Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Click-evoked and speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses from individuals with multiple sclerosis.
Rishiq, Dania; Harkrider, Ashley; Springer, Cary; Hedrick, Mark.
Afiliación
  • Rishiq D; University of South Alabama, College of Allied Health Professions, The Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 5721 USA Drive N HAHN 1119, Mobile AL 36688, USA. Electronic address: drishiq@southalabama.edu.
  • Harkrider A; University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 578 South Stadium Hall, UT, Knoxville, TN 37996-0740, USA.
  • Springer C; University of Tennessee, Research Computing Support, Office of Information Technology, 517 Greve Hall, 821 Volunteer Blvd, UT, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
  • Hedrick M; University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, 578 South Stadium Hall, UT, Knoxville, TN 37996-0740, USA.
Neurosci Lett ; 740: 135460, 2021 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33184036
PURPOSE: To determine whether speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) is more sensitive to the effects of multiple sclerosis (MS) than click-evoked ABR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven previously-confirmed MS patients (8 females, 3 males) and nine controls (7 females, 2 males), matched in age and gender, participated in a repeated-measures design. Stimuli were presented monaurally to the right ear via insert earphone. All evoked potential responses were collected by a single-channel montage where three electrodes were placed on the center of the head (Cz: non-inverting/ active), the ipsilateral earlobe (inverting/ reference) and the contralateral earlobe (ground). Rarefaction clicks of 0.1 ms duration were presented at rates of 13.30 and 91.1 clicks per second. Speech-evoked ABRs were obtained using the BioMARK software and the Bio-Logic Navigator PRO hardware. A synthesized /da/ syllable of 40-ms duration was presented via alternating polarity and at a rate of 10.9 stimuli per second. Stimuli were presented at 80 dB SPL. Speech-evoked ABR responses were obtained in quiet and in noise. RESULTS: Conventional click ABR responses were absent more often at high presentation rates in control subjects than in MS patients. Speech-evoked ABR peak amplitudes, wave E latency and VA complex slope variables separated the MS patients from controls. Group differences were also found in speech-evoked ABR response correlations in quiet versus noise conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The speech-evoked ABR is as or more sensitive to MS than conventional ABR measures without resort to simply noting missing peaks. Comparison of speech-evoked ABR responses in quiet and in noise highlight loss of neural synchrony in MS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Habla / Estimulación Acústica / Potenciales Evocados Auditivos del Tronco Encefálico / Esclerosis Múltiple Idioma: En Revista: Neurosci Lett Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Habla / Estimulación Acústica / Potenciales Evocados Auditivos del Tronco Encefálico / Esclerosis Múltiple Idioma: En Revista: Neurosci Lett Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article