Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immediate clinical and microbiological evaluation of the effectiveness of 0.5% versus 3% sodium hypochlorite in root canal treatment: A quasi-randomized controlled trial.
Ulin, C; Magunacelaya-Barria, M; Dahlén, G; Kvist, T.
Afiliación
  • Ulin C; Specialist Clinic of Endodontics, Public Dental Service, Västra Götaland, Göteborg, Sweden.
  • Magunacelaya-Barria M; Specialist Clinic of Endodontics, Public Dental Service, Västra Götaland, Göteborg, Sweden.
  • Dahlén G; Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Göteborg, Sweden.
  • Kvist T; Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Int Endod J ; 53(5): 591-603, 2020 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31808947
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To test the hypothesis that in the daily routine of a specialist clinic in endodontics that irrigation during root canal preparation with 3.0% NaOCl will result in fewer postoperative samples with cultivable bacteria than irrigation with 0.5% buffered NaOCl but, at the same time, will not result in a higher frequency of postoperative pain nor swelling.

METHODOLOGY:

Two hundred ninety-eight patients were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned into two groups - 0.5% NaOCl and 3% NaOCl. All endodontic diagnoses were included. Root canal treatment was performed, and bacterial sampling was carried out prior to root filling. The patients were requested to complete a form regarding pain and swelling seven days postoperatively. Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared and the chi-squared test with a significance level of P < 0.05 were used for statistical analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS:

In the 0.5% NaOCl group, 18 (13.4%) of the root canal samples were positive; in the 3% NaOCl group, the corresponding number was 24 (18.6%). The mean difference of -5.2% (95% CI -14.8 to 4.4) was not significant (P = 0.33). In the 0.5% NaOCl group, 57 (53.8%) patients reported some pain; in the 3% group, the corresponding number was 56 (53.3%). The mean difference of 0.4 (95% CI -14.0 to 14.8) was not significant (P = 1.0). In the 0.5% NaOCl group, 5 (5.1%) patients reported swelling; in the 3% NaOCl group, the corresponding number was 18 (17.8%). The mean difference was 12.7 (95% CI 3.1-22.4), which was significant (P = 0.0084).

CONCLUSIONS:

The difference in the concentration of NaOCl (0.5% vs 3%) had no significant impact on the number of positive cultures and did not influence either the frequency or the magnitude of postoperative pain. A significantly higher incidence of postoperative swelling was recorded for patients who received a greater concentration of NaOCl (3%).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Irrigantes del Conducto Radicular / Hipoclorito de Sodio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Int Endod J Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Irrigantes del Conducto Radicular / Hipoclorito de Sodio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Int Endod J Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article