Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Standard versus hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: assessing the impact on dose modulation and normal tissue effects when using patient-specific cancer biology.
Her, E J; Ebert, M A; Kennedy, A; Reynolds, H M; Sun, Y; Williams, S; Haworth, A.
Afiliación
  • Her EJ; School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Ebert MA; School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Kennedy A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  • Reynolds HM; 5D Clinics, Perth, Australia.
  • Sun Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  • Williams S; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Haworth A; Institute of Medical Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Phys Med Biol ; 66(4): 045007, 2021 02 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32408293
ABSTRACT
Hypofractionation of prostate cancer radiotherapy achieves tumour control at lower total radiation doses, however, increased rectal and bladder toxicities have been observed. To realise the radiobiological advantage of hypofractionation whilst minimising harm, the potential reduction in dose to organs at risk was investigated for biofocused radiotherapy. Patient-specific tumour location and cell density information were derived from multiparametric imaging. Uniform-dose plans and biologically-optimised plans were generated for a standard schedule (78 Gy/39 fractions) and hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy/20 fractions and 36.25 Gy/5 fractions). Results showed that biologically-optimised plans yielded statistically lower doses to the rectum and bladder compared to isoeffective uniform-dose plans for all fractionation schedules. A reduction in the number of fractions increased the target dose modulation required to achieve equal tumour control. On average, biologically-optimised, moderately-hypofractionated plans demonstrated 15.3% (p-value <0.01) and 23.8% (p-value 0.02) reduction in rectal and bladder dose compared with standard fractionation. The tissue-sparing effect was more pronounced in extreme hypofractionation with mean reduction in rectal and bladder dose of 43.3% (p-value < 0.01) and 41.8% (p-value 0.02), respectively. This study suggests that the ability to utilise patient-specific tumour biology information will provide greater incentive to employ hypofractionation in the treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiotherapy. However, to exploit the radiobiological advantages given by hypofractionation, greater attention to geometric accuracy is required due to increased sensitivity to treatment uncertainties.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada / Órganos en Riesgo / Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Biol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada / Órganos en Riesgo / Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Biol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article