Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cosmetic assessment in brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) for breast cancer: A multidisciplinary review.
Tagliaferri, Luca; Lancellotta, Valentina; Zinicola, Tiziano; Gentileschi, Stefano; Sollena, Pietro; Garganese, Giorgia; Guinot, José L; Rembielak, Agata; Soror, Tamer; Autorino, Rosa; Cammelli, Silvia; Gambacorta, Maria A; Aristei, Cynthia; Valentini, Vincenzo; Kovacs, György.
Afiliación
  • Tagliaferri L; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia.
  • Lancellotta V; Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italia.
  • Zinicola T; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia. Electronic address: tiziano.z@hotmail.it.
  • Gentileschi S; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento di Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, Centro di Trattamento Chirurgico del Linfedema, Roma, Italia.
  • Sollena P; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Dermatologia, Roma, Italia.
  • Garganese G; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Roma, Italia.
  • Guinot JL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), València, Spain.
  • Rembielak A; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester and Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Soror T; Department of Clinical Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Medical Center, Academic Teaching Hospital of Humboldt University Berlin (Charité), Berlin, Germany; National Cancer Institute (NCI), Radiation Oncology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Autorino R; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia.
  • Cammelli S; Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italia.
  • Gambacorta MA; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma
  • Aristei C; Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italia.
  • Valentini V; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma
  • Kovacs G; Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, UKSH CL, Lübeck, Germany.
Brachytherapy ; 18(5): 635-644, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31171462
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This review was to focus on breast brachytherapy cosmetic assessment methods state of the art and to define the advantages and disadvantages related to. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a literature review of the major experience on breast brachytherapy cosmetic assessment methods in several databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases). To identify the relevant works, a task force screened citations at title and abstract level to identify potentially relevant paper. An expert board reviewed and approved the text. The assessment systems were classified into three main groups (1) the Oncological Toxicity Scales, (2) the Independent Patients Perspective Measures, (3) the Patient-Related Outcome Measures. Each cosmetic assessment method was evaluated following six parameters (1) anatomical site, (2) advantages, (3) disadvantages, (4) subjective/objective, (5) quantitative/qualitative, (6) computers or pictures needs.

RESULTS:

Eleven assessment methods were selected. Three methods were classified as Oncological Toxicity Scale, six in the Independent Patients Perspective Measures classification, and two as Patient-Related Outcome Measures. Six methods are subjective, while eight are objective. Four systems are classified as quantitative, four as qualitative while three both. Five systems need informatics support. Moreover, each method was discussed individually reporting the main characteristics and peculiarities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cosmesis is one major end point for the patient who has a malignancy of low lethal potential. In modern personalized medicine, there is a need for standardized cosmetic outcome assessments to analyze and compare the results of treatments. No gold standard methods currently exist. The result of this review is to summarize the various cosmesis methods, defining the strengths and weaknesses of each one and giving a line in research and clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Braquiterapia / Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Estética / Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Asunto de la revista: RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Braquiterapia / Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Estética / Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Asunto de la revista: RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article