Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How Should Physicians Respond When They Learn Patients Are Using Unapproved Gene Editing Interventions?
Chapman, Carolyn Riley; Caplan, Arthur L.
Afiliación
  • Chapman CR; A faculty affiliate in the Division of Medical Ethics at New York University School of Medicine in New York City.
  • Caplan AL; The Drs William F. and Virginia Connolly Mitty Professor of Bioethics and founding director of the Division of Medical Ethics at the New York University School of Medicine.
AMA J Ethics ; 21(12): E1021-1028, 2019 12 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31876464
Hundreds of gene therapies are currently in various stages of research and development. A subset of these involve gene editing technologies such as CRISPR. In this hypothetical case, a patient with chronic pain has initiated a CRISPR-based intervention obtained from a clinic in the Cayman Islands. His physician doubts it is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and worries about its safety. The case presents ethical questions about potential violations of US regulations regarding the sale of products intended to affect human health, patients' lack of understanding about risks of unproven drugs, and suboptimal support for and management of patients with chronic pain. We discuss how physicians should address these questions.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Relaciones Médico-Paciente / Médicos / Terapia Genética / Edición Génica Idioma: En Revista: AMA J Ethics Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Relaciones Médico-Paciente / Médicos / Terapia Genética / Edición Génica Idioma: En Revista: AMA J Ethics Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article