Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of two methods of subcision Nokor and blunt blade in acne scars treatment.
Asilian, Ali; Faghihi, Gita; Asemi Esfahani, Alireza; Mokhtari, Fatemeh; Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammadali; Mozafarpoor, Samaneh.
Afiliación
  • Asilian A; Department of Dermatology, Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Faghihi G; Department of Dermatology, Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Asemi Esfahani A; Department of Dermatology, Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Mokhtari F; Department of Dermatology, Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Nilforoushzadeh M; Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Mozafarpoor S; Department of Dermatology, Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 18(6): 1788-1793, 2019 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31102320
CONTEXT: Subcision is a simple surgical method that can be effective in treatment of acne scars. AIMS: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the two methods of Nokor needle and blunt blade (BB) subcision in treatment of acne scars. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This clinical trial study was conducted on 28 patients with acne scars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One side of the face was treated with BB subcision method, and the other side was treated with Nokor needle method. Followed up period was 6 months after treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 20) software using independent sample t test, Mann-Whitney test, Friedman test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In follow-up period, the improvement of acne scars was comparable in both groups (P > 0.05). Complications were lower in BB method than another method (P < 0.05). The patient satisfaction was higher in BB method (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both of modalities offered similar improvement, but the complication rate was lower and the patient satisfaction was also higher in the BB method than another method.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Cicatriz / Acné Vulgar / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Cosmet Dermatol Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Cicatriz / Acné Vulgar / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Cosmet Dermatol Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article