Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of bioresorbable vs durable polymer drug-eluting stents in unprotected left main (from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).
Iannaccone, Mario; Barbero, Umberto; De Benedictis, Michele; Imori, Yoichi; Quadri, Giorgio; Trabattoni, Daniela; Ryan, Nicola; Venuti, Giuseppe; Montabone, Andrea; Wojakowski, Wojciech; Rognoni, Andrea; Helft, Gerard; Parma, Radoslaw; De Luca, Leonardo; Autelli, Michele; Boccuzzi, Giacomo; Mattesini, Alessio; Templin, Christian; Cerrato, Enrico; Wanha, Wojciech; Smolka, Grzegorz; Huczek, Zenon; Tomassini, Francesco; Cortese, Bernardo; Capodanno, Davide; Chieffo, Alaide; Nuñez-Gil, Ivan; Gili, Sebastiano; Bassignana, Antonia; di Mario, Carlo; Doronzo, Baldassarre; Omedè, Pierluigi; D'Amico, Maurizio; Tedeschi, Delio; Varbella, Ferdinando; Luscher, Thomas; Sheiban, Imad; Escaned, Javier; Rinaldi, Mauro; D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio.
Afiliación
  • Iannaccone M; Division of Cardiology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, ASL CN1, Savigliano, Italy.
  • Barbero U; Division of Cardiology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, ASL CN1, Savigliano, Italy. umberto.barbero@unito.it.
  • De Benedictis M; Division of Cardiology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, ASL CN1, Savigliano, Italy.
  • Imori Y; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Quadri G; Department of Cardiology, Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Italy.
  • Trabattoni D; Department of Cardiology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Ryan N; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy.
  • Venuti G; University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Montabone A; Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Wojakowski W; Division of Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele,", Catania, Italy.
  • Rognoni A; Structural Interventional Cardiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
  • Helft G; Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Parma R; Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory, A.O.U. Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
  • De Luca L; Division of Cardiology, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France.
  • Autelli M; University Clinical Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Boccuzzi G; Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
  • Mattesini A; Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco, Turin, Italy.
  • Templin C; Cardiology Department, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco, Turin, Italy.
  • Cerrato E; Structural Interventional Cardiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
  • Wanha W; Division of Cardiology, Universityspirtal of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Smolka G; Department of Cardiology, Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Italy.
  • Huczek Z; Department of Cardiology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Tomassini F; Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Cortese B; Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Capodanno D; University Clinical Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Chieffo A; Department of Cardiology, Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Italy.
  • Nuñez-Gil I; Department of Cardiology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Gili S; Interventional Cardiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy.
  • Bassignana A; Division of Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele,", Catania, Italy.
  • di Mario C; San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Doronzo B; Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Omedè P; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy.
  • D'Amico M; University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Tedeschi D; Division of Cardiology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, ASL CN1, Savigliano, Italy.
  • Varbella F; Division of Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele,", Catania, Italy.
  • Luscher T; Division of Cardiology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, ASL CN1, Savigliano, Italy.
  • Sheiban I; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
  • Escaned J; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
  • Rinaldi M; Interventional Cardiology, Istituto clinico Sant'anna, Brescia, Italy.
  • D'Ascenzo F; Department of Cardiology, Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Italy.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 20(1): 225, 2020 05 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32414330
BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the impact of bioresorbable polymer drug eluting stent (BP-DES) compared to durable polymer drug eluting stent (DP-DES) in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention using ultrathin stents in left main or bifurcations. METHODS: In the RAIN registry (ClinicalTrials NCT03544294, june 2018 retrospectively registered) patients with a ULM or bifurcation stenosis treated with PCI using ultrathin stents (struts thinner than 81 µm) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR); major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, TLR and stent thrombosis) and its components, along with target vessel revascularization (TVR) were the secondary ones. A propensity score with matching analysis to compare patients treated with BP-DES versus DP-DES was also assessed. RESULTS: From 3001 enrolled patients, after propensity score analysis 1400 patients (700 for each group) were selected. Among them, 352 had ULM disease and 1048 had non-LM bifurcations. At 16 months (12-22), rates of TLR (3.7% vs 2.9%, p = 0.22) and MACE were similar (12.3% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.74) as well as for the other endpoints. Sensitivity analysis of outcomes after a two-stents strategy, showed better outcome in term of MACE (20.4% vs 10%, p = 0.03) and TVR (12% vs 4.6%, p = 0.05) and a trend towards lower TLR in patients treated with BP-DES. CONCLUSION: In patients with bifurcations or ULM treated with ultrathin stents BP-DES seems to perform similarly to DP-DES: the trends toward improved clinical outcomes in patients treated with the BP-DES might potentially be of value for speculating the stent choice in selected high-risk subgroups of patients at increased risk of ischemic events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03544294. Retrospectively registered June 1, 2018.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Implantes Absorbibles / Estenosis Coronaria / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Implantes Absorbibles / Estenosis Coronaria / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article