Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of Casualties That Underwent Airway Management Before Reaching Role 2 Facilities in the Afghanistan Conflict 2008-2014.
Hudson, Ian L; Blackburn, Megan B; Staudt, Amanda M; Ryan, Kathy L; Mann-Salinas, Elizabeth A.
Afiliación
  • Hudson IL; US Army Institute of Surgical Research is United States of America (USA), 3698 Chambers Pass, San Antonio TX 78234, USA.
  • Blackburn MB; US Army Institute of Surgical Research is United States of America (USA), 3698 Chambers Pass, San Antonio TX 78234, USA.
  • Staudt AM; US Army Institute of Surgical Research is United States of America (USA), 3698 Chambers Pass, San Antonio TX 78234, USA.
  • Ryan KL; US Army Institute of Surgical Research is United States of America (USA), 3698 Chambers Pass, San Antonio TX 78234, USA.
  • Mann-Salinas EA; US Army Institute of Surgical Research is United States of America (USA), 3698 Chambers Pass, San Antonio TX 78234, USA.
Mil Med ; 185(Suppl 1): 10-18, 2020 01 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074383
INTRODUCTION: Airway compromise is the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield. The purpose of this study was to better understand wartime prehospital airway patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Role 2 Database (R2D) was retrospectively reviewed for adult patients injured in Afghanistan between February 2008 and September 2014. Of primary interest were prehospital airway interventions and mortality. Prehospital combat mortality index (CMI-PH), hemodynamic interventions, injury mechanism, and demographic data were also included in various statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 12,780 trauma patients were recorded in the R2D of whom 890 (7.0%) received prehospital airway intervention. Airway intervention was more common in patients who ultimately died (25.3% vs. 5.6%); however, no statistical association was found in a multivariable logistic regression model (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.98-1.68). Compared with U.S. military personnel, other military patients were more likely to receive airway intervention after adjusting for CMI-PH (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: In the R2D, airway intervention was associated with increased odds of mortality, although this was not statistically significant. Other patients had higher odds of undergoing an airway intervention than U.S. military. Awareness of these findings will facilitate training and equipment for future management of prehospital/prolonged field care airway interventions.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Manejo de la Vía Aérea Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Mil Med Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Manejo de la Vía Aérea Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Mil Med Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article