Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Guidance for the Conduct and Reporting of Clinical Trials of Breast Milk Substitutes.
Jarrold, Katharine; Helfer, Bartosz; Eskander, Mona; Crawley, Helen; Trabulsi, Jillian; Caulfield, Laura E; Duffy, Gillian; Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa; Hayward, Deborah; Hyde, Matthew; Jeffries, Suzan; Knip, Mikael; Leonardi-Bee, Jo; Loder, Elizabeth; Lodge, Caroline J; Lowe, Adrian J; McGuire, William; Osborn, David; Przyrembel, Hildegard; Renfrew, Mary J; Trumbo, Paula; Warner, John; Schneeman, Barbara; Boyle, Robert J.
Afiliación
  • Jarrold K; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Helfer B; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Eskander M; Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Crawley H; First Steps Nutrition Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Trabulsi J; Scientific and Technical Advisory Group on the Inappropriate Promotion of Foods for Infants and Young Children, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Caulfield LE; Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark.
  • Duffy G; Center for Human Nutrition, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Garcia-Larsen V; Department of Public Health Nutrition Standards, Food Standards Australia New Zealand, Canberra, Australia.
  • Hayward D; Center for Human Nutrition, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Hyde M; Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Jeffries S; Section of Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Knip M; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Leonardi-Bee J; International Board of Certified Lactation Consultant Examiners, Fairfax, Virginia.
  • Loder E; Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Lodge CJ; Research Program for Clinical and Molecular Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Lowe AJ; Medical Statistics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • McGuire W; Research, British Medical Journal , London, United Kingdom.
  • Osborn D; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Przyrembel H; Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Renfrew MJ; Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Trumbo P; Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
  • Warner J; Division of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Schneeman B; Department of Food Safety, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
  • Boyle RJ; Mother and Infant Research Unit, University of Dundee School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee, United Kingdom.
JAMA Pediatr ; 174(9): 874-881, 2020 09 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32391870
ABSTRACT
Importance Breast milk substitutes (BMS) are important nutritional products evaluated in clinical trials. Concerns have been raised about the risk of bias in BMS trials, the reliability of claims that arise from such trials, and the potential for BMS trials to undermine breastfeeding in trial participants. Existing clinical trial guidance does not fully address issues specific to BMS trials.

Objectives:

To establish new methodological criteria to guide the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of BMS trials and to support clinical trialists designing and undertaking BMS trials, editors and peer reviewers assessing trial reports for publication, and regulators evaluating the safety, nutritional adequacy, and efficacy of BMS products. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

A modified Delphi method was conducted, involving 3 rounds of anonymous questionnaires and a face-to-face consensus meeting between January 1 and October 24, 2018. Participants were 23 experts in BMS trials, BMS regulation, trial methods, breastfeeding support, infant feeding research, and medical publishing, and were affiliated with institutions across Europe, North America, and Australasia. Guidance development was supported by an industry consultation, analysis of methodological issues in a sample of published BMS trials, and consultations with BMS trial participants and a research ethics committee.

Results:

An initial 73 criteria, derived from the literature, were sent to the experts. The final consensus guidance contains 54 essential criteria and 4 recommended criteria. An 18-point checklist summarizes the criteria that are specific to BMS trials. Key themes emphasized in the guidance are research integrity and transparency of reporting, supporting breastfeeding in trial participants, accurate description of trial interventions, and use of valid and meaningful outcome measures. Conclusions and Relevance Implementation of this guidance should enhance the quality and validity of BMS trials, protect BMS trial participants, and better inform the infant nutrition community about BMS products.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lactancia Materna / Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Consenso / Sustitutos de la Leche / Lista de Verificación Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Pediatr Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lactancia Materna / Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Consenso / Sustitutos de la Leche / Lista de Verificación Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Pediatr Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article