Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Negotiating stairs with an inconsistent riser: Implications for stepping safety.
Francksen, Natasha C; Ackermans, Thijs M A; Holzer, Denis; Ebner, Sophia A; Maganaris, Constantinos N; Hollands, Mark A; Karamanidis, Kiros; Roys, Mike; O'Brien, Thomas D.
Afiliación
  • Francksen NC; Research to Improve Stair Climbing Safety (RISCS), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: nfrancksen7@gmail.com.
  • Ackermans TMA; Research to Improve Stair Climbing Safety (RISCS), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
  • Holzer D; Research to Improve Stair Climbing Safety (RISCS), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; Department of Biomechanics in Sports, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Ebner SA; Research to Improve Stair Climbing Safety (RISCS), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
  • Maganaris CN; Research to Improve Stair Climbing Safety (RISCS), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
  • Hollands MA; Research to Improve Stair Climbing Safety (RISCS), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
  • Karamanidis K; Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.
  • Roys M; Rise and Going Consultancy, Watford, UK.
  • O'Brien TD; Research to Improve Stair Climbing Safety (RISCS), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Appl Ergon ; 87: 103131, 2020 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32501252
Stairs are associated with falls, especially when step dimensions are inconsistent. However, the mechanisms by which inconsistencies cause this higher risk are mostly theoretical. In this experimental study we quantified the effect of inconsistent rise heights on biomechanical measurements of stepping safety from younger (n = 26) and older adults (n = 33). In ascent, both groups decreased foot clearance (~9 mm) over the inconsistently higher step (F(1,56) = 48.4, p < 0.001). In descent, they reduced foot contact length on the higher step by 3% (F(1,56) = 9.1, p < 0.01). Reduced clearance may result in a toe-catch potentially leading to a trip, while reduced foot contact lengths increase the risk of overstepping which may also lead to a fall. These effects occurred because participants did not alter their foot trajectories, indicating they either did not detect or were not able to adjust to the inconsistent rise, increasing the likelihood of a fall. Consistent stair construction is vital, and existing inconsistencies should be identified and safety interventions developed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Factores de Edad / Diseño de Equipo / Subida de Escaleras Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Appl Ergon Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Factores de Edad / Diseño de Equipo / Subida de Escaleras Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Appl Ergon Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article