Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mechanistic Modeling of Radium-223 Treatment of Bone Metastases.
Moreira, Hugo M R; Guerra Liberal, Francisco D C; O'Sullivan, Joe M; McMahon, Stephen J; Prise, Kevin M.
Afiliación
  • Moreira HMR; Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom; Faculdade de Ciências e Tenclonogia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal. Electronic address: h.moreira@qub.ac.uk.
  • Guerra Liberal FDC; Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom; Faculdade de Ciências e Tenclonogia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
  • O'Sullivan JM; Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom; Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
  • McMahon SJ; Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
  • Prise KM; Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 103(5): 1221-1230, 2019 04 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557674
PURPOSE: Despite the effectiveness of 223RaCl2 for treating patients with symptomatic bone metastatic disease, its mechanisms of action are still unclear. Even established dosimetric approaches differ considerably in their conclusions. In silico tumor models bring a new perspective to this situation because they can quantitatively simulate the interaction of α-particles with the target(s). Here, we investigated 3 different mathematical models of tumor growth that consider the radiation effect of radium-223 (223Ra) treatments and compared the results with clinical data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The well-established Gompertz growth model was applied to simulate metastatic tumor burden. On the basis of published measurements of 223Ra uptake, we have incorporated the radiation effect of α-particles into the model and investigated 3 radium distribution scenarios-uniform exposure, exposure of only an outer layer, and exposure of a constant volume of the tumor. For each scenario, the times for various tumor stages to progress to the first symptomatic skeletal event were calculated. RESULTS: Uniform and outer-layer exposure scenarios showed very poor agreement with the Kaplan-Meier patient curves from clinical data. However, the constant-volume effect predicted outcomes very similar to the observed clinical results, suggesting, depending on the dose rate, that relatively small fractions of the cell population see damage from 223Ra. CONCLUSIONS: The commonly used assumption of uniform 223Ra distribution does not accurately reflect clinical responses. The suggestion that only a subpopulation of the tumor might be affected by 223Ra shows a pressing need to further study the tumor and drug kinetics to schedule more effective treatments in the future.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Óseas / Radio (Elemento) / Modelos Biológicos / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Óseas / Radio (Elemento) / Modelos Biológicos / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article