß2GPI IgG 77.2%; R2â¯=â¯0.7688 and anti-ß2GPI IgM 81.7%; R2â¯=â¯0.3305. CONCLUSIONS: With inclusion of LAC, the ELISA and CIA show comparable performance for the diagnosis of APS. However, correlations of APS-specific manifestations were dependent on method of detecting the aPL antibodies suggesting platforms may not be used interchangeable.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Síndrome Antifosfolípido
/
Anticuerpos Anticardiolipina
/
Beta 2 Glicoproteína I
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Clin Chim Acta
Año:
2018
Tipo del documento:
Article