Comparison of figure-of-8 and circular coils for threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation measurements.
Neurophysiol Clin
; 51(2): 153-160, 2021 Mar.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33468370
OBJECTIVES: The transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) technique of threshold-tracking short-interval intracortical inhibition (T-SICI) has been proposed as a diagnostic tool for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Most of these studies have used a circular coil, whereas a figure-of-8 coil is usually recommended for paired-pulse TMS measurements. The aim of this study was to compare figure-of-8 and circular coils for T-SICI in the upper limb, with special attention to reproducibility, and the pain or discomfort experienced by the subjects. METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects (aged: 45.5⯱â¯6.7, mean⯱â¯SD, 9 females, 11 males) underwent two examinations with each coil, in morning and afternoon sessions on the same day, with T-SICI measured at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) from 1-7â¯ms. After each examination the subjects rated degree of pain/discomfort from 0 to 10 using a numerical rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: Mean T-SICI was higher for the figure-of-8 than for the circular coil at ISI of 2â¯ms (pâ¯<â¯0.05) but did not differ at other ISIs. Intra-subject variability did not differ between coils, but mean inhibition from 1-3.5â¯ms was less variable between subjects with the figure-of-8 coil (SD 7.2% vs. 11.2% RMT, pâ¯<â¯0.05), and no such recordings were without inhibition (vs. 6 with the circular coil). The subjects experienced less pain/discomfort with the figure-of-8 coil (mean NRS: 1.9⯱â¯1.28 vs 2.8⯱â¯1.60, pâ¯<â¯0.005). DISCUSSION: The figure-of-8 coil may have better applicability in patients, due to the lower incidence of lack of inhibition in healthy subjects, and the lower experience of pain or discomfort.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal
/
Corteza Motora
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Neurophysiol Clin
Asunto de la revista:
FISIOLOGIA
/
NEUROLOGIA
Año:
2021
Tipo del documento:
Article