Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Systematic Depression Screening in Primary Care on Depression Identification and Treatment in a Large Health Care System: A Cohort Study.
Pfoh, Elizabeth R; Janmey, Isabel; Anand, Amit; Martinez, Kathryn A; Katzan, Irene; Rothberg, Michael B.
Afiliación
  • Pfoh ER; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. Pfohe@ccf.org.
  • Janmey I; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Anand A; Center for Behavioral Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Martinez KA; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Katzan I; Cerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Rothberg MB; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(11): 3141-3147, 2020 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32495093
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Unless implementation of systematic depression screening is associated with timely treatment, quality measures based on screening are unlikely to improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the impact of integrating systematic depression screening with clinical decision support on depression identification and treatment.

DESIGN:

Retrospective pre-post study.

PARTICIPANTS:

Adults with a primary care visit within a large integrated health system in 2016 were included. Adults diagnosed with depression in 2015 or prior to their initial primary care visit in 2016 were excluded. INTERVENTION Initiation of systematic screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) which began in mid-2016. MAIN

MEASURES:

Depression diagnosis was based on ICD codes. Treatment was defined as (1) antidepressant prescription, (2) referral, or (3) evaluation by a behavioral health specialist. We used an adjusted linear regression model to identify whether the percentage of visits with a depression diagnosis was different before versus after implementation of systematic screening. An adjusted multilevel regression model was used to evaluate the association between screening and odds of treatment. KEY

RESULTS:

Our study population included 259,411 patients. After implementation, 59% of patients underwent screening. Three percent scored as having moderate to severe depression. The rate of depression diagnosis increased by 1.2% immediately after systematic screening (from 1.7 to 2.9%). The percent of patients with diagnosed depression who received treatment within 90 days increased from 64% before to 69% after implementation (p < 0.01) and the adjusted odds of treatment increased by 20% after implementation (AOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.28, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementing systematic depression screening within a large health care system led to high rates of screening and increased rates of depression diagnosis and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Depresión Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Depresión Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article