Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
From participation to diagnostic assessment: a systematic scoping review of the role of the primary healthcare sector in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.
Holden, Carol A; Frank, Oliver; Caruso, Joanna; Turnbull, Deborah; Reed, Richard L; Miller, Caroline L; Olver, Ian.
Afiliación
  • Holden CA; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and Corresponding author. Email: carol.holden@sahmri.com.
  • Frank O; Discipline of General Practice, University of Adelaide, Helen Mayo North, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
  • Caruso J; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
  • Turnbull D; School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Level 7, Hughes Building, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
  • Reed RL; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
  • Miller CL; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, 57 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
  • Olver I; School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Level 7, Hughes Building, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Aust J Prim Health ; 26(3): 191-206, 2020 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32536362
Primary health care (PHC) plays a vital support role in organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs by encouraging patient participation and ensuring timely referral for diagnostic assessment follow up. A systematic scoping review of the current evidence was conducted to inform strategies that better engage the PHC sector in organised CRC screening programs. Articles published from 2005 to November 2019 were searched across five databases. Evidence was synthesised and interventions that specifically require PHC involvement were mapped to stages of the CRC screening pathway. Fifty-seven unique studies were identified in which patient, provider and system-level interventions align with defined stages of the CRC screening pathway: namely, identifying/reminding patients who have not responded to CRC screening (non-adherence) (n=46) and follow up of a positive screen referral (n=11). Self-management support initiatives (patient level) and improvement initiatives (system level) demonstrate consistent benefits along the CRC screening pathway. Interventions evaluated as part of a quality-improvement process tended to report effectiveness; however, the variation in reporting makes it difficult to determine which elements contributed to the overall study outcomes. To maximise the benefits of population-based screening programs, better integration into existing primary care services can be achieved through targeting preventive and quality care interventions along the entire screening pathway.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Aceptación de la Atención de Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust J Prim Health Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Aceptación de la Atención de Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust J Prim Health Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article