Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Response inhibition in borderline personality disorder: Neural and behavioral correlates.
Albert, Jacobo; López-Martín, Sara; Arza, Rocío; Palomares, Nerea; Hoyos, Sandra; Carretié, Luis; Díaz-Marsá, Marina; Carrasco, José L.
Afiliación
  • Albert J; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Instituto Pluridisciplinar, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: jacobo.albert@uam.es.
  • López-Martín S; Centro Neuromottiva, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Arza R; Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Cibersam, Madrid, Spain.
  • Palomares N; Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Cibersam, Madrid, Spain.
  • Hoyos S; Universidad Católica del Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.
  • Carretié L; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Díaz-Marsá M; Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Cibersam, Madrid, Spain.
  • Carrasco JL; Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Cibersam, Madrid, Spain.
Biol Psychol ; 143: 32-40, 2019 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30772405
ABSTRACT
Although response inhibition is thought to be important in borderline personality disorder (BPD), little is known about its neurophysiological basis. This study aimed to provide insight into this issue by capitalizaing on the high temporal resolution of electroencephalography and information provided by source localization methods. To this end, twenty unmedicated patients with BPD and 20 healthy control subjects performed a modified go/no-go task designed to better isolate the brain activity specifically associated with response inhibition. Event-related potentials (ERP) were measured and further analyzed at the scalp and source levels. Patients with BPD made more commission errors (failed inhibitions) than control subjects. Scalp ERP data showed that both groups displayed greater frontocentral P3 amplitude for no-go (response inhbition) than for go trials (response execution). However, source reconstruction data revealed that patients with BPD activated posterior parietal regions (precuneus) to inhibit their responses, whereas controls activated prefrontal regions (presupplementary motor area, preSMA). This dissociation was supported by a significant Region (precuneus, preSMA) x Trial Type (no-go, go) x Group (BPD, control) interaction. These findings extend our understanding of the neurophysiological basis of abnormal response inhibition in BPD, suggesting that patients with BPD recruit different brain regions for inhibiting prepotent responses compared to controls. Future research in larger, medication-naïve samples of patients with BPD is required to confirm and extend these findings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas / Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe / Potenciales Evocados / Inhibición Psicológica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas / Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe / Potenciales Evocados / Inhibición Psicológica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article