Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is there an Association between Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Prediction and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury?
Brown, Oluwateniola; Luchristt, Douglas; Miller, Emily S; Pidaparti, Mahati; Geynisman-Tan, Julia; Kenton, Kimberly; Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina.
Afiliación
  • Brown O; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Luchristt D; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Miller ES; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Pidaparti M; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Geynisman-Tan J; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Kenton K; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Lewicky-Gaupp C; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(7): 750-758, 2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32992349
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to estimate whether there is an association between the predicted probability of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). STUDY

DESIGN:

This was a single-site retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section between January 2011 and December 2016. Women were divided into four ordinal groupings by the predicted probability of achieving vaginal birth after cesarean using the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network VBAC calculator (less than 41%, 40.1-60%, 60.1-80%, and greater than 80%). The primary outcome was OASIS, defined as a 3rd or 4th degree perineal laceration. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to examine the association between predicted VBAC probability and OASIS.

RESULTS:

In total, 1,411 women met inclusion criteria and 73 (5.2%) sustained OASIS. The median predicted probability of VBAC was lower in women with OASIS compared with those without OASIS (60% [interquartile range {IQR} 48-70%] vs. 66% (IQR 52-80%), p = 0.02]. On bivariable and multivariable logistic regression, predicted probability of VBAC was associated with increased odds of OASIS (less than 41% probability adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-11.21; 41-60% probability aOR 3.76, 95% CI 1.34-10.57; 61-80% probability aOR 3.47, 95% CI 1.25-9.69) relative to women with a predicted probability of VBAC of greater than 80%.

CONCLUSION:

Having a lower predicted probability of VBAC is associated with an increased risk of OASIS at the time of a VBAC relative to those with greater than 80% predicted probability. Incorporation of this aspect of maternal morbidity may inform risk-stratification at the time of trial of labor after cesarean, as well as the choice of performing an operative vaginal delivery. KEY POINTS · Predicted probability of VBAC is associated with OASIS.. · Low predicted probability of VBAC is associated with increased odds of OASIS.. · Forceps delivery was associated with the highest odds of OASIS..
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Am J Perinatol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Am J Perinatol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article