Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes.
Yaka, Reyhan; Mapelli, Igor; Kaptan, Damla; Dogu, Ayça; Chylenski, Maciej; Erdal, Ömür Dilek; Koptekin, Dilek; Vural, Kivilcim Basak; Bayliss, Alex; Mazzucato, Camilla; Fer, Evrim; Çokoglu, Sevim Seda; Lagerholm, Vendela Kempe; Krzewinska, Maja; Karamurat, Cansu; Gemici, Hasan Can; Sevkar, Arda; Dagtas, Nihan Dilsad; Kilinç, Gülsah Merve; Adams, Donovan; Munters, Arielle R; Saglican, Ekin; Milella, Marco; Schotsmans, Eline M J; Yurtman, Erinç; Çetin, Mehmet; Yorulmaz, Sevgi; Altinisik, N Ezgi; Ghalichi, Ayshin; Juras, Anna; Bilgin, C Can; Günther, Torsten; Storå, Jan; Jakobsson, Mattias; de Kleijn, Maurice; Mustafaoglu, Gökhan; Fairbairn, Andrew; Pearson, Jessica; Togan, Inci; Kayacan, Nurcan; Marciniak, Arkadiusz; Larsen, Clark Spencer; Hodder, Ian; Atakuman, Çigdem; Pilloud, Marin; Sürer, Elif; Gerritsen, Fokke; Özbal, Rana; Baird, Douglas; Erdal, Yilmaz Selim.
Afiliación
  • Yaka R; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: yakaryhn@gmail.com.
  • Mapelli I; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kaptan D; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Dogu A; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Chylenski M; Institute of Human Biology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
  • Erdal ÖD; Department of Anthropology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Koptekin D; Department of Health Informatics, Middle East Technical University (METU), Historic England, London, UK.
  • Vural KB; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Bayliss A; Scientific Dating, Historic England, London, UK; Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Mazzucato C; Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94303 USA.
  • Fer E; Department of Genetics, University of Arizona, 85719, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Çokoglu SS; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Lagerholm VK; Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Palaeogenetics, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Krzewinska M; Centre for Palaeogenetics, Stockholm, Sweden; Archaeological Research Laboratory, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Karamurat C; Graduate School of Social Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gemici HC; Graduate School of Social Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Sevkar A; Department of Anthropology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Dagtas ND; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kilinç GM; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey; Department of Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Adams D; Department of Anthropology, University of Central Florida, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Munters AR; Human Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden; SciLife Lab, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Saglican E; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Milella M; Department of Physical Anthropology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Sulgenauweg 40, CH-3007 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Schotsmans EMJ; Centre for Archaeological Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia; UMR 5199, De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie (PACEA), Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
  • Yurtman E; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Çetin M; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yorulmaz S; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Altinisik NE; Department of Anthropology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey; Human G Lab, Department of Anthropology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Ghalichi A; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey; Department of Archaeogenetics, Max-Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Strasse 10, D-07745, Jena, Germany.
  • Juras A; Institute of Human Biology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
  • Bilgin CC; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Günther T; Human Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Storå J; Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Jakobsson M; Human Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • de Kleijn M; Spatial Information Laboratory (SPINlab) at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Mustafaoglu G; Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Letters, Ankara Haci Bayram Veli University, Abant 1 Cad. No:10/2D, Yenimahalle, Ankara.
  • Fairbairn A; School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Michie Building, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Pearson J; Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, 8-14 Abercromby Square, Liverpool, L69 7WZ, UK.
  • Togan I; Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kayacan N; Department of Prehistory, Faculty of Letters, Istanbul University, Ordu Cad. No: 6, 34459, Laleli, Istanbul.
  • Marciniak A; Faculty of Archaeology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
  • Larsen CS; Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA 43210-1106.
  • Hodder I; Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94303 USA.
  • Atakuman Ç; Institute of Social Sciences, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Pilloud M; Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno.
  • Sürer E; Department of Modeling and Simulation, Graduate School of Informatics, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gerritsen F; Netherlands Institute in Turkey, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Özbal R; Department of Archaeology and History of Art, Koç University, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Baird D; Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, 8-14 Abercromby Square, Liverpool, L69 7WZ, UK.
  • Erdal YS; Department of Anthropology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey; Human G Lab, Department of Anthropology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Curr Biol ; 31(11): 2455-2468.e18, 2021 06 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33857427
ABSTRACT
The social organization of the first fully sedentary societies that emerged during the Neolithic period in Southwest Asia remains enigmatic,1 mainly because material culture studies provide limited insight into this issue. However, because Neolithic Anatolian communities often buried their dead beneath domestic buildings,2 household composition and social structure can be studied through these human remains. Here, we describe genetic relatedness among co-burials associated with domestic buildings in Neolithic Anatolia using 59 ancient genomes, including 22 new genomes from Asikli Höyük and Çatalhöyük. We infer pedigree relationships by simultaneously analyzing multiple types of information, including autosomal and X chromosome kinship coefficients, maternal markers, and radiocarbon dating. In two early Neolithic villages dating to the 9th and 8th millennia BCE, Asikli Höyük and Boncuklu, we discover that siblings and parent-offspring pairings were frequent within domestic structures, which provides the first direct indication of close genetic relationships among co-burials. In contrast, in the 7th millennium BCE sites of Çatalhöyük and Barcin, where we study subadults interred within and around houses, we find close genetic relatives to be rare. Hence, genetic relatedness may not have played a major role in the choice of burial location at these latter two sites, at least for subadults. This supports the hypothesis that in Çatalhöyük,3-5 and possibly in some other Neolithic communities, domestic structures may have served as burial location for social units incorporating biologically unrelated individuals. Our results underscore the diversity of kin structures in Neolithic communities during this important phase of sociocultural development.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arqueología / Estructura Social País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Curr Biol Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Arqueología / Estructura Social País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Curr Biol Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article