Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How to implement routine electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring in oncology rehabilitation.
Wintner, Lisa M; Sztankay, Monika; Riedl, David; Rumpold, Gerhard; Nickels, Alain; Licht, Thomas; Holzner, Bernhard.
Afiliación
  • Wintner LM; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Sztankay M; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Riedl D; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Rumpold G; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck Austria Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Nickels A; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck Austria Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Licht T; Oncological Rehabilitation St. Veit im Pongau, St. Veit im Pongau, Austria.
  • Holzner B; Oncological Rehabilitation St. Veit im Pongau, St. Veit im Pongau, Austria.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(4): e13694, 2021 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885565
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Implemenation of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) like quality of life can add the patient's perspective to traditional clinical outcomes of cancer rehabilitation in a structured and standardized way.

AIM:

To present useful steps for a successful implementation of routine electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) monitoring. The presented steps are exemplified by describing the procedure applied in an Austrian inpatient cancer rehabilitation centre.

METHODS:

The suggested implementation steps are presented based on the structure of the replicating effective programmes framework, which was used for developing a pragmatic implementation strategy.

RESULTS:

We scheduled alternating trainings and process evaluations for audit and enhancement of procedures. In this way, the ePRO participation rates could be improved. Stakeholder involvement led to initiatives that included the integration of ePRO data into the medical discharge letter and the implementation of follow-up assessments.

DISCUSSION:

Tailored changes in assessment procedures enabled the successful implementation of ePRO, which has been shown to be feasible before and after cancer rehabilitation. The continuous involvement of stakeholders paved the way for further projects initiated by medical staff as users themselves (inclusion of PRO data in the discharge letter and a comprehensive ePRO follow-up using a versatile online patient portal).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article