Surgical outcomes of the anterior versus posterior approach for advancement of the levator aponeurosis in Japanese patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes of the anterior and posterior approaches for advancement of the levator aponeurosis for aponeurotic blepharoptosis in relation to levator function (LF). METHODS: This retrospective study included 223 eyelids from 125 patients with aponeurotic blepharoptosis. The anterior approach was used for 115 eyelids from 65 patients (anterior group), while the posterior approach was used in 108 eyelids from 60 patients (posterior group). Patients were subdivided into two groups in accordance with their LF (fair: 5-10 mm; good: > 10 mm). Functional success was defined as a margin reflex distance of 2-5 mm without serious complications at 3 months postoperatively. Cosmetic success was defined as the achievement of ≤ 1 mm laterality of the upper eyelid height, ≤ 2 mm laterality of the pretarsal show, and eyelid contour symmetry at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The functional success rates of the anterior and posterior groups were comparable for patients with good LF (78.9% vs 87.7%, p = 0.228), whereas it was better in the posterior group (85.7%) than the anterior group (64.1%) in the total group (p = 0.022) and in patients with fair LF (p = 0.031). The posterior group achieved better cosmetic success than the anterior group regarding upper eyelid height symmetry (p = 0.042) and pretarsal show (p = 0.012). No serious complications occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior approach achieved better functional and cosmetic outcomes than the anterior approach, indicating that the posterior approach is more useful in patients with aponeurotic blepharoptosis, particularly for those with only fair LF.