Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of a ban on outpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy among the secondary and tertiary hospitals in China.
Wang, Xiaomin; Wu, Dan; Xuan, Ziming; Wang, Weiyi; Zhou, Xudong.
Afiliación
  • Wang X; Institute of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
  • Wu D; Department of Clinical Medicine, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7TH, UK.
  • Xuan Z; Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
  • Wang W; Institute of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
  • Zhou X; Institute of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310058, China. zhouxudong@zju.edu.cn.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1794, 2020 Nov 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33239002
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious global public health challenge. Physicians' over-prescription of antibiotics is a major contributor, and intravenous (IV) antibiotic use has been a particular concern in China. To address the rapid fallout of antibiotic overuse, the Chinese government has piloted a ban of IV antibiotics in the outpatient department (OD) with the exemption of paediatrics, emergency department (ED), and inpatient ward of secondary and tertiary hospitals in several provinces. METHODS: To assess the potential impact of the policy, we conducted a mixed-methods study including 1) interviews about the ban of IV antibiotic use with 68 stakeholders, covering patients, health workers, and policy-makers, from two cities and 2) a hospital case study which collected routine hospital data and survey data with 207 doctors. RESULTS: Our analyses revealed that the ban of IV antibiotics in the OD led to a reduction in the total and IV antibiotic prescriptions and improved the rational antibiotic prescribing practice in the OD. Nevertheless, the policy has diverted patient flow from OD to ED, inpatient ward, and primary care for IV antibiotic prescriptions. We also found that irrational antibiotic use in paediatrics was neglected. Radical policy implementation, doctors circumvented the regulations, and lack of doctor-patient communication during patient encounters were barriers to the implementation of the ban. CONCLUSIONS: Future efforts may include 1) to de-escalate both oral and IV antibiotic therapy in paediatric and reduce oral antibiotic therapy among adults in outpatient clinics, 2) to reduce unnecessary referrals by OD doctors to ED, primary care, or inpatient services and better coordinate for patients who clinically need IV antibiotics, 3) to incorporate demand-side tailored measures, such as public education campaigns, and 4) to improve doctor-patient communication. Future research is needed to understand how primary care and other community clinics implement the ban.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Atención Ambulatoria / Política de Salud / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Atención Ambulatoria / Política de Salud / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article