Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detecting Progression in Advanced Glaucoma: Are Optical Coherence Tomography Global Metrics Viable Measures?
Thenappan, Abinaya; Tsamis, Emmanouil; Zemborain, Zane Z; La Bruna, Sol; Eguia, Melvi; Joiner, Devon; De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo; Hood, Donald C.
Afiliación
  • Thenappan A; Columbia Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
  • Tsamis E; Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Zemborain ZZ; Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • La Bruna S; Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Eguia M; New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York.
  • Joiner D; Department of Ophthalmology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • De Moraes CG; Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Optom Vis Sci ; 98(5): 518-530, 2021 05 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33973920
ABSTRACT

SIGNIFICANCE:

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) summary measures have been suggested as a way to detect progression in eyes with advanced glaucoma. Here, we show that these measures have serious flaws largely due to segmentation errors. However, inspection of the images and thickness maps can be clinically useful.

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that recently suggested global OCT measures for detecting progression in eyes with advanced progression are seriously affected by segmentation mistakes and other errors that limit their clinical utility.

METHODS:

Forty-five eyes of 38 patients with a 24-2 mean deviation worse than -12 dB had at least two spectral domain OCT sessions (0.8 to 4.4 years apart) with 3.5-mm circle scans of the disc and cube scans centered on the fovea. Average (global) circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, GcRNFL, and ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness, GGCLP, were obtained from the circle and cube scan, respectively. To evaluate progression, ΔGcRNFL was calculated for each eye as the GcRNFL value at time 2 minus the value at time 1, and ΔGGCLP was calculated in a similar manner. The b-scans of the six eyes with the highest and lowest ΔGcRNFL and ΔGGCLP values were examined for progression as well as segmentation, alignment, and centering errors.

RESULTS:

Progression was a major factor in only 7 of the 12 eyes with the most negative values of either ΔGcRNFL or ΔGGCLP, whereas segmentation played a role in 8 eyes and was the major factor in all 12 eyes with the largest positive values. In addition, alignment (one eye) and other (three eyes) errors played a secondary role in four of the six eyes with the most negative ΔGcRNFL values.

CONCLUSIONS:

For detecting the progression of advanced glaucoma, common summary metrics have serious flaws largely due to segmentation errors, which limit their utility in clinical and research settings.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto / Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Optom Vis Sci Asunto de la revista: OPTOMETRIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto / Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Optom Vis Sci Asunto de la revista: OPTOMETRIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article